These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Warfare & Tactics

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Aivonen battle from grunt perspective (19th)

Author
Bad Messenger
Rehabilitation Clinic
#61 - 2012-06-20 16:26:05 UTC
HHAHAHAAA

WOLF BRIGADE SAYS THEY CAME TO HELP CALDARI AND STILL THEY MADE DEAL WITH GALLENTE P

And then they wonder what went wrong.

Gunthar X
Desecration
#62 - 2012-06-20 16:34:22 UTC
Crimper wrote:
Gunthar X wrote:
Go ahead and pull the hiding behind Snuff card in your reply too, little fact though Snuff is not in an enemy militia they are pirates and we had a common enemy you guys on the other hand help our common enemy to kill your friendly militia's. Little bit of a difference between the two.


Friendly militia? Really? Where? Maybe insofar as game mechanics go theoretically, but thats about it!

All I've read in this entire thread (and others like it) is the Caldari saying, " waahhhhh, you don't love us anymore! And you're being bullies. I'm gonna take my toys and go play with somebody else and when I grow up, I'm gonna hurt you".

seriously, show me on the doll where daddy hurt you .



I honestly could care less about WBR and them helping the Gallente because I do not have a problem killing every single one of you who show up to help them, standings be damned. The issue is the BS response you always give about how you will only help them for this or you will only help them if that happens then you constantly go that one step farther.

I know the post was made to illicit this very response and it accomplished exactly what it was meant to but the fact still remains you are actively assisting an allied militia to hold territory and kill those who are unable to defend themselves unless they want a massive standings hit in the process. Then you play it all off as if your innocent and only providing reps and this is ok because you didn't fire a single shot. The game mechanics are in place to prevent random groups from wiping out entire fleets of friendly militia and griefing not so you can hide behind them while you provide logistics assistance to an enemy militia.

Either way you have damned the entire Amarr militia to a future of zero Caldari help in their efforts to drive back the Minni's because I can't think of a single group that would assist the Amarr at this point regardless of the consequences to our own war. It is sad that the rest of your militia has to pay for you when they could be running joint ops with the Caldari like they used to and begin working together to regain their lost systems
Azami Nevinyrall
172.0.0.1
#63 - 2012-06-20 16:42:14 UTC
Bad Messenger wrote:
HHAHAHAAA

WOLF BRIGADE SAYS THEY CAME TO HELP CALDARI AND STILL THEY MADE DEAL WITH GALLENTE P

And then they wonder what went wrong.


This...

...

X Gallentius
Black Eagle1
#64 - 2012-06-20 16:47:16 UTC
Mutnin wrote:

I will make it very easy for you guys. We know you are BFF's and are gonna assist each other. You play the crap game mechanics to support each other knowing we have to go GCC & take faction standings loss with Amarr same as SotF plays same forcing Minmatar to take GCC/ faction standings loss.

FYI: There is no faction loss for shooting allied militia. You will likely go GCC if you shoot first, however.
Crimper
Shadow State
Goonswarm Federation
#65 - 2012-06-20 16:47:48 UTC
Gunthar X wrote:
Crimper wrote:
Gunthar X wrote:
Go ahead and pull the hiding behind Snuff card in your reply too, little fact though Snuff is not in an enemy militia they are pirates and we had a common enemy you guys on the other hand help our common enemy to kill your friendly militia's. Little bit of a difference between the two.


Friendly militia? Really? Where? Maybe insofar as game mechanics go theoretically, but thats about it!

All I've read in this entire thread (and others like it) is the Caldari saying, " waahhhhh, you don't love us anymore! And you're being bullies. I'm gonna take my toys and go play with somebody else and when I grow up, I'm gonna hurt you".

seriously, show me on the doll where daddy hurt you .



I honestly could care less about WBR and them helping the Gallente because I do not have a problem killing every single one of you who show up to help them, standings be damned. The issue is the BS response you always give about how you will only help them for this or you will only help them if that happens then you constantly go that one step farther.

