These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

The Mittani's Presumption of Safety

First post
Author
Elena Melkan
Magellanic Itg
Goonswarm Federation
#81 - 2012-05-30 07:56:18 UTC
Bunnie Hop wrote:
Mitt got his 30 day ban and his ego cannot handle it, so now he has called out to his brainless drones to help him seek some sort of retribution in an attempt to be relevent. None of this is about hi sec miners or a sense of entitlement of non pvp'ers, its all about Mitt and his insecurities.

I'd say his ego handled the situation incredibly well. He managed to turn it all for good, despite the fact that he had in certain way "betrayed" those who voted for him in CSM elections. Besides, there is nothing wrong in using what the sandbox has to offer: all the people who complain about goons could do something to it, instead of whine and ask the game to change, ban the goons or whatever comes to your mind. You could actually arrange and make something happen in the game! It may not be easy and might take some time, but everything is possible.

Logically this article was aimed towards people who think they live in a baby cradle and think nothing can harm them. There are miners and industrialists and PvE-players, who know that this game is harsh and they act that way: they take precautions and if they get blown up, they come back even stronger than before. Instead of, uh, hop into forums and write something like: "boohooo, CCP do something to it, or I'll unsub!".
EFF ONEF1
Caldari Grand Prix Engineering
#82 - 2012-05-30 07:56:25 UTC
He sure is wordy about a game he claims to rarely log into.
Xython
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#83 - 2012-05-30 08:01:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Xython
EFF ONEF1 wrote:
He sure is wordy about a game he claims to rarely log into.


He doesn't log on as "The Mittani" very often. Pay attention, exact wording is important!

Also: He's paid to write those 10 Ton Hammer columns, I think. So yeah. He's literally paid to be the leader of Goonswarm. He's entitled to a little ~smug~ in his life.
Richard Desturned
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#84 - 2012-05-30 08:03:17 UTC
Xython wrote:
EFF ONEF1 wrote:
He sure is wordy about a game he claims to rarely log into.


He doesn't log on as "The Mittani" very often. Pay attention, exact wording is important!


The Mittani isn't known for his ~luv2play~

He does, however, play EVE like a Paradox Interactive game.

npc alts have no opinions worth consideration

Desert Ice78
Gryphons of the Western Wind
#85 - 2012-05-30 08:03:35 UTC
Personally I agree (gasp) with the Titanni on his point of pvp being non-optional. The option to do or be anything is the core of Eve Online, even to be a goon if you choose.

However I also believe that all hi-sec so-called pvp is as a rule pathetic, as are the sub-life forms that engage in it, with the suicide gankers being the lowest class of said sub-life form.

I am a pod pilot: http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/DesertIce/POD.jpg

CCP Zulu: Came expecting a discussion about computer monitors, left confused.

Richard Desturned
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#86 - 2012-05-30 08:04:11 UTC
Desert Ice78 wrote:
However I also believe that all hi-sec so-called pvp is as a rule pathetic, as are the sub-life forms that engage in it, with the suicide gankers being the lowest class of said sub-life form.


NO HONOURE?

npc alts have no opinions worth consideration

Xython
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#87 - 2012-05-30 08:05:39 UTC
Desert Ice78 wrote:
Personally I agree (gasp) with the Titanni on his point of pvp being non-optional. The option to do or be anything is the core of Eve Online, even to be a goon if you choose.

However I also believe that all hi-sec so-called pvp is as a rule pathetic, as are the sub-life forms that engage in it, with the suicide gankers being the lowest class of said sub-life form.


The sad thing is, if the highsec miners hadn't killed nullsec mining with their incessant bitching at CCP, illegal botting, and general "Screw EVE, wallet flashes make me hard" mentality, then these suicide gankers would be off in Nullsec, hunting nullsec miners.

Except there aren't any, because ~~bot bot bot~~.
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#88 - 2012-05-30 08:06:35 UTC
Desert Ice78 wrote:
Personally I agree (gasp) with the Titanni on his point of pvp being non-optional. The option to do or be anything is the core of Eve Online, even to be a goon if you choose.

