These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

I'm Gallente, and I own slaves

Author
Ston Momaki
Disciples of Ston
#61 - 2012-05-22 14:10:12 UTC
Leto Aramaus wrote:
enslave and own beautiful young girls (of all races)...


You are a Pedophile!

The Disciples of Ston bid you peace

Leto Aramaus
Frog Team Four
Of Essence
#62 - 2012-05-22 14:27:07 UTC
Quote:
You are a Pedophile!


Your logic is irrefutable. I must be, how nice... one more evil label placed upon me, pirate, murderer, rapist, pedophile... I shall add these to my corporate titles!
Repentence Tyrathlion
Tyrathlion Interstellar
#63 - 2012-05-22 15:41:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Repentence Tyrathlion
Tiberious Thessalonia wrote:
Leto Aramaus wrote:
Who ever said anything about pedophilia?

"Young" does not mean infantile you slanderer. I should bring you up on charges... or simply find you and destroy your ship for those accusations.

I made no such thing "clear". Seems a habit of you zealots and fools to assume that what you take from someone's statements must be the only interpretation.


Please, Mr. Gallente Policeman! A capsuleer is slandering me about my illegally owned slaves! He is saying I am a pedophile, when I am clearly just a rapist!


Damn it, Thessalonia, will you stop making me laugh? It keeps ruining my anti-Sansha bias.

But on the topic at hand... I've been around a bit. Used to work for the Angel Cartel, never got directly involved with the slave trading side there, but I saw it. I've also seen Blooder slaving rings (or what's left of them after I melt their defences), and I've helped to run a psuedo-legitimate Holding in lowsec, and of course I've seen more than a few Holdings in the Empire and Kingdom - including that of my own family, that I now run.

The main thing that I have drawn from all that is that 'slavery' is a mutable term. Different people, different cultures, different societies mean different things by it. Sometimes those terms can get mixed up. Quite often those different meanings come from different views of the same thing. The Amarrians view slavery as a religious institution and a way of enlightening the universe - the Minmatar view tends to be that it's an abomination and attempt to destroy them as a people. Different people, different meanings, same term.

tl;dr: ITT, semantics at work.

Mr Aramaus' definition of slavery seems like a very Gallentean one. Kink-laden and dubious in morality. Not enormously surprising, since high ethical standards are not often a huge priority in the capsuleer community, but not much of an excuse. Nonconsensual sex is pretty high on the list of things that Should Not Be Done, by anyone's standards. If you really thought to find approval from Amarrian society... well, I'm insulted.
Leto Aramaus
Frog Team Four
Of Essence
#64 - 2012-05-22 15:52:28 UTC
That's amusing...

that non-consensual sex is, according to you, on the list of things that "should not be done", yet genocide and enslaving an entire race is god's command and a holy crusade.

Hilarious really.

Tiberious Thessalonia
True Slave Foundations
#65 - 2012-05-22 16:00:05 UTC
Ms. Tyrathlion, I will assume that means that my humour implants are functioning at 100% efficiency then. Thank you for participating in my test.

Did that help?
Repentence Tyrathlion
Tyrathlion Interstellar
#66 - 2012-05-22 16:10:25 UTC
Leto Aramaus wrote:
That's amusing...

that non-consensual sex is, according to you, on the list of things that "should not be done", yet genocide and enslaving an entire race is god's command and a holy crusade.

Hilarious really.



If we're going to start dragging up past mistakes and the delusions of traditionalists, shall I tell you a little story involving Gallentean imperialistic oppression of some people who shared their home system?

No nation is clean and innocent, but kindly desist from implying that I am a mindless stereotypical drone of my upbringing.

And yes, Tiberious, your circuits are working nicely. Keep it up, it gives me perspective on the world.
Leto Aramaus
Frog Team Four
Of Essence
#67 - 2012-05-22 16:15:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Leto Aramaus
I just assumed you believed the Amarr version of slavery was righteous, like most of your people, but adding sex to forcing men and women to do whatever you command, makes it disgusting and vile. That's the message I'm getting from most of these Amarrians.

