These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

The weak, and the strong

Author
Torneach
Doomheim
#61 - 2012-06-12 20:11:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Torneach
Jenn aSide wrote:
That players made the wrong choice by coming to eve is not CCPs fault.


Quote of the year right here.
Cipher Jones
The Thomas Edwards Taco Tuesday All Stars
#62 - 2012-06-12 20:12:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Cipher Jones
Quote:
That's a strawman argument...


When you ignore something and someone points it out, its not a strawman.

People pay for this game with real world currency. Therefore their enjoyment level is absolutely critical to CCP's success, no matter what your opinions are.

Quote:
Torneach wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
That players made the wrong choice by coming to eve is not CCPs fault.


Quote of the year right here.



Quote of the year 2010, when CCP hit its high point for subscriptions.

internet spaceships

are serious business sir.

and don't forget it

baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#63 - 2012-06-12 20:16:32 UTC
Cipher Jones wrote:


Real life is not video games. I adapt to and overcome obstacles in real life every day. Most people play video games to escape that.

I know you probably got confused by the "Eve is real" trailer. It was SO good and realistic.


You are playing the wrong game.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#64 - 2012-06-12 20:18:49 UTC
Cipher Jones wrote:
Quote:
That's a strawman argument...


When you ignore something and someone points it out, its not a strawman.

People pay for this game with real world currency. Therefore their enjoyment level is absolutely critical to CCP's success, no matter what your opinions are.



9 years and still growing. Seems people are happy with the way EVE works.
Darth Gustav
Sith Interstellar Tech Harvesting
#65 - 2012-06-12 20:20:29 UTC
Cipher Jones wrote:
Quote:
That's a strawman argument...


When you ignore something and someone points it out, its not a strawman.

People pay for this game with real world currency. Therefore their enjoyment level is absolutely critical to CCP's success, no matter what your opinions are.

Quote:
Torneach wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
That players made the wrong choice by coming to eve is not CCPs fault.


Quote of the year right here.



Quote of the year 2010, when CCP hit its high point for subscriptions.

Because once they pay for their sub and then cancel due to butthurt, CCP has to send them their money back due to the SATISFACTION GUARANTEE.

Oh wait, no they don't. Roll

Meanwhile people like you and me, Cipher Jones, we keep on payin'.

He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom

Cipher Jones
The Thomas Edwards Taco Tuesday All Stars
#66 - 2012-06-12 20:26:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Cipher Jones
baltec1 wrote:
Cipher Jones wrote:
Quote:
That's a strawman argument...


When you ignore something and someone points it out, its not a strawman.

People pay for this game with real world currency. Therefore their enjoyment level is absolutely critical to CCP's success, no matter what your opinions are.



9 years and still growing. Seems people are happy with the way EVE works.


The game is 9 years old and has less subscribers than 2 years ago. CCP admitted that they almost went bankrupt over player exodus.

"9 years old and still growing" is not accurate at all.

"9 years old and growing" is true, but not the whole story.

"9 years old and growing towards a point it had once been" is the intellectually honest way to word what you are trying to say.

Quote:
Because once they pay for their sub and then cancel due to butthurt, CCP has to send them their money back due to the SATISFACTION GUARANTEE.

Oh wait, no they don't.

Meanwhile people like you and me, Cipher Jones, we keep on payin'.


Have to admit, I lol'd.

internet spaceships

are serious business sir.

and don't forget it

baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#67 - 2012-06-12 20:36:43 UTC
Cipher Jones wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
Cipher Jones wrote:
Quote:
That's a strawman argument...


When you ignore something and someone points it out, its not a strawman.

People pay for this game with real world currency. Therefore their enjoyment level is absolutely critical to CCP's success, no matter what your opinions are.



9 years and still growing. Seems people are happy with the way EVE works.


The game is 9 years old and has less subscribers than 2 years ago. CCP admitted that they almost went bankrupt over player exodus.

"9 years old and still growing" is not accurate at all.

"9 years old and growing" is true, but not the whole story.

"9 years old and growing towards a point it had once been" is the intellectually honest way to word what you are trying to say.



Please link said CCP statement of almost going bankcrupt over a player exodus.

Please link sub numbers because the ones I am looking at show EVE grew to well past 400k subs last year dispite the troubles.
Barbelo Valentinian
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#68 - 2012-06-12 20:49:51 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Cipher Jones wrote:
Quote:
That's a strawman argument...


When you ignore something and someone points it out, its not a strawman.

People pay for this game with real world currency. Therefore their enjoyment level is absolutely critical to CCP's success, no matter what your opinions are.



9 years and still growing. Seems people are happy with the way EVE works.


But the way EVE works has changed over time. It was, in fact, harsher at the beginning. It's gradually been carebear-ified over time, but that was always done in a circumspect way, without losing the essential FFA open-world PvP aspect.

So in fact, "people were happy" with the carebearish direction it was going in for a while, but something changed more recently.

