These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Why Does Nobody Choose Transgendered/Intersex Avatars?

First post
Author
ISD Stensson
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#41 - 2012-06-18 09:43:49 UTC
Thread moved from "EVE General Discussion" to "Features & Ideas Discussion" forum.

[b]ISD Stensson Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department[/b]

Rordan D'Kherr
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#42 - 2012-06-18 09:59:59 UTC
Vicky Somers wrote:
Why only adults? I want to be an 8 year old girl.


Im afraid but this thread is about earthworms.

Don't be scared, because being afk is not a crime.

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
#43 - 2012-06-18 13:54:23 UTC  |  Edited by: FloppieTheBanjoClown
This again?

Because 99% of Eve players would choose one or the other. And because you can craft your character be a very masculine woman or a very feminine man, giving you much of the variance that a few people seem to crave. And probably because that would be some tedious programming for a small feature that would primarily be used by guys who think it's hilarious to create outrageous characters. Just look at what's been done with the current tools.

Let's just pretend that in the year 30,000 AD or whatever it is, there are no trannies or intersex individuals. It's just a part of the dystopian future where such behavior was suppressed through some mechanic or another and no longer occurs.

Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement.

Xenuria
#44 - 2012-06-18 15:34:45 UTC
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:
This again?

Because 99% of Eve players would choose one or the other. And because you can craft your character be a very masculine woman or a very feminine man, giving you much of the variance that a few people seem to crave. And probably because that would be some tedious programming for a small feature that would primarily be used by guys who think it's hilarious to create outrageous characters. Just look at what's been done with the current tools.

Let's just pretend that in the year 30,000 AD or whatever it is, there are no trannies or intersex individuals. It's just a part of the dystopian future where such behavior was suppressed through some mechanic or another and no longer occurs.



According to the lore Cis Gendered pure-blood gallente don't exist.
Whereas amarr are very much full of cis privilege and religiosity.
I for one think that we should be given the option to be something non-cis. Right now that is not possible due to makeup and clothing exclusivity.
OlRotGut
#45 - 2012-06-18 15:44:58 UTC
I had assumed the scientists of new eden cleaned up the gene pool....
Sardek Nardan
Khanid Constructions
#46 - 2012-06-18 16:04:37 UTC
Xenuria wrote:
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:
This again?

Because 99% of Eve players would choose one or the other. And because you can craft your character be a very masculine woman or a very feminine man, giving you much of the variance that a few people seem to crave. And probably because that would be some tedious programming for a small feature that would primarily be used by guys who think it's hilarious to create outrageous characters. Just look at what's been done with the current tools.

Let's just pretend that in the year 30,000 AD or whatever it is, there are no trannies or intersex individuals. It's just a part of the dystopian future where such behavior was suppressed through some mechanic or another and no longer occurs.



According to the lore Cis Gendered pure-blood gallente don't exist.
Whereas amarr are very much full of cis privilege and religiosity.
I for one think that we should be given the option to be something non-cis. Right now that is not possible due to makeup and clothing exclusivity.

Is it possible for normal people which first language is not English and who do not really care about such issue to not use weird words such as "Cis" what the hell is that suppose to mean (I supposed it was "normal" gender).

Finally what would slider be for? I mean you are either male or female at birth, after that you have the character creator to do a feminine guy or a masculine gal. As you cannot see player genitalia, I do not see what you want more? Make up?
FloppieTheBanjoClown
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
#47 - 2012-06-18 16:06:14 UTC
Xenuria wrote:
According to the lore Cis Gendered pure-blood gallente don't exist.
Whereas amarr are very much full of cis privilege and religiosity.
I for one think that we should be given the option to be something non-cis. Right now that is not possible due to makeup and clothing exclusivity.

I for one think you're investing entirely too much effort into a profile picture and avatar that only you can see.

