These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

@CCP : Do not cave in to Goons on Inferno 1.1

First post First post
Author
Zelda Wei
New Horizon Trade Exchange
#1 - 2012-06-17 07:57:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Zelda Wei
To rush to judgement on such obviously one side changes will prove you the Dev-Swarm allegations in many players minds, that Goons are Hand in glove with CCP Devs. This will damage Eve immensely. You put T20 behind you do let this raise that ugly head again.

Soundwave is fond of saying “Eve isn’t fair and nor should it be”. So let the Goons drink their own Cool-Aid in high sec. Null sec is unfair in favour the big alliances, and should be. The 1.0 Mechanics are unfair in favour of carebears in high-sec, AND SHOULD BE.

Park the 1.1 Ally mechanics changes, hold the line with 1.0 Mechanics. Let the emergent mechanics emerge. They are actually brilliant, shocking brilliant they've created a space for real outlaws to exist in high-sec, within existing CONCORD mechanics.

When the Goons stop whinging they will realise this is great for Eve. It will cut the Jita umbilical cord for Null-Sec and force them to make logistics key.
Richard Desturned
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#2 - 2012-06-17 07:59:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Richard Desturned
Since you're obviously talking about the wardec assistance changes, you do realize that we didn't lobby for it one way or another, right? This will not "sever" the Jita "umbilical cord" for nullsec because people use neutral alts.

Until you can show a single post where a Goonswarm member is complaining about allies dogpiling into wars, I'm just going to assume that the basis of your complaint is based on hearsay.

npc alts have no opinions worth consideration

Jake Warbird
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#3 - 2012-06-17 08:03:07 UTC
Apparently even the Eve forums these days 'isn't fair'.
Makkal Hanaya
Revenent Defence Corperation
#4 - 2012-06-17 08:16:20 UTC
If you believed these boards, you'd think EVE lived and died around Goonswarm.

The funny part being that the Goons don't promote this idea at all.

Render unto Khanid the things which are Khanid's; and unto God the things that are God's.

Marconus Orion
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#5 - 2012-06-17 08:26:06 UTC
You have seen the new forum rules out this week right??
Grumpy Owly
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#6 - 2012-06-17 08:26:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Grumpy Owly
Makkal Hanaya wrote:
If you believed these boards, you'd think EVE lived and died around Goonswarm.

The funny part being that the Goons don't promote this idea at all.


You should check some of the details of the CSM 7 campaign.

Was promoted by Mittens himself that EVE development was mostly influenced by the GSF bar bill in Iceland.

It was also questioned as to wether he was serious about it also at the time, to which he said was an indicator to the level of political influence he had, not just in jest.

Of course some people dont believe this to be true, but it was still actively promoted.
InternetSpaceship
State War Academy
Caldari State
#7 - 2012-06-17 08:29:28 UTC
I'll ask again, and it'll be ignored again, for someone to prove that goons are whining about anything.

Wardecs mean literally nothing to nulsec corps. They aren't a necessary mechanic for us. We can fight eachother all we like, no one needs to declare anything. Our highsec presence is in the single digits, and no one cares about them.

Meanwhile, after having had supercaps nerfed to give other corps a decent chance (we had an instant win button there for awhile, that we willfully gave up for game balance), a number of goons are currently lobbying to have tech seriously nerfed.

You know, that moon goo that is currently just flooding us with free isk. Yeah, we're trying to make it available to anyone who wants it.

You better hope ccp "caves" to us, since most of what we lobby for actually keeps goon power and wealth in check.

Official Recruiter for GoonSwarm Corporation.

If you paid isk to get into GoonSwarm, you were probably scammed.  If you had the foresight to save the name of your scammer, let me know and I'll do what I can to help you.

Pisov viet
Perkone
Caldari State
#8 - 2012-06-17 08:43:00 UTC
Zelda Wei wrote:
To rush to judgement on such obviously one side changes will prove you the Dev-Swarm allegations in many players minds, that Goons are Hand in glove with CCP Devs. This will damage Eve immensely. You put T20 behind you do let this raise that ugly head again.

Soundwave is fond of saying “Eve isn’t fair and nor should it be”. So let the Goons drink their own Cool-Aid in high sec. Null sec is unfair in favour the big alliances, and should be. The 1.0 Mechanics are unfair in favour of carebears in high-sec, AND SHOULD BE.

Park the 1.1 Ally mechanics changes, hold the line with 1.0 Mechanics. Let the emergent mechanics emerge. They are actually brilliant, shocking brilliant they've created a space for real outlaws to exist in high-sec, within existing CONCORD mechanics.

When the Goons stop whinging they will realise this is great for Eve. It will cut the Jita umbilical cord for Null-Sec and force them to make logistics key.