What changed more recently is the lower class of player that's infested the game in recent years. It's no longer a game that has FFA open world PvP realism because that contributes to the sense of a virtual world (a "multiplayer Elite"), it's now a game in which it's widely known that you can be an asshat with little consequence - IOW, the open world PvP is a mere enabler of asshattery and metagaming.

The tail is now wagging the dog.

So, bang goes the neighbourhood, and people start leaving.

Does anyone even care that this game is a virtual make-believe universe any more? Do many players even care about the lore any more? Or do most players just laugh at all that stuff now? Is it all merely about jumping into an internet spaceship for some pew-pew now?

Constantly, I see whining in the forums about making the game easier to get into - and that usually means "easier to jump into an uber ship and start pwning noobs". It's that attitude that's killing the spirit of the game (not the actual game itself - EVE will go on for years to come - but the spirit of the game, the core idea of the game).

NO, NO, NO, a thousand times NO!!!! This is a roleplaying game - which means that even if you aren't a "serious" roleplayer, your actions ought to respect the idea that you aren't Joe Blow sitting at your computer merely playing a game, but you are Joe Blow imaginatively finding his place and carving out a career (solo or with others) in an imaginary world.

EVE is being devalued by its own players. CCP have given people a sandbox, and there's a whole bunch of players who are basically just shitting in it.
Natsett Amuinn
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#69 - 2012-06-12 20:51:54 UTC
Seems like the guys on the other side of the fence have relaxed with the posting.

Imagine if the guys on this side of the fence did the same?
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#70 - 2012-06-12 20:56:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
Barbelo Valentinian wrote:

EVE is being devalued by its own players. CCP have given people a sandbox, and there's a whole bunch of players who are basically just shitting in it.



WTS Pooper Scooper (republic fleet version)

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Barbelo Valentinian
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#71 - 2012-06-12 20:57:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Barbelo Valentinian
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
Seems like the guys on the other side of the fence have relaxed with the posting.

Imagine if the guys on this side of the fence did the same?


The fact that there's a "fence" is the whole problem. When EVE started, there was no "fence", and for many years there was no "fence". Now there's a "fence" - funnily enough, coinciding with a slow-down in EVE's previously seemingly inexorable rise.
Darth Gustav
Sith Interstellar Tech Harvesting
#72 - 2012-06-12 20:59:27 UTC
Barbelo Valentinian wrote:
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
Seems like the guys on the other side of the fence have relaxed with the posting.

Imagine if the guys on this side of the fence did the same?


The fact that there's a "fence" is the whole problem.

Can't we all just get along?

According to Dr. E, that's not good for Eve.

So I guess we get more abloobloobloo.

He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom

Cipher Jones
The Thomas Edwards Taco Tuesday All Stars
#73 - 2012-06-12 21:04:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Cipher Jones
baltec1 wrote:
Cipher Jones wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
Cipher Jones wrote:
Quote:
That's a strawman argument...


When you ignore something and someone points it out, its not a strawman.

People pay for this game with real world currency. Therefore their enjoyment level is absolutely critical to CCP's success, no matter what your opinions are.



9 years and still growing. Seems people are happy with the way EVE works.


The game is 9 years old and has less subscribers than 2 years ago. CCP admitted that they almost went bankrupt over player exodus.

"9 years old and still growing" is not accurate at all.

"9 years old and growing" is true, but not the whole story.

"9 years old and growing towards a point it had once been" is the intellectually honest way to word what you are trying to say.



Please link said CCP statement of almost going bankcrupt over a player exodus.

Please link sub numbers because the ones I am looking at show EVE grew to well past 400k subs last year dispite the troubles.


Please link me to the pot you are smoking.

It was one of the first things talked about at fanfest, it has had articles dedicated to it in gaming periodicals, and you could google the financial information for yourself, and people did so and posted the information right here in this forum. It is also visibly demonstrate-able by logging into the server, or observing it via the API system.

internet spaceships

are serious business sir.

and don't forget it

Darth Gustav
Sith Interstellar Tech Harvesting
#74 - 2012-06-12 21:07:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Darth Gustav
The pot I'm smoking.

Edit: link was borked, now fixed.

He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom

Natsett Amuinn
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#75 - 2012-06-12 21:07:36 UTC
Barbelo Valentinian wrote:
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
Seems like the guys on the other side of the fence have relaxed with the posting.

Imagine if the guys on this side of the fence did the same?


The fact that there's a "fence" is the whole problem. When EVE started, there was no "fence", and for many years there was no "fence". Now there's a "fence" - funnily enough, coinciding with a slow-down in EVE's previously seemingly inexorable rise.


Don't kid yourself, there's always been a fence.

Those that don't want FFA pvp, and those that do.


Thakfully CCP has a world that works for everyone. Unfortunetly neither side is willing to stop with the posting.
Darth Gustav
Sith Interstellar Tech Harvesting
#76 - 2012-06-12 21:09:27 UTC
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
Barbelo Valentinian wrote:
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
Seems like the guys on the other side of the fence have relaxed with the posting.