I know the post was made to illicit this very response and it accomplished exactly what it was meant to but the fact still remains you are actively assisting an allied militia to hold territory and kill those who are unable to defend themselves unless they want a massive standings hit in the process. Then you play it all off as if your innocent and only providing reps and this is ok because you didn't fire a single shot. The game mechanics are in place to prevent random groups from wiping out entire fleets of friendly militia and griefing not so you can hide behind them while you provide logistics assistance to an enemy militia.

Either way you have damned the entire Amarr militia to a future of zero Caldari help in their efforts to drive back the Minni's because I can't think of a single group that would assist the Amarr at this point regardless of the consequences to our own war. It is sad that the rest of your militia has to pay for you when they could be running joint ops with the Caldari like they used to and begin working together to regain their lost systems


TL;DR
So what you are saying is that daddy touched you where we can't mention in the forum, and as a result you also cannot show those which we cannot mention in this forum.

Gotcha.! thx
Salicaz
Verrimus Caelum
#66 - 2012-06-20 16:56:08 UTC
Looooooool

I love it! First, the minmitar cry like babies about our operations. Now the Caldari are butt hurt. P

NUT UP, SHUT UP, OR GTFO!

The drama in this thread is amazing!
Crimper
Shadow State
Goonswarm Federation
#67 - 2012-06-20 17:01:04 UTC
Bad Messenger wrote:
HHAHAHAAA

WOLF BRIGADE SAYS THEY CAME TO HELP CALDARI AND STILL THEY MADE DEAL WITH GALLENTE P

And then they wonder what went wrong.



first off...."Help Caldari"? I read this thread from the beginning and Rydal's first post is the only thing that comes close to suggesting that was the reason for the fleet.

Rydal32 wrote:
This operation was seen as an opportunity to build some bridges with the Caldari militia, engaging a pirate entity that has plagued the Caldari militia for years. Sure, we were allied with SOTF for the operation, but as the target was not the Caldari militia, we still considered this op to be in the best interests of the Caldari....


...but it wasn't the reason we were there. it was however, or could have been, a positive side-effect of that fight.

Also,, we weren't wondering anything of "what went wrong". We know exactly how the mechanics of the fight played out and the Caldari "comaraderie" was never considered to be a part of it.
Joanna Ramirez
Intaki Militia
#68 - 2012-06-20 17:08:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Joanna Ramirez
Crimper wrote:
...but it wasn't the reason we were there. it was however, or could have been, a positive side-effect of that fight.

Also,, we weren't wondering anything of "what went wrong". We know exactly how the mechanics of the fight played out and the Caldari "comaraderie" was never considered to be a part of it.


So basicly if you had achieved said supercarrier kills over the wrecks of caldari fleet with your bros in gallente militia, you would have painted this in positive light and suggested that next time caldari team with both of you ahead of time since it's clearly in their best interest and logical thing to do? (without consideration to such arbitary mechanics such as militia war target).

I still think Bad Messenger summarised it best though.
Bad Messenger
Rehabilitation Clinic
#69 - 2012-06-20 17:09:45 UTC
Crimper wrote:
Bad Messenger wrote:
HHAHAHAAA

WOLF BRIGADE SAYS THEY CAME TO HELP CALDARI AND STILL THEY MADE DEAL WITH GALLENTE P

And then they wonder what went wrong.



first off...."Help Caldari"? I read this thread from the beginning and Rydal's first post is the only thing that comes close to suggesting that was the reason for the fleet.

Rydal32 wrote:
This operation was seen as an opportunity to build some bridges with the Caldari militia, engaging a pirate entity that has plagued the Caldari militia for years. Sure, we were allied with SOTF for the operation, but as the target was not the Caldari militia, we still considered this op to be in the best interests of the Caldari....


...but it wasn't the reason we were there. it was however, or could have been, a positive side-effect of that fight.

