These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Eve mottos: Adapt or die, Eve is hard, HTFU

Author
Simetraz
State War Academy
Caldari State
#41 - 2012-06-01 16:49:12 UTC
Spikeflach wrote:
Perhaps one could say that the hi sec dwellers are looking to get the most tears from those that claim they are hardcore?

But most of the ganker types aren't doing it for the tears as they all have clearly stated....

Eve is harsh, and people keep looking for the best way to get the most tears from another person. If the hi sec dwellers do what the big guys are saying and somehow take up arms, its givnig the big guys what they want and no tears will be shed.


Exactly
People once again are trying to dictate what a person does in game.
It is never going to happen.

In the end even though ganking doesn't need to be nerfed that is what is going to happen.
Eventually CCP is going to be forced to do something and past history shows us when a mechanic is used to much it gets nerfed.

Gankers are just shooting themselves in the foot.




Dessau
The Scope
#42 - 2012-06-01 16:55:58 UTC
Anazzar wrote:
Im not trying to be tough, im in a corporation called howling Stones Mining hardly a hardman image is it?

Hardman Image would be a great corp name.
Keia Nomesteturj
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#43 - 2012-06-01 17:04:47 UTC
Anazzar wrote:
An interesting take on things, perhaps then all this forum whining is just another aspect of eve warfare, I like the thought but I doubt it to be honest.


I think you're onto something. Working the forums has become part of the game of influencing the Eve Online universe. Hiseccers should continue to post frequently, speak loudly and advocate for their vision(s) of the their part of the sandbox. And its working...in the past few months CCP has slowly limited hisec mechanics to make ganking less easy/profitable. There's room to go before the majority of hisec folks feel a proper balance has been struck between risk and reward, so we should continue to advocate for proper balance (from our perspective, of course).

Mitt and his lemmings have worked the forums to great effect for a long time now. Hiseccers should continue to do the same.
Khadann
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#44 - 2012-06-01 17:16:32 UTC
Simetraz wrote:
Spikeflach wrote:
Perhaps one could say that the hi sec dwellers are looking to get the most tears from those that claim they are hardcore?

But most of the ganker types aren't doing it for the tears as they all have clearly stated....

Eve is harsh, and people keep looking for the best way to get the most tears from another person. If the hi sec dwellers do what the big guys are saying and somehow take up arms, its givnig the big guys what they want and no tears will be shed.


Exactly
People once again are trying to dictate what a person does in game.
It is never going to happen.

In the end even though ganking doesn't need to be nerfed that is what is going to happen.
Eventually CCP is going to be forced to do something and past history shows us when a mechanic is used to much it gets nerfed.

Gankers are just shooting themselves in the foot.



Can't wait for the devblog detailing crimewatch for december and how ccp will somehow increase even more the difficulty of ganking. They should not remove it though.
RAP ACTION HERO
#45 - 2012-06-01 17:25:16 UTC
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:
The truer EVE motto: play my way or go away!

lol so your way is to afk mine in a cargo rigged hulk

and if forum whining is the new metagame i quit.

vitoc erryday

Velicitia
XS Tech
#46 - 2012-06-01 17:34:00 UTC
Twulf wrote:

EvE has sandbox elements but is not a sandbox.
If EvE was a true sandbox, this ganking miners in highsec would not be an issue at all because Miners could equip hulks with guns and pretend to mine until a ganker showed up. Then Said Hulk would ambush the ganker and gankers would have to worry about something for once.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CARHyF3jkHI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b5JwBz89_cQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ndWUlntJ58U
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XWxa6fFRtEA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U4n8UGqY0mY

Not saying any of these are good ... but seems that it can be done.

One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia

Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy
Caldari State
#47 - 2012-06-01 18:14:53 UTC
So, OP is trying to say that anyone who gets ganked in hisec should biomass and start ganking character.

