EVE General Discussion

Doing what, exactly?
What would the add?
What benefit would they provide?
What purpose would they serve?

Aren't Subsystems T3 modules?

If they banished T3s from hi sec, then I suppose adding T3 mods would be fair.



Stupid carebear tengus stealing all the safe explorations sites. I must have spent 3 hours or so in low yesterday just to try and find something decent...

I got a rock.

Here's a random thought, use them to introduce a rock-paper-scissors nature to the game. Name have T3 equipped craft be weak on their own (so T1 beats them) but have bonuses when they are opposed to T2 ships. T2 would still have the upper hand over T1, but it'd have something with more oomph than it does. T1 could beat T3, but it's still underpowered compared to T2.

T1 ships already have an upper hand on T2. Cost wise. One HAC is like 200 mil. That's 150 thrashers.

T3 ships aren't supposed to be more powerful than T2. T3 modules would be neat, but they wouldn't be like deadspace modules, rather they might have multiple scripts that allow them to serve multiple functions and could be changed in space.

No they're not, at least not in general terms like you use. Seems every one agrees about command sub but after this no, it's not overpowered and has a perfect predator, learn to use it.

By your means then all faction/deadspace loot piñatas missioning in high sec are far too much overpowered and need nerfs.

Back on topic: player made modules having similar performances to dead space NPC modules in an economic player driven content game it's not something unreasonable.
What IS unreasonable is the amount of training required to use those T2 modules when same dead space one has 40 to 120% better performance, less skills required, and offer a larger fitting performance also.

Only drawback? -price, but let me say it for you, if price is not a balance argument when it comes to Tengus and other T3's then this argument is also valid for dead space modules vs player made ones in a player driven content game.

More Subs...sure. Not T3 modules. You dont need it, well unless the ship balancing fails miserably. What would be interesting is to change the null drops from the faction/officer loot to components that would go into a reverse engineer/invention style build requirements for said meta items built by players. Thereby killing off another aspect of seeded items and introducing more player built and driven economies.

I could see a division of null sec/WH and low sec items that would go into the production chains then perhaps limit production to high sec only to encourage "transportation" from one area to another and thereby increasing the likelihood of.... "interception" by those of the Yarr persuasion.

Then by changing where or how much drops where CCP can directly control the markets for said items.

Id also love to see a personal flare for the manufactured items to make them more one of a kind items. Having them loosely based on their meta named counterparts; Estamel, Cormack, Domination, Dread Guristas, etc, but with a player name for each item if wished. This would create another collectors status or goodwill style of value over and above the market or meta level value of the good in question.

How about not? My Gotan's Modified String Vest and Draclira's Modified Leather Cop Hat are working out just fine.

No.