If that's not the case, and you actually believe that all forms of slavery, sexual in nature or not, are wrong... then I would be glad to hear your thoughts and opinions. You're one of the 2 or 3 people who have responded to this channel with any intelligent input.

Oh and "past mistakes" ?? Unless I'm very out of the loop in intergalactic happenings, the last I remember, the Amarr were still enslaving Minmatar around the cluster.
Evelyn Meiyi
Corvidae Trading and Holding
#68 - 2012-05-22 16:42:40 UTC
Leto Aramaus wrote:
I just assumed you believed the Amarr version of slavery was righteous, like most of your people, but adding sex to forcing men and women to do whatever you command, makes it disgusting and vile. That's the message I'm getting from most of these Amarrians.

If that's not the case, and you actually believe that all forms of slavery, sexual in nature or not, are wrong... then I would be glad to hear your thoughts and opinions. You're one of the 2 or 3 people who have responded to this channel with any intelligent input.

Oh and "past mistakes" ?? Unless I'm very out of the loop in intergalactic happenings, the last I remember, the Amarr were still enslaving Minmatar around the cluster.


Personally, I find the idea of sexual slavery to be vile. We are chosen to bring people into God's presence, not subject them to assaults of this type.

Not to mention that bragging about such things in a public forum shows a sinful level of pride. Shame on you, sir.
Repentence Tyrathlion
Tyrathlion Interstellar
#69 - 2012-05-22 16:51:51 UTC
Leto Aramaus wrote:
I just assumed you believed the Amarr version of slavery was righteous, like most of your people, but adding sex to forcing men and women to do whatever you command, makes it disgusting and vile. That's the message I'm getting from most of these Amarrians.

If that's not the case, and you actually believe that all forms of slavery, sexual in nature or not, are wrong... then I would be glad to hear your thoughts and opinions. You're one of the 2 or 3 people who have responded to this channel with any intelligent input.

Oh and "past mistakes" ?? Unless I'm very out of the loop in intergalactic happenings, the last I remember, the Amarr were still enslaving Minmatar around the cluster.


That would fall under the heading of 'delusions of traditionalists'. It didn't work the first time, I don't see anything changing by trying it again now. For the record, I mostly hold the Republic responsible for the current war, although I won't say that the Empire has done nothing to contribute. Both seem quite happy with the current state of affairs. My rants about the Empyrean war are not the topic on hand, however.

Let me correct you - the best way I would describe myself is anti-emancipation. Not quite the same thing as pro-slavery. Slavery as a tool is badly misused, misunderstood and misrepresented. I'm sure that some people do genuinely believe that they're doing the right thing. Some Holders mistreat their slaves. Some believe that slavery is a religious calling. These three attributes do not necessarily imply one another, but nor are they mutually exclusive - if that makes sense.

But mass emancipation is not the way forward, and it would do considerably more harm than good to everyone concerned, not least the former slaves. I'm not going to pretend that every slave has a happy life right now. My gut tells me that that is quite possibly the exception rather than the rule. But there is no benefit in owning a slave that is not fed and rested and healthy. Could the Republic guaruntee that for all the billions of people that would suddenly be dumped upon them? Not likely. Meanwhile, the Empire and Kingdom would collapse as a massive chunk of the society and economic foundation was removed.

So no, I don't think emancipation is a good idea. Nor do I think that slavery is inherently a bad one. I own two estates, and a fairly significant number of slaves - and I understand that it is my duty and responsibility to ensure that every one of them is cared for and at least content, if not happy. The common conception is that slavery is a way of getting free labour, when in truth, it simply means that you become responsible for all their costs of living, and their consequent well-being. A slave is a human being, and should be treated as such.