However I also believe that all hi-sec so-called pvp is as a rule pathetic, as are the sub-life forms that engage in it, with the suicide gankers being the lowest class of said sub-life form.

So you would say that perhaps these "sub-life forms" need to be "purged", or perhaps "cleansed"?

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Desert Ice78
Gryphons of the Western Wind
#89 - 2012-05-30 08:33:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Desert Ice78
Richard Desturned wrote:
NO HONOURE?

None my friend

Alavaria Fera wrote:
So you would say that perhaps these "sub-life forms" need to be "purged", or perhaps "cleansed"?

Nope, as I said, the core of Eve is to be whatever you want to be, even a goon.

Xython wrote:
The sad thing is, if the highsec miners hadn't killed nullsec mining with their incessant bitching at CCP, illegal botting, and general "Screw EVE, wallet flashes make me hard" mentality, then these suicide gankers would be off in Nullsec, hunting nullsec miners.

Except there aren't any, because ~~bot bot bot~~.

That is entirely incorrect. Ratting in supers in the drone regions is what killed all forms of mining, both hi-sec and nul-sec. But that has now been fixed, to the contentment of a hive of busy miners that I personally know in both areas.

Suicide ganking is pathetic, and no justification will make it any less so.

I am a pod pilot: http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/DesertIce/POD.jpg

CCP Zulu: Came expecting a discussion about computer monitors, left confused.

Richard Desturned
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#90 - 2012-05-30 08:50:24 UTC
Desert Ice78 wrote:
Suicide ganking is pathetic, and no justification will make it any less so.


i'm sorry you feel that way and we're not playing the game by your standards of e-bushido

i will proceed to commit seppuku as i have disgraced my family

actually no i'm just laffoin at u

npc alts have no opinions worth consideration

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#91 - 2012-05-30 09:04:36 UTC
Alavaria Fera wrote:
Richard Desturned wrote:
So what do you do in this game that is completely non-competitive?
I donno, do L4s count?
Only if you do ones that simply require you to shoot everything, and if you only do them for the LP, and if you don't cash in that LP, and if you do them in a newbie ship with newbie weapons…

…anything more than that, and you've engaged in plenty competitive activities. Sure, the actual “accept mission” and “complete mission” buttons can't really be out-competed — you're all alone with the game for those two button presses. Anything before, after, and in-between on the other hand…

Evelyn Meiyi wrote:
I mine.
…in competition with other miners who are after the same ore.
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#92 - 2012-05-30 09:07:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Alavaria Fera
Tippia wrote:
Alavaria Fera wrote:
Richard Desturned wrote:
So what do you do in this game that is completely non-competitive?
I donno, do L4s count?
Only if you do ones that simply require you to shoot everything, and if you only do them for the LP, and if you don't cash in that LP, and if you do them in a newbie ship with newbie weapons…

…anything more than that, and you've engaged in plenty competitive activities. Sure, the actual “accept mission” and “complete mission” buttons can't really be out-competed — you're all alone with the game for those two button presses. Anything before, after, and in-between on the other hand…

Wait, you can use quest given destroyers and rat dropped loot, I think - that would still suffice.

So maybe a Coercer with a set of lazers and stuff, you could do L2s maybe?


Dropped BPOs, mining from missions sites - might still not get enough highend minerals. Perhaps melt your rat loot to get enough. But production slots to make a bigger ship would be competetive. Maybe not if no one at all was using slots really far away?

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Desert Ice78
Gryphons of the Western Wind
#93 - 2012-05-30 09:16:35 UTC
Richard Desturned wrote:
Desert Ice78 wrote:
Suicide ganking is pathetic, and no justification will make it any less so.


i'm sorry you feel that way and we're not playing the game by your standards of e-bushido

i will proceed to commit seppuku as i have disgraced my family

actually no i'm just laffoin at u


May I second myself to strike off your head?

I am a pod pilot: http://dl.eve-files.com/media/corp/DesertIce/POD.jpg

CCP Zulu: Came expecting a discussion about computer monitors, left confused.

