These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Proof of CCP double standard when it comes to null/carebrears!

First post
Author
BeforetheStorm90
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#41 - 2012-06-06 16:05:58 UTC
MeBiatch wrote:

Either fix the war dec formula so if people like goons and so on want to have a high sec campaign they should be persona non grata… every high sec corp should be war decced with them and have it cost effective…


While I appreciate the gesture, I think everyone would be happiest with Goons remaining Goons.
Rico Minali
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#42 - 2012-06-06 16:09:09 UTC
Im a nullsec pvper. I have an alt that does some borign stuff such as Ice mining in nullsec when we organise ops, with defence, security, scouts etc (you know, the way mining ops shoudl happen.)

I also have a couple of hisec toons. One is a miner I use to mine often AFK in near complete safety while I look after my kids, do housework, cook and stuff like that. I have never been ganked.

The difference between how I mine and how the hapless carebears who are crying about getting ganked mine is simple; I think about what Im doing, where Im doing it and worry less about isk/hour and more about keeping my ship and cargo.

Trust me, I almost know what I'm doing.

Ban Bindy
Bindy Brothers Pottery Association
True Reign
#43 - 2012-06-06 17:02:57 UTC
OP does not make sense, there is no double standard at work that I can see, and I think Hulkageddon Infinity is a stupid event, so I would be inclined to agree with him if his logic were better. CCP would undoubtedly like to see more players in null sec and low sec, but that has little or nothing to do with the war dec mechanics. Pegging the cost of a war dec to the size of the alliance or corp is just good sense.

I'd like to find more nasty things to say about the Goons, too, but in this case I'll pass.
Ban Bindy
Bindy Brothers Pottery Association
True Reign
#44 - 2012-06-06 17:08:37 UTC
There's a difference between opposition to Hulkageddon Infinity and opposition to ganking in general. The two are discussed here as if they're the same thing, and they're not. I don't think players should be allowed to organize perpetual events that encourage the demonization of a class of players who are trying to enjoy the game in their own way.

There's no need for a Hulkageddon Infinity to encourage more ganking. The levels of ganking without Hulkageddon are high enough. I don't have any problem with that part.

For the record, my hulk has survived three gank attempts by fleets of 4 destroyers; I know how to tank my hulk and always encouraged my corp mates to do the same. Unfortunately, Eve newbies like most gamers think they know more than anybody else in the world, even in a game as complicated as this one. It was always an uphill battle to convince newer players to tank their hulks. We had to kick one player from our corp - a veteran Eve player - because he refused to stop mining during war decs, choosing to mine in a busy system instead of find something else to do for a week. It's not that easy to get people to do the sensible thing in this game.
Roisin Saoirse
Doomheim
#45 - 2012-06-06 17:21:11 UTC
Ban Bindy wrote:
There's a difference between opposition to Hulkageddon Infinity and opposition to ganking in general. The two are discussed here as if they're the same thing, and they're not. I don't think players should be allowed to organize perpetual events that encourage the demonization of a class of players who are trying to enjoy the game in their own way.

The flip side to this is that CCP shouldn't be able to demonise a group of players who have found a legal way to manipulate the market and profit (current GSF/OTEC profiteering from T2 ship losses which is what it's really about (along with Mittani's bruised ego)), and that it should be up to the players in-game to organise a counter to it.

As much as I also think it's lame and damaging to the game, it's within CCP's rules so there's nothing we can do about it besides adapt or quit.
Scatim Helicon
State War Academy
Caldari State
#46 - 2012-06-06 17:35:58 UTC
Ban Bindy wrote:
. I don't think players should be allowed to organize perpetual events that encourage the demonization of a class of players who are trying to enjoy the game in their own way..

So CCP should have stepped in to halt every major war in the history of Eve then?

Every time you post a WiS thread, Hilmar strangles a kitten.