Where's sandbox element in this game if there's only one thing you're allowed to do? Sounds more like theme park MMO or Elder Scrolls game to me.
Anazzar
Polaris Space Industries
#48 - 2012-06-01 18:21:07 UTC
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
So, OP is trying to say that anyone who gets ganked in hisec should biomass and start ganking character.

Where's sandbox element in this game if there's only one thing you're allowed to do? Sounds more like theme park MMO or Elder Scrolls game to me.


No YOU are saying that, please dont put words in my mouth and its not true, also the quit & gimmie your stuff is a joke thats old as hell, christ thought everyone would see that.
Cutout Man
Doomheim
#49 - 2012-06-01 18:54:06 UTC
Anazzar wrote:
Possibly yes, but that's introducing a NEW mechanic that also goes against the statement "eve is hard" if you can just pay2win.

suicide ganking is nothing new, the only thing that has changed is the number of players who feel that CCP should protect them from pvp

I didnt mean to say that people shouldn't complain about game mechanics of eve, but eves style of pvp is arguably a founding aspect and it is what sets it apart from other games.

If you can't see the irony in your statement, I'm not sure you can be helped. New has nothing to do with it. Your core argument is "this is the way the game works, deal with it." That means no complaints: adapt, die, or play something else. Just because the current cause d'jour isn't your issue, doesn't mean it isn't valid. You're argument is turning from "adapt or die" to "here are the things you are allowed to complain about." Whatever CCP introduces, adapt or die, whether its gold ammo or pets or whatever the f*ck. Follow your own ethos or shut up.
Indahmawar Fazmarai
#50 - 2012-06-01 19:11:08 UTC
Lharanai wrote:
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:
Anazzar wrote:
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:
The truer EVE motto: play my way or go away!


That doesn't really make much sense, I feel adapt or die is still more fitting.

Getting ganked mining is highsec? adapt

Oh you lack the skill/organisation/willpower to adapt? then die (then cry on the fourms).


Only animals adapt to environment, whereas humans strive to adapt the environment to themselves by any means.



FACEPALM, another one of these who believe that humans belong to a higher order and are not animals...and about only humans adapt their environment please see for example: ants, corals, birds.

Biota
Eukarya
Animalia
Chordata
Mammalia - yay we belong to the same clade as dolphins :)
Primates - you know, just because we have been the first (prime) chapter in Linne's classification
Hominidae
Homo sapiens - thats us.

P.s. sorry for not posting on the topic :)


I am sure that your point would make a lot of sense if we weren't talking about cultural adaptation in a videogame forum.

Also, if you are to blame someone for using lame biological analogies, it should be the OP and his victorian era conception of what "adaptation" means.
Selinate
#51 - 2012-06-01 19:36:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Selinate
Anazzar wrote:


Selinate wrote:
And your OP is the common species of thread that is "I'm real tough. I play Eve. Eve is hard. It is mean to you".

But go ahead and feel free to keep trying to look tough on internet spaceships forum.


"Inventing a fictitious persona with actions or beliefs which are then criticized, implying that the person represents a group of whom the speaker is critical."

seems like a strawman to me, feel free to prove me wrong though I am keenly waiting for you to post somthing useful.

And this thread seems like a debate to me, lots of people disagreeing/argreeing.


"A straw man is a type of argument and is an informal fallacy based on misrepresentation of an opponent's position.[1] To "attack a straw man" is to create the illusion of having refuted a proposition by replacing it with a superficially similar yet unequivalent proposition (the "straw man"), and refuting it, without ever having actually refuted the original position"

Thanks wikipedia.

The only argument we're having is about what a straw man is. What I originally said was not a straw man to your OP. It was an observation. My second observation is that your IQ isn't very high, due to the fact that you are trying to be a previously stated internet tough guy. I was never trying to say that Eve is not hard, hence I was never trying to disprove your point, and hence... I hope you get it now...

