These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Ships & Modules

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

More Tech 3?

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Large Collidable Object
morons.
#81 - 2012-06-14 23:41:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Large Collidable Object
CCP Ytterbium wrote:
Stuff



I can't tell you how much I love you for this post.

T3 cruisers already are a problem and cruisers were supposedly the least likely class to cause problems. Adding T3 on the more extreme ends of ship sizes will be impossible to do in a balanced manner.

And hell - with T3 cruisers outclassing T2 Battlecruisers in any way imaginable and Tier 2 BC's already being so popular it's a plague, adding T3 BCs would be a terrible idea.

100 faith points in CCP restored :).
You know... [morons.](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4gjOx65yD5A)
Jacob Holland
Weyland-Vulcan Industries
#82 - 2012-06-15 12:37:27 UTC
Hans Tesla wrote:
Dedicated gas cloud harvester?

Better to do that with the existing T3s and the missing subsystems.

Offensive Subsystem:
High Slots: 6, (Turret Hardpoints: 4)
20% Bonus to Mining Laser and Gas Harvester Yield per level
10% Bonus to Mining Laser and Gas Harvester Range per level

Propulsion Subsystem:
5,000m3 Cargo (Possibly a large, dedicated Gas Bay too?)
5% Bonus to Velocity per level
5% Bonus to Cargo Capacity per level

+1 Warp Strength


That still leaves unused subsystems from the original listing which could also be added but those alone should be a good start.
Iria Ahrens
Space Perverts and Forum Pirates
#83 - 2012-06-22 14:26:31 UTC
Tasiv Deka wrote:


youve made a couple mistakes the post you quoted was talking about Blops(Black Ops) not Blaps(Capital blobs i am assuming is what you meant) which black ops shouldnt be avoided its a valid tatic and actually could stand for some more fleshing out

and what they mean about force projection is in getting your ships behind enemy lines which i wholly agree with however i disagree with him over removing titans and jump bridges... possibly nerf them but dont remove them... anyways i digress your claim about eve being about calculated risk is accurate however you do seem misguided as to a few terms


Woops, thanks for the correction.

My choice of pronouns is based on your avatar. Even if I know what is behind the avatar.