These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

Suicide Gankers - The New Soon to be Carebears or Not?

Author
Aldeskwatso
Primus Societas
Crimson Interstellar Alliance
#1 - 2012-06-11 13:17:28 UTC  |  Edited by: Aldeskwatso
We all know they are around. A lot hate their guts while others celebrate the bigger picture they bring to the game. If you are against them or not doesn't matter. It's a legitimate enterprise within the sandbox that is Eve and simply something to deal with as it occurs.

Something does astonish me tho. Pro gankers or those who engage in it have this air around them that they view themselves as being better then their victims. Specifically about their knowledge and experience about the game. But when you look at some of the facts about suicide ganking it's just not all that impressive.

Miners (Carebears, people who mainly live in highsec) are being prosecuted for not taking any risks in the game. Making themselves easy targets by ignoring PvP altogether and not knowing or taking the needed precautions to avoid getting popped while mining etc. They don't venture into more riskier undertakings and avoid low, wormholes and null sec almost as a religion.

I think these actions (or lack of them) by miners contribute the biggest part to the "succes" that suicide gankers have. It's actually not the eledged skill that suicide gankers claim to have that contributes the biggest part to their succes but rather the lack of skill and adaptability that miners had.

These days the landscape miners have to immerse themselves into is largely made different by suicide gankers efforts. As a result it takes far more skill to mine succesfully now, then to engage in suicide ganking.

I'm not against suicide ganking at all, dont get me wrong on that. But it just seems to me that anyone engaging in it has taken the place of their victims in being the new Carebears of New Eden.

Suicide ganking is a low skill and low risk trade, takes place in high sec, most are alts making it even less risky. While mining takes more skill training, is riskier these days, takes more experience to pull off and you need to be far more adaptable.

So what astonishes me is that even tho it's FAR more easy to engage in suicide ganking, less risky and all of the above. How can you continue to justify and defend your so called experience and superior knowledge towards "Carebares" by engaging is such almost pathetic strategies to feel better about yourself?

If suicide gankers feel so strongly towards highsec carebears why don't you take more risks? To me all your efforts have only woken up most miners and they have started to adapt. Which in my opinion needed to be done. But the way it's been done only makes suicide gankers look like the new Carebears of the game and has revealed they aren't much different or better then they let off to be.

Would you agree that if miners adapted succesfully to the changes suicide gankers bring on in high sec that their arguments for calling them carebares are invalid and that if suicide gankers continue to engage in this low risk, low skill activity it makes them actually look like more of a carebear then their victims?

I think so.

Edit,
After reading some of the opinions on this, people are as devided on the subject as they are on their opinions about Suicide Gankers in general. Based on the responses to this topic alone I guess most people on this forum as of now disagree because the act of suicide ganking alone does not condemn other accomplishments. I still think it does to some extent tho. On the act of suicide ganking alone it does make them a carebare since it's easy, low risk and they aren't prone to increasing the ante when a situation calls for it but rather move on for an easier pop.

The biggest obstacle you'll encounter doing anything is yourself.

masternerdguy
Doomheim
#2 - 2012-06-11 13:18:33 UTC
HTFU

Things are only impossible until they are not.

Aldeskwatso
Primus Societas
Crimson Interstellar Alliance
#3 - 2012-06-11 13:22:49 UTC
masternerdguy wrote:
HTFU


Doesn't apply here. Learn how to read mister!

The biggest obstacle you'll encounter doing anything is yourself.

Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#4 - 2012-06-11 13:24:36 UTC
Carebears physically fear losing their ship. Suicide gankers don't fear losing their ship.

vOv

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#5 - 2012-06-11 13:25:11 UTC
Aldeskwatso wrote:
It's actually not the eledged skill that suicide gankers claim to have that contributes the biggest part to their succes but rather the lack of skill and adaptability that miners had.
Has anyone really alleged the opposite?

Quote:
How can you continue to justify and defend your so called experience and superior knowledge towards "Carebares" by engaging is such almost pathetic strategies to feel better about yourself?
Same here: is anyone actually doing this?

