Assembly Hall

A pilot belonging to a player corporation, should be able to buy a 24-hour jamming license from Concord. During that period, that pilot, and any member of their fleet may use EWar in hi-sec on any targets they choose, in a solar system specified by the license.

Here are the restrictions and consequences in bullet form for easier digestion:

• Not available to NPC corp members
• License for one 24-hour period
• Restricted to a single system
• Fee based on system size / population, and security level
• Players that get jammed have aggression rights
• License permits only jamming / disruption / dampening
• Webbing, scrambling, target painting or any kind of actual firing is not permitted
• ECM drones are permitted
• Licensed pilots are listed in a solar system's information
• Licenses held by any given pilot are listed in that pilot's information
• Licenses are non-transferable

Rather than sit like fish in a barrel, a miner can pop out a set of ECM drones and attempt to jam a ganker before getting ganked. Or better, a defending fleet can jam the would-be ganker first, without Concord getting involved. As aggression rights would then be available to the would-be ganker, the ganker gets an actual fight if they're willing to stick around for it.


Like can flipping, jamming licenses would not be sold in newbie systems (1.0). Yes, this could potentially be can-flipping on steroids... only, you don't lose the contents of the container, you just lose a lock (or miss the shot).

In the case of third party interference with ongoing hostilities, the aggression rights cover that. Fight back.

Yes. You can do that... but it'd be better if that miner had a pack of buddies in dessies getting in your way. You wouldn't get aggro on the miner, in that case.

Mining solo is dangerous.

I disagree (naturally). It adds a mechanic for an initial punch in hisec without Concord interference.

Let's talk about the exploits, though. How bad would they be?

Please explain why this is insane. Otherwise you're just blathering in electronic form.

Then don't repeat. The only thing that has already been said is "it doesn't add anything to the game" which I refuted. Feel free to argue against my refutation. That would not be repetition unless you just literally repeat the claim without giving evidence or a line of reasoning to back up the stance.

As for "exploitation" I gave an argument for why I thought that kind of "exploitation" would be an acceptable addition to the game. It wouldn't be an exploit, it would simply be one more thing leading to a fight. I thought the thesis of Eve was that fighting is good.

Also feel free to bump the thread again.

The proposal was not a joke. Your "no, shut up" is kind of silly, though.

See?

I don't really need to say much.

Speaks our overall opinion clearly here.

The whole concept is flawed as it would create another avenue for griefing and mechanic exploitation. End up wit a bunch of neutral jammers during wars or 1v1's instead of neutral RR.

Do us all a favor. Give me your stuff and biomass. You half***ed a half*** idea you quarter***ed twit.

You know not what you do.... I would back off while you still have a chance.

LOL

Best one yet!