You do realize that the current status of wardecs will end causing either:
-Nobody wardecs anyone ever after, as doing so expose you to 40+ alliances joining freely the defender side, while the "defender" can still make the war mutual and lock you in it.
or
-Nobody join any war as an ally. In the situation where the defender declare the war mutual, you're locked in a war on which you have no influence.

Either the current situation will kill wardecs, or they will matter to almost nothing because nobody would join as ally anymore.
Richard Desturned
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#9 - 2012-06-17 08:45:36 UTC
actually the current state of wardecs would just mean that the only active wardecs in the game are ~honourdecs~ like RvB and the GSF/TEST wardec bandwagons where the defenders' allies are panicking at the idea that they've locked themselves into a perpetual wardec with the largest alliance in the game

not that I have a problem with that outcome vOv

npc alts have no opinions worth consideration

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#10 - 2012-06-17 08:46:54 UTC  |  Edited by: Nicolo da'Vicenza
I love how highsec players are totally willing to make highsec worse if they think it'll finally make goons mad somehow
Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
#11 - 2012-06-17 08:48:17 UTC
Posting in yet another "Gewns R Bad" thread. Honestly, are we so bored in high sec that all we have to talk about is GSF?

I recently finished Cruise Missile V and did Cruise Missile Specialization to II, put on 6 Cruise Missile Launcher IIs and did a mission and it seems like I am doing a lot less DPS. This seemed odd to me. I guess I will have to tinker with the fitting.

In other news, this thread sucks.

"Grr Kimmi  Nerf Chans!" ~Jenn aSide

www.eve-radio.com  Join Eve Radio channel in game!

Richard Desturned
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#12 - 2012-06-17 08:49:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Richard Desturned
Kimmi Chan wrote:
Cruise Missile Specialization to II


spec skills should never be trained short of IV

also, the idea that some hisec players have that this permadec a) matters to us, b) keeps us out of hisec and c) is affecting us adversely is patently ridiculous, just sayin'

npc alts have no opinions worth consideration

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
#13 - 2012-06-17 08:51:36 UTC
Richard Desturned wrote:
Kimmi Chan wrote:
Cruise Missile Specialization to II


spec skills should never be trained short of IV


It's a work in progress. Big smile

"Grr Kimmi  Nerf Chans!" ~Jenn aSide

www.eve-radio.com  Join Eve Radio channel in game!

Cutter Isaacson
DEDSEC SAN FRANCISCO
#14 - 2012-06-17 08:56:41 UTC
Grumpy Owly wrote:
Makkal Hanaya wrote:
If you believed these boards, you'd think EVE lived and died around Goonswarm.

The funny part being that the Goons don't promote this idea at all.


You should check some of the details of the CSM 7 campaign.

Was promoted by Mittens himself that EVE development was mostly influenced by the GSF bar bill in Iceland.

It was also questioned as to wether he was serious about it also at the time, to which he said was an indicator to the level of political influence he had, not just in jest.

Of course some people dont believe this to be true, but it was still actively promoted.



Were you there? Did you witness any of this yourself first hand, or are you repeating the nonsense of others?

"The truth is usually just an excuse for a lack of imagination." Elim Garak.

Nicolo da'Vicenza
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#15 - 2012-06-17 09:00:56 UTC
wait so did mittani seduce CCP into implementing Inferno 1.0 like Grumpy Owly says or did he seduce them into rolling it back like OP says, I'm having trouble keeping my highsec mongoloid babble straight
Cutter Isaacson
DEDSEC SAN FRANCISCO
#16 - 2012-06-17 09:05:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Cutter Isaacson
Zelda Wei wrote:
To rush to judgement on such obviously one side changes will prove you the Dev-Swarm allegations in many players minds, that Goons are Hand in glove with CCP Devs. This will damage Eve immensely. You put T20 behind you do let this raise that ugly head again.

Soundwave is fond of saying “Eve isn’t fair and nor should it be”. So let the Goons drink their own Cool-Aid in high sec. Null sec is unfair in favour the big alliances, and should be. The 1.0 Mechanics are unfair in favour of carebears in high-sec, AND SHOULD BE.

Park the 1.1 Ally mechanics changes, hold the line with 1.0 Mechanics. Let the emergent mechanics emerge. They are actually brilliant, shocking brilliant they've created a space for real outlaws to exist in high-sec, within existing CONCORD mechanics.

When the Goons stop whinging they will realise this is great for Eve. It will cut the Jita umbilical cord for Null-Sec and force them to make logistics key.



I don't think you have the first idea what you are talking about. People keep coming here and whining about the Goons "Wah wah wah, they did this and that and this" when clearly the only people whining are idiots like you! If it weren't so utterly depressing it would be funny.

