These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Looks like we're winning the war: Highsec mining drops by HALF!

Author
John Caligan
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#361 - 2012-05-27 15:18:26 UTC
Destiny Corrupted wrote:
The two massive holes in your logic (if your drivel can even be called that) are:

1. That the gankers destroy all mining, industrial, mission and ganking (???) ships, instead of just the ones that are improperly fit and/or being flown by imbeciles.

2. That the players piloting said ships will certainly leave if their ships get destroyed. If ship destruction leads to quitting in absolutely every case, then each and every subscription can't be viewed as anything more than temporary, because it is nigh impossible to play this game and not be destroyed at some point.

Yet this game has grown from a few thousand subscribers (and a time when space was indeed much less safe), to what it is today; an overpopulated cesspool of cowardly, over-entitled, self-proclaimed sperglords.



But there's your problem!!! How do you tell which ships are properly fitted and which aren't?!? You can't descriminate through that regard. By that logic, if I take a well-fitted Drake, and I see a rookie ship, I might decide that it's "improperly fitted" because it couldn't sink me if it tried, and shoot it down. Also, if you want to prove a point that a ship is improperly fitted, take him down to just over 1 structure point, and then tell the pilot what he or she needs to fix to get a better fit. Some people can't necessarily afford to fit their ship well, so you have to take that kind of thing into consideration.

Also, ganking new players is not a good way to keep them subscribed. People generally tend to stop playing MMO's if the first thing that happens to them is being blown up in an area supposedly safe from PvP
Quartzlight Evenstar Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Operations
#362 - 2012-05-27 15:19:55 UTC
TigerXtrm wrote:
So what is the benefit of wiping out the primary source of minerals, thus letting mineral prices and thus everything else skyrocket? Or is this just for the lulz?


The Goons quite loudly announced years ago they came in here to ruin the game.

This is the fruit of their endeavor.

***

Karn Dulake
Doomheim
#363 - 2012-05-27 15:55:34 UTC
So do we win when there is no one left in the game?

Im still trying to work out what the victory conditions are
I dont normally troll, but when i do i do it on General Discussion.
Quartzlight Evenstar Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Operations
#364 - 2012-05-27 16:00:04 UTC
Karn Dulake wrote:
So do we win when there is no one left in the game?

Im still trying to work out what the victory conditions are


VC is whoever brings the most 'content' I think.

***

ReiAnn
Nova-Tek
#365 - 2012-05-27 16:50:06 UTC
Quartzlight Evenstar Icefluxor wrote:
Karn Dulake wrote:
So do we win when there is no one left in the game?

Im still trying to work out what the victory conditions are


VC is whoever brings the most 'content' I think.



If this is the highlight of 'eve content', then I seriously want my money back. There are phone apps with more storyline.
Quartzlight Evenstar Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Operations
#366 - 2012-05-27 16:55:02 UTC
ReiAnn wrote:


If this is the highlight of 'eve content', then I seriously want my money back. There are phone apps with more storyline.


Watch the Fanfest Video Footage and watch CCP and the SONY Rep PRAISE the Goons. "They bring great content. You guys REALLY do it."

***

Keno Skir
#367 - 2012-05-27 19:31:00 UTC
I loved how dangerous this game felt when i first started. It isn't actually quite like that though. So aside from the inflation (which lets face it is affecting the gankers too) i quite like that its actually a bit dangerous in hisec. Miners should be made aware more of the dangers and how to avoid them, rather than dumbing down the game to keep miners safe.

This is a sandbox, but also a loose approximation of a lawless (almost) new frontier. Be the brave space captain, not Arnold fecking Rimmer. Learn of the dangers of your new world and master them, don't snivel until daddy makes them stop kicking sand at you.

Some people get ganked all the time, and some never do. There is a reason for this i think, and it seems to do with peoples ability to adapt and learn to survive. As should be the case in a world like New Eden Roll
Herping yourDerp
Tribal Liberation Force
Minmatar Republic
#368 - 2012-05-27 19:46:14 UTC
De see me mining.... they hatin.
trying to catch my hulk afkin
t
Quartzlight Evenstar Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Operations
#369 - 2012-05-27 19:47:35 UTC
Keno Skir wrote:

Learn of the dangers of your new world and master them, don't snivel until daddy makes them stop kicking sand at you.



The Casual Player has not the time for that kind of operation which at this point would have to be rather massive.

***

Destiny Corrupted
Deadly Viper Kitten Mitten Sewing Company
Senpai's Afterschool Anime and Gaming Club
#370 - 2012-05-27 20:03:11 UTC
John Caligan wrote:
Destiny Corrupted wrote:
The two massive holes in your logic (if your drivel can even be called that) are:

1. That the gankers destroy all mining, industrial, mission and ganking (???) ships, instead of just the ones that are improperly fit and/or being flown by imbeciles.

