Jita Park Speakers Corner

Station guns?? Locking down gates?? You know for a null resident who rages at players in high sec for playing solo and being risk free, you sure sound like you don't want to interact with other players in null much.

But see, the difference between nullsec risk management and highsec risk management is the difference of having players provide their own security, versus players demanding that the game actually protect them without those players having to lift a finger.

In other words, Nullsec is safe because of the efforts of the people living there, whereas highsec is safe because of NPC space police. Now, in a player-driven game like EVE, which do you think is more deserving of actually having that safety?

Highseccers should be crossing their fingers and praying that CCP never starts looking seriously at what changes need to be made to their particular corner of space.

No, they should be praying that CCP start this process 9AM this mornng. The sooner we ditch the outdated and obviously wrong idea that hi-sec is a starter area, the sooner we can start making it better for everyone (except utterly risk averse people I guess, but who cares about them?)

I think the CSM has more credibility and a bit more sanity and awareness about it now that it is less influenced by extremists with absurd views. I actually think they will be able to see it as trying to improve communications more than seeing it as an accusation. As such I think they might be a bit more mature than other certain EVE cultures about being able to accomodate more interests than a narrow mindset.

I'm sure they will be able of seeing this as a fair criticism as to why certain areas have continued to receive a focus due to them having an historical bias previously in the CSM topic content. I doubt they would be so scared of introducing more topic content for discussion pertaining to other regions as a result, especially after describing how much of a diverse interest set they have regarding EVE and also since they have previously promoted this awareness to the EVE player base.

Except from a point of omission or neglect to see the big picture due to ignorance or predjudice to issues then this "prioritisation" the Goons like to use as they supposed effectual political rambling aid is just another exclamation to the full level of ignorance they like to think they have full control over CSM or CCP with.

It doesn't escape the EVE community the obvious tactics they like to think they can employ. Shame they don't have an offical voice on the CSM this year though to make this most "effective" for those selfish interests though really eh?

It will be interesting to see who if any on the CSM will pander to the old schoolboy way of continuing to think about these issues in a similar manner however especially after all the rhetoric employed on the subject to placate the EVE playbase about bias.

Except again you missunderstand, my point was about official Goon CSM representation or the obvious lack of it, not about any CSM member representing mining. Besides there are other candidates representing other regional interests also.



Hope so, long over due. Shame your organisation doesnt seem to echo your desire to see EVE improved with an effective BH system.

But the point was not intended to be limited to just crimewatch related issues as you seem to have missintepreted, but all other non-null regional interests, which also includes worm holes and low sec environments aswell as high sec interests.

I think once the summit minutes are out you'll find that your fears of "null sec bias" on the current council (or even more so, on CCP's part) are misplaced.

Despite having a dedicated session, null sec issues hardly dominated the recent summit discussions. Also, plenty of other sessions overlapped and contained content highly relevant to low and null sec (content, the war dec system & crimewatch, mining and industry, faciton warfare, the economy, new player experience).

In other words, you can't really evaluate how much one area of space was discussed or where it is in the coming pipeline just by whether it had a dedicated session at the summit. Many incursion enthusiasts, for example, felt slighted because of the lack of a session named "incursions" despite the fact that they appeared in multiple other sessions as a topic of discussion.

High sec is currently receiving a lot of development love front and center, low sec issues are less concrete at the moment, other than the recent work on Faction Warfare, but null sec issues are pretty sharply defined and compartmentalized, due to most of them being left over from Dominion. Thus, it's easier to hold a focused talk on null sec issues and fixes, even if they aren't imminently being worked on by CCP.

Rest assured Empire space was by no means slighted!

You do realize one could easily replace highseccers with nullseccers and the shoe would fit just as well?

As far as the people proclaiming I have screamed local should be removed without doing a complete directional scanner revamp is of course lying their ass off.

my list and ive been in nullsec for a lot of years

- Tech moons or any high income moons such as prom and dyspro. Remove them either completely or randomise them every month!. Alliances should be made to work for these massive isk makers! I dont want to hear about maintaining pos, and the effort. Its easy, even easier now with blocks of fuel. You stick up a pos its mods and fuel it, then jsut continue to fuel it. Thats not much effort. Constant risk free pvp because alliances make billions from doing nothing and pay for anything and everything is beyond a joke! Stop it now!

- Stop alliances owning region after region and not even living in it! and then creaming it from renters! To allow more people to own space alliances can only have sov in 1 region and only hold 51% of the stations in that region

- Limit alliance numbers to 2000! Its not right people like goons and test can control the whole of eve! No No No!

- Limit the number of blues! Eve has become a complete napfest now! Having this set to a limit allows people to think about who really there friends are and who they choose not to be

The above two will allow smaller alliances to compete and own space! and create more pew pew.

- Remove warp bubbles - Seriously WTF - Stop lazy ass gameplay. We have dictors and hictors for that! You want to camp a gate then get the right ship and be prepared to fight for it! Drag bubbles again WTF. Lets camp 100Km off a gate!

- Remove jump bridges! Seriously WTF - You want to move through space get a gang to escort you! Wheres the Risk?