If a Holder (I use the term loosely) is unable to provide for their slaves, then clearly something is wrong, and those slaves should be moved on to somewhere that they can be cared for. This is the inherent price; a slave does not have as much freedom as a normal individual, but they gain some certainty as to their future. As capsuleers, we stand apart - but how many baseliners really have the freedom to go and do and be what they wish? How many wish for some kind of certainty? I'm not proposing mass enslavement, merely pointing out that as a theoretical proposition, slavery is not as bad as it might seem.

The problem comes when people abuse their power. When doesn't it? Sexual abuse of a slave falls into that category; it amounts to stripping away their existence as a person, reducing them to a thing, a toy. A slave maintains their sense of self and the rights of a person because we, the owners, do not take it away. We can. We have that power. But just because one can, doesn't mean that one should.

I cannot speak for those who consider slavery to be a religious institution. Here in the Khanid Kingdom, although we sometimes pretend otherwise, slavery tends to be prosaic and secular. But that core ideal, that there is an unspoken pact between the owned and the owner that should not be broken, is universal. Not everyone adheres to it; the Blood Raiders do not, because to them, a slave is an animal, a being to be worked and drained of blood. The Cartel does not (although some groups are better than others), as to them, a slave is a tool and a piece of property, a source of money or a tangible investment. But here, in the civilised world, that pact should hold.

The reason why it has such a bad name is that some people ignore it.
Tiberious Thessalonia
True Slave Foundations
#70 - 2012-05-22 17:10:01 UTC
I actually quite agree with Ms. Tyrathlion there. Something that many slave holders seem to miss is that in the way the Amarr, ideally, do things, neither the slave nor the holder are free.

As a poetic example, think of the Slave and the Holder as being bound together, and while the holder holds the keys to the chains, if he undoes his own chains he also frees the slaves. He may whip them after, or decimate them to try to make them obey, but once he has undone those chains those slaves are now free to act purely in the role of free human beings acting against an oppressor.

In short, in the Amarrian mindset, at least ideally, you must act morally to engender moral behavior in others.

It is the Empire's shame that this particular mindset is no longer held by the majority of holders. This is why I left.
Nick Bete
Highsec Haulers Inc.
#71 - 2012-05-22 17:31:11 UTC
Entertaining and creative trolling is a job best left to professionals. However, due to the fact that I see some potential here and the number of responses generated I rate this effort at 4/10. Sub-optimal to be sure but, with some polish and hard work Pilot Aramaus could move up to the semi-pro ranks fairly quickly. Keep trying!

Also, I agree with what Pilot Starfire said.
Darius Shakor
Second Shakor Clan
#72 - 2012-05-22 21:15:44 UTC
Fredfredbug4 wrote:
At least the Amarr genuinely believe that they are helping their slaves.


Do you genuinely believe that? Amarr self-aggrandising their practice as being helpful to their victims is one of the biggest and best played mass lies in all of New Eden. Most simply own slaves because they can and it helps their social status among the other holders and such. Those that do actually believe they are doing the right thing and helping the slaves are likely laughed at behind their backs by the other holders who know what the real deal is.

As for you, Leto. I don't think I need to come here and express my outrage or gnash my teeth at you because that should be expected, right? Of course it would be. You even said so yourself in your second post that you expected the outrage of your fellow Gallente or the Minmatar people here in response. Begs the question of why you posted this nonsense to begin with because it was hardly a public awareness announcement.

Craving a little attention, are we? I love how some of you Gallente do that.

Still, it is worth knowing...

Darius Shakor - Kacha

Vandeamon Writing Project - EVE Works

AsheRaven
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#73 - 2012-05-22 21:26:10 UTC
Oh Amarr live in a perpetual state of self imposed denial. Not something I can forgive, if only pity. They fail to understand that to be a true master of the populace, enforced servitude and eventual softening up leads to a weak work force.

