These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

SP redo

First post
Author
Sarah Schneider
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#21 - 2012-06-11 23:14:51 UTC
Pay2win idea. No.

"I'd rather have other players get shot by other players than not interacting with others" -CCP Soundwave

AFK Hauler
State War Academy
#22 - 2012-06-11 23:15:32 UTC
This idea is shot down daily in suggestions. What makes you think it would fair better in GD?
ModeratedToSilence
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#23 - 2012-06-11 23:22:29 UTC
Large Marg wrote:


At least I didn't do something stupid like post about Tengugeddon. Its not even creative in the least.

These forums are much like WoW. Never see replies like I don't think it will work cause of this and that.
Just a bunch looses who never leave home looking for any opportunity to slam on someone on the forums.
Truly sad lot of people. Most not all.


Tippia wrote:
No, it would be awful, since it would break the game in new and hilarious ways.


Your idea is silly and would ruin the game by removing any sense of balance. This has been pointed out by Tippia. You have chosen to ignore that post. People reading this thread can safely presume you:
1. do not know how eve really works beyond your little I want this skill now bubble.
2. lack competent reading comprehension

Please don't complain about being treated as such.
Jimmy Gunsmythe
Sebiestor Tribe
#24 - 2012-06-11 23:25:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Jimmy Gunsmythe
There was a time that I supported a ONE TIME SP remap. However, since I sold my main, bought another toon and created this one, it really has no more bearing on me and thus, I am neutral about it. I will say that Neural Remaps should also be considered as removing both consequence and smoothing out the learning curve somewhat. Like SP, attributes should be committed once the character is made. But then again, since they dumbed down the creation process, I guess there isn't too much of a choice there now, is there?

John Hancock

Cutter Isaacson
DEDSEC SAN FRANCISCO
#25 - 2012-06-12 00:44:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Cutter Isaacson
Edit: Please be polite and keep in mind rules about pyramid quoting - ISD Stensson

Lets try this again shall we?

"The truth is usually just an excuse for a lack of imagination." Elim Garak.

Christopher Dulson
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#26 - 2012-06-12 01:18:52 UTC
This is such a good idea.

I can only hope that hilmar is reading this
ISD Stensson
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#27 - 2012-06-12 01:45:22 UTC  |  Edited by: ISD Stensson
Thread moved from "EVE General Discussion" to "Features & Ideas Discussion" forum.

Please keep in mind rules about being respectful of others and also do not use pyramid quoting. Thank you.

[b]ISD Stensson Captain Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department[/b]

Large Marg
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#28 - 2012-06-12 01:52:43 UTC
So all you hard core seasoned head cases think this will ruin Eve?
You must be on some high grade drugs to think this.

Let's see how best to explain it to you.

They gave back the SP from all the learning skills. I got back 2.3mil SP. something like that and it was from like 5 skills, not just 1.I spent my points in something I needed and Eve has not been destroyed. I'm at a total loss for words. My spending the 2.3mil SP should by what you tell me destabilized the whole game. I am disappointed now.

Remapping skill you get once a year and Eve is still moving along and not on fire or been pulled into a Black Hole.
Very strange indeed.

Yet you tell me getting the ability once a year to skill points from 1 skill let say mining will tear the very fabrice of space and time killing Eve?

You kids are amusing I will give you that, but WOW.. ROFLMAO....
Eli Green
The Arrow Project
#29 - 2012-06-12 02:10:49 UTC
>Implying that mining isn't a necessary part of EVE

Also, search forums b4 posting.

Move along.

wumbo

David Cedarbridge
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#30 - 2012-06-12 03:17:06 UTC  |  Edited by: David Cedarbridge
Large Marg wrote:
So all you hard core seasoned head cases think this will ruin Eve?
You must be on some high grade drugs to think this.

Let's see how best to explain it to you.

They gave back the SP from all the learning skills. I got back 2.3mil SP. something like that and it was from like 5 skills, not just 1.I spent my points in something I needed and Eve has not been destroyed. I'm at a total loss for words. My spending the 2.3mil SP should by what you tell me destabilized the whole game. I am disappointed now.

Remapping skill you get once a year and Eve is still moving along and not on fire or been pulled into a Black Hole.
Very strange indeed.

Yet you tell me getting the ability once a year to skill points from 1 skill let say mining will tear the very fabrice of space and time killing Eve?

You kids are amusing I will give you that, but WOW.. ROFLMAO....


I'm going to do you a favor here. After I do you will probably leap at the new chance to fling poo around or whatever it is that you do in place of being a useful and grown up person. That's your deal.

When offering a suggestion, one generally has a set of burdens that must first be met in order for that suggestion to be considered better than the status quo.

1) You must establish a need for your suggested action. If I do not have a problem, I will certainly not need your solution. In this case, you have never shown a reason that the game needs an ability to randomly remap skill points. Therefore, with this step alone unmet, I have no reason to consider needing your idea to do so.

2) You must establish a reason that the system in place now (stat remaps on long timers and SP only returned in extreme cases) is inferior to your suggestion. Since you provide no reason to suggest that these are not adequate, I also have no reason to consider them as such and again, I find no reason why I would need your suggestion to fix something that is apparently fine and dandy.

