These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

Eve: Alternative Universes...

First post
Author
YuuKnow
The Scope
#1 - 2012-05-28 20:08:51 UTC  |  Edited by: YuuKnow
Hypothetically, what if CCP were to decide in the future that there are enough Eve subscribers that additional servers would be better. Each server will have a different twist on the gameplay mechanics to offer tatical/gameplay variety amongst the servers. What "alternative universes" of Eve would you like to see and how do you think the changes would effect the gameplay? There would also be no character transfers (basically a sp reset) so that everyone starts from a new character.

Here's mine:

Server 1: Tranquility

Server 2: Anarchy:
-No local in Null sec.
-No super caps
-No T2 BPOs
Effect: probably the Eve that most players have been asking for a long time.

Server 3: Eternity
-no microwarp drives
-no webbers
-no 100MN AB T3s (T3 would only fit 10MN ABs)
Effect: not sure, but curious

What's yours?

yk
Ginseng Jita
PAN-EVE TRADING COMPANY
#2 - 2012-05-28 20:10:01 UTC
No
Esan Vartesa
Samarkand Financial
#3 - 2012-05-28 20:10:28 UTC
Crawl into a deep hole and die [ingame].
Barbara Nichole
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#4 - 2012-05-28 20:13:41 UTC
YuuKnow wrote:
Hypothetically, what if CCP were to decide in the future that there are enough Eve subscribers that additional servers would be better. Each server will have a different twist on the gameplay mechanics to offer tatical/gameplay variety amongst the servers. What "alternative universes" of Eve would you like to see and how do you think the changes would effect the gameplay?

Here's mine:

Server 1: Tranquility

Server 2: Anarchy:
-No local in Null sec.
-No super caps
-No T2 BPOs
Effect: probably the Eve that most players have been asking for a long time.

Server 3: Eternity
-no microwarp drives
-no webbers
-no 100MN AB T3s (T3 would only fit 10MN ABs)
Effect: not sure, but curious

What's yours?

yk


so if I go to an alternate universe will I find a version of me with a goatee..and tribbles running wild on my ship?

  - remove the cloaked from local; free intel is the real problem, not  "afk" cloaking -

[IMG]http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a208/DawnFrostbringer/consultsig.jpg[/IMG]

Vicky Somers
Rusty Anchor
#5 - 2012-05-28 20:15:28 UTC
Server 4:

-no ships
-one system
-local covers entire screen
-everyone stays docked and talks smack
Virgil Travis
Non Constructive Self Management
#6 - 2012-05-28 20:17:50 UTC
Barbara Nichole wrote:
so if I go to an alternate universe will I find a version of me with a goatee..and tribbles running wild on my ship?


You might look good with a goatee actually.

Unified Church of the Unobligated - madness in the method Mamma didn't raise no victims.

Karn Dulake
Doomheim
#7 - 2012-05-28 20:18:32 UTC
Ginseng Jita wrote:
No



This
I dont normally troll, but when i do i do it on General Discussion.
Ituhata Saken
Killboard Padding Services
#8 - 2012-05-28 20:20:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Ituhata Saken
Server 7:

No gates, no warp drives, only afterburner fits allowed. Lets take space travel to the next level of realism.

Server 9:

PvP is permitted in highsec, but ships destroyed there only drop candycanes and lollipops.

Server 11:

Picking up player corpses inside strange gas clouds causes the debuff 'zombies' , which all of the players abilities are slowed by 10 seconds due to the ships crew being preoccupied with their own survival inside the hull. For added realism, when player zooms into affected ships, terrified screams and sounds of gunfire along with the shuffling of feet can be heard through the hull.

So close...

Darth Tickles
Doomheim
#9 - 2012-05-28 20:21:59 UTC
server 1: you

server 2: everyone else
Lexmana
#10 - 2012-05-28 20:23:42 UTC
Why? Seriously why? What are you trying to fix (and brake)?
Sigurd Thorson
Ghost Recon Squad
#11 - 2012-05-28 20:32:21 UTC
Vicky Somers wrote:
Server 4:

-no ships
-one system
-local covers entire screen
-everyone stays docked and talks smack


I think you will find this server is already up and running - it is better known as the Eve Forums
Ursula Thrace
Dreamland Augmented Consortium
#12 - 2012-05-28 20:35:40 UTC
killorbekilled TBE
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#13 - 2012-05-28 20:42:44 UTC
bahahahaha.....ahem i mean no not supported

:)

Aruken Marr
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#14 - 2012-05-28 20:43:18 UTC
Oh god no
YuuKnow
The Scope
#15 - 2012-05-28 20:43:40 UTC  |  Edited by: YuuKnow
Lol. Such creative and imaginative minds at work here.

On a related note: How about an alternative universe where CCP actually decently moderates their forums? Or is that what reputation that CCP is going for... troll infestation?
Cutter Isaacson
DEDSEC SAN FRANCISCO
#16 - 2012-05-28 20:45:30 UTC
Karn Dulake wrote:
Ginseng Jita wrote:
No



This


Both of these.

"The truth is usually just an excuse for a lack of imagination." Elim Garak.

Vicky Somers
Rusty Anchor
#17 - 2012-05-28 20:47:41 UTC
Sigurd Thorson wrote:
I think you will find this server is already up and running - it is better known as the Eve Forums

touché
Ager Agemo
Rainbow Ponies Incorporated
#18 - 2012-05-28 20:50:15 UTC
Cutter Isaacson wrote:
Karn Dulake wrote:
Ginseng Jita wrote:
No



This


Both of these.



that
YuuKnow
The Scope
#19 - 2012-05-28 20:52:30 UTC
Lexmana wrote:
Why? Seriously why? What are you trying to fix (and brake)?


Its not about "fixing" anything. Its about after a decade of gameplay some tatical variety would do the game some good. There are alot of ways that the game-mechanics could have been hypothetically setup. The *current* game-mechanics exist because of arbitrary whims of the devs. If they had decided to go a different direction with the game mechanics the game tatics would shift to tatics completely different. I think that its an interesting bit of speculation.

For example:
What if the devs had never made MW... and without MW, no webbers... what would game tatics be then? Interesting to speculate.

yk
Simetraz
State War Academy
Caldari State
#20 - 2012-05-28 20:56:11 UTC
I would rather see CCP open up new area's of space (maybe with different rule sets) then allocate new hardware to a completely different server

Perhaps a new section of 0.0 on the other side of W-Space.

123Next pageLast page