These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123
 

Mining: What's the Hulkageddon End Game?

Author
Richard Desturned
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#41 - 2012-06-02 08:38:41 UTC
Chopper Rollins wrote:
Nobody's mentioned RMT yet.

Why?



Good point, a lot of RMT farmers end up getting their Hulk bots killed during Hulkageddon.

npc alts have no opinions worth consideration

Rico Minali
Sons Of 0din
Commonwealth Vanguard
#42 - 2012-06-02 08:48:03 UTC
I think teh end game here is to make miners understand that they are not and should not be invulnerable and should tank their ships, defend their operations and stop trying to get CCP to do teh game for them. It takes minimal effort to protect yourself to a significant level.

Trust me, I almost know what I'm doing.

Singoth
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#43 - 2012-06-02 10:16:48 UTC
Don't worry, eventually mineral prices are so high that one mining session will earn you billions. Goons are buffing mining. :D

Less yappin', more zappin'!

Makkal Hanaya
Revenent Defence Corperation
#44 - 2012-06-02 10:28:01 UTC
James 315 wrote:
Paxx Bello wrote:
It seems to me that most of the participants in Hulkageddon are of the general mindset that "high sec mining is over lulz". Is the actual intent of Hulkageddon to remove high sec mining from the game?

I can't speak for everyone, but I personally would love to see the removal of highsec mining from the game.

It would make those new player tutorial missions more interesting, I'll give you that.

Render unto Khanid the things which are Khanid's; and unto God the things that are God's.

Mallak Azaria
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#45 - 2012-06-02 10:31:44 UTC
The point is to make grown men go from this, to this.

This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal, proud member of the popular gay hookup site somethingawful.com, Spelling Bee, Grammar Gestapo & #1 Official Gevlon Goblin Fanclub member.

Chopper Rollins
Brave Newbies Inc.
Brave Collective
#46 - 2012-06-02 11:07:21 UTC
Richard Desturned wrote:
Chopper Rollins wrote:
Nobody's mentioned RMT yet.

Why?



Good point, a lot of RMT farmers end up getting their Hulk bots killed during Hulkageddon.



But not Goon ones, right?


Right?


Goggles. Making me look good. Making you look good.

Roisin Saoirse
Doomheim
#47 - 2012-06-02 13:34:40 UTC
Richard Desturned wrote:
Chopper Rollins wrote:
Nobody's mentioned RMT yet.

Why?



Good point, a lot of RMT farmers end up getting their Hulk bots killed during Hulkageddon.

Proof?
Quartzlight Evenstar Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Operations
#48 - 2012-06-02 13:41:33 UTC
The ENDGAME is the unplugging of the Tranquility Server due to Lack of Interest or Fun.

***

VaMei
Meafi Corp
#49 - 2012-06-02 16:50:22 UTC
Denidil wrote:
you really are a bloody idiot with no understanding of the eve economy. i hope you enjoy inflation because idiots like you are the single biggest cause of it in eve - forget incursions.. ******* up the mineral economy is the fastest way to raise prices in eve across the board.


You say that like it was a bad thing.
IMO, it's about damned time that live miners got paid for their time, and the 'mining profession' was something other than a joke left to bots & AFKers.
I'm happy to see ship prices climb too. People have been flying best in class at any cost for far too long, rather than thinking of bang for your buck.
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#50 - 2012-06-02 16:59:51 UTC
VaMei wrote:

IMO, it's about damned time that live miners got paid for their time, and the 'mining profession' was something other than a joke left to bots & AFKers.
I'm happy to see ship prices climb too. People have been flying best in class at any cost for far too long, rather than thinking of bang for your buck.


It is still a joke. It will be until they make it something more interesting than watching paint dry.
Spikeflach
Perkone
Caldari State
#51 - 2012-06-02 17:02:04 UTC
I have at least seen people posting proof that it is for making profit for Goonswarm alliance as well as getting rid of the supposed abomination of hi sec mining.

