These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

Empire wars in its current state.

First post
Author
Aesheera
Doomheim
#1 - 2012-06-03 13:10:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Aesheera
Im surprised there is so little debate going on about this, so i'll fire one up.

***
Arrow DISCLAIMER:
Pretty sure there will be plenty of people saying that the *real pvp* is found elsewhere, so let me start by saying that not everyone has the desire to go -10 again or to be participating in monstersized fleetbattles.
***


With this being said I'll explain why I believe Empire warring is currently in the slow process of being destroyed, thanks to the presumed brilliant expansion by CCP, Inferno.

First of all.

ArrowThe ally system.

It's stupid to no extent that an aggressor launches a dec and the defender has a LIMITLESS number of allies to recruit.
As most Empire warrers are experiencing right now, it's wars that everyone joins on the defenders side in the hopes of finding targets, resulting in a ridiculous number of people chasing down aggressors.
We're talking 50 man aggressor outfits facing over 10 corps/alliances resulting in a 50 vs 900+ situation.

Question End result:

People obviously wont play. Its going to be Destroyers, Cloakies or Pods you'll see outside, with the odd brainless git trying to mine in a random system.

***


ArrowThe Merc marketplace.

It's pointless. Utterly pointless.
Merc work is destroyed at this point.
Why? Because all a defender has to do is put up a request and viola, everyone out there joins just for the hell of it and in no time, you will see countless corps and alliances joining just to get those few odd kills - if any.

No one will pay anyone anymore because with Inferno in place, players will just join for free.

***


With these changes implemented Empire merc outfits are falling apart, what used to be a very interesting way for PvP is turning into a massive heap of boredom and already there is mention of the older, bigger groups considering moving away from Empire, considering FW, piracy or other means.
There is just no incentive to keep doing this anymore.

In short, even though CCP claimed to redo Empire wars and make them more interesting for everyone, all they;re doing right now is killing it. BIG time.
And the fact that they didn't see this coming is beyond me, and I'm sure many others as well.

It's pushing people out of Empire and in my humble opinion, it reeks of a little hidden agenda they had when designing this because as far as succes with Inferno goes, im pretty sure that's the only achievement they will get for this in the not-all-too-long run from here on.

***


IdeaPROPOSED CHANGES BASED ON INGAME AND FORUM INPUT.

- Defenders must charge a fee for allies. This will keep merc work alive and not eradicate it from play entirely.

- Aggressors should be allowed allies once a Defender gets them. This should also be at a fee. Again, keeping the merc business alive.

- Minimum fees should be introduced for recruiting allies. 50m as bare minimum, outside of the merc's contract prices.
Since they dont have to fund the wars, I'm pretty sure that the 50m will be the cheaper alternative to the old, pre-Inferno costs for Merc alliances.

These three changes alone will put some use to the Merc marketplace.

Discuss.

- I think my passion is misinterpreted as anger sometimes. And I don't think people are ready for the message that I'm delivering, and delivering with a sense of violent love.

Tora Bushido
The Marmite Mercenaries
BLACKFLAG.
#2 - 2012-06-03 13:19:44 UTC
Not much to add...... I agree with what you re saying. I also think there should be a minimum fee to join as allies (50-100M or so) and for every 3 allies, you should be able to get an extra offence. This way you keep it in balance and you dont get wars we have now with half eve joining in for "fun". Think we have a dec now with 10 allies. Twisted

DELETE THE WEAK, ADAPT OR DIE !

Meta Gaming Level VII, Psycho Warfare Level X, Smack Talk Level VII.

Aesheera
Doomheim
#3 - 2012-06-03 13:22:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Aesheera
CCP should adress this as a serious issue imo.

One extra aggressor for each extra defender the target gets.

This will recreate the option for merc services and/or at least level the playing field.
In it's current state its ending up to be 1 vs many when you're talking groups (be it corps or alliances).

It's ridiculous, not thought-through and detrimental to those who loved Empire wars.

EDIT: a mandatory fee for recruiting allies would also be a small alternative, like Tora mentioned.

- I think my passion is misinterpreted as anger sometimes. And I don't think people are ready for the message that I'm delivering, and delivering with a sense of violent love.

LittleTerror
Stygian Systems
#4 - 2012-06-03 13:24:33 UTC
If the defender gets allies then the aggressor should also be allowed to have them.