And just because other's are agreeing or disagreeing, that does not mean I'm debating. I'm not.
Mina Hiragi
Perkone
Caldari State
#52 - 2012-06-01 19:44:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Mina Hiragi
Twulf wrote:
If these so called "Big guys" want PvP then why are they ganking unarmed ships? Oh right they do not want PVP they want to pad the kill board, end of story.


End of story? Your story sucks, and you're a terrible author, with terrible editors. There are far more lucrative and easier ways to pad a killboard.

Twulf wrote:
Ganking a unarmed ship is not PVP, not even close.


A player destroying another player's ship seems to fit within the definition of 'player vs. player'.

Of course, it doesn't fit into the delusional "meaning" of 'PvP' as per the Most Chivalric Order of the Chivalric e-Knights of Internet Chivalry. Thankfully, those people don't have the power to redefine common terms.

Twulf wrote:
EvE is a ganking and griefing game, not a pvp game. Sure there are so PvP players but mostly fake PvP players that will never engage in a fair fight ever.


In short, EVE is a PvP game, not a lol Internet e-honor dueling game.

If you're engaging in a fair fight, you completely suck at what you're doing.
Totalrx
NA No Assholes
#53 - 2012-06-01 19:58:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Totalrx
Quote:
If you find yourself in a fair fight, you didn't plan your mission properly.
(Col. David Hackworth)


Eve is not a game of equals where "may the better man win" mindset is the rule.

Eve is a game a "may the smarter and better prepared man win".

Honestly, I haven't PvP'ed on this toon. I will eventually, but right now I find mission running to be a stress reliever from being a Regional Technical Program Manager.

I'm still not dumb enough to think that if I am running loot and salvage to sell that my ship can't or won't get ganked. I also keep an eye out for a posible gank while mission running. I also do not think it's unfair that the spoils of my hard work could easily wind up in the hands of a suicide ganker in a manner of seconds. They'll get to sell my loot and I'll have to buy another ship and start the process f building up my stores all over again.

That's Eve.

That's why I play Eve.

It's not safe. It's not without risk of losing everything I have on me.

Rather than trying to change Eve to fit your style of preferred playing, maybe you should allow some change in yourself by embracing the risk of the unexpected and calculating consequences for everything you do and everywhere you go. If you change it in a game, maybe it will spread to other areas of your life and you can start recognizing opportunities to take hold of and have the courage to do so. Maybe you'll start paying more attention to what's going on around you and realize that someone is attempting to take advantage of you before they actually succeed.

I got lucky last night. I was an idiot and headed out with about 65 million worth (sale price, not market average) of spolis in my hold. After I docked and opened up my inventory, I about crapped myself that I made it considering I auto-piloted for two jumps to take a wiz. If I had lost everything, I would not blame the gankers or CCP. I know the risks and I goofed up and brought more than I should have. I would have only blamed myself.

Worked out in my favor. Caught the market at a good spot and had alot of items that were in the green over market average.

If you want safe and predictable, then Eve is not, and hopefully will not ever be what you want.
Harbonah
Short Bus Window Licker
#54 - 2012-06-01 21:50:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Harbonah
Suicide ganking in high sec in a nutshell

1. Risk free first strike capability 100% of the time for the ganker

2. Ganker gets to choose the target and his weapon of which the smaller a ship is the less risk involved while still being able to kill it's enemy.

3. The miner is forced to trade protection for mining capability with dimishing returns on mining M3 while only getting marginal decreases in risk unless they trade out for a Battleship.


The ganker gets to attack and kill their enemy while their buddy collects the loot. RIsk free since the ganker will always respawn as there is no permadeath.

The miner takes all the risk as they risk both expensive ships and all the work they put into mining for the mostly pathetic return you get in high sec.


Sounds like miner ganking is the ultimate carebear activity to me. Completely risk free and the ganker knows and 100% controls exactly what he can lose without sacrificing his ability to kill his target.



Lets balance the risk equation.

CCP's next patch
High Sec Ganking
- Effective immediately Concord has declared an intent to crack down on criminals in high sec. In an efforts to do so Concord has fitted all cloning facilities with and electronic tagging system to identify and biomass any clone killed in high sec with a -7 sec rating or below.