2. That the players piloting said ships will certainly leave if their ships get destroyed. If ship destruction leads to quitting in absolutely every case, then each and every subscription can't be viewed as anything more than temporary, because it is nigh impossible to play this game and not be destroyed at some point.

Yet this game has grown from a few thousand subscribers (and a time when space was indeed much less safe), to what it is today; an overpopulated cesspool of cowardly, over-entitled, self-proclaimed sperglords.

But there's your problem!!! How do you tell which ships are properly fitted and which aren't?!? You can't descriminate through that regard.

Uh, we have something called "passive targeters" and "ship scanners." No, really! Come on, you can't not believe me; just look in the market for yourself!

John Caligan wrote:
By that logic, if I take a well-fitted Drake, and I see a rookie ship, I might decide that it's "improperly fitted" because it couldn't sink me if it tried, and shoot it down.

Well, enjoy losing your Drake to CONCORD for the satisfaction of killing a rookie ship that the guy will just get another copy of when he docks at the closest station.

John Caligan wrote:
Also, if you want to prove a point that a ship is improperly fitted, take him down to just over 1 structure point, and then tell the pilot what he or she needs to fix to get a better fit.

And when I play CoD, I'll shoot at the enemy's leg to get him down to low health, after which I'll stop shooting and offer him to surrender. In a nice game of ball, I'll aim my shots to only go near the basket/goal/hole, and then tell the opposing team that they need to play better.

We wouldn't want to hurt anyone's feelings in a competitive gaming environment, would we now? Scoring a goal in soccer (football to the European barbarians) might make the opposing team stop playing, and then no one will play soccer anymore. :(

John Caligan wrote:
Some people can't necessarily afford to fit their ship well, so you have to take that kind of thing into consideration.

Also, ganking new players is not a good way to keep them subscribed. People generally tend to stop playing MMO's if the first thing that happens to them is being blown up in an area supposedly safe from PvP

There's a difference between not being able to afford expensive fittings, and not being able to rub two brain cells together to fit properly. Also, where the hell do you get off calling Hulk pilots new players? New players don't fly 250+ million ships.

I wrote some true EVE stories! And no, they're not of the generic "my 0.0 alliance had lots of 0.0 fleets and took a lot of 0.0 space" sort. Check them out here:

https://truestories.eveonline.com/users/2074-destiny-corrupted

Cheeks For Weeks
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#371 - 2012-05-27 22:52:48 UTC
James 315 wrote:
According to the official statistics released this week by CCP Diagoras, the volume of ore mined in highsec has dropped by a staggering 45.53%. Nearly half of all highsec mining has been wiped out, thanks to coordinated anti-highsec mining operations (most prominently Hulkageddon V), and the extraordinary shift in public opinion about highsec mining. You can read CCP Diagoras' tweet here.

If we were to believe the conventional wisdom among the carebears and the pseudointellectuals of Market Discussions, highsec mining is too vast and pervasive to stop. Prior to the latest round of Hulkageddon, they confidently predicted that gankers wouldn't put a dent in the amount of mining. They were wrong.

Miners have been slaughtered by the thousands, but that's not all. Anti-mining operations are primarily instruments of terror. While thousands of miners died, more importantly, thousands more miners have given up mining. Ordinarily we wouldn't be able to quantify the effect of the latter, and the carebear apologists would be free, in their ignorance, to keep crowing about the absence of any impact. But thanks to CCP Diagoras, we can make our enemies eat crow instead.

I know there are some skeptics who will grasp to the straws of any alternate explanation, so I'll provide a preemptive debunking service here. The mining of ore in highsec did not decline during the measured period due to a drop in botting. Over the relevant period, there was no mass-banning of bots by CCP. Quite the opposite, in fact. My own observations, corroborated by the dedicated bot-watchers in Crime & Punishment, have actually seen a proportionate increase in botting of late; a new network of easily-identified botters is crawling over the belts in highsec as we speak.

What's happened is that the human miners, unlike the bots, became aware of Hulkageddon and have ceased mining. When humans abandoned the belts, the bots became a larger percentage of those left behind, and they stand out more. For example, a new type of ice-mining bot, very common today, flocks in the ice fields. They use an identical ship name scheme (a space before the ship name, easy to spot groups of them using your D-scanner), and they warp out one-by-one if you lock them. I have cleared out entire ice fields with a frigate just by locking up the bots, because there are no humans left mining there.