But how long will it take for them to implement this, 1 month? 6 month? A year? Roll
Aesheera
Doomheim
#5 - 2012-06-03 13:32:10 UTC
Updated OP with proposed changes.

- I think my passion is misinterpreted as anger sometimes. And I don't think people are ready for the message that I'm delivering, and delivering with a sense of violent love.

Hands 0ff
Doomheim
#6 - 2012-06-03 14:32:50 UTC
Totally agree with all of the above even tho the high sec guys get stick for there high sec wars and what not , i agree that the current changes to the system are killing it and fast, i have many contacts within the merc scene and all are getting fed up and annoyed with it all.

Even if you dont like war decs and guys that do that side to eve i think we should all get behind this and push for the change as war decs and mercs should always be apart of eve and not become what they are starting to and thats boring and *$%^ as this will just make high sec a safe place for all and everywhere should have an element of danger :)

+1 - for the changes above Big smile
Waylan Yutani
SkyLark Insurgency
#7 - 2012-06-03 14:42:55 UTC
+1 for op
Private Pineapple
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#8 - 2012-06-03 15:26:02 UTC
Aesheera wrote:
*real pvp* is found elsewhere

.

LittleTerror
Stygian Systems
#9 - 2012-06-03 15:33:22 UTC
Private Pineapple wrote:
Aesheera wrote:
*real pvp* is found elsewhere


So what point are you trying to make here by quoting this?
Private Pineapple
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#10 - 2012-06-03 15:58:37 UTC
LittleTerror wrote:
Private Pineapple wrote:
Aesheera wrote:
*real pvp* is found elsewhere


So what point are you trying to make here by quoting this?


What point are you trying to make by quoting me and then asking me what point I am trying to make by quoting that?

.

LittleTerror
Stygian Systems
#11 - 2012-06-03 16:03:46 UTC
Private Pineapple wrote:
LittleTerror wrote:
Private Pineapple wrote:
Aesheera wrote:
*real pvp* is found elsewhere


So what point are you trying to make here by quoting this?


What point are you trying to make by quoting me and then asking me what point I am trying to make by quoting that?


That you're a troll.
Kamden Line
Sovereign Citizen and other Tax Evasion Schemes
#12 - 2012-06-03 16:06:54 UTC
Trolls in my C&P? Unpossible!

But seriously, this makes sense. High Sec war decs in their current state are suffering from the law of unintended consequences.
Blackcamper
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#13 - 2012-06-03 16:14:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Blackcamper
hallo all.

i use to be a merc. in hisec and did some wh work as well.

When i saw the changes they where going to make. i shut down my merc corp, The Condemned and Convicted [HAM.]
we then se a new plan, and whent to 0,0. but after just 60 days i was sick of 0,0 rating and pvp out there is just not for me.

Tora Bushido know what happen when i left 0,0

I like the feeling that i get for helping a small corp. that can't fight for them self. And i have never ones taken the isk and not done that job i was pay for.


After jeg cam back to Hisec, i now had to choice if i will go low sec. and go - 10, but i do not feel like doing that as i like to fly in all space. we i stay in Hisec and was going to start the merc corp. ones more, but i need to learn all the new change to the war system.

I believe that it is so hard to war dec some one, as in the mail. all of sudden you have 900+ target on the defender side.
so i hope that ccp will see that they have kill merc work. even if there plan was to make it better, but whit all new things there are bugs to work out and i hope the ccp will take to hart what the Hisec pvp'ers are saying.

I belive that the defender have to pay the war dec fee if a ally joins his war. and a min of 50 - 100 mil must be pay to the ally.

there are many things that need to be work on and to think that we are going to get a easy fix, that will not happen.

there is always room to make a system better and more so that all can be part of it. but it will take some time.

Now if any like to know more about what happen in 0,0

the 0,0 rip off


Tora Bushido I'l see you in space

Blackcamper

There Was NO WARNING Of Their ARRIVAL! They Had No MERCY! They Gave NO QUARTER!

http://screenshotuploader.com/s/1307gxodd

Cetaphil Thrace
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#14 - 2012-06-03 17:06:42 UTC
+1 for OP, great post.
Cannibal Kane
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#15 - 2012-06-03 17:30:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Cannibal Kane
A simple limit on the number of allies will make corps look alot harder when it comes to whom they want as an ally.