Also,, we weren't wondering anything of "what went wrong". We know exactly how the mechanics of the fight played out and the Caldari "comaraderie" was never considered to be a part of it.


you want to build bridges by negotiating with gallente about it?
Gunthar X
Desecration
#70 - 2012-06-20 17:11:40 UTC
Crimper wrote:
Bad Messenger wrote:
HHAHAHAAA

WOLF BRIGADE SAYS THEY CAME TO HELP CALDARI AND STILL THEY MADE DEAL WITH GALLENTE P

And then they wonder what went wrong.



first off...."Help Caldari"? I read this thread from the beginning and Rydal's first post is the only thing that comes close to suggesting that was the reason for the fleet.

Rydal32 wrote:
This operation was seen as an opportunity to build some bridges with the Caldari militia, engaging a pirate entity that has plagued the Caldari militia for years. Sure, we were allied with SOTF for the operation, but as the target was not the Caldari militia, we still considered this op to be in the best interests of the Caldari....


...but it wasn't the reason we were there. it was however, or could have been, a positive side-effect of that fight.

Also,, we weren't wondering anything of "what went wrong". We know exactly how the mechanics of the fight played out and the Caldari "comaraderie" was never considered to be a part of it.


So you expected that the Caldari fleet would just sit there while you brought in your fleet to help the Gallente kill the pirates and then we would all just stare at each other until we all left peacefully. You knew for a fact as soon as the Caldari showed up and you decloaked to light the cyno exactally what was going to happen. Building bridges was never a part of the process you were there solely to defend your buddies POCO and to try and kill some expensive ships. Please make sure you send out a mail next time so all your members can sell us all the same BS story.
Mutnin
SQUIDS.
#71 - 2012-06-20 17:13:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Mutnin
Crimper wrote:
Gunthar X wrote:
Go ahead and pull the hiding behind Snuff card in your reply too, little fact though Snuff is not in an enemy militia they are pirates and we had a common enemy you guys on the other hand help our common enemy to kill your friendly militia's. Little bit of a difference between the two.


Friendly militia? Really? Where? Maybe insofar as game mechanics go theoretically, but thats about it!

All I've read in this entire thread (and others like it) is the Caldari saying, " waahhhhh, you don't love us anymore! And you're being bullies. I'm gonna take my toys and go play with somebody else and when I grow up, I'm gonna hurt you".

seriously, show me on the doll where daddy hurt you .


Actually this was a topic about a BR and the 1st reply was butt hurt from Wolfsbrigade guys as well as the next 10 + reply from WB members. Caldari guys for most part all pretty much just accept the fact that we need to shoot you when you interfere with our fights. When your cyno pilgrim showed up on grid it was called primary.

There were no tears from anyone in our fleet over shooting it. I got a little tear'd up when we didn't instantly blap your second cyno ship, that would have stopped the rest of your caps from getting on grid. I was also saddened when caps were self destructing, but this is the way of EVE.
Joanna Ramirez
Intaki Militia
#72 - 2012-06-20 17:14:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Joanna Ramirez
Salicaz wrote:
Looooooool

I love it! First, the minmitar cry like babies about our operations. Now the Caldari are butt hurt. P

NUT UP, SHUT UP, OR GTFO!

The drama in this thread is amazing!


But....that drama was started by you.

Also, I dont think any of the caldari are butthurt over anything except by your butthurtiness that we did not want to shoot temporary blues "because of isk value'. People should have more integrity than that.

And also, "blue ops" where Caldari/Gallente are involved has always ended up hurting Caldari in the long run. So best keep the ideology pure and refuse any and all *friendly relations with enemy.

*Except me and my two involved spy alts of course, celebrating job well done.
Salicaz
Verrimus Caelum
#73 - 2012-06-20 17:17:05 UTC
Joanna Ramirez wrote:
Salicaz wrote:
Looooooool

I love it! First, the minmitar cry like babies about our operations. Now the Caldari are butt hurt. P

NUT UP, SHUT UP, OR GTFO!

The drama in this thread is amazing!


But....that drama was started by you.

Also, I dont think any of the caldari are butthurt over anything except by your butthurtiness that we did not want to shoot temporary blues "because of isk value'. People should have more integrity than that.