But this Gallente is egocentric despotism. Something even I can't respect

Or choose to acknowledge. All I see is another target to add to the list
Valdezi
Revenent Defence Corperation
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#74 - 2012-05-22 21:44:02 UTC
Perhaps if you weren't so sadly lacking in the hair department you could convince girls to bed you for your looks and the guarantee of a mind-blowing sexual extravaganza.

Instead, you use force, which leads me to question your honour and manliness.
Tiberious Thessalonia
True Slave Foundations
#75 - 2012-05-22 22:09:10 UTC
Leto Aramaus wrote:
Quote:
You brought it up. I'm saying that I would be entirely happy with you losing your ability to continue to be a monster. I want to make you human, again.


You're a strange person Mr. Thessalonia, for something like that to make you happy... who's more the monster here I wonder.

I am proud to be the "monster" that I am, and take great pride in it. I would certainly never wish to be "human" again, I pity you who still considers himself one of such a base and primitive race. I also wonder at why you would believe that to be human is better than to be an evil, nearly immortal, god of the stars.... it's been quite fun for me so far.



I missed this. You are human, genetically. You have a few steps forward in the direction that I personally believe all of humanity is going to go, in terms of the infomoph. You are not a god. You are not even a demi-god. As far as the universe is concerned, you are a piece of dust, momentarily floating around, gone in the blink of an eye, 'immortal' or no.

My principle concern is to help humanity into this next step of evolution without them becoming like you. The capsuleer project has been, for the most part, an absolutely failure in terms of bringing us to that step in as peaceful a manner as possible.

If you were truly post-human, you wouldn't have any need to force yourself on the unwilling.

Enjoy your time amongst the stars.
AsheRaven
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#76 - 2012-05-22 22:35:36 UTC
Tiberious Thessalonia wrote:
The capsuleer project has been, for the most part, an absolutely failure in terms of bringing us to that step in as peaceful a manner as possible.


How is it peace can improve the human condition? What use are the weak, even as slaves or "toys" for this.... man.... to humanity? War is good for the human condition. Without it how could we pilots have become the influence we are today? I think you see enlightenment and Utopia in a very weak light.

The passive fall, the aggressive strive
Korsavius
Revenent Defence Corperation
#77 - 2012-05-22 23:42:38 UTC
Valdezi wrote:
Perhaps if you weren't so sadly lacking in the hair department you could convince girls to bed you for your looks and the guarantee of a mind-blowing sexual extravaganza.

Instead, you use force, which leads me to question your honour and manliness.


If I was interested in my own gender, your gluteus maximus would not be safe, Val.

Cold Wind's Blade || Follow the I-RED Newsfeed & visit the I-RED GalNet site!

Leto Aramaus
Frog Team Four
Of Essence
#78 - 2012-05-23 01:09:53 UTC
Quote:
If you were truly post-human, you wouldn't have any need to force yourself on the unwilling.


Who said anything about need? I want, therefore I do.

Now, nonsense as they may have been, you may recall ancient stories of our ancestor's "gods", many figures of which Gallente ships are named... they regularly forced themselves upon mortals, impregnated them with their hybrid-god children, and so on and so forth...

It all depends on your definition of "god".

I am, by no means, an all powerful all knowing being, as much as I'd like to be. I also understand that I am not truly immortal, but I am working on that ;)

Still... in relative terms, I am a god, or at least I enjoy seeing it that way. So what is your point again Tiberious? Ah yes, no point, you just hate what I do, and the fact that I decided to publish a channel about it on the summit. Well I didn't start this thread just to "troll" and aggravate others, but it looks like I did a good job of that anyways... 4 pages and still at the top =)
Kohiko Sun
Stormcrows
#79 - 2012-05-23 01:59:30 UTC
It has been a slow news cycle. Being first among the irrelevant and forgettable is still forgettable irrelevance.
AsheRaven
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#80 - 2012-05-23 02:00:02 UTC
What? Do you think you're the first Gallante to say "I'm Gallente, and I own slaves"?

You're not the first, likely not to be the last an certainly not a unique sight on my kill list