These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Blizzard Entertainment thanks CCP Games

Author
Ezekeil Rage
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#81 - 2012-06-04 20:16:27 UTC
Benny Ohu wrote:


You can just say you don't get it. It's okay. We won't judge.


Yes we will.
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
#82 - 2012-06-04 20:24:31 UTC
There are exactly 0 covops cloaking ships in the game that can't be killed by a single PVP fit hurricane. If you can't get a single t1 battlecruiser to protect you in your own sov then you have absolutely no right to have sov in the first place.
Lin-Young Borovskova
Doomheim
#83 - 2012-06-04 20:27:02 UTC
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
As moronic as that would have looked at least it's not quite as stupid as complaining about people not even at their computers.


Those are bots Lol

brb

Drew Solaert
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#84 - 2012-06-04 20:40:30 UTC
Wait wait WAIT A DAMN SECOND.

Your telling me, that if someone AFK cloaks in a system, it shuts down your engines and cap and revokes all undocking rights?

I lied :o

Joe Skellington
Sarz'na Khumatari
#85 - 2012-06-04 21:20:38 UTC
Show us on the Doll where the bad man touched you.

Please note that ASCII art is not permitted in the forum signatures. Spitfire

Zelman Axe
Lollipop Shopkeepers
#86 - 2012-06-04 21:25:51 UTC
its a relatively easy fix just make cloak ships burn liquid ozone to cloak or run a 15min cycle and make cloaks not designed for the specific ships unavailable problem solved.
Daemon Ceed
Ice Fire Warriors
#87 - 2012-06-04 21:29:25 UTC
Abloobloobloo! Waaaaahhhhh! Somebody is cloaking in my system and I can't carebear the way I wanna because I'm gonna get suprise buttsec'ed! Fix this CCP! And warm up my milk bottle while your at it.

Seriously bro, grow a scrot. Besides, how do YOU know they are actually AFK. Maybe they are sitting there patiently. Watching. Waiting. Warming up the KY. Just because someone is ruining your game doesn't mean that they are ruining 'the' game. I'm sure they are having great fun cultivating your neverending paranoia.

Is it just me or did some people forget that this is a multiplayer game? I'm pretty sure it is. I could be wrong. I do tend to drink a lot.
Suqq Madiq
#88 - 2012-06-04 21:29:54 UTC
Tippia wrote:
…and Diablo 1 was the best in the series anyway.


Diablo 1 was ******* awful. Anybody who says otherwise is blinded by the nostalgia of 1996 and remembering what it was like when your life had promise, potential and it was still OK to live in your mom's basement.
Natsett Amuinn
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#89 - 2012-06-04 21:35:44 UTC
Acwron wrote:
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
Acwron wrote:
Pak Narhoo wrote:
OP is afraid of someone who isn't there. That's sad. Sad


Words of wisdom...Can I be your friend ? Can I follow you on twitter or book in the face ?
Please, tell me you are not that stupid...If you are, you just don't know it therefore you should be happy.


Op said AFK cloaking, and you're attacking this guy?

AFK?

Away
from
keyboard
?

How stupid can the guy your quoting be if you and the OP don't know what AFK means.

AFK doesn't mean, at my keyboard, watching a movie, while keeping an eye on the system I'm cloaked in in EVE. That's called multitasking.

Perhaps the OP should read, CCP please fix players that can multitask in a system while cloaked. As moronic as that would have looked at least it's not quite as stupid as complaining about people not even at their computers.


WAH WAH WAH WAH.


I'm sorry, could you repeat that without all the incomprehensible crying?

Know what this shows? That CCP needs to make it so that when you cloak you don't show in local, that way you don't have moronic whines about people being cloaked in a system. You won't know they're there to be able to whine about them being AFK cloaked, unless they pop out of cloak and shoot you, at which point you'd know they weren't ******* AFK!
Generals4
#90 - 2012-06-04 21:46:23 UTC
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
Acwron wrote:
Natsett Amuinn wrote:
Acwron wrote:
Pak Narhoo wrote:
OP is afraid of someone who isn't there. That's sad. Sad


Words of wisdom...Can I be your friend ? Can I follow you on twitter or book in the face ?
Please, tell me you are not that stupid...If you are, you just don't know it therefore you should be happy.


