EVE Information Portal

There is an issue with the new Ancillary X-large shield booster, it doesn't shield boost like its supposed to, before any AMPS are added it has more boosting power then the pith x-type, but when you add shield boost amps onto your ship, it doesn't do anywhere near the same amount of boost as a pith x-type does, now i don't know if its because it doesn't recognize the crystal implants or what, but somethings amiss here...

Pith X-type X-Large shield booster + 3 amps + crystal set = 3,666.49 shield boost

Ancillary X-Large shield booster + 3 amps + crystal set = 3,100 shield boost

and the base stats are :

Pith = 840 shield bonus

Ancillary = 940 shield bonus

so somethings not getting calculated correctly i don't think

PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, put the cargo, items and ships windows back as it was or, at least, let people choose how to have it. It's not user friendly at all. Can you CCP please do it, the quicker the better?

Generally I adapted to your changes, but this one, yuck, really, I just can't stand it.

When I'm in station, I have my active ships cargo hold, Item Hanger and Ship Hangers open. When I leave and reenter the station, I have to reopen the Item and Ship Hangers. The active ships Cargo Hold remains open and where I position it on screen. When I reopen the Items and Ship Hangers, they open where I previously positioned them.

Would it be possible to enable opening the Corp Hanger separately. I find it handy to be able to have the Corp Hanger open separately.

However, it's not.


A lot of constructive feedback has been posted in the sisi thread during the recent weeks. I had the impression the responsible team took it to heart? Why would you have to compile a new list?

I didn't check today but yesterday, everything I put in an Audit Log Secure Container was locked even though the containers were configured so Items put in them were to be unlocked. When I went to Configure Container, the configuration was unchanged - i.e. they were still configured for items put in them remain unlocked.

There is a known issue with some of the ship bonuses on ships that give shield bonus (like Maelstrom). These don't work with the new shield boosters (we're looking into fixing that). But the amps and the crystal implants should work with the new mods. Can you tell me what ship you were flying?

Funny. CCP's bug ninja closed my bug report and said "The problem you have described was non-reproducible."

If two dozen people here have been able to reproduce the problem, it's definitely reproducible.

I still can't start Eve on my mac.

It actually does work with Sleipnir / Cyclone / Tengu / Presumably Claymore (but not tested). It does not work with BS Class (Maelstrom / Golem / Presumably Vargur)

Yep, flying a Golem

Now imagine for a moment one of your appendages does not exist on your upper torso. One of mine doesn't. Up until now, I have been able to play the majority o this game by being a mouse whore. One of the things I have always liked about this sand box we call EVE is being able to play one handed.

Now fast forward to this patch. try to play this game now, with the current 'fixes/patch" one handed. Answer is, redock and unsub. You have now forever dramatically affected my ability to play the game.

and btw, I work for one of the larger software companies in the wold, Very High Level Architect for them and participate regularly in the QA process and testing. I truly understand Why some people are of the opinion the nested sub menu and the functions needed to support, what would normally be sloppy development, a general consideration as sloppy UI design. But this is NOT normal software.

And for those of you not understanding the hangar, I get it. It does not show that ship you are in cause it active and not parked in the hangar. Still makes one kind of panic when you are accustomed to seeing your ships assets in the window and wonder where in the hell you left a ship at.

I would be interested in seeing your use cases (User Stories) for some of these changes. If you are operating under Agile these days, well, I probably get it as Agile just sux in a complex software environment because Agile does not afford the time to actually think through the impacts like waterfall does. Even the authors of Agile readily admit,t Agile should only be used for short run, simple outcome efforts and has been proven numerous times to fail the market when the effort is complex.

Given, the testing on SiSi is mostly concentrated in one system. Soooo, you would have easily missed the session change for the inventory pop on session changes in to the new system. Although, after trying to keep up with this thread for 12 pages, I still do not see this issue readily acknowledged even though numerous posters have mentioned it, without raging even.

Respectfully,