In addition to all of this I would also consider that insulting everyone in the thread that tells you that this idea has been considered before and previously rejected for a,b.c...zz reasons is generally a poor reaction if your goal was to convince other people to support the idea now.

Hope this all helps.

Edit: Also, making the second post in your own thread on an alt praising the idea with an empty "You go girl" is beyond unhelpful. Thought I'd tack that on here. Don't do that.
Mag's
Azn Empire
#31 - 2012-06-12 11:05:26 UTC
Large Marg wrote:
So all you hard core seasoned head cases think this will ruin Eve?
You must be on some high grade drugs to think this.

Let's see how best to explain it to you.

They gave back the SP from all the learning skills. I got back 2.3mil SP. something like that and it was from like 5 skills, not just 1.I spent my points in something I needed and Eve has not been destroyed. I'm at a total loss for words. My spending the 2.3mil SP should by what you tell me destabilized the whole game. I am disappointed now.

Remapping skill you get once a year and Eve is still moving along and not on fire or been pulled into a Black Hole.
Very strange indeed.

Yet you tell me getting the ability once a year to skill points from 1 skill let say mining will tear the very fabrice of space and time killing Eve?

You kids are amusing I will give you that, but WOW.. ROFLMAO....
The learning skill debarcle, was not in the same league as what you are suggesting. Not only that, but that change diectly helped new players and old alike with almost equal measure. (those of us that had all at 5/5, actually lost a little training time per hour but ho hum)

If you cannot see, or even if you simply do not want to see the bad results that would come from your idea, then fine. But that is not our problem, it is in fact yours. For it is those dire consqueces for the game, that means this idea will never come to pass.

Also, not understanding the issue and problems therein, but calling others who do 'kids', will not win you the argument either. Blink

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.

Cutter Isaacson
DEDSEC SAN FRANCISCO
#32 - 2012-06-12 11:10:43 UTC
Large Marg wrote:

At least I didn't do something stupid



Large Marg wrote:
something stupid


Large Marg wrote:
stupid


The reason your post was subjected to derision is because you made a thread about a stupid subject that has been discussed, dismissed, re-discussed, re-hashed and subsequently filed under "moronic idea with no benefits at all" a long time ago. I suggest researching such things in future to avoid such a backlash.

"The truth is usually just an excuse for a lack of imagination." Elim Garak.

lanyaie
Nocturnal Romance
Cynosural Field Theory.
#33 - 2012-06-12 13:08:45 UTC
masternerdguy wrote:
Large Marg wrote:
masternerdguy wrote:
This is idiotic.



So you approve then. Nice...


No. I think you are a troll.


and a very bad troll, doesn't even own a bridge like me

Spaceprincess

People who put passwords on char bazaar Eveboards are the worst.

Liliana Rahl
Remote Soviet Industries
Insidious Empire
#34 - 2012-06-12 13:36:46 UTC
This is a new and original idea.
Liliana Rahl
Remote Soviet Industries
Insidious Empire
#35 - 2012-06-12 13:36:54 UTC
Oh wait no its not.
Liliana Rahl
Remote Soviet Industries
Insidious Empire
#36 - 2012-06-12 13:37:07 UTC
Hint: it gets the same response every time it comes up
Liliana Rahl
Remote Soviet Industries
Insidious Empire
#37 - 2012-06-12 13:38:27 UTC
ISD Stensson wrote:
Thread moved from "EVE General Discussion" to "Features & Ideas Discussion" forum.

Please keep in mind rules about being respectful of others and also do not use pyramid quoting. Thank you.


Maybe you guys could learn how to create a forum properly and make it so that when you quote someone, you only quote the last quote by default?

braining is hard
FloppieTheBanjoClown
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
#38 - 2012-06-12 14:26:06 UTC  |  Edited by: FloppieTheBanjoClown
I suggested something like this a long time ago, and have since decided it's generally a bad idea. That said, here is the ONE possible "SP refund" idea that I think could work without being abused:

After 18-24 months of subscription, allow pilots to "unlearn" from 1-2 million SP. This would allow people to recover SP lost to noob mistakes after they've played long enough to recognize noob mistakes. It would be a one-time release per account.

This would let me get back about half of the now-useless industry skills I trained early on before I really had the game figured out. Yes it's completely self-serving, but what suggestions aren't around here.

Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement.

Zyress
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#39 - 2012-06-12 14:28:42 UTC
Herping yourDerp wrote:
masternerdguy wrote:
Large Marg wrote:
masternerdguy wrote:
This is idiotic.



So you approve then. Nice...


No. I think you are a troll.


can troll claim other troll is a troll QuestionStraight


Well you know they say it takes one to know one...
Danika Princip
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#40 - 2012-06-12 15:33:28 UTC
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:
I suggested something like this a long time ago, and have since decided it's generally a bad idea. That said, here is the ONE possible "SP refund" idea that I think could work without being abused:

After 18-24 months of subscription, allow pilots to "unlearn" from 1-2 million SP. This would allow people to recover SP lost to noob mistakes after they've played long enough to recognize noob mistakes. It would be a one-time release per account.

This would let me get back about half of the now-useless industry skills I trained early on before I really had the game figured out. Yes it's completely self-serving, but what suggestions aren't around here.



EVE is a game of consequences. WHy is the removal of these consequences a good thing?
Previous page123Next page