These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

Highsec Wars are lame
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
FloppieTheBanjoClown
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
#21 - 2012-05-21 14:10:37 UTC
Yes, yes. Everyone should play Eve the same way. That's what "sandbox" means, after all. When are they serving the Kool-Aid?

Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement.
Daemon Ceed
Ice Fire Warriors
#22 - 2012-05-21 22:02:34 UTC
Ashera Yune wrote:
Such an easy and riskless pvp. With players using concord protected neutral alts that can't be shot, there is no skill required.

Highsec should be brimming with destruction and no cowardice.


Cynos and capital and supercapital ships should be flown in highsec and highsec pvpers will get a taste of TRUE PVP.

Then we will have 1000 man fleets fighting in systems for all to watch first hand.

As long as concord exists high pvp is not pvp, it is carebearing in a different way.


While I generally agree with the premise of your poast, you know what else is lame? Faceless, irrelevant, forum alts Lol
Immortis Vexx
Onyx Moon Industries
#23 - 2012-05-21 23:56:29 UTC
Daemon Ceed wrote:
Ashera Yune wrote:
Such an easy and riskless pvp. With players using concord protected neutral alts that can't be shot, there is no skill required.

Highsec should be brimming with destruction and no cowardice.


Cynos and capital and supercapital ships should be flown in highsec and highsec pvpers will get a taste of TRUE PVP.

Then we will have 1000 man fleets fighting in systems for all to watch first hand.

As long as concord exists high pvp is not pvp, it is carebearing in a different way.


While I generally agree with the premise of your poast, you know what else is lame? Faceless, irrelevant, forum alts Lol


LOL if I gave you a "Like" for every time you heckle someone about their forum alt you would have a billion likes from me alone. It is almost comical at this point. All jokes aside...

Highsec PVP is PVP and war dec (if upheld and not shed) is even more PVP. Any idiot who claims otherwise is just that, an idiot. Wardec pvp is as close to pure space combat as you can get, it's completely lawless. What I don't like about it is the bs games that get played.

Now, moving on to those that say blobs are dumb. When I think of space ship war I don't think of 2 rifters picking on a rifter from another corp; I think FLEET BATTLE! EPIC TAKEDOWNS, combat on massive scale, complete with server crushing lag! Space ships are epic, the battles should be epicer.


The best way to tell if a war was good is if you can explain it to a non-EVE'r and have it sound cool. Here's how this goes...

"Oh man, we had like 600 people with giant capital ships shooting everything, massive amounts of fighter pilots all over the place, it was friggin chaos! "

or...

"Me and this other guy snuck up on someone mining and ganked his @$$! hahaha"


Just a random thought :P
Tora Bushido
The Marmite Mercenaries
BLACKFLAG.
#24 - 2012-05-22 10:02:08 UTC
Internet Lawyer Steve wrote:
Internet Lawyer Steve on the scene...

Just wanted to point out that it is PVP. Player vs. Player. Also, please play the game for more than a 1year, 4 months and move out of high sec and experience Null, Low and WH PVP before you talk out of your ass.


Says the forum alt who is to scared to use his own name and give arguments why he thinks different. P Point where the highsec merc touched you Blink I know people who have been playing here since the beginning and still have no clue.....

DELETE THE WEAK, ADAPT OR DIE !

Meta Gaming Level VII, Psycho Warfare Level X, Smack Talk Level VII.
Rho Anan
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#25 - 2012-05-22 10:33:02 UTC
I concur. High Sec PVP is lame. To much station faggotry and remote rep alts. Atleast in null you know who your fighting.
Tora Bushido
The Marmite Mercenaries
BLACKFLAG.
#26 - 2012-05-22 13:39:28 UTC
Rho Anan wrote:
I concur. High Sec PVP is lame. To much station faggotry and remote rep alts. Atleast in null you know who your fighting.


Agree on the to much RR and sometimes to much station camping. Could be a bit less, but its a choice people make. I prefer to move around and hunt....

DELETE THE WEAK, ADAPT OR DIE !

Meta Gaming Level VII, Psycho Warfare Level X, Smack Talk Level VII.
Barbara Nichole
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#27 - 2012-05-22 18:52:57 UTC
Dawn Flare wrote:
You know, highsec wardecs ARE lame!

Good thing we are getting a much improved wardec system in 3 days.



you don't really think that's going to change the lameness do you?

  - remove the cloaked from local; free intel is the real problem, not  "afk" cloaking -

[IMG]http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a208/DawnFrostbringer/consultsig.jpg[/IMG]
Dawn Flare
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#28 - 2012-05-23 05:59:29 UTC
Barbara Nichole wrote:
Dawn Flare wrote:
You know, highsec wardecs ARE lame!