Right now 99% of allies consist of trade hub station campers or your larger than life faction fleets where there are more RR ships than actual DPS ships.

ANother thing i noticed is that a corp at war with another corp. can join that corp as an ally agaist somebody else. That is a flaw that should not have been overlooked.

also, as I said from before the patch... the stacking cost for wars is ******** right now. 300mil a week to dec 3 corps....

"Kane is the End Boss of Highsec." -Psychotic Monk

Karloth Valois
1st. Pariah Malefactor corp.
The New Eden Yacht Club.
#16 - 2012-06-03 17:31:34 UTC
Personally I think there should be a limit to the number of allies, thats all the needs to change. If the defender could only have say two allies for a war (any other would have to war dec the aggressor themself like they used to) but can kick allies out if they are usless. This will improve the merc market place since people will kick out corp that are just joining wars incase they happen to bump into a War target in space and replace them with corp that will actively hunt targets.

Allies will be better selected even if they are free, Mercs will still have a place in highsec wars, people that are war-deccing corps (whether you like it or not) will be able to carry on with ending up being a target for all of highsec, and the defenders can still have the help they need, either by free corps just joining for targets or hireing proper mercs.

It's not been nice, but thanks for using lube

Private Pineapple
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#17 - 2012-06-03 20:06:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Private Pineapple
LittleTerror wrote:
Private Pineapple wrote:
LittleTerror wrote:
Private Pineapple wrote:
Aesheera wrote:
*real pvp* is found elsewhere


So what point are you trying to make here by quoting this?


What point are you trying to make by quoting me and then asking me what point I am trying to make by quoting that?


That you're a troll.


Nonsense!

Seriously though, if you want real attention on this kind of thing then it should have been posted in General Discussion.

I'm not 100% sure on how the CSM politics thingy works, but you could always lobby the CSM and try to get someone on the council to voice your arguments.

.

BringerMC
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#18 - 2012-06-03 20:28:38 UTC
Well said. Current system is borked beyond belief and many people made it loud and clear that it was a stupid idea before CCP implemented it but they still went ahead, When your MERCS say this is broken and don't work and it is targeted against them you should listen to them. Instead honestly think CCP listened to all the wrong people, mainly themselves. CCP should have learned by now that their "IDEAS" suck 70% of the time, such as the unified inventory that I heard no one saying they wanted but CCP game to us anyway and borked everything up.

Join **The Ghost Division **Today! Because Pac-man ghosts driving Panzers can't be beat.

Aesheera
Doomheim
#19 - 2012-06-03 20:32:36 UTC
Private Pineapple wrote:

Seriously though, if you want real attention on this kind of thing then it should have been posted in General Discussion.

I tend to agree, but having to post in one particular forum to draw attention when it is clearly about crime and punishment makes no sense to me.

CCP lazyness if that's the truth.

In any case, it's good to see many people posting in here in a civil fashion.
IMO it deserves attention and a thorough revamp, because - as i said before - the current state is detrimental and the amount of people enjoying Empire decs is close to non existant, simply due to the fact that this is SO horribly implemented it makes baby jesus cry.

- I think my passion is misinterpreted as anger sometimes. And I don't think people are ready for the message that I'm delivering, and delivering with a sense of violent love.

Private Pineapple
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#20 - 2012-06-03 20:38:56 UTC
Aesheera wrote:
Private Pineapple wrote:

Seriously though, if you want real attention on this kind of thing then it should have been posted in General Discussion.

I tend to agree, but having to post in one particular forum to draw attention when it is clearly about crime and punishment makes no sense to me.

CCP lazyness if that's the truth.

In any case, it's good to see many people posting in here in a civil fashion.
IMO it deserves attention and a thorough revamp, because - as i said before - the current state is detrimental and the amount of people enjoying Empire decs is close to non existant, simply due to the fact that this is SO horribly implemented it makes baby jesus cry.


The problem is that all of the rabble and serious trolls are posting in GD all the time so it's hard to get a serious discussion on there without having these things happen: thread derailing, trolls posting on either side of argument, and many more...

The more serious problem is that everyone looks at GD, so all "serious discussions" are expected to pop up in there. I doubt CCP will take most discussions on C&P seriously because you can't make a change based on what a particular subforum wants so it has to be a change that appeals to the masses (aka it has to be discussed on GD where it will get plenty of exposure to many different groups/playstyles).

.

123Next pageLast page