Imagine if the guys on this side of the fence did the same?


The fact that there's a "fence" is the whole problem. When EVE started, there was no "fence", and for many years there was no "fence". Now there's a "fence" - funnily enough, coinciding with a slow-down in EVE's previously seemingly inexorable rise.


Don't kid yourself, there's always been a fence.

Those that don't want FFA pvp, and those that do.


Thakfully CCP has a world that works for everyone. Unfortunetly neither side is willing to stop with the posting.

Never stop posting bro.

He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom

baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#77 - 2012-06-12 21:15:27 UTC
Cipher Jones wrote:


It was one of the first things talked about at fanfest, it has had articles dedicated to it in gaming periodicals, and you could google the financial information for yourself, and people did so and posted the information right here in this forum. It is also visibly demonstrate-able by logging into the server, or observing it via the API system.


Then you should be able to provide evidence for your wild accusations then.
Barbelo Valentinian
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#78 - 2012-06-12 21:18:14 UTC
Darth Gustav wrote:
Barbelo Valentinian wrote:
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
Seems like the guys on the other side of the fence have relaxed with the posting.

Imagine if the guys on this side of the fence did the same?


The fact that there's a "fence" is the whole problem.

Can't we all just get along?

According to Dr. E, that's not good for Eve.

So I guess we get more abloobloobloo.


Obviously, the game thrives on conflict, but in the old days, it was roleplaying conflict (I don't mean in a "heavy" way, like serious RP-ers do, but in a loose general, rp-lite sort of way - i.e. the players in the game were into the idea of this big, s-f universe, and into the idea of imaginatively putting themselves in it).

Or to put it another way: in the old days, it was EVE players against the world. All of us, PvP-ers and PvE-ers alike, were proud to play in a wonderfully-realized s-f game that had full-on FFA open-world PvP because that made it a more realistic, MORE ENGAGING virtual world.

Now it's EVE players against EVE players.

That's the "fence" and IMHO that's the reason for EVE's bumpy subscription ride atm.
Darth Gustav
Sith Interstellar Tech Harvesting
#79 - 2012-06-12 21:22:25 UTC
Barbelo Valentinian wrote:
Darth Gustav wrote:
Barbelo Valentinian wrote:
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
Seems like the guys on the other side of the fence have relaxed with the posting.

Imagine if the guys on this side of the fence did the same?


The fact that there's a "fence" is the whole problem.

Can't we all just get along?

According to Dr. E, that's not good for Eve.

So I guess we get more abloobloobloo.


Obviously, the game thrives on conflict, but in the old days, it was roleplaying conflict (I don't mean in a "heavy" way, like serious RP-ers do, but in a loose general, rp-lite sort of way - i.e. the players in the game were into the idea of this big, s-f universe, and into the idea of imaginatively putting themselves in it).

Or to put it another way: in the old days, it was EVE players against the world. All of us, PvP-ers and PvE-ers alike, were proud to play in a wonderfully-realized s-f game that had full-on FFA open-world PvP because that made it a more realistic, MORE ENGAGING virtual world.

Now it's EVE players against EVE players.

That's the "fence" and IMHO that's the reason for EVE's bumpy subscription ride atm.

So I'm not sure what you're saying.

Either Eve players were originally against Eve players, or they weren't. RP reasons have nothing to do with it anymore than strategic or tactical ones do.

And I think the Eve community still has a fairly coherent "Us against all the other lame themepark mmo's in the world" vibe to it, even if you don't.

To me this just looks like it's working as intended.

He who trolls trolls best when he who is trolled trolls the troller. -Darth Gustav's Axiom

Natsett Amuinn
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#80 - 2012-06-12 21:28:27 UTC
Barbelo Valentinian wrote:


Obviously, the game thrives on conflict, but in the old days, it was roleplaying conflict (I don't mean in a "heavy" way, like serious RP-ers do, but in a loose general, rp-lite sort of way - i.e. the players in the game were into the idea of this big, s-f universe, and into the idea of imaginatively putting themselves in it).

Or to put it another way: in the old days, it was EVE players against the world. All of us, PvP-ers and PvE-ers alike, were proud to play in a wonderfully-realized s-f game that had full-on FFA open-world PvP because that made it a more realistic, MORE ENGAGING virtual world.

Now it's EVE players against EVE players.

That's the "fence" and IMHO that's the reason for EVE's bumpy subscription ride atm.

It just becomes more prominent as the game attracts more players.

But lets keep in mind, that if EVE always remained in the state it was in, in the "good old days" you wouldn't have the players you have today.

I'd rather EVE had 500k players under the system we have today, then 100k under the system it had 8-9 years ago. This is by far the best system of any FFA pvp mmo on the market. The fact that it's the most succesful is proof of that.


Both sides are responcible for giving the game a bad rep by continuing to post about how the other side doesn't get it.
The only side that needs to get it is CCP, and they obviously do or the game wouldn't be were it is today.

Love it or hate, CCP must be doing something right and it sure aint mining!