The drop in mining has been disproportionately--perhaps entirely--caused by a decline in the number of human miners, not bots. Thus, the decrease in mining among humans in highsec is greater than 45.53%. We don't have official statistics on what percentage of the total mining in highsec is done by bots, but by all accounts it's a hefty amount. Therefore, this is the bottom line:

The majority of human highsec miners have quit mining.

Two weeks ago, I wrote a Manifesto II in which I called upon the people of EVE to put a stop to all mining in highsec. Most people probably thought it was crazy to even consider such a thing possible. Not anymore. We're already more than halfway there!

Granted, some miners will return to the belts once Hulkageddon ends. But many will not. Having been forced to adapt and try out other professions, and having found them more rewarding, they will leave mining for good. As the miners' numbers diminish, so does their power and influence over CCP.

As for the gankers, their numbers are growing rapidly. Each day, more and more pilots are getting hooked on ganking. They see the miners for what they are: targets. And they will prey upon an ever-decreasing number of carebears.

In light of these facts, we must now realize that the extinction of highsec mining is not just an impossible dream anymore. It's something that we, as the EVE community, can realistically accomplish together. If you have not yet committed to the fight against the carebears, then I encourage you to join us now. This is your chance. Kill some highsec miners before they're all gone!

- 315

I'm a carebear of 4 years...
and not a single f*** was given that day.

If people actually quit because of a flotilla of losers sitting behind keyboards with over-inflated internet egos
take the time to develop useless drivel like this, that just shows how weak-minded they all are. Go ahead and let them quit.

People seem to forget that EVE is a game no matter how realistic things seem to be.
I don't care for you PVPers whining because people don't play the game the way you want them to. You're no better than the miners complaining because they got shot. Both sides feel entitled to something when they're not. So whats left? Play the f***ing game and STFU.


  • In regard to other posts, I can't fathom how a current figure of people online (or some number crunch of how many are mining) could reveal whether or not people are unsubscribing. Has CCP actually confirmed this?

  • It's quite normal for player activity to drop during the summer as earlier mentioned

    Diablo III is out as earlier mentioned

    Once hulkageddon is over I'm willing to bet life will continue as if it never happened... as earlier mentioned... just like last year



This thread fails. There is no war. CCP is after profit.
Linna Excel
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#372 - 2012-05-27 23:53:39 UTC
Quartzlight Evenstar Icefluxor wrote:
Karn Dulake wrote:
So do we win when there is no one left in the game?

Im still trying to work out what the victory conditions are


VC is whoever brings the most 'content' I think.



It's a sandbox, you set your own victory conditions. Like today I find a BPO on the markets for half the going price. I call that a victory.
CoffinQueen
The Marmite Mercenaries
BLACKFLAG.
#373 - 2012-05-28 00:13:28 UTC
forcing own believes onto other people is called fascism, so you are a fascist, James, and there always were and will be enough people who will never give in to fascists.
Quartzlight Evenstar Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Operations
#374 - 2012-05-28 01:17:06 UTC
Linna Excel wrote:



It's a sandbox, you set your own victory conditions. Like today I find a BPO on the markets for half the going price. I call that a victory.


Interestingly, THIS is the most true-hearted inspirational post about the spirit of EVE that I have read in weeks.


+20

***

John Caligan
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#375 - 2012-05-28 11:50:55 UTC
Destiny Corrupted wrote:
Uh, we have something called "passive targeters" and "ship scanners." No, really! Come on, you can't not believe me; just look in the market for yourself!


Yes, and I took those things into account. But one person's opinion cannot be the arbiter of all truths in terms of fittings.

Destiny Corrupted wrote:

Well, enjoy losing your Drake to CONCORD for the satisfaction of killing a rookie ship that the guy will just get another copy of when he docks at the closest station.


Yet you ignore the fact that that's the exact mentality that's being promoted here. If I felt he was improperly fitted, or if he was mining, than shooting him should be incouraged.

Destiny Corrupted wrote:

And when I play CoD, I'll shoot at the enemy's leg to get him down to low health, after which I'll stop shooting and offer him to surrender. In a nice game of ball, I'll aim my shots to only go near the basket/goal/hole, and then tell the opposing team that they need to play better.

We wouldn't want to hurt anyone's feelings in a competitive gaming environment, would we now? Scoring a goal in soccer (football to the European barbarians) might make the opposing team stop playing, and then no one will play soccer anymore. :(


This isn't CoD (THANK GOODNESS FOR THAT!!), and this also isn't Soccer, to use your OBVIOUSLY less barbaric name, this coming from the people who use "advanced interrogation". Politics and names of sports aside, there is no reason why if you aren't about to die anytime soon, you take them down to just above death and then threaten them for whatever money they have, and then give them some tips and fly off. That's another problem I have. If you can't meet a ransom, pirates should just settle for whatever you have. Some money is better than no money.