And also, "blue ops" where Caldari/Gallente are involved has always ended up hurting Caldari in the long run. So best keep the ideology pure and refuse any and all friendly relations with enemy.


These foums would be a lot less whinny if people realised we don't play United Nations online :P

Bree Okanata
Perkone
Caldari State
#74 - 2012-06-20 17:17:19 UTC
Seeing all this drama makes me want to sign up my alt into FW. Just have to pick Gallente or Minmatar...
Rydal32
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#75 - 2012-06-20 17:18:34 UTC
Wow, this thread got out of hand really quickly.

The great thing to see is the passion of all involved. Keep fighting the good fight.
Mutnin
SQUIDS.
#76 - 2012-06-20 17:25:00 UTC
X Gallentius wrote:
Mutnin wrote:

I will make it very easy for you guys. We know you are BFF's and are gonna assist each other. You play the crap game mechanics to support each other knowing we have to go GCC & take faction standings loss with Amarr same as SotF plays same forcing Minmatar to take GCC/ faction standings loss.

FYI: There is no faction loss for shooting allied militia. You will likely go GCC if you shoot first, however.



When you lose standings with the Faction Militia corp you also lose standings with that faction, just the same as you gain faction standings by gaining standings with the NPC FW corp. You are however right, I didn't lose any Amarr Faction standings because I'm also -10 with the 24th.. Big smile
chatgris
Quantum Cats Syndicate
Of Essence
#77 - 2012-06-20 17:29:40 UTC
Mutnin wrote:
X Gallentius wrote:
Mutnin wrote:

I will make it very easy for you guys. We know you are BFF's and are gonna assist each other. You play the crap game mechanics to support each other knowing we have to go GCC & take faction standings loss with Amarr same as SotF plays same forcing Minmatar to take GCC/ faction standings loss.

FYI: There is no faction loss for shooting allied militia. You will likely go GCC if you shoot first, however.



When you lose standings with the Faction Militia corp you also lose standings with that faction, just the same as you gain faction standings by gaining standings with the NPC FW corp. You are however right, I didn't lose any Amarr Faction standings because I'm also -10 with the 24th.. Big smile


I don't think that's true. I think it more goes like this (lets assume Caldari shooting Amarr for the example).

Caldari shoots amarr guy - no standing loss at all.

Caldari pods amarr guy - standing loss to IC, no standing loss to Amarr Faction.
Capitol One
Blue Canary
Watch This
#78 - 2012-06-20 17:49:40 UTC
I would like to add something, a secondary viewpoint if you will.

The Caldari are complaining that they and snuffbox were fighting the gallente and that we [W-BR] should've either kept out of it or "expected" them to shoot us since it was "obvious" they were buddiebrosefpact with Snuffbox. We "interfered" with their fight or something to that effect.

Now here's my point:

This fight originated as a POCO belonging to SOTF was reinforced by Snuffbox (not caldari, to the best of my knowledge). Since W-BR and SOTF are brosefs, and considering Snuffbox is an entity that we both consider an enemy and somewhat decent pvp'ers with a flair for the expensive (Machs! Supers! Big smile ), we agreed to team up to fight Snuff, and possibly get some nice kills.

Fast forward a bit, SOTF are on field, W-BR standing by with cyno recons all over the place. Snuffbox are added to the recipe and then...Caldari. Ok, so the Caldari decided to team up with Snuffbox, and shoot both Gallente and Amarr pilots...

And then they call us out for siding with SOTF over them? That the objective was somehow the Caldari Milita, when it was an SOTF brosef POCO that was reinforced and Snuffbox who reinforced it. And when we knew the Caldari would be there, the order was given "Don't shoot Caldari".

And yet, we're somehow "the bad guys". When it wasn't us that shot the Caldari, but the Caldari that shot us...while fighting over something not related to them at all.

I could also point out that you "should've expected us to defend SOTF vs Snuff" akin to how you said we should've expected you to be teamed up with Snuffbox.

As for the point that W-BR have been helping SOTF vs Caldari in the war. I don't remember ever having teamed up with SOTF to actively fight the Caldari, despite all the dramaLOLpropaganda in this thread. On the contrary I remember teaming up with the Caldari to fight the Gallente.