Talon SilverHawk
Patria o Muerte
#47 - 2012-06-06 17:37:24 UTC
Scatim Helicon wrote:
Ban Bindy wrote:
. I don't think players should be allowed to organize perpetual events that encourage the demonization of a class of players who are trying to enjoy the game in their own way..

So CCP should have stepped in to halt every major war in the history of Eve then?




I wouldn't class shooting unarmed mining ships as a war tbh ??

Tal


Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#48 - 2012-06-06 17:43:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Ranger 1
MeBiatch wrote:
There is a great cry among the miner community due to the fact that they are being griefed and its encouraged from CCP…

In the eyes of CCP miners have no right being in high sec and they should be forced to move to null sec “where its supposed to be safe?”…

But look how the CSM has manipulated their position when it comes to the war dec formula…

Apparently if you have more peeps in your corp/alliance it should be more expensive to war dec you!??!?!?

Yes you read that right! In the eyes of CCP large nullbears alliances should be aloud to roam free in highsec without having to worry about being killed…

How can it on one hand be unfair to have cheep war dec costs because of the perception that it would be unfair to nullbears due to having high sec no longer be “safe”… when the same people say that miners should be targeted and harassed because they have no right to be safe in high sec?

Either fix the war dec formula so if people like goons and so on want to have a high sec campaign they should be persona non grata… every high sec corp should be war decced with them and have it cost effective…

Or if the csm is right and high sec should be reasonably safe then just increase the PG of the hulk so it can fit a LSE

Make harder hits for sec status for suicide ganks and make it so someone with negative sec status cant use an orca to reship…

Common CCP this hypocrisy is nauseating!



I believe the words you are looking for are "CCP believes there is a certain amount of safety in numbers, and that you can become stronger and accomplish more when you learn to work with others".

Of course, in EVE being larger often means you are simply a bigger target.

I wasn't aware that CCP put mechanics in place that keep High Sec citizens from banding together.

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

D3F4ULT
#49 - 2012-06-07 02:52:51 UTC
Talon SilverHawk wrote:
Scatim Helicon wrote:
Ban Bindy wrote:
. I don't think players should be allowed to organize perpetual events that encourage the demonization of a class of players who are trying to enjoy the game in their own way..

So CCP should have stepped in to halt every major war in the history of Eve then?




I wouldn't class shooting unarmed mining ships as a war tbh ??

Tal




A deceleration against a body that represents industrialists.


sounds like war to me.

"Bow down before the one you serve, you're going to get what you deserve"

Akirei Scytale
Okami Syndicate
#50 - 2012-06-07 02:58:07 UTC
MeBiatch wrote:


Yes you read that right! In the eyes of CCP large nullbears alliances should be aloud to roam free in highsec without having to worry about being killed…



I'm pretty sure TEST currently has a new record for active wardecs at any given time.
RAP ACTION HERO
#51 - 2012-06-07 05:31:25 UTC
you know if you war dec the gonos, you have like a 6000 all you can eat buffet of potential targets
but if you dec some scrub vanity alliance, you only get 5 and 2 online?

prices seems fair to me lol

vitoc erryday

DeMichael Crimson
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#52 - 2012-06-07 06:34:37 UTC
Degren
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#53 - 2012-06-07 06:39:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Degren
Damn! Best thread on GD right now, and I have nothing to add.

Johnny!

Hello, hello again.

Richard Desturned
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#54 - 2012-06-07 06:41:25 UTC
CCP capped the wardec cost so that huge alliances wouldn't cost several billion to wardec

deal with it

npc alts have no opinions worth consideration

Fleet Me
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#55 - 2012-06-07 06:55:13 UTC
why does nobody ever thinks of it like this.

FIrst you start in rookie highsec (1.0->0.8
THen you go to Highsec (8.0->0.5
then you go and wonder around in lowsec ALERT DANGEROUS :) (0.4->0.1
wooohoo nulsec!!!!!!! TIME to kill some fleets AND RESET TEST! (0.o)

so everything is just a step to get you into 0.0 space.