Also, I'd rather not see what some members of the community would come up with given tranny characters on the current system. Perhaps one of CCP's reservations is an attempt to maintain a level of "decency" in character design; I know that I wouldn't enable tranny characters until I was confident they would be presented in a tasteful manner. Done wrong, it could easily result in offensive avatars that insult the community you seek to empower. Tread carefully.

Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement.

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
#48 - 2012-06-18 16:13:11 UTC
Sardek Nardan wrote:
As you cannot see player genitalia, I do not see what you want more? Make up?

I believe what they want is to see the female clothing and makeup on men, and vice versa.

One challenge I see to that is that male and female bodies are very different (on average). Our proportions differ and most clothing cut for women would be a poor fit for men. The challenge there for the art team is making clothing that works for both sexes.

Remember guys that you're asking for a significant effort on the part of the art team. This isn't just a matter of making skirts appear in the man's "closet". The skirt will need to be recreated to fit the man properly, and the male models themselves might need to be reworked in order to properly wear a skirt. In fact, they would probably need a different walking animation in order for the skirt to look right.

While we're asking for new artwork...can I get a kilt and some blue face paint? FREEDOM!!!

Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement.

Sardek Nardan
Khanid Constructions
#49 - 2012-06-18 16:16:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Sardek Nardan
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:
Sardek Nardan wrote:
As you cannot see player genitalia, I do not see what you want more? Make up?

I believe what they want is to see the female clothing and makeup on men, and vice versa.

One challenge I see to that is that male and female bodies are very different (on average). Our proportions differ and most clothing cut for women would be a poor fit for men. The challenge there for the art team is making clothing that works for both sexes.

Remember guys that you're asking for a significant effort on the part of the art team. This isn't just a matter of making skirts appear in the man's "closet". The skirt will need to be recreated to fit the man properly, and the male models themselves might need to be reworked in order to properly wear a skirt. In fact, they would probably need a different walking animation in order for the skirt to look right.

While we're asking for new artwork...can I get a kilt and some blue face paint? FREEDOM!!!


Hum, I already imagine the "tasty" character that would lead to. If the wis with other people is ever implemented I can already imagine the mods will have to deal with offensive characters.

Edit: by the way is it not their claim a bit stereotypical? I mean in Europe most gay dress more or less normally, and trans well try to look like female. What would you achieve with a man dressed like a woman? You can make "gayish" clothes why n
PinkKnife
The Cuddlefish
Ethereal Dawn
#50 - 2012-06-18 16:20:47 UTC
Please learn the definition of the word tranny before using it.

Hint: it is derogatory.
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#51 - 2012-06-18 16:22:04 UTC
PinkKnife wrote:
Please learn the definition of the word tranny before using it.

Hint: it is derogatory.


No, it allows my car to shift gears.

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

Reaver Glitterstim
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#52 - 2012-06-18 17:36:59 UTC
Xenuria wrote:
According to the lore Cis Gendered pure-blood gallente don't exist.

I haven't read this lore, but I think you might be misunderstanding something about it. For starters, sex isn't a "slider" even in real life. People who are actually naturally trans-sexual (hermaphrodites) have partially developed versions of all of the male-specific features as well as the female-specific features. They're not in between, they're a little of both. To use a more colorful example, they are not a color between light blue and pink, but rather they consist of light blue areas and pink areas.

Now, people, don't get all insulted about this. You can feel that sex is a slider if you want, but that doesn't make it true.

Most trans-gendered people, however, are not even hermaphrodites. They are either fully male or fully female, with the possible exception of some hormonal development at very early stages. They might feel they belong more to one group than another, but they will look physically indistinguishable from one of the two sexes.

I do agree that CCP should have included more intersex clothing, esp. clothing that is less form-fitting; and perhaps also clothing that comes in two cuts so that both sexes have the option to look approximately the same. And perhaps when they release more clothing options they will give us things like this.

But I do not think they should waste time trying to support very rare human features that will primarily be abused by people who think it's funny to abuse the character generator. There are too few normal options to add things like that just yet.

