These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Test Server Feedback

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

Mass-test feedback - June 14

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
jolanai
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#21 - 2012-06-14 21:23:01 UTC
CCP Habakuk wrote:
Hi! If you participated in the mass-test on the 14th of June, please reply in this thread to give your feedback, based on following template:

Machine Info and Settings

  • OS version: 7 Ultimate 64bit (SSD)
  • CPU: Core 2 quad extreme
  • GPU: Radeon 4850 2GB
  • RAM: 8GB
  • How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
  • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Optimize for memory

User Experience

  • Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot, zoomed out (no brackets): 41.3
  • Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): 28.5
  • On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 8
  • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No
  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:

    • More cynos. Otherwise, great. :)
Kitty Bear
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#22 - 2012-06-14 21:27:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Kitty Bear
Machine Info and Settings



•OS version: XP Pro SP3
•CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo E8200 @ 2.66Ghz
•GPU: Radeon HD 4650 1GB
•RAM: 2Gb
•How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
•Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Medium mostly (HDR off)

User Experience



•Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot, zoomed out (no brackets): Didnt check FPS, but was fairly responsive.
•Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): Didnt check FPS, but was fairly responsive.
•On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5.
•Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? None.
•Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Seemed to extremely disorganised, and i was never really sure what was going off, or what i was meant to be doing. But still had fun.



[Edit]
Noob Q -- Where do I find my FPS data on the UI :p


Possible useless idea -- Is a [Create Settings Logfile] button on the ESC-Menu a feasable addition to it. That way we could just C&P the data directly, or upload/attatch a txt file that contains video settings data.
[/Edit]
yoshi smokeaganga
Perkone
Caldari State
#23 - 2012-06-14 21:27:59 UTC
machine info:

OS: windows vista ultimate service pack 2
CPU: intel centrino duo (core2 duo) @ 1.83 GHz
GPU: Nvidia Geforce Go 7400
RAM: 2 GB
Number of clients: 1
Graphics settings: as low as possible

User experience:

FPS on gate (zoomed in) around 1.5-3 fps
zoomed out: 3-5 fps
combat fps: 1.5

crashes?: yes, frequent ui failures, got "entering space" while in middle of engagements off planet 1 even though I had been there for a while, misiles would stop firing (was fly9ing a drake), ui elements would disappear/reappear. Also mutiple "socket closed" errors. All unessential software on this computer was closed and unloaded prior to masstesting.

Seemed to work best during the POS engagement, but outside of that I was completely combat ineffective due to the extreme frequent client issues and disconnects.
Alesha Virpio
SovNarKom.
Goonswarm Federation
#24 - 2012-06-14 21:33:06 UTC
Machine Info and Settings


OS version: Win7 64
CPU: Intel core i3 530
GPU: gtx 250
RAM: 4gb
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): low


User Experience


Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot, zoomed out (no brackets): 25
Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): 14
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: pretty okay
Carola Kessler
Lost Sisters Of New Eden
#25 - 2012-06-14 21:35:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Carola Kessler
Machine Info and Settings

• OS version: W7
• CPU: Intel i7 3820 CPU 3,60 Ghz
• GPU: Nvidia GTX 570 2560 Mbyte
• RAM: 16 Gbyte
• How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
• Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high

User Experience

• Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot, zoomed out (no brackets): 33 FPS
• Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): 17 FPS
• On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 8
• Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? none
• Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: as expected as usual a funny test and it was really interessting to watch and be part of it sofar my machine was doing good except at poitot gate massacre ^^


Just on a sidenote as Afterthougth.....those FOFOFOFOFOFOF guys were pretty annoying, if at all possible would be there a way that if GM's or ISD's in Fleet could get rid upon such distracting Chatting in Fleet chat and Local would be helpful, if not all make Experience for those Really want to help testing a bit better.
Fribain Magnusson
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#26 - 2012-06-14 21:36:19 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

OS version: Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit
CPU: AMD Athlon II X3 450
GPU: nvidia GTX 560
RAM: 16 GB
How many clients were you running at the same time? One.
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High

User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot, zoomed out (no brackets): 20
Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): 5
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No disconnects or crashes, but nasty lag during the fights.
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:

Was in Fleet W. When my drake got destroyed during the gate camp battle, I got a BAD spike of lag. Before I could warp out to get another ship, I got podded.