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#94 - 2012-05-30 09:26:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Alavaria Fera wrote:
Wait, you can use quest given destroyers and rat dropped loot, I think - that would still suffice.
The destroyer, maybe, the loot not so much… anyone could come along as steal that so you have to compete with them.

Any kind of loot is right out — only the rewards from the agents work, and a lot of it is contingent on delivering stuff that is open to competition. I suppose you could L1/L2-grind your way to faction standing 10 and collect a faction cruiser/BS from the COSMOS agents, but you'd still not be able to equip it with anything that lets it survive anything above an L2. Never mind, I'm being stupid — they give you BPCs, so you can't use them either.
Vaju Enki
Secular Wisdom
#95 - 2012-05-30 09:34:57 UTC
"Through education or violence, they must learn that EVE’s difficulty is what makes the game unique and worthwhile, rather than just another consequence-free PvP-optional themepark game."

The Mittani

The Tears Must Flow

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#96 - 2012-05-30 09:43:23 UTC
Oddball Six wrote:
Where the premise of this writer sees "growing and dangerous" from the perspective of someone in "goonswarm", there are several debatable premises here.

[list=1]
  • If "they" (whoever that is) wish to destroy the philosophy behind eve... what is that exactly? Doesnt the strictest interpretation of the sandbox so acclaimed in these threads imply that there should be a place int he sandbox for people who want to play in that other corner of the sandbox this writer is not interested in?



  • yes exactly, but it's the carebear whiners who are interested in adding restrictions to gameplay that violate the sandbox.


    "Sandbox" doesn't mean "I get to succeed at whatever I feel like attempting", it means that "I get to attempt whatever I want to succeed at". Other players frustrating or competing against you in your goals is exactly what the sandbox is all about. The whole idea and point and meaning of EVE is that you are playing against other humans, not against scripted AIs.

    "Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

    Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

    Eugene Kerner
    TunDraGon
    Goonswarm Federation
    #97 - 2012-05-30 10:09:22 UTC
    Good read; good points...
    it is vital to give 0.0 mining a perspective now that there is, next to other things, no drone poo anymore. I like the pragmatic approach here...actually there are quite some paralells to RL economic problems...

    SO suicide ganking is indeed very important for the whole eve industry and economy.
    Adidionally I agree that there never should be a place (except docked in high sec) where there is full security....that would ruin the very idea of EvE.

    TunDraGon is recruiting! "Also, your boobs [:o] "   CCP Eterne, 2012 "When in doubt...make a diȼk joke." Robin Williams - RIP

    Evelyn Meiyi
    Corvidae Trading and Holding
    #98 - 2012-05-30 10:40:59 UTC
    Mallak Azaria wrote:

    I noticed you add World of Warcraft as an exception, but it really isn't. Blizzard cares more about lost profit than any other company.


    WoW is losing players, but Blizzard is actively trying to stem the exodus; I'm referring specifically to companies that are forced by their corporate managers to rush a half-finished game to market simply because it's a holiday season and people will be buying lots of computer games.

    Anyway, back to the original topic:

    Eugene, I agree: there shouldn't be a place where you're entirely secure. High-security space should be better-protected, because -- hey -- it's the sovereign space of an entire empire.
    c4 t
    Cosmic Psychedelics
    #99 - 2012-05-30 11:04:52 UTC
    Great article. All these non trolls crying make me want to puke. If CCP caves to these mongs I.... I dunno what I'd do.
    Mallak Azaria
    Caldari Provisions
    Caldari State
    #100 - 2012-05-30 11:06:38 UTC
    Aggressive Nutmeg wrote:
    So where's the risk for the suicide-ganker?


    The risk is.... You may have done all that work for nothing & fail in pulling off the gank. Sorta like when I tried to SB a cluster of macks, only to find out they were heavily tanked & received boosts from multiple Orca's.

    So yes, suicide ganking does have it's risks. You just prefere to pretend they don't exist.

    This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal, proud member of the popular gay hookup site somethingawful.com, Spelling Bee, Grammar Gestapo & #1 Official Gevlon Goblin Fanclub member.