Good thing we are getting a much improved wardec system in 3 days.



you don't really think that's going to change the lameness do you?

The new ally system at least should prove amusing. Big smile
DReadEyE
Grumpy Old Bastards
#29 - 2012-05-26 09:05:35 UTC
Fleet blobs can be borring, gatecamping can be borring, highsec wars can be borring, all kinds of pvp can be borring and dull, but they can all be fun also. No one can really say whats 'real' pvp - what ever rocks your boat i say.

0.0 is not allways about fleet blobs. fighting in npc null gives a good ballance between null sov and hig sec wars..
Vicky Somers
Rusty Anchor
#30 - 2012-05-27 18:31:22 UTC
If your enemy has or might have RR, why don't you just bring in your own RR?
If you don't like station games, why don't you just dec someone who wants to shoot back?
Ramon Sohei
The Florez Law Firm
#31 - 2012-05-29 03:41:37 UTC
Oh yes, griefer alliances at trading hubs in with their leet hisec pvp... because that makes them leet pvpers.
E6o5
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#32 - 2012-05-29 06:04:02 UTC
Ashera Yune wrote:
Such an easy and riskless pvp. With players using concord protected neutral alts that can't be shot, there is no skill required.

Highsec should be brimming with destruction and no cowardice.


Cynos and capital and supercapital ships should be flown in highsec and highsec pvpers will get a taste of TRUE PVP.

Then we will have 1000 man fleets fighting in systems for all to watch first hand.

As long as concord exists high pvp is not pvp, it is carebearing in a different way.


you forum pvp is even lamer
Pinky Feldman
Amarrian Vengeance
Ragequit Cancel Sub
#33 - 2012-05-29 06:11:52 UTC
Rho Anan wrote:
I concur. High Sec PVP is lame. To much station faggotry and remote rep alts. Atleast in null you know who your fighting.


Yeah, you always know who you're fighting when you get into a battle...because titan bridges and hot drops never happen.

The moar you cry the less you pee
Pinky Feldman
Amarrian Vengeance
Ragequit Cancel Sub
#34 - 2012-05-29 06:15:17 UTC
Ramon Sohei wrote:
Oh yes, griefer alliances at trading hubs in with their leet hisec pvp... because that makes them leet pvpers.


Pretty sure most of us don't consider what we do "leet PVP" and the ones that do are idiots. Troll harder.

Also, did anyone else notice how the OP posted a pretty standard "highsec pvp sux" troll thread and then disappeared. Now that the thread is on the second page i'd say that successful OP is successul.

The moar you cry the less you pee
FloppieTheBanjoClown
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
#35 - 2012-05-29 14:06:03 UTC
Ramon Sohei wrote:
Oh yes, griefer alliances at trading hubs in with their leet hisec pvp... because that makes them leet pvpers.

Those guys are hilarious, with their superawesomeomg killboards full of rookie ships and shuttles and pods and T1 frigates to go along with the hapless haulers and mission/incursion boats they manage to pop.

Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement.
Gally Alita
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#36 - 2012-05-29 15:18:55 UTC
I trade in high sec a lot. It's amusing to see folks shooting the hell out of each other when by passing. Especially those cute and funny comments on the local chat.
Mr Bigwinky
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#37 - 2012-05-29 15:52:56 UTC
Tora Bushido wrote:
Highsec pvp is even better then nul pvp, where only numbers count and the size of ships. Its called blob warfar.


>> Highsec pvp is even better then nul pvp, where only numbers count and the size of ships. Its called blob warfar.
>> Its called blob warfar.
>> blob warfar.
>> warfar.

lolololololol
Welcome to EVE online, here's your rubix cube, go F*** yourself ♥
Longinius Spear
Semper Ubi Sub Ubi
#38 - 2012-05-29 16:05:48 UTC
Ashera Yune wrote:
Such an easy and riskless pvp. With players using concord protected neutral alts that can't be shot, there is no skill required.

Highsec should be brimming with destruction and no cowardice.


Cynos and capital and supercapital ships should be flown in highsec and highsec pvpers will get a taste of TRUE PVP.

Then we will have 1000 man fleets fighting in systems for all to watch first hand.

As long as concord exists high pvp is not pvp, it is carebearing in a different way.



Yep,

Hot drops and blobs are were the real action is at.

2/10 -- gave you an extra point for using "And" in a sentence 3 times.

Read more of my ramblings on my blog www.invadingyourhole.blogspot.com
Previous page12