FT Diomedes: "Reaver, sometimes I wonder what you are thinking when you sit down to post."

Frostys Virpio: "We have to give it to him that he does put more effort than the vast majority in his idea but damn does it sometime come out of nowhere."

Cerulean Errant
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#53 - 2012-06-18 17:52:49 UTC
Methinks he wants to play Second Life instead of Eve, where it can all hang out.

Seriously, though, I thought the main point of this game was to fly and blow up ships in space, not discuss gender politics.
Cor'byn Black
Doomheim
#54 - 2012-06-21 15:15:06 UTC
Now comes the question, how does one program a video game to emulate a social and mental construction such as gender and gender identity? It's all in how you portray yourself in communications. And, since our avatars in this game are technically spaceships floating through space, we are all referred to in the feminine (following the tradition that vessels use feminine pronouns).

Cor'byn Black
Captain
Caldari Cormorant - Class Destroyer 'Exile'
FloppieTheBanjoClown
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
#55 - 2012-06-21 15:33:59 UTC
PinkKnife wrote:
Please learn the definition of the word tranny before using it.

Hint: it is derogatory.


"Tranny" is short for "transsexual" which "defines a person whose assigned sex at birth conflicts with their psychological gender." (wikipedia). How is that derogatory?

Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement.

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
#56 - 2012-06-21 15:36:55 UTC
Cor'byn Black wrote:
Cor'byn Black
Captain
Caldari Cormorant - Class Destroyer 'Exile'

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Captain
Amarr Vengeance-Class Assau--*BOOM*
*ahem*
Gallente Proteus-Cla--*BOOM*
uhh...
Ibis.

Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement.

PinkKnife
The Cuddlefish
Ethereal Dawn
#57 - 2012-06-21 16:08:45 UTC
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:
PinkKnife wrote:
Please learn the definition of the word tranny before using it.

Hint: it is derogatory.


"Tranny" is short for "transsexual" which "defines a person whose assigned sex at birth conflicts with their psychological gender." (wikipedia). How is that derogatory?



Try a non-crowd sourced definition

http://www.glaad.org/transgender

Also, Simply because a definition of a pejorative word doesn't include that it can be offensive, doesn't make it not-offensive. Hang around the GLBT circles and start calling people fags and trannys and see how far that gets you.

Quote:
*** may refer to:
***, or ****** (slang), an American English slur for a homosexual or effeminate man.


Surely that means it isn't offensive.
Reaver Glitterstim
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#58 - 2012-06-21 17:56:37 UTC
Forgive me for posting this in a thread in features and ideas, but I fear it needs to be said.

No word or term is derogatory, but people may use it in a statement that is intended to be derogatory, or it may be perceived by a person hearing it to be derogatory. This is completely a factor of intent, and has nothing to do with the word or phrase itself, except by association. Thus banning the word or phrase is effectively ignoring the problem in lieu of a false solution.

Go ahead and be angry that there are people who think it's wrong to be a tranny, but don't for one second think that it's bad for a kind-hearted person to use it as a mere label.


I grew up believing that a transsexual was a person who had undergone gender-swap surgery and was pretending to be and telling others that they are what they aren't. This is not true--a transsexual is someone who's inner gender identity conflicts with their outer sex. I am a transsexual.
(it's not trans as in transformation, but more like cis/trans as is used in chemistry)

I also grew up being told that a pedophile is a person who molests or rapes children. This is also not true. A pedophile is anyone who is sexually attracted to anyone who is prepubescent, or in the early years of puberty. The title has nothing to do with any sexual activity, and in fact not only are most pedophiles avoiding sexual contact with children, but there is evidence that a substantially large percentage of child molesters and rapists may not even be pedophiles. Also, being sexually attracted to someone under the age of 18 years who is fully sexually developed is not pedophilia, though some will tell you it is. When I was in my early years of puberty, I believed I was a pedophile. By technical terms I was a hebephile, but considering I was attracted to girls my age and slightly younger, it was completely normal.