They also have a special Haven For carebears (some times with Teeth) called WH


In 0.0 we have something callled Countering (some cases this is blobing) so Hey you little Miner
FLoating around in space in your hulk at the Veldspar belt Go buy a small pos online it in A wormhole
and start scanning out some gravi sites (c1) You just have to worry about getting fuel and you have your
system alone wheir you can Mine all day,

Stop wining about CCP that they are supporting people to kill you becouse if you do you should be blown out of your
hulk

Ps; if you go into a c1 could i haz the bookmark one day
Aramatheia
Tiffany and Co.
#56 - 2012-06-07 07:13:19 UTC
Jafit wrote:
Richard Desturned wrote:
Jafit wrote:
Vindicator - 1.64 Billion


lost to rats ahahahahaha


Yup. That hall of shame is a comedy goldmine.


i lost a coercer to rogue drones in a scanned site.. oh woe was that a depressing day... lol
Trinkets friend
Sudden Buggery
Sending Thots And Players
#57 - 2012-06-07 07:14:19 UTC
Roisin Saoirse wrote:


The issue with the war dec formula is just another example of the CCP disconnect between what they believe wardecs should be used for (legal PvP between entities in highsec), and what they're actually being used for (griefing small and/or industrial corps). The claim 'more people in a corp means more targets, and that's what you're paying for' sounds good on paper, but since most wardecs are intended for minimum-risk griefing and easy kills it doesn't hold water in the real EVE.


Uh huh. So, lets say Goons decs a vanity alliance of 5 guys. It costs sod all, and potentially 6,000 people are grieifing the balls off 5 guys. These 6,000 cads can permacamp the 5 guys in station for ever - I mean, surely Goons can afford an endless dec!

But then, oh, wait, the executor man for Vanity alliance logs in and clicks the tickybox "assistance requests enabled". Some dude in MOAR TEARS sees that Goons are at war with some tiny flyspeck alliance, which is looking for help. Double Tap sees this too, when MOAR TEARS man gets in the intel channel and is all like "DAFUQQ DO U SEE DIS?!?!" and the Orphans bloke is like "ME GUSTA!!", MOAR TEARS man is all "INORITE?!?!" and the intel channels blaze into light, and suddenly Vanity Alliance XO, who is crying tears of shame while station spinning in 4-4 has his mail icon flashing like a strobe light, and everyone's offering their help for 0 ISK.

And you know what, he might just accept it.

Given Sudden Buggery was, and this is confirmed, the first corp to lay out and accept an assist in a wardec, I can tell you, a 15 v 50 turned into a 15 v 450 pretty damn quickly once everyone realised you could join wars for free, as long as you were prepared to stick it out till the aggressor decided it was too much of a PITA.

Therefore, sirrah, your argument holds less water than a teabag. I would dare a large entity to pick on a small entity these days without a solid exit strategy lined up.

@ rest of thread: DAFU-Q.Q-Q.Q
Kyra Yaken
Doomheim
#58 - 2012-06-07 07:16:26 UTC
Remove nullsec

True story Bro.

Marlona Sky
State War Academy
Caldari State
#59 - 2012-06-07 07:20:39 UTC
Maybe just allow a single person to pay a very small war dec fee to - brace yourselves - war dec another single person. What alliance and corp they are in is irrelevant. I guess your friends can come to remote rep you or whatever like now, but at least it would not be a situation where super large alliances are immune to war decs unless by the insanely rich.

I am drinking right now and I am sure the above is terrible, but thought I would toss it out there anyways. Please poke a ton of holes in it so tomorrow when I read it, I will know how bad of an idea it was. Also point out any good parts so i dont' feel as bad.

Ok off to pass out.
ModeratedToSilence
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#60 - 2012-06-07 07:23:21 UTC
Dear OP.

Look in the current wars tab under corporation in alliance you don't like. Find a current war where the "null bear alliance" you do not like is the aggressor. Offer to help the defender as an ally. Well done free war against any "null bear alliance" .