Now those big bad miner killers have something to risk. No so eager to go out and pod kill newbies in high sec are you?


I demand you HTFU and request that CCP make permadeath a reality for criminals killed in High Sec. Then you can all fight each other in Low and Null sec and never have to see another carebear again unless you want to risk permadeath for the reward of killing a miner.

I
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#55 - 2012-06-01 22:01:31 UTC
Harbonah wrote:
Suicide ganking in high sec in a nutshell

1. Risk free first strike capability 100% of the time for the ganker

2. Ganker gets to choose the target and his weapon of which the smaller a ship is the less risk involved while still being able to kill it's enemy.

3. The miner is forced to trade protection for mining capability with dimishing returns on mining M3 while only getting marginal decreases in risk unless they trade out for a Battleship.


The ganker gets to attack and kill their enemy while their buddy collects the loot. RIsk free since the ganker will always respawn as there is no permadeath.

The miner takes all the risk as they risk both expensive ships and all the work they put into mining for the mostly pathetic return you get in high sec.


Sounds like miner ganking is the ultimate carebear activity to me. Completely risk free and the ganker knows and 100% controls exactly what he can lose without sacrificing his ability to kill his target.



Lets balance the risk equation.

CCP's next patch
High Sec Ganking
- Effective immediately Concord has declared an intent to crack down on criminals in high sec. In an efforts to do so Concord has fitted all cloning facilities with and electronic tagging system to identify and biomass any clone killed in high sec with a -7 sec rating or below.


Now those big bad miner killers have something to risk. No so eager to go out and pod kill newbies in high sec are you?


I demand you HTFU and request that CCP make permadeath a reality for criminals killed in High Sec. Then you can all fight each other in Low and Null sec and never have to see another carebear again unless you want to risk permadeath for the reward of killing a miner.

I


Not so long ago you would have been celebrating the end of insurance payouts on gankboats and saying this is the end of mass ganking. You were wrong then and you are wrong now. This game is perfectly balanced in that, people who chose to not fit a tank are exposed to greater risk. Dont want that destroyer killing your hulk? Then protect yourself.

Ganking is here to stay and 9 years of EVE history tells us that it will not hurt the game.
Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy
Caldari State
#56 - 2012-06-01 23:20:21 UTC
Anazzar wrote:
No YOU are saying that, please dont put words in my mouth and its not true, also the quit & gimmie your stuff is a joke thats old as hell, christ thought everyone would see that.


Well, then you probably can say what miners should do. Tbh, there's not much miners can do.

- Defensive fleet can't attack gankers before they start their gank.
- Locking destroyers takes years in cruisers (designed for anti-destroyer tasks).
- Smartbombs? Not very good idea in hisec.
- Tanked mining ships can and will be ganked.
Yonis Kador
KADORCORP
#57 - 2012-06-02 00:47:10 UTC
Mhax Arthie wrote:
HTFU .. I didn't know what this means so I made a search. Was a huge surprise to see this clip Permaband - HTFU on the first page of results ...

This is an official ccp clip.. not sure to laugh or cry :| Maybe I'm wrong, but the guys in the clip are making their living on our wallet.



lmao

I hadn't seen this before. Thank you for posting this link.

I lol'd every single time I saw Sveinn's gold chains.

That pimp got some bling!

Effin' Hilarious.

Yonis Kador
Large Marg
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#58 - 2012-06-02 02:19:51 UTC
I'm not retreating, just advancing in a different direction.
Jake Warbird
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#59 - 2012-06-02 02:26:20 UTC
Many of you should log into the game and see for yourselves. It's not all 'The sky is falling!' like you make it out to be.
Le Dei Opus
Doomheim
#60 - 2012-06-02 03:16:46 UTC
Anazzar wrote:


There are ways round hulkageddon


Sir this thread contains a prize for you

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=116399