The sad fact is that there seem to be ever increasing numbers of self appointed internet idiots, and these idiots think that because they heard something from their Uncle Dave's best friends sister's Aunties hairdresser's gardener (also called Dave), that Goonswarm are evil internet people who have, despite the fact that there are REAL financial backers pouring tens of millions of their own dollars in to CCP, managed to take over this entire game.

That is the crux of it right there. Ill informed, illiterate, sky is falling chest beaters are actually convinced that a bunch of gamers have somehow managed to perform a hostile takeover of a multimillion dollar company, through a GAME. Why don't you go away and think about that for a minute, and then when you realise how stupid you are, sit and have a think about everything else you said.

"The truth is usually just an excuse for a lack of imagination." Elim Garak.

Richard Desturned
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#17 - 2012-06-17 09:06:23 UTC
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:
wait so did mittani seduce CCP into implementing Inferno 1.0 like Grumpy Owly says or did he seduce them into rolling it back like OP says


It's amazing how despite getting removed from the CSM, people still think that Mittens wields extensive influence within CCP.

npc alts have no opinions worth consideration

Grumpy Owly
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#18 - 2012-06-17 09:08:14 UTC
Cutter Isaacson wrote:
Grumpy Owly wrote:
Makkal Hanaya wrote:
If you believed these boards, you'd think EVE lived and died around Goonswarm.

The funny part being that the Goons don't promote this idea at all.


You should check some of the details of the CSM 7 campaign.

Was promoted by Mittens himself that EVE development was mostly influenced by the GSF bar bill in Iceland.

It was also questioned as to wether he was serious about it also at the time, to which he said was an indicator to the level of political influence he had, not just in jest.

Of course some people dont believe this to be true, but it was still actively promoted.



Were you there? Did you witness any of this yourself first hand, or are you repeating the nonsense of others?


The Mittani wrote:
The CSM is not about spreadsheets. The CSM is about persuasion, deal-cutting, and political nuance. It is not a job for a saint, someone on the autism spectrum, or someone who doesn’t understand why a quiet word in a dev’s ear after a night out drinking is more effective than days of formalized conferences. If you want to get things done, you must be able to read body language, understand how CCP itself works as a business, and determine who the most influential people at the company are. Over the last year I’ve repeatedly proven that I have what it takes to lead, where so many others have failed before.
Cutter Isaacson
DEDSEC SAN FRANCISCO
#19 - 2012-06-17 09:08:20 UTC
Richard Desturned wrote:
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:
wait so did mittani seduce CCP into implementing Inferno 1.0 like Grumpy Owly says or did he seduce them into rolling it back like OP says


It's amazing how despite getting removed from the CSM, people still think that Mittens wields extensive influence within CCP.



It's amazing that the morons think he EVER had any influence over a multimillion dollar company and its multimillionaire financial backers.

"The truth is usually just an excuse for a lack of imagination." Elim Garak.

Cutter Isaacson
DEDSEC SAN FRANCISCO
#20 - 2012-06-17 09:09:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Cutter Isaacson
Grumpy Owly wrote:
Cutter Isaacson wrote:
Grumpy Owly wrote:
Makkal Hanaya wrote:
If you believed these boards, you'd think EVE lived and died around Goonswarm.

The funny part being that the Goons don't promote this idea at all.


You should check some of the details of the CSM 7 campaign.

Was promoted by Mittens himself that EVE development was mostly influenced by the GSF bar bill in Iceland.

It was also questioned as to wether he was serious about it also at the time, to which he said was an indicator to the level of political influence he had, not just in jest.

Of course some people dont believe this to be true, but it was still actively promoted.



Were you there? Did you witness any of this yourself first hand, or are you repeating the nonsense of others?


The Mittani wrote:
The CSM is not about spreadsheets. The CSM is about persuasion, deal-cutting, and political nuance. It is not a job for a saint, someone on the autism spectrum, or someone who doesn’t understand why a quiet word in a dev’s ear after a night out drinking is more effective than days of formalized conferences. If you want to get things done, you must be able to read body language, understand how CCP itself works as a business, and determine who the most influential people at the company are. Over the last year I’ve repeatedly proven that I have what it takes to lead, where so many others have failed before.



I'm not asking you to regurgitate what is clearly political campaign material, I am asking if you were there. Here's a hint. This sentence and the other ones like it are made of things called words, that's what you are reading right now, words.

Now go put your big boy pants on and use some of your own words to make your own statements about what YOU personally know. Then we can have what's called a conversation. Until then it's me talking, and you spouting off nonsense you overheard somewhere.

"The truth is usually just an excuse for a lack of imagination." Elim Garak.

123Next pageLast page