These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

CCP vs The Mattani
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Not Amused Responsible
Doomheim
#1 - 2012-05-29 23:11:17 UTC
Are you currently sick to death of the recent ganking of multiple faceless enemies? Ah but the enemy isn’t faceless you say, its Goonswarm and the Mattani, he’s even replacing Helicity Boston as the chef organiser.
Well I don’t know the Mattani in person, but I’m told that the goons have a great community and explore all aspects of Eve game play including mining!
So why is he organising this assault on high sec? , well nullsec players have for years told CCP that nullsec is broken and needs fixing but CCP haven’t fixed it for them, so the Mattani joins the CSM to try and help fix Nullsec and with some changes and suggestions from the pervious CSM and the Mattani, the Incarna Expansion was partially bypassed to the benefit of all EVE players.
But nullsec still hasn’t been fixed, as I’m not a nullsec C.E.O and not fully aware of the issues that Nullsec has, but when the Mattani was removed from the running in the next csm, he was pissed especially after helping out CCP to save their game, so he turn to the only route he had left which was mindless aggression with his mass army and other nullsec alliances, they didn’t care if they lost ships in Burn Jita, it was a statement to CCP and so is the latest Hulkageddon which is just a Tool to get CCP’S attention, after all they don’t listen to 90% of their client base anyway.
So why should we players old and new pay for this argument between CCP and the Mattani?, well we shouldn’t but understand this CCP make the mechanics of EVE and only they can fix Nullsec, CCP is making everyone in Eve pay for their mistakes, I don’t think people should unsub, but I do think that CCP should settle this argument/blackmail, because I don’t have 800+ plus members to fight back.
I want a better system for people to PVP, PVE or to be industrialists and only CCP can achieve this, because if it were a true sandbox, nullsec would have been fixed years ago as nullsec alliances would have fixed them.
To anyone who trolls or bores me about PVP, can jump off a cliff, it’s taken me a while but I can see why this is happening.
So how can we fix this? We can’t its up to CCP and they refuse to listen, perhaps they can’t or worried about other game mechanics that will get affected by the multilayer programing, I can’t write as political as the Mattani but I wish he and CCP would knock this **** off.

I hope that we can all at least be Civilised
Vicky Somers
Rusty Anchor
#2 - 2012-05-29 23:14:04 UTC
I wish people posted threads about me in a hateful manner. :(
Roll Sizzle Beef
Space Mutiny
#3 - 2012-05-29 23:14:48 UTC
Not Amused Responsible wrote:
Civilized


What universe are you from?
Surfin's PlunderBunny
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#4 - 2012-05-29 23:17:36 UTC
Why does it feel like I should be reading that as fast as I can?

"Little ginger moron" ~David Hasselhoff 

Want to see what Surf is training or how little isk Surf has?  http://eveboard.com/pilot/Surfin%27s_PlunderBunny
Not Amused Responsible
Doomheim
#5 - 2012-05-29 23:18:43 UTC
Roll Sizzle Beef wrote:
Not Amused Responsible wrote:
Civilized


What universe are you from?



Well I try to tread the middle ground between Eve and RL
Darth Tickles
Doomheim
#6 - 2012-05-29 23:21:40 UTC
Nullsec could be a fantasy-land of perfect gameplay, and hulkageddon, burn jita, etc would still be happening. don't kid yourself
Vaju Enki
Secular Wisdom
#7 - 2012-05-29 23:21:44 UTC
Mattani? What is that? A new module to gank carebears?

The Tears Must Flow
Not Amused Responsible
Doomheim
#8 - 2012-05-29 23:24:11 UTC
Darth Tickles wrote:
Nullsec could be a fantasy-land of perfect gameplay, and hulkageddon, burn jita, etc would still be happening. don't kid yourself



Sure mate Smile thanks for the advise
Ginseng Jita
PAN-EVE TRADING COMPANY
#9 - 2012-05-29 23:24:50 UTC
Vaju Enki wrote:
Mattani? What is that? A new module to gank carebears?


Yeah and who is this Helicity Boston?
Selinate
#10 - 2012-05-29 23:25:26 UTC
Vaju Enki wrote:
Mattani? What is that? A new module to gank carebears?


Here I was thinking it was some kind of evil mattress.
James 315
Experimental Fun Times Corp RELOADED
CODE.
#11 - 2012-05-29 23:27:07 UTC
Not Amused Responsible wrote:
The Mittani
Fixed that for you.

MinerBumping.com
Not Amused Responsible
Doomheim
#12 - 2012-05-29 23:27:13 UTC
Ginseng Jita wrote:
Vaju Enki wrote:
Mattani? What is that? A new module to gank carebears?


Yeah and who is this Helicity Boston?



I dunno? do you know her, is she your friend? are you buddies Big smile
Bootleg Jack
ACME Mineral and Gas
#13 - 2012-05-29 23:27:51 UTC
Not Amused Responsible wrote:
...
I hope that we can all at least be Civilised


Those are the people who get podded the most P

I'm an American, English is my second language...
Not Amused Responsible
Doomheim
#14 - 2012-05-29 23:30:09 UTC
Bootleg Jack wrote:
Not Amused Responsible wrote:
...
I hope that we can all at least be Civilised


Those are the people who get podded the most P


Clever, very clever, I’d say very original, head of the class Lol
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#15 - 2012-05-29 23:32:54 UTC
This is about banning The Mittani, goons, the whole CFC, all gankers, something like that right?

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?
Not Amused Responsible
Doomheim
#16 - 2012-05-29 23:37:19 UTC
Alavaria Fera wrote:
This is about banning The Mittani, goons, the whole CFC, all gankers, something like that right?



Well i'm sure you know what this is all about, but this thread is getting read by CCP, both parties have their own arguments, and i have mine.
Serene Repose
#17 - 2012-05-30 00:24:05 UTC
Mitt has problems with originality. He has to take over things then put his mark on them...or sign his name to them...

We must accommodate the idiocracy.
ShipToaster
#18 - 2012-05-30 00:37:07 UTC
What amazes me is not another Mittens bashing thread but the realisation that Mittens had **** all to do with the abomination that is Inferno.

You know that Mittens would have slapped sense into the douches at :ccp: and Inferno might have actually been decent. Not all :ccp: employees are douches just the ones that repeatedly **** things up. You know who you are and so do we.

.
Llywelyn Emrys
Doomheim
#19 - 2012-05-30 00:40:37 UTC
Is this the Mattani?
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#20 - 2012-05-30 00:41:38 UTC
ShipToaster wrote:
What amazes me is not another Mittens bashing thread but the realisation that Mittens had **** all to do with the abomination that is Inferno.

You know that Mittens would have slapped sense into the douches at :ccp: and Inferno might have actually been decent. Not all :ccp: employees are douches just the ones that repeatedly **** things up. You know who you are and so do we.

I'm sure he was secretly pushing them towards the unified UI.

I think a bunch of CSM members gave the new UI rave reviews or something, so I guess that feedback system worked. A little different from the SiSi feedback, but hey, when you get mixed signals, you do whatever seems best ~

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?
12Next page