On the whole, it was fun and it seems a bit more responsive than the last mass test I was in.
Darth Behelzebhu
Lair of Demons
#27 - 2012-06-14 21:45:58 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

OS version: Windows Vista 64
CPU: intel core 2quad
GPU: Nvidia Geforce GT120 2 of 1gb each
RAM: 8gb
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): mostly high

User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot, zoomed out (no brackets): 12
Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): 5
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? 1
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
Deep Fried Death
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#28 - 2012-06-14 21:48:48 UTC
os: winows 7 64 bit

cpu: pentium r duel core t4300 @ 2.10 ghz

gpu: nvidia geforce gt 220m

ram: 4 gb
running one client on medium

average fps was 11 at poitot

scale of one to ten for performence id say 3

i had one disconect it actually came after test was over and i got podded. large battles are cool in a slow slow way.
Machida
Psyonic Legion
#29 - 2012-06-14 22:25:03 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

OS version: Windows 7 64bit
CPU: AMD A4-3300M APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics 1.9GHz
GPU: AMD Radeon(tm) HD 6480G
RAM: 6GB
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high

User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot, zoomed out (no brackets): < 25
Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): < 10
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 3
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? 1
MurKfaCe
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#30 - 2012-06-14 23:21:23 UTC
os: windows 7 64 bit

cpu: amd a8 3510 quad core with radeon hd graphics at 1.80 ghz

ram: 6 gb

average fps was about 10 durring the major engagement

personally, ive never been involved in a major fleet engagement and it didnt go exactely how i expected but to see all of us at once in system was pretty bad @$$. i dont know if it was my rig but it also didnt perform like i thought it would either but again ive never been involved in something of this scale so i didnt have much to go on to make any real expectations. the one thing i didnt like was the organization surrounding what we were actually supposed to do. the second half of it i was completely lost so i just followed the crowd until i got destroyed. all in all though, i would definitely do it again n im looking forward to seeing what u guys come up with next. - MurKfaCe
Velarra
#31 - 2012-06-14 23:31:18 UTC
OS: 6.1, build: 7601, Service Pack 1
Video Card: NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT (Driver: 8.16.11.8861)
CPU: Intel64 Family 6 Model 23 Stepping 6, GenuineIntel @ 2.60 GHz (2 CPUs)
Memory: 4076 MB
All graphics settings high, AA & HDR turned off.

User Experience

Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot, zoomed out (no brackets): 10-15
Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets):8-10
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:

General lag seemed minimal, modules responded, mouse clicks in space functioned.
With brackets on, it was marginally playable but client responded and did not lock up.
Incoming Fleet audio was functional, yet i had no reason to speak / test out going audio .
Just Alter
Futures Abstractions
#32 - 2012-06-15 07:20:54 UTC
CCP Habakuk wrote:
Hi! If you participated in the mass-test on the 14th of June, please reply in this thread to give your feedback, based on following template:

Machine Info and Settings

  • OS version: windows xp service pack 3.
  • CPU: intel E6600
  • GPU: geforce 7950gt
  • RAM:2gb
  • How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
  • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): lowest, everything off.

User Experience

  • Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot, zoomed out (no brackets): 30fps
  • Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): 15fps
  • On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5
  • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? none
  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: much better than last time


Devils Fighter
Paradox Collective
#33 - 2012-06-15 09:50:33 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

  • OS version: Win 7 64bit
  • CPU: Intel(R) Quad Core i5 @ 3.3GHz
  • GPU: GeForce GTX 560
  • RAM: 16Gb
  • How many clients were you running at the same time? 2
  • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High

User Experience

  • Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot, zoomed out (no brackets): 45
  • Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): 25
  • On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) definitely 10 since the last time I've been in system with that many people on TQ
  • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No
  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Everything was smooth, apart from Eve Voice - speech often broken, slow to deactivate/activate when switching between squads etc. Otherwise, modules responded, virtually no delay in loading grid with mass jumps.


Smartbombs were a bit of a nuisance - maybe they could be banned next time because all I saw them do was SB their own fleet.
Lisanna Tourla
Stop taxing me
#34 - 2012-06-15 09:52:31 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

  • OS version: Win 7 64bit
  • CPU: Intel(R) Quad Core i5 @ 3.3GHz
  • GPU: GeForce GTX 560
  • RAM: 16Gb
  • How many clients were you running at the same time? 2
  • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High

User Experience

  • Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot, zoomed out (no brackets): 45
  • Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): 25
  • On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) definitely 10 since the last time I've been in system with that many people on TQ
  • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No
  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Everything was smooth, apart from Eve Voice - speech often broken, slow to deactivate/activate when switching between squads etc. Otherwise, modules responded, virtually no delay in loading grid with mass jumps.


Smartbombs were a bit of a nuisance - maybe they could be banned next time because all I saw them do was SB their own fleet.
big miker
Frogleap Factories
#35 - 2012-06-15 16:34:46 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

  • OS version: Windows 7 home premium 64bit
  • CPU: Intel I5 'ivy bridge' 3570K @ 3.4ghz
  • GPU: Gigabyte 460GTX 1gb
  • RAM: Geil 8gb DDR3
  • How many clients were you running at the same time? 2
  • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high):
    • First client in combat: High
    2nd client staying in 6C: lowest, minimized


    User Experience

  • Average FPS during the fight at the gate in Poitot, zoomed out (no brackets): 30 FPS
  • Average FPS - Zoomed in (no brackets): 18 FPS
  • On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ with same settings? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 7, better
  • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No disconnects or crashes at all.
  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
    • Very good test. Haven't crashed a single time and there was no server lagg at all. Satisfied!

    Latest video: Ferocious 9.0 - Vertical Supremacy

    Nano Naglfar!
    Previous page12