These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

I think its time to take a vacation..
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Cutter Isaacson
DEDSEC SAN FRANCISCO
#21 - 2012-06-01 15:12:27 UTC
Quartzlight Evenstar Icefluxor wrote:
Musashi IV wrote:


I think all high-sec players should think about taking a vacation from EVE. The only thing CCP cares about is monitary loss. This is the only way high-sec players can get thier attention.




(tick tick tick tick) 2 accounts with 15 days left. 2 already dead. Done and done.


You really seem to like repeating that don't you? Are you related to NickYo?

"The truth is usually just an excuse for a lack of imagination." Elim Garak.
Bunnie Hop
Bunny Knights
#22 - 2012-06-01 15:20:38 UTC
Cutter Isaacson wrote:
Quartzlight Evenstar Icefluxor wrote:
Musashi IV wrote:


I think all high-sec players should think about taking a vacation from EVE. The only thing CCP cares about is monitary loss. This is the only way high-sec players can get thier attention.




(tick tick tick tick) 2 accounts with 15 days left. 2 already dead. Done and done.


You really seem to like repeating that don't you? Are you related to NickYo?


You're such an angry person, heres a song for you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AtzIWPeun7c
Nyreanya
Serenity Labs
#23 - 2012-06-01 15:21:38 UTC
gfldex wrote:
If you have 100B in the bank you don't mine.
If you have that money, you likely play the game how you want. Just because you don't enjoy mining, doesn't mean other people don't.

[/sarcasm]
Aggressive Nutmeg
#24 - 2012-06-01 15:21:49 UTC
We've had hulkageddon. Ho hum.

We've had Burn Jita. Ho hum.

So, do you really want to have an impact on the game?

Vote with your wallet and watch the goonswarm virus die. Big smile

Never make eye contact with someone while eating a banana.
NickyYo
modro
Northern Coalition.
#25 - 2012-06-01 15:27:34 UTC
Ludi Burek wrote:
Ah, yet another pretend quitter... or troll ofc.


I think the EvE online statistic graph speaks for its self.
You sir are just in denial.

..
Mallak Azaria
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#26 - 2012-06-01 15:33:18 UTC
Musashi IV wrote:
CCP has allowed Goonswarm to circumvent these game mechanics.


Are you implying that they're using some form of exploit? Some elaboration is required.

This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal, proud member of the popular gay hookup site somethingawful.com, Spelling Bee, Grammar Gestapo & #1 Official Gevlon Goblin Fanclub member.
Snow Axe
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#27 - 2012-06-01 15:39:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Snow Axe
Mallak Azaria wrote:
Musashi IV wrote:
CCP has allowed Goonswarm to circumvent these game mechanics.


Are you implying that they're using some form of exploit? Some elaboration is required.


Everything in the game that could be percieved as a negative by any player at any time is the fault of Goonswarm and the influence we obviously must have on CCP (did you hear 2 former members work for CCP now???????????????????????). Our influence is so strong that we managed to convince some Icelandic fellows to create a non-consentual PVP game 9 years ago. Just to make sure we didn't get found out, we waited 3 years to even truly ~reveal ourselves~ in game, but unfortunately, the intrepid AFK mining Hulk crowd has found us out.

"Look any reason why you need to talk like that? I have now reported you. I dont need to listen to your bad tone. If you cant have a grown up conversation then leave the thread["
Jill Xelitras
Xeltec services
#28 - 2012-06-01 15:41:19 UTC
Remove all asteroids from high-sec, problem solved Big smile

Don't anger the forum gods.

ISD Buldath:

> I Saw, I came, I Frowned, I locked, I posted, and I left.
Quartzlight Evenstar Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Operations
#29 - 2012-06-01 15:43:10 UTC
Jill Xelitras wrote:
Remove all asteroids from high-sec, problem solved Big smile


May as well. Ain't gonna be nobody 'round to mine 'em eeenyways.

***
Vaju Enki
Secular Wisdom
#30 - 2012-06-01 15:43:16 UTC
We will remember you forever.

The Tears Must Flow
Bunnie Hop
Bunny Knights
#31 - 2012-06-01 15:44:03 UTC
Snow Axe wrote:
Mallak Azaria wrote:
Musashi IV wrote:
CCP has allowed Goonswarm to circumvent these game mechanics.


Are you implying that they're using some form of exploit? Some elaboration is required.


Everything in the game that could be percieved as a negative by any player at any time is the fault of Goonswarm and the influence we obviously must have on CCP (did you hear 2 former members work for CCP now???????????????????????). Our influence is so strong that we managed to convince some Icelandic fellows to create a non-consentual PVP game 9 years ago. Just to make sure we didn't get found out, we waited 3 years to even truly ~reveal ourselves~ in game, but unfortunately, the intrepid AFK mining Hulk crowd has found us out.


You should clean your keyboard more often, that ? key seems stuck. But yes, everything is subjective as seems your point but it does seem the balance that existed is gone. Large alliances seem to exert their will on the entire population but the goons will fade into memory at some point as every other bully alliance has. I would like to see alliance size limited, more alliances would form then and battle it out.
Quartzlight Evenstar Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Operations
#32 - 2012-06-01 15:47:50 UTC
Bunnie Hop wrote:
I would like to see alliance size limited, more alliances would form then and battle it out.



Better: Corporations ONLY. Twisted

***
Snow Axe
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#33 - 2012-06-01 15:48:03 UTC
Bunnie Hop wrote:
You should clean your keyboard more often, that ? key seems stuck. But yes, everything is subjective as seems your point but it does seem the balance that existed is gone. Large alliances seem to exert their will on the entire population but the goons will fade into memory at some point as every other bully alliance has. I would like to see alliance size limited, more alliances would form then and battle it out.


