These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123
 

Rule Clarification

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Raimo
Genos Occidere
HYDRA RELOADED
#41 - 2012-06-04 08:02:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Raimo
B4ckstab wrote:
CCP Loxy wrote:
B4ckstab wrote:
"All competing pilots must have been members of the alliance for which they are competing, and be a member of that Alliance by downtime on May, 05, 2012."


Its okay to leave the alliance for a couple of days after May 05 and then join again before the competions.
As i understand it you are allowed to compete as long as you were in the right alliance at downtime may 5th.


You must have been in your alliance from downtime on May the 5th and you must remain in your Alliance, if you leave you will not be eligible.



Then why does it not say that in the rules. I was in the alliance at the 5th and in an npc corp now. And i wanna join my team.
Who is incharge of this? Who do i need to petion to know if it can be fixed?


A lot of important things are not said in the rules Big smile


michael boltonIII wrote:


I would suggest asking for an appeal to the alliance tournament e-mail and maybe the mails of the dev team in charge of the tournament. Be aware that the rule "All competing pilots must have been members of the alliance for which they are competing, and be a member of that Alliance by downtime on May, 05, 2012" does in fact say that you "must have been members" so you are asking for a special favor and should not be an ass about it.

Edit: quoting for it never gets old, does it?
Challu
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#42 - 2012-06-04 09:13:14 UTC
Dunno, the rules look pretty simple and clear in my eyes. But then perhaps that's cause I'm accepting the spirit of the rules and not thinking of ways to game it.

O/H, you guys are awesome at what you do.. but all this forum shitposting is really making you look quite petty. It doesn't become you.
Cody Zamorah
Doomheim
#43 - 2012-06-04 09:57:38 UTC
Tyrrax Thorrk wrote:
it just doesn't apply to forum posting - nobody respects anonymous cowards who don't have the balls to post their opinions under their own names.


Come come now, do we have to resort to namecalling to appear stronger?
Is that the most valid point you can make in your arguement?
Randomize All
Doomheim
#44 - 2012-06-04 11:00:38 UTC
Maybe if Sreegs wasn't on a campaign of getting people's mains forum banned for calling out his lies........

Maybe that would be more mains posting. Who knows?!

I know.
Raimo
Genos Occidere
HYDRA RELOADED
#45 - 2012-06-04 15:25:38 UTC
Randomize All wrote:
Maybe if Sreegs wasn't on a campaign of getting people's mains forum banned for calling out his lies........

Maybe that would be more mains posting. Who knows?!

I know.


No s**t!
Robert Caldera
Caldera Trading and Investment
#46 - 2012-06-05 13:24:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Robert Caldera
Randomize All wrote:

All rules are left intentionally vague so that they may be used against Hydra or Outbreak regardless of the circumstances.

for a good reason, suck it up.

Even rules in RL (laws) are vague, the judge will tell you if you are guilty.
Karbox Delacroix
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#47 - 2012-06-05 15:43:49 UTC
Robert Caldera wrote:
Randomize All wrote:

All rules are left intentionally vague so that they may be used against Hydra or Outbreak regardless of the circumstances.

for a good reason, suck it up.

Even rules in RL (laws) are vague, the judge will tell you if you are guilty.


Driving while black = flying while Hydra?
Lemster
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#48 - 2012-06-05 15:53:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Lemster
Cody Zamorah wrote:
Tyrrax Thorrk wrote:
it just doesn't apply to forum posting - nobody respects anonymous cowards who don't have the balls to post their opinions under their own names.


Come come now, do we have to resort to namecalling to appear stronger?
Is that the most valid point you can make in your arguement?



Cody Zamorah wrote:
Lemster, you should have been that vocal in your early pet days. Maybe then you would have become relevant by now.


Bless


Randomize All wrote:
Maybe if Sreegs wasn't on a campaign of getting people's mains forum banned for calling out his lies........

Maybe that would be more mains posting. Who knows?!

I know.


You guys know ccp have access to your IPs and which alts are on which accounts right?
Randomize All
Doomheim
#49 - 2012-06-05 16:45:32 UTC
Robert Caldera wrote:
Randomize All wrote:

All rules are left intentionally vague so that they may be used against Hydra or Outbreak regardless of the circumstances.

for a good reason, suck it up.

Even rules in RL (laws) are vague, the judge will tell you if you are guilty.


*cough* "jury"
Randomize All
Doomheim
#50 - 2012-06-05 16:46:08 UTC
Lemster wrote:
Cody Zamorah wrote:
Tyrrax Thorrk wrote:
it just doesn't apply to forum posting - nobody respects anonymous cowards who don't have the balls to post their opinions under their own names.


Come come now, do we have to resort to namecalling to appear stronger?
Is that the most valid point you can make in your arguement?



Cody Zamorah wrote:
Lemster, you should have been that vocal in your early pet days. Maybe then you would have become relevant by now.


Bless


Randomize All wrote:
Maybe if Sreegs wasn't on a campaign of getting people's mains forum banned for calling out his lies........

Maybe that would be more mains posting. Who knows?!

I know.


You guys know ccp have access to your IPs and which alts are on which accounts right?

Of course, that's how we know he's lying.
Cody Zamorah
Doomheim
#51 - 2012-06-05 23:25:05 UTC
Lemster wrote:

You guys know ccp have access to your IPs and which alts are on which accounts right?


And what would he be able to do with it if the alts break no rules?

Nothing.

Because if he would use it or if all of a sudden someone else has that intell then all hell will break loose.
Randomize All
Doomheim
#52 - 2012-06-06 19:47:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Randomize All
It's also funny because the population only has Sreegs' say so that anything at all happened in the wormhole on the other server and Hydra and Outbreak were quite open about it.

Today, literally anything could be happening on sisi and Sreegs/Soundwave (two entirely different entities - operating as an A and B team to achieve victory) would have zero, zilch, nada, nil, none, no appetite for even looking if it is.
And none of these baying mobs would be any the wiser, they're just happy with the pound of flesh that got served to them in a Bullshit Sandwich, nothing else matters to them.

Hydra and Outbreak should have just pretended it was lag or something after AT9 and pretended to know nothing about how it happened, and then today the unwashed masses would be crying the forums down about how CCP are kicking the best people out because they're so good, they even broke the server.

I don't know who deserves who the most, CCP or their customers. Few people actually deserve to see actually good players at the this game playing at their best, they wouldn't recognise it if they saw it anyway.
Tyrrax Thorrk
Guiding Hand Social Club
#53 - 2012-06-06 20:25:40 UTC
Obsessed much ?
Michael Harari
Genos Occidere
HYDRA RELOADED
#54 - 2012-06-06 20:26:02 UTC
Randomize All wrote:


Hydra and Outbreak should have just pretended it was lag or something after AT9 and pretended to know nothing about how it happened, and then today the unwashed masses would be crying the forums down about how CCP are kicking the best people out because they're so good, they even broke the server.


They could have used a combination of excuses. One guy d/cs, another burns out his guns, etc.
Malakai Asamov
Van Diemen's Demise
Northern Coalition.
#55 - 2012-06-07 03:16:59 UTC
Tyrrax Thorrk wrote:
Obsessed much ?


Compared to how much you post on this topic?
Tyrrax Thorrk
Guiding Hand Social Club
#56 - 2012-06-07 07:45:20 UTC
Yes
Previous page123