Op said AFK cloaking, and you're attacking this guy?

AFK?

Away
from
keyboard
?

How stupid can the guy your quoting be if you and the OP don't know what AFK means.

AFK doesn't mean, at my keyboard, watching a movie, while keeping an eye on the system I'm cloaked in in EVE. That's called multitasking.

Perhaps the OP should read, CCP please fix players that can multitask in a system while cloaked. As moronic as that would have looked at least it's not quite as stupid as complaining about people not even at their computers.


WAH WAH WAH WAH.


I'm sorry, could you repeat that without all the incomprehensible crying?

Know what this shows? That CCP needs to make it so that when you cloak you don't show in local, that way you don't have moronic whines about people being cloaked in a system. You won't know they're there to be able to whine about them being AFK cloaked, unless they pop out of cloak and shoot you, at which point you'd know they weren't ******* AFK!


That's actually a very good point. I support this motion.

_-Death is nothing, but to live defeated and inglorious is to die daily. _

Lykouleon
Noble Sentiments
Second Empire.
#91 - 2012-06-04 22:26:40 UTC
AFK cloaking ships have never killed anyone.

Lykouleon > CYNO ME CLOSER so I can hit them with my sword

Widow Cain
#92 - 2012-06-04 23:38:48 UTC
Richard Desturned wrote:
Widow Cain wrote:
The AFKer would not be bothering you if they removed local...


That's like saying "Let's remove suicide ganks by removing CONCORD"

Know what both suggestions have in common? They don't fix a problem because the problem doesn't exist ;p


Yes, nullbear there is a problem, it is called no risk intel, this guy wouldn't be complaining about the cloaker if he wasn't getting free intel.

OMG You are sooo pixel macho...

Acwron
Meet The Fockers
#93 - 2012-06-05 00:10:40 UTC
Lykouleon wrote:
AFK cloaking ships have never killed anyone.


I will say again : You are MISSING the point. I have nothing against them, they can stay as long as they want. I just said you should be able to counter cloaking in system for days/weeks. Personally, I don't really care cos I fly ships that hardly can be killed. Trust me on that. Been camped by goons, pl, you name it. They camped and realized they can't do much to me. I won't tell you why, they just can't. It's never impossible but it's too much trouble.

BUT : There are not many in the game in my position. A cloaker in system is disturbing when you have a ratting ship and that's the only one you have. There are many and different reasons but (afk) cloaking is disrupting the system/constellation even small alliance economy.

This post is not about tears, it's about a specific issue I don't like. You're free to disagree, that doesn't make me smarter or makes you smarter. Different views, that's all.

Imagine how troubled, desperate even regarding the isk. I can't carebear, Oh, Dear LORD !
Suddenly I remember that I have 2 Titans, 1 Nyx. Do I sound that desperate to you ? I'm not really. Don't even want to mention the assets. I could easily do absolutely nothing for years from now on. Accounts already payed til 2013 also.

Now you understand that I'm really troubled about that specific issue and not about carebearing?

I tried to write this last post in a non aggressive way. I tend to be aggressive even I know it's just a game. That's my personality and I may offend people with it. But I can't help it when I get those typical stupid remarks like carebear, go to highseec, pubbie and so on. So if you could post something constructive, please do.
TigerXtrm
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#94 - 2012-06-05 00:22:07 UTC
Vimsy Vortis wrote:
There are exactly 0 covops cloaking ships in the game that can't be killed by a single PVP fit hurricane. If you can't get a single t1 battlecruiser to protect you in your own sov then you have absolutely no right to have sov in the first place.


This, pretty much. An alliance is a laughing stock if a single cloaked ship can shut everything down. And self respecting corp would organize a trap/hunt. Hulk in belt and wait until he takes the bait.

My YouTube Channel - EVE Tutorials & other game related things!

My Website - Blogs, Livestreams & Forums

Natsett Amuinn
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#95 - 2012-06-05 00:53:07 UTC
Acwron wrote:
Lykouleon wrote:
AFK cloaking ships have never killed anyone.