Let's not confuse "SOTF helping W-BR defending our home system at a crucial juncture (patchday), and W-BR promising SOTF the same favour in return" with "W-BR actively team up with SOTF to fight the Caldari"...

So far that hasn't happened at our prerogative, the only reason a clash came to be between our respective bodies, is because the Caldari decided to shoot our pilots in this Avoinen engagement. I'm not saying they weren't allowed to, all the power to Caldari for doing their thing, but I'm saying that you shouldn't cast all blame on us [W-BR] for what is pretty much your own actions.

- Capitol One.
Mutnin
SQUIDS.
#79 - 2012-06-20 17:57:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Mutnin
Schalac wrote:
It's funny to see wolf trying to reconcile with cal mil after so many years of pissing on it. Do you honestly think we are going to come dig you out of your hole? Amarr will be wiped off the lowsec map, and not a single Caldari tear will be shed.



It's not Amarr Militia we should be having a gripe with. It's WB and anyone whom supports them when they interfere with our fights. Amarr Militia corps are more than welcome to work with Caldari as WB is not all of Amarr Militia they are just there to leech off it.

They are in Amarr Militia because of their best bro pact with SoTF to avoid having to shoot at each other, but they came from Caldari Militia. They just want PVP from what I can gather but for the life of me I don't understand why both WB & SoTF try so hard to pretend they want to help any of the Militia's aside from things that directly benefit their own corps.

I suspect the butt-hurt out of WB & SoTF in these topics, comes from the fact that both corps grew up in FW and both corps are filled with members that might of at some time cared about FW. Now they try to hold on to those roots of being FW corps but are really not part of FW in any meaningful way other than using it to get KMs.

Honestly both would be better off just to quit crapping up the battlefield and just go pirate and shoot whom ever they want, rather than try to pretend they somehow are still interested in FW and what makes it work.
Capitol One
Blue Canary
Watch This
#80 - 2012-06-20 18:06:39 UTC
Mutnin wrote:
Schalac wrote:
It's funny to see wolf trying to reconcile with cal mil after so many years of pissing on it. Do you honestly think we are going to come dig you out of your hole? Amarr will be wiped off the lowsec map, and not a single Caldari tear will be shed.



It's not Amarr Militia we should be having a gripe with. It's WB and anyone whom supports them when they interfere with our fights. Amarr Militia corps are more than welcome to work with Caldari as WB is not all of Amarr Militia they are just there to leech off it.

They are in Amarr Militia because of their best bro pact with SoTF to avoid having to shoot at each other, but they came from Caldari Militia. They just want PVP from what I can gather but for the life of me I don't understand why both WB & SoTF try so hard to pretend they want to help any of the Militia's aside from things that directly benefit their own corps.

I suspect the butt-hurt out of WB & SoTF in these topics, comes from the fact that both corps grew up in FW and both corps are filled with members that might of at some time cared about FW. Now they try to hold on to those roots of being FW corps but are really not part of FW in any meaningful way other than using it to get KMs.

Honestly both would be better off just to quit crapping up the battlefield and just go pirate and shoot whom ever they want, rather than try to pretend they somehow are still interested in FW and what makes it work.


Honestly Mutnin, there's certainly no butthurt coming from our side, it seems to me it's more of the caldari being butthurt over W-BR, but I digress :)

As for your point of W-BR "interfering with your fights". I would direct you to my post above, where I sort of explained it. A fight between SOTF/W-BR vs Snuffbox and then Caldari come into the fray .. that's more of a "you intefering with our fight", but that's just me being cheeky, so I'll stop that trail of discussion.

And to be perfectly honest, I would appreciate it if you would leave the analyzing of my corporation to us, you know .. the people that are actually in the corp. I'll just tell you this, we very much are a FW corp, to the core, but it's not the only thing that defines us. We are in FW and we are an FW corp, but we're also striving to be much, much more than that at the same time.

I hope that clears up a few things Smile

- Capitol One