And I grew up being told by many people that homosexuality is a choice. It is most definitely not a choice, and it is also not a boolean value. I'm approx. 90% straight and 10% gay. I'll likely never have a fulfilling sexual relationship with someone of my sex because they don't usually have much to offer me. But I'm not saying it couldn't happen.


So in conclusion, I hope you can see why these derogatory attitudes toward such benign things can be very hurtful. It is best to accept alternative ideas and thoughts that don't hurt you, and to not jump to the conclusion that they will hurt you. It is not wrong to be a transsexual, cissexual, a pedophile, an ephebophile, gay, straight, a shade of brown, or whatever other characteristic people are born with and have no choice of. And also remember, it's the intent that counts, not the word!

FT Diomedes: "Reaver, sometimes I wonder what you are thinking when you sit down to post."

Frostys Virpio: "We have to give it to him that he does put more effort than the vast majority in his idea but damn does it sometime come out of nowhere."

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
#59 - 2012-06-21 18:26:11 UTC
PinkKnife wrote:
Try a non-crowd sourced definition

http://www.glaad.org/transgender

Also, Simply because a definition of a pejorative word doesn't include that it can be offensive, doesn't make it not-offensive.

Anyone can choose to be offended by any term used to categorize them. Every new generation tries to change the words used to describe them if they have the slightest notion those words might have been

I could *choose* to be offended when someone calls me "white", because my skin isn't white and my heritage is far more diverse than is implied by that word. I'm not because I understand that it's the most accurate description of my skin tone without getting far too descriptive for casual conversation. In truth I'm an anglo-irish-franco-german-spanish-african-native-American with a slightly darker skin tone than most non-mediterranean European-descended Americans.

So calling a transgendered person a tranny is an accurate and acceptable term so far as I'm concerned. It's concise and descriptive and obvious as to its origin. Whether it offends anyone in particular...Frankly, I don't care. We've developed a culture where we're expected to know which words are and aren't in style for every given group and are labelled bigots or worse for using the wrong ones. At the same time we use our language to dilute important concepts. Just listen to Carlin's bit on euphemisms for a good example.

You know what offends me? "Human resources". They used to call it "personnel". There was nothing wrong with that term. It accurately described the purpose of the department and didn't have any discriminatory undertones. The only way anyone would be excluded would be if they couldn't be considered a person. But at some point someone decided we needed to a less personal-sounding term and invented "human resources". The new term implies that we humans are simply resources to be consumed. But hey, no one is out there complaining about no longer being persons. They're too busy getting mad about people not using the FOTM word.

Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement.

Dersen Lowery
The Scope
#60 - 2012-06-21 19:05:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Dersen Lowery
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:
[You know what offends me? "Human resources". They used to call it "personnel". There was nothing wrong with that term. It accurately described the purpose of the department and didn't have any discriminatory undertones. The only way anyone would be excluded would be if they couldn't be considered a person. But at some point someone decided we needed to a less personal-sounding term and invented "human resources". The new term implies that we humans are simply resources to be consumed.


Quoted for truth.

Clothing is mostly just a shader applied to the body model, so "fitting" the clothes might not actually be that hard; as shaders, they are fitted by definition. They should still be tested for rendering glitches, of course.

I've always been surprised that there was no makeup for men. First, Gallente; second, if you're going to have WWII fetish clothes, piercings, and freaking aviators (without bomber jackets?! really?), you might as well let people go full goth/glam/Lou Reed/Eurotrash/whatever, whether they're transgendered or not.

As far as gender goes, nobody knows your gender in space; your portrait only shows your sex. So that would come down to character behavior, which can currently only be expressed in chat and on voice comms.

Proud founder and member of the Belligerent Desirables.

I voted in CSM X!