These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

CCP technetium !!!!!!!!!!!
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Pink Marshmellow
Caucasian Culture Club
#161 - 2012-05-22 18:01:26 UTC
Technetium is one of the things CCP put into the null to promote fights.

If you nerfed Tech well motivation for fighting would fall greatly. It requires several manhours along with lots of organization of thousands of people to acquire a source of tech.
JitaPriceChecker2
Doomheim
#162 - 2012-05-22 18:05:18 UTC
Pink Marshmellow wrote:
Technetium is one of the things CCP put into the null to promote fights.



Then they are doing a crappy job at promoting other regions than north.
Richard Desturned
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#163 - 2012-05-22 18:08:36 UTC
Pink Marshmellow wrote:
Technetium is one of the things CCP put into the null to promote fights.

If you nerfed Tech well motivation for fighting would fall greatly. It requires several manhours along with lots of organization of thousands of people to acquire a source of tech.


the problem is that it's the only moon mineral worth fighting over

npc alts have no opinions worth consideration
Hedion's oracle
Naari LLC
#164 - 2012-05-23 02:13:23 UTC
Pink Marshmellow wrote:
Technetium is one of the things CCP put into the null to promote fights.

If you nerfed Tech well motivation for fighting would fall greatly. It requires several manhours along with lots of organization of thousands of people to acquire a source of tech.

It also requires several hundred hours of posting from the Napfest North countering logical arguments calling for Tec Redistrabution.Blink

Error: Working As intended
Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#165 - 2012-05-23 07:13:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Lord Zim
Hedion's oracle wrote:
Pink Marshmellow wrote:
Technetium is one of the things CCP put into the null to promote fights.

If you nerfed Tech well motivation for fighting would fall greatly. It requires several manhours along with lots of organization of thousands of people to acquire a source of tech.

It also requires several hundred hours of posting from the Napfest North countering logical arguments calling for Tec Redistrabution.Blink

Your arguments are about as good as your spelling, as are your accusations. (To make it easy for you: you're dumb, your arguments are ****, and your spelling is atrocious.)

But hey, if you want to ignore all the times literally the entire playerbase has gone on record to try to get CCP to fix the moongoo consumption imbalance (even before it was an actual imbalance), then go ahead, you're the one who'll end up with egg on your face.

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat
Elzon1
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#166 - 2012-05-23 08:54:12 UTC
I'm still confused why r32 alchemy hasn't been implemented. It seems the devs want this bottleneck to stay for some strange reason. If r32 alchemy isn't enough then add ring mining on top of that. This bottleneck has persisted for far too long and its time to end it.

I'm glad the goons and others have taken the time to bring this issue to the forefront as it is an important one. This issue has been around almost the entire time I have been playing EVE and I would be happy to see it finally fixed.
admiral root
Red Galaxy
#167 - 2012-05-23 09:24:26 UTC  |  Edited by: admiral root
Rico Minali wrote:
Oh look, its yet another thread about how some people worked to be successful and I am still failing, please CCP help me be more successful by pulling down those who worked to achieve their ends.



Well what else are us non-CFC types supposed to do? Organise ourselves and mobilise against the "enemy"? Defeat them and then pillage their lands? That kinda crazy talk will land you a padded room at the nearest looney hotel. Roll

No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff
Blawrf McTaggart
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#168 - 2012-05-23 13:41:45 UTC
Zhihatsu wrote:
Killer Gandry wrote:
Richard Desturned wrote:


Considering that you're one of those who constantly moans about Goonswarm and Mittens at every turn you should probably take your own advice.


I do moan about Goonswarm and I do moan about Mittens.
They do give enough ammo to shoot at them, don't you agree?

Goons and Mittens have worked hard to be the most hated and distrusted people in the game and now you moan that people express their dislike.

You really should have your clone checked on malfunctions in the intelligence department.


But see, it's one thing to moan about Goons blowing up spaceships. It is totally another for people to go nuts and accuse CCP of favoritism towards GSF (when GSF has been at the forefront of exposing favoritism in the past), to accuse GSF of desiring to literally destroy the game (when we've actually been working hard to help fix the game, through the CSM and various GSF-driven initiatives), and to accuse GSF of being entirely made up of botters and RMTers (which have existed in GSF, just as they do almost everywhere in EVE).


stop seriousposting, nerd
Arnema Schnazz
Doomheim
#169 - 2012-05-23 13:46:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Arnema Schnazz
Doctor Benway Kado wrote:
Yes, tech should be nerfed. Pretty sure that's been the party line since last year. But until it is (and the nerf is coming), the pubbies will just have to grin and bear it. Maybe you should vote for the goonfleet CSM next time, and not get him thrown off this time. Just a thought.



Really! Here I was thinking he pissed his position and your votes up against a wall because he didn't know when to stop drinking.

Goons, out BoBbing BoB by the power of the blob.
Blawrf McTaggart
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#170 - 2012-05-23 13:48:06 UTC
didn't want those votes anyway