Quote:
Would you agree that if miners adapted succesfully to the changes suicide gankers bring on in high sec that their arguments for calling them carebares are invalid and that if suicide gankers continue to engage in this low risk, low skill activity it makes them actually look like more of a carebear then their victims?
No, because then it would no longer be a low-risk, low-skill activity.
masternerdguy
Doomheim
#6 - 2012-06-11 13:26:04 UTC
Aldeskwatso wrote:
masternerdguy wrote:
HTFU


Doesn't apply here. Learn how to read mister!

Things are only impossible until they are not.

Singoth
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#7 - 2012-06-11 13:29:16 UTC
I don't think you understand what a carebear is.

Less yappin', more zappin'!

Kijo Rikki
Killboard Padding Services
#8 - 2012-06-11 13:30:16 UTC
You sir, would make a perfect addition to my corporation. Remember, our killboard doesn't speak for the performance of our company nor the satisfaction of our customers.

You make a valid point, good Sir or Madam. 

Aldeskwatso
Primus Societas
Crimson Interstellar Alliance
#9 - 2012-06-11 13:30:57 UTC
Lord Zim wrote:
Carebears physically fear losing their ship. Suicide gankers don't fear losing their ship.

vOv


I think a lot of them do actually. How do you account for going in with alts losing ships that are basically worthless to them and as a fact are?

The biggest obstacle you'll encounter doing anything is yourself.

Aldeskwatso
Primus Societas
Crimson Interstellar Alliance
#10 - 2012-06-11 13:33:13 UTC
Singoth wrote:
I don't think you understand what a carebear is.


Maybe, tho I am implying that it's changing.

The biggest obstacle you'll encounter doing anything is yourself.

Fabulousli Obvious
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#11 - 2012-06-11 13:34:24 UTC
My take: the Circus is trying to take over the Town.

Even Tigers take a break from the hunt occasionally....you know.....to get some SUN.

The disruption of Industrial Processes towards a focus of constant preparation has turned the MMO with the most creative potential into a boring defensive exercise that is already feeling old and tired.

The EVE Community Page Server Graph illustrates this as does the Daily Average Graph at EVE-Offline.

In the world of online gaming, there are many other Garden Parties happening. Time to go and mix and mingle. Toodles.

I am NOT YOUNG ENOUGH to know EVERYTHING.  ~~ Oscar Wilde, writer, d. November 30, 1900

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
Senpai's Afterschool Anime and Gaming Club
#12 - 2012-06-11 13:37:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Destiny Corrupted
For every gank I ever made, I have ten other kills in my records, with most being solo, or at most as part of a group of five or less people.

Your whole wall of text is one big fallacy. Do you really think that gankers only possess that singular capability to blow up barges with destroyers? No, ganking stems from an attitude that can only be cultivated by experiencing the many different interactive facets this game possesses, including industry, combat pvp, and market trading.

On the other hand, the defining trait of a carebear is the monotonous repetition of the cycle of dying, and then whining about it and begging for the game to be changed in favor of unjustified and undeserved safety.

I wrote some true EVE stories! And no, they're not of the generic "my 0.0 alliance had lots of 0.0 fleets and took a lot of 0.0 space" sort. Check them out here:

https://truestories.eveonline.com/users/2074-destiny-corrupted

Simetraz
State War Academy
Caldari State
#13 - 2012-06-11 13:45:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Simetraz
OP that is a rather long post just to call someone a name.

Gankers already have a name that depict what they do.
So do Miners, mission runners, Traders etc etc etc.

Carebear isn't a name and says nothing.
Just like calling someone a PvP'r in this game.

They are meaningless as they are subject to interpretation and can cover a large segment of unrelated players.
Carebear and PvP'r can be considered derogatory and a complementary depending on who you are speaking too.

So whatever...
Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#14 - 2012-06-11 13:45:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Lord Zim
Aldeskwatso wrote:
I think a lot of them do actually. How do you account for going in with alts losing ships that are basically worthless to them and as a fact are?