Destiny Corrupted wrote:

There's a difference between not being able to afford expensive fittings, and not being able to rub two brain cells together to fit properly. Also, where the hell do you get off calling Hulk pilots new players? New players don't fly 250+ million ships.


A lot of the proper fits ARE expensive. Look: Send me what you think a proper Drake fit is, and I'll tell you the cost, for the entire forum to see. And also, I didn't say that new players fly Hulks. Remember: Hulkageddon isn't just about Exhumers and Orcas, in fact it has grown to include a "junior league" (according to the Hulkageddon site) for non-exhumers and mining barges and Orcas that are killed whilst mining. And a new player can easily get the 2-3 mil for the first level of mining barge within the 14 day trial period.
Alia Gon'die
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
#376 - 2012-05-28 13:13:45 UTC
John Caligan wrote:
Destiny Corrupted wrote:
Uh, we have something called "passive targeters" and "ship scanners." No, really! Come on, you can't not believe me; just look in the market for yourself!


Yes, and I took those things into account. But one person's opinion cannot be the arbiter of all truths in terms of fittings.

Destiny Corrupted wrote:

Well, enjoy losing your Drake to CONCORD for the satisfaction of killing a rookie ship that the guy will just get another copy of when he docks at the closest station.


Yet you ignore the fact that that's the exact mentality that's being promoted here. If I felt he was improperly fitted, or if he was mining, than shooting him should be incouraged.

Destiny Corrupted wrote:

And when I play CoD, I'll shoot at the enemy's leg to get him down to low health, after which I'll stop shooting and offer him to surrender. In a nice game of ball, I'll aim my shots to only go near the basket/goal/hole, and then tell the opposing team that they need to play better.

We wouldn't want to hurt anyone's feelings in a competitive gaming environment, would we now? Scoring a goal in soccer (football to the European barbarians) might make the opposing team stop playing, and then no one will play soccer anymore. :(


This isn't CoD (THANK GOODNESS FOR THAT!!), and this also isn't Soccer, to use your OBVIOUSLY less barbaric name, this coming from the people who use "advanced interrogation". Politics and names of sports aside, there is no reason why if you aren't about to die anytime soon, you take them down to just above death and then threaten them for whatever money they have, and then give them some tips and fly off. That's another problem I have. If you can't meet a ransom, pirates should just settle for whatever you have. Some money is better than no money.

Destiny Corrupted wrote:

There's a difference between not being able to afford expensive fittings, and not being able to rub two brain cells together to fit properly. Also, where the hell do you get off calling Hulk pilots new players? New players don't fly 250+ million ships.


A lot of the proper fits ARE expensive. Look: Send me what you think a proper Drake fit is, and I'll tell you the cost, for the entire forum to see. And also, I didn't say that new players fly Hulks. Remember: Hulkageddon isn't just about Exhumers and Orcas, in fact it has grown to include a "junior league" (according to the Hulkageddon site) for non-exhumers and mining barges and Orcas that are killed whilst mining. And a new player can easily get the 2-3 mil for the first level of mining barge within the 14 day trial period.


So what we are doing in this post is comparing Hulkageddon, an event in a video game, with real torture?

Self-appointed forums hallway monitor Ask me about La Maison and what it means for you! http://bit.ly/LTW5gW These wardec rules are not in place for our protection. They're in place for yours.

John Caligan
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#377 - 2012-05-28 17:05:48 UTC
Alia Gon'die wrote:


So what we are doing in this post is comparing Hulkageddon, an event in a video game, with real torture?


No: We're refuting all of your claims and saying that just because you call your messed-version of Rugby with the same name that we use for what you call "soccer", that doesn't mean that all Europeans are barbarians.
EVE Roy Mustang
Doomheim
#378 - 2012-05-28 19:26:56 UTC  |  Edited by: EVE Roy Mustang
Quartzlight Evenstar Icefluxor wrote:
TigerXtrm wrote:
So what is the benefit of wiping out the primary source of minerals, thus letting mineral prices and thus everything else skyrocket? Or is this just for the lulz?


The Goons quite loudly announced years ago they came in here to ruin the game.

This is the fruit of their endeavor.


And theyve been trying to walk that statement back for years

Alia Gon'die wrote:


So what we are doing in this post is comparing Hulkageddon, an event in a video game, with real torture?


why not ppl usually compare it to real terrorism
EVE Roy Mustang
Doomheim
#379 - 2012-05-28 19:28:31 UTC
grr ffs
Vicky Somers
Rusty Anchor
#380 - 2012-05-28 19:31:54 UTC
I was sitting cloaked in your home system and a staggering 45.53% of your alliance docked up. lol numbers