And that is straight from the horses mouth.
VaMei
Meafi Corp
#52 - 2012-06-02 17:21:31 UTC
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
VaMei wrote:
IMO, it's about damned time that live miners got paid for their time, and the 'mining profession' was something other than a joke left to bots & AFKers.
I'm happy to see ship prices climb too. People have been flying best in class at any cost for far too long, rather than thinking of bang for your buck.

It is still a joke. It will be until they make it something more interesting than watching paint dry.


Granted. The game play of mining, if you can even call it that, sucks in a big way. I think it's the only aspect of Eve that's had zero iteration other than bigger/better/more. Hell, even E&B mining involved doing something. There have been tons of ideas offered to CCP about how they could make mining more interactive, but we have what we have.

I still stand by my point; if CCP wants live players to do a job that you don't want to do, you need to pay them to do it. I don't think that paying hi-sec miners 20-30Misk/hr for their skills & ship is unfair when compared to players that skill into a Drake to run 4s.
If that's not what CCP wants, they need to drop the presence, bring back gun mining & eliminate ore mining.
Widow Cain
#53 - 2012-06-02 17:25:56 UTC
Danika Princip wrote:
Pretty sure the actual intention is threads like this.


Yep, little boys, and young men who have not grow up properly, have low self esteem and no life get the attention they crave by smashing things.

It is kind of sad and pathetic really.

OMG You are sooo pixel macho...

James 315
Experimental Fun Times Corp RELOADED
CODE.
#54 - 2012-06-02 17:29:30 UTC
Widow Cain wrote:
Yep, little boys, and young men who have not grow up properly, have low self esteem and no life get the attention they crave by smashing things.

It is kind of sad and pathetic really.

Please tell us more about the heroic, well-adjusted, accomplished men who spend their days piling up rocks, all so they can have them disappear when they unsubscribe. Truly these are the role models of EVE. Lol
James 315
Experimental Fun Times Corp RELOADED
CODE.
#55 - 2012-06-02 19:25:01 UTC
Denidil wrote:
you really are a bloody idiot with no understanding of the eve economy. i hope you enjoy inflation because idiots like you are the single biggest cause of it in eve - forget incursions.. ******* up the mineral economy is the fastest way to raise prices in eve across the board.

You misunderstand. I have no interest in maintaining the status quo on prices. I don't care if inflation occurs.
James 315
Experimental Fun Times Corp RELOADED
CODE.
#56 - 2012-06-02 19:26:53 UTC
Barbara Nichole wrote:
dumb as a stump... the idea behind a "sandbox" is there is no intended play.. Many things have been nerfed in the past because they bothered ccp.. Laser gate camps nerfed so badly Amarr almost didn't recover. why? because a large corp was using them to hold people out of one area by alpha-striking hundreds who tried the gate.... stealth time bombs in high sec and don't forget the nerfs that have gone the other way.. mostly nerfs on empire value. if this was truly a "sandbox" those things should remain using your logic.

I suspect we haven't seen the last nerf.. and I wouldn't be surprised to see a "rebalance" of ganking strength in some fashion.

The problem with your argument was thoroughly dissected in my Manifesto II. Suicide ganking has already been "rebalanced" on multiple occasions. In fact, it may even be the most frequently nerfed thing in EVE. So you have apparently fallen victim to the "one more nerf" syndrome...Nothing personal, it's a very common affliction among certain elements...
Thor Kerrigan
Guardians of Asceticism
#57 - 2012-06-02 19:34:17 UTC
Le Dei Opus wrote:
Gabriel Kaile wrote:
Archimedes Eratosthenes wrote:
Rengerel en Distel wrote:
The purpose of hulkageddon is to make even more money for goonswarm, while feasting on supposed tears from miners. I'm sure both endeavors are fruitful enough for them to consider it pretty successful.



You are wrong.

The purpose of Hulkageddon is to allow The Butthurt Mitanni to get revenge on CCP for his 30-day ban by striking at their wallet.


How exactly did he strike at their wallet?

