Assembly Hall

You are the only one whinging like a fail troll.. Ty for keeping the topic alive

You gave no such evidence. I didn't ask for it anyway. Either you agree with the proposal or not. That's all I asked for.

As for your trolling, get a life and move to another topic if you can add something constructive

they HAVE been adding soemthing constructive, they ahve been BUILDING A COUNTER ARGUEMENT to your proposal, while all you've done is whine and complain about people not agreeing with you.

so far ive seen your one sentence of an opinion supporting this topic,
and about 8 paragraphs of irrefutable evidence pointing out that your opinion is based on a faulty perspective of intended game mechanics.

Deliberately not taking sides here, perhaps the OP can explain to me HOW concord is not fulfilling its intended function?

if we outlaw suicide TANKING, more hulks might fit some extenders adn survive a gank or two, wouldnt want to destroy teh ganking dynamic, now would we?

Sorry. I just can't take people who use internet-abbreviations seriously.

Also, if they removed CONCORD now, they'd lose thousands of subscribers.

Thank you all for keeping this thread alive!

Im so glad that it has received so much attention!

So many of you deserve a darwin award.

Do you ever post anything constructive? Are your parents beating you? Are you fat? Do you eat to much candies? Maybe someone stolen your pet?

I hate CONCORD.

That being said, I think the solution to EVE's problem of law and unlawful balancing should take a look to Freelancer and Freelancer mods. Freelancer has both trading and combat, it's an excellent game to play if per say, your waiting for your battleship skills to train and you just can't take thinking about piloting it anymore...



I think interdiction should be easier, and more player involved. I think it should become more frequently able, usable, etc by NPC's and PVP. To counter this there should be certain specific this can be done, such as a "Deep Space Communication Relay" that a player/unlawful NPC used to "amplify interdiction signals".

These locations are static, generally halfway in between major locations/hubs (IE;in between a gate and a station). The higher the security, the higher the likelihood and strength of lawful NPC groups, and the lower the security the lower frequency but higher intensity fights. The fights in lower security would really depend on players attempting to fly in between locations and their pirate counterparts, which would be inevitable.

In addition to being easier to interdict, it should also be noted some sort of anti-Warp Scrambling device should most likely be added, much less paralyzing compared to warp stabilizers, which kill your range ridiculously much.

As is CONCORD really doesn't do anything in my opinion, except stop the flow of the game in a more logical, cop vs robber mentality, a constant "good vs evil" which should naturally happen is somehow relegated relatively to corporations and alliances. I really don't enjoy the thought of you either DIE or you DON'T die. I often feels like there's not enough gray area and complexity in EVE's warp/navigation in between systems. You aren't really forced to meet pirate scum unless they are camping at gates, which I think should start to be discouraged by lawful races by fighting, not "OMG CONCORD CONCORD" boom... or "BOOM TAKE THE PLEX'sCONCORDS COMING!" whew, we escaped. If CONCORD is so strong it's a really, really bizarre universe.

Could we let this terrible thread die with some dignity please? (ie, stop posting in it)

Thank you.