Great idea, instead of fighting Goonswarm Federation, you could be fighting Goonswarm1, Goonswarm2, and Goonswarm3!

Fun fact: The corporation GoonWaffe was originally created when population sizes on corporations was far smaller, and the original GoonFleet was full to capacity. Funny how that didn't change anything at all, did it?

"Look any reason why you need to talk like that? I have now reported you. I dont need to listen to your bad tone. If you cant have a grown up conversation then leave the thread["
Bunnie Hop
Bunny Knights
#34 - 2012-06-01 15:52:52 UTC
Snow Axe wrote:
Bunnie Hop wrote:
You should clean your keyboard more often, that ? key seems stuck. But yes, everything is subjective as seems your point but it does seem the balance that existed is gone. Large alliances seem to exert their will on the entire population but the goons will fade into memory at some point as every other bully alliance has. I would like to see alliance size limited, more alliances would form then and battle it out.


Great idea, instead of fighting Goonswarm Federation, you could be fighting Goonswarm1, Goonswarm2, and Goonswarm3!

Fun fact: The corporation GoonWaffe was originally created when population sizes on corporations was far smaller, and the original GoonFleet was full to capacity. Funny how that didn't change anything at all, did it?


I think you are mistaken about alliance. If goonswarm for example were forced to split it would find its loyalties diverge. Its just human nature as demonstrated many times in experiments (blue vs red arm band exp. comes to mind). When the corp you mentioned was full it still was able to make an alliance corp, so its not the same.
Snow Axe
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#35 - 2012-06-01 15:56:46 UTC
Bunnie Hop wrote:
I think you are mistaken about alliance. If goonswarm for example were forced to split it would find its loyalties diverge. Its just human nature as demonstrated many times in experiments (blue vs red arm band exp. comes to mind). When the corp you mentioned was full it still was able to make an alliance corp, so its not the same.


Ahh I get it, we'd stop working together ~just because~.

"Look any reason why you need to talk like that? I have now reported you. I dont need to listen to your bad tone. If you cant have a grown up conversation then leave the thread["
Caldari Citizen20110707
Doomheim
#36 - 2012-06-01 15:57:04 UTC
if ccp is smart they should have a customer portfolio with the make up, amount and general player profiles. it should tell them that the long term players (the ones that drives the sandbox (o.o dwellers)) are 0.0 players and that high sec character amounts are mosty alts of 0.0 players.... in short: high sec players pnly play a fraction of the time 0.0 players are playing.... 0.0 players make this game... why should ccp continue to listen to these players that quit anyway in a few months? expecialy afyrr the big player decrease when there was a cataclism of canceled subscriptiond due this 5months ago?

quit whining, go do social like eve is desighned and join a 0.0 mining corp or whine that ccp isnt promoting eve more as a social game where it actualy is a social unwritten rule that players should join a player driven corp...


just a quick brainfart
Bunnie Hop
Bunny Knights
#37 - 2012-06-01 15:58:20 UTC
Snow Axe wrote:
Bunnie Hop wrote:
I think you are mistaken about alliance. If goonswarm for example were forced to split it would find its loyalties diverge. Its just human nature as demonstrated many times in experiments (blue vs red arm band exp. comes to mind). When the corp you mentioned was full it still was able to make an alliance corp, so its not the same.


Ahh I get it, we'd stop working together ~just because~.


I believe so, if it were a complete break, its human nature.
Quartzlight Evenstar Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Operations
#38 - 2012-06-01 16:01:37 UTC
Snow Axe wrote:
Bunnie Hop wrote:
I think you are mistaken about alliance. If goonswarm for example were forced to split it would find its loyalties diverge. Its just human nature as demonstrated many times in experiments (blue vs red arm band exp. comes to mind). When the corp you mentioned was full it still was able to make an alliance corp, so its not the same.


Ahh I get it, we'd stop working together ~just because~.



No. Not 'just because'.

The creation suddenly of a bunch of Little Dictators..........we know how that goes historically. They ALL want to be on top. (get the mind out of the gutter).

***
seany1212
M Y S T
#39 - 2012-06-01 16:01:48 UTC
Talon SilverHawk wrote:
Musashi IV wrote:
Yesterday one of my orcas got killed by 7 ships in in hi sec. All of these players had a security rating of -8 or worse. Im very cautious when I mine but you cant hide a Hulk very easily. Normally the high-sec game mechanics work pretty good. CCP has allowed Goonswarm to circumvent these game mechanics. Yes I know this is a sandbox but if someone is circumventing the game mechanics, its an exploit. Im not going to plead proverty. I have enouph ISK to play my three accounts for serveral more years. Why should I if game mechanics allow 7 players with a security rating less than -8 to play in high-sec with emmunity. When CCP has returned hi-sec to more reasonable game play I will return.

I think all high-sec players should think about taking a vacation from EVE. The only thing CCP cares about is monitary loss. This is the only way high-sec players can get thier attention.

Pirates that want my stuff can meet me in Jita at 1930 hours on Saturday.


Enjoy your break, its good sometimes. Hopefully CCP restores balance soon (tm)

Tal




So OP originally wrote orca then changed it for effect and sympathy? But faceless alt is faceless so we'll never know Roll
Snow Axe
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#40 - 2012-06-01 16:02:46 UTC
Bunnie Hop wrote:
I believe so, if it were a complete break, its human nature.


But it's not a complete break, not a real one, anyway. It'd be like saying because one fleet is full it'd never be able to fully co-operate with the second one that formed immediately afterwards because it's ~different~. The only thing that'd truly be different is the ticker name.

"Look any reason why you need to talk like that? I have now reported you. I dont need to listen to your bad tone. If you cant have a grown up conversation then leave the thread["