Gabriel Kaile, Order of Merlin, Third Class, Honorary Member of the Dark Force Defense League, five time winner of Goonwaffe Weekly's Most-Charming Smile award


I once had four extra accounts for mining, three of them were closed last month and the last one is being closed as of this month with a permanent announcement of Hulkageddon.

Since taking my Tengu into WH's is more profitable and less risky than high sec mining, you can understand why I'd do this. Also I only need one account, my main account.

So CCP lost 4 of my 5 subscriptions and a rather robust source of tritanium. Many others with alt mining accounts have followed through with what I have done. I'm I'm going to be forced to watch my screen endlessly, I may as well do something enjoyable and more profitable like WH's.


Working as intended.
EVE Roy Mustang
Doomheim
#58 - 2012-06-02 19:38:53 UTC
Paxx Bello wrote:
I'm relatively new to EVE, having only started playing in late December 2011. I've never really done much mining, but the small amount of mining I've done (in a Retriever) seems to indicate to me that it's a relatively low profit scheme -- in high sec and, to an extent, in worm holes.

It seems to me that most of the participants in Hulkageddon are of the general mindset that "high sec mining is over lulz". Is the actual intent of Hulkageddon to remove high sec mining from the game?

(And if so, what is the proposed mechanism for 'picking up the slack' in the mineral market?)


"for the lulz" which is the definitiobn of harassment ganking in the actual rules... but vOv
Ris Dnalor
Tribal Liberation Force
Minmatar Republic
#59 - 2012-06-02 23:15:00 UTC
Paxx Bello wrote:
I'm relatively new to EVE, having only started playing in late December 2011. I've never really done much mining, but the small amount of mining I've done (in a Retriever) seems to indicate to me that it's a relatively low profit scheme -- in high sec and, to an extent, in worm holes.

It seems to me that most of the participants in Hulkageddon are of the general mindset that "high sec mining is over lulz". Is the actual intent of Hulkageddon to remove high sec mining from the game?

(And if so, what is the proposed mechanism for 'picking up the slack' in the mineral market?)



They need something to do, that's the end game in eve... finding something fun to do :)

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=118961

EvE = Everybody Vs. Everybody

  • Qolde
Yonis Kador
KADORCORP
#60 - 2012-06-03 08:09:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Yonis Kador
I was always under the impression that the real Hulkageddon (Helicity's prize contest) was created to eliminate mining bots from the game. It may have evolved into a shoot-em-all nowadays, but I thought that was the original intent. Players were frustrated that CCP wasn't acting on an issue they deemed serious so they created a little player-generated content.

I'm less sure there can be an endgame with a neverending Goonageddon. To see what happens maybe? Because they can? Or is it something much-better thought out involving mineral speculation and artificial market inflation? All of the above?

While I'm not personally fond of "ganking" ships that can't fight back, I certainly recognize that in principle, pvp is good for the game's economy. People who lose ships buy new ones. Those ships have mineral costs. Goons are targeting hulks specifically because that benefits their industry but even when they lose 4-5 dessies in their ganks, their losses should benefit the high-sec mineral market.

It's not about hatred. (or at least I hope it isn't) It's not about destroying high-sec. It can't be. That makes no sense. If there's any long-term objective, I'm sure it comes back around to profit and greed. (Which, if proven true, is pretty ironic since I read so many posts about how carebears are evil, greedy, b@stards.) Nothing wrong with it. Greed is a boon to success in a capitalistic system.

The only other thing that even comes to mind is that for the past couple years there's been a notable push to make EVE more pvp-centric. And yes I've heard all the scenarios. (Even mining is pvp etc. Sandboxxx! I got it.) It sorta makes you wonder if the powers that be, through intervention or nonintervention, have ulterior motives of their own. Too many people in high sec? Not enough people in low? Some kind of predictive modeling fortelling disaster and moves like this are meant to combat them? Who knows? For all we know, CCP could be using bots to manipulate its own market...

Just remember gankers. Your lil gank ship needs to cost less than 10m iskies or you'll lose isk doing this. hehe

Some people are terrible at math.

Yonis Kador
Previous page123