No, it's still a ship loss. Tell carebears to fight back against the -10's, and they'll quickly whine about how they could lose their ship if they tried, no matter how cheap it is.

The price doesn't matter, except to make the loss easier to swallow. They're still going in there knowing they'd lose their ship, whereas most carebears start blubbering uncontrollably when the topic of "engaging another player" comes up.

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Aldeskwatso
Primus Societas
Crimson Interstellar Alliance
#15 - 2012-06-11 13:51:07 UTC
Destiny Corrupted wrote:
For every gank I ever made, I have ten other kills in my records, with most being solo, or at most as part of a group of five or less people.

Your whole wall of text is one big fallacy. Do you really think that gankers only possess that singular capability to blow up barges with destroyers? No, ganking stems from an attitude that can only be cultivated by experiencing the many different interactive facets this game possesses, including industry, combat pvp, and market trading.

On the other hand, the defining trait of a carebear is the monotonous repetition of the cycle of dying, and then whining about it and begging for the game to be changed in favor of unjustified and undeserved safety.


No I don't think that. But your KB and whatever kills you made solo etc or in a small gang don't do a lot of justice to the skills you have to be able to do that by reverting to something as easy and low risk as suicide ganking carebears for being carebears.

I think you're thinking more of it then it actually is. Which is a common trait among people who engage in it. Just takes a couple of days to skill up for it. To be honest a 10 day old noob engaging in it is a GD hero compared to some skilled null sec player using alts.

The biggest obstacle you'll encounter doing anything is yourself.

Barbara Nichole
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#16 - 2012-06-11 13:51:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Barbara Nichole
Lord Zim wrote:
Carebears physically fear losing their ship. Suicide gankers don't fear losing their ship.

vOv

Because their ships are crap. They aren't "risking" anything.. that buys you nothing..

  - remove the cloaked from local; free intel is the real problem, not  "afk" cloaking -

[IMG]http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a208/DawnFrostbringer/consultsig.jpg[/IMG]

Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#17 - 2012-06-11 13:52:20 UTC
Barbara Nichole wrote:
They are "risking" anything.. that buys you nothing..

Actually, you're right, risk implies there's a chance of getting out of it without losing their ship. What I meant to say is it's a certainty.

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Barbara Nichole
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#18 - 2012-06-11 13:53:36 UTC
Singoth wrote:
I don't think you understand what a carebear is.


yeah, he's someone who doesn't risk more than he can afford to lose.....hmmm.

  - remove the cloaked from local; free intel is the real problem, not  "afk" cloaking -

[IMG]http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a208/DawnFrostbringer/consultsig.jpg[/IMG]

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#19 - 2012-06-11 13:56:52 UTC
Aldeskwatso wrote:
I think you're thinking more of it then it actually is. Which is a common trait among people who engage in it. Just takes a couple of days to skill up for it.
No, it takes a fair bit longer than that.

Barbara Nichole wrote:
Singoth wrote:
I don't think you understand what a carebear is.
yeah, he's someone who doesn't risk more than he can afford to lose.....hmmm.
No. It's someone who refuses to even risk that.
Aldeskwatso
Primus Societas
Crimson Interstellar Alliance
#20 - 2012-06-11 13:57:04 UTC
Lord Zim wrote:
Aldeskwatso wrote:
I think a lot of them do actually. How do you account for going in with alts losing ships that are basically worthless to them and as a fact are?

No, it's still a ship loss. Tell carebears to fight back against the -10's, and they'll quickly whine about how they could lose their ship if they tried, no matter how cheap it is.

The price doesn't matter, except to make the loss easier to swallow. They're still going in there knowing they'd lose their ship, whereas most carebears start blubbering uncontrollably when the topic of "engaging another player" comes up.


Whenever the risks go up and they'd have to pull some more weight pulling a gank of they seem to drop the ball and go for an easier kill. Which makes sence but shows a weak resolve. Not really a testament to their motivation and air of superiority towards their victims.

The biggest obstacle you'll encounter doing anything is yourself.

123Next pageLast page