I will say again : You are MISSING the point. I have nothing against them, they can stay as long as they want. I just said you should be able to counter cloaking in system for days/weeks. Personally, I don't really care cos I fly ships that hardly can be killed. Trust me on that. Been camped by goons, pl, you name it. They camped and realized they can't do much to me. I won't tell you why, they just can't. It's never impossible but it's too much trouble.

BUT : There are not many in the game in my position. A cloaker in system is disturbing when you have a ratting ship and that's the only one you have. There are many and different reasons but (afk) cloaking is disrupting the system/constellation even small alliance economy.

This post is not about tears, it's about a specific issue I don't like. You're free to disagree, that doesn't make me smarter or makes you smarter. Different views, that's all.

Imagine how troubled, desperate even regarding the isk. I can't carebear, Oh, Dear LORD !
Suddenly I remember that I have 2 Titans, 1 Nyx. Do I sound that desperate to you ? I'm not really. Don't even want to mention the assets. I could easily do absolutely nothing for years from now on. Accounts already payed til 2013 also.

Now you understand that I'm really troubled about that specific issue and not about carebearing?

I tried to write this last post in a non aggressive way. I tend to be aggressive even I know it's just a game. That's my personality and I may offend people with it. But I can't help it when I get those typical stupid remarks like carebear, go to highseec, pubbie and so on. So if you could post something constructive, please do.


What!!!!
How the hell does an AFK cloaker disrupt anything? WTF are you talking about? Seriously, explain it. How is someone who is afk cloaked in a system anything other then a name in a local list? And how does a single ship AFK cloaked mess up the economy of a small alliance?

Different views? I feel like maybe we're not even using the same english.



Dear CCP,
Please make cloaking remove a player from the local list.
Shepard Book
Underground Stargate
#96 - 2012-06-05 00:55:13 UTC
Acwron wrote:
CCP, fix this afk cloaking. I for one am tired with it. You made a game some of us can't play.

Create a POS module which can be installed in a system where you hold the SOV. Module that can be activated and decloak enemy cloaked ships. Every half an hour or one hour, doesn't matter. If they wanna camp, they're free to do it. But they have to be there. Otherwise, using that module, I decloak and kill them. Would give me a chance to do something in return.

Meanwhile, Blizzard wants to thank you cos you made me buy Diablo 3. Click, click, click, kill them monsters ! At least here there's no afk cloak camping.

Hold on Deckard Cain, I'm gonna save you !



Only after they remove local! You know what local is right? That free intel your getting to know someone is there to begin with... Go back to high sec so concord can hold you hand.
Richard Desturned
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#97 - 2012-06-05 01:08:13 UTC
Shepard Book wrote:
Only after they remove local! You know what local is right? That free intel your getting to know someone is there to begin with... Go back to high sec so concord can hold you hand.


lmao I love how AFK cloaking whine threads attract all of the failed PvPers whining about local like flies on crap

npc alts have no opinions worth consideration

Degren
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#98 - 2012-06-05 01:08:31 UTC
To my everlasting surprise, Blizzard refunded my Diablo 3 purchase.

"I don't like this game, Blizzard. As you can see, I've barely played."

"OK Deggies, np."

I'm posting mostly off topic, because on topic was already crushed.

Hello, hello again.

EVE Roy Mustang
Doomheim
#99 - 2012-06-05 01:11:41 UTC  |  Edited by: EVE Roy Mustang
Vile rat wrote:
See you in a week.


thought you were on the csm wheres your tag

Degren wrote:
To my everlasting surprise, Blizzard refunded my Diablo 3 purchase.

"I don't like this game, Blizzard. As you can see, I've barely played."

"OK Deggies, np."

I'm posting mostly off topic, because on topic was already crushed.



Any game that has internet lag in the single player or that you cant play single player cause the internet login servers are down you SHOULD get a refund on
Richard Desturned
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#100 - 2012-06-05 01:18:41 UTC
EVE Roy Mustang wrote:
Vile rat wrote:
See you in a week.


thought you were on the csm wheres your tag


he didn't run for csm 7

npc alts have no opinions worth consideration