These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Ships & Modules

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

Dreads.. so what use are they now ?

Author
sabre906
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#21 - 2012-05-20 17:44:14 UTC
Drakarin wrote:
ELECTR0FREAK wrote:
Dreads really should be an anti-capital weapon... it's a shame they're not very effective at it.

Granted, it's been a while since I got rid of my Revelation, but it's kinda sad when a typical Carrier has no trouble tanking a DPS-fit Dread.


How is this the case, though? Looking at the video posted in this thread, the Dreadnaught was doing an actual dps of at least 10,000 assuming he did not miss, which he won't against a slow moving ultra large ship like a carrier.

So why aren't they effective anti capital ships?


Speed tank.Lol

Unless it's in triage, the dread will miss, all the time.
Rroff
Antagonistic Tendencies
#22 - 2012-05-20 17:44:17 UTC
Mfume Apocal wrote:

Triaged Archon + 2 local reppers + 2x EANMs + Damnation bonuses = 14k DPS tanked (before heat or exile). It's cap stable doing that btw. Overheated w/ strong exile, it's about 25k DPS tanked.


Throw in exile, legion booster and a couple of faction eanms (they aren't _that_ expensive) and thats easily well over 20K dps sustained tank without overheating.
Drakarin
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#23 - 2012-05-20 19:48:10 UTC
sabre906 wrote:
Drakarin wrote:
ELECTR0FREAK wrote:
Dreads really should be an anti-capital weapon... it's a shame they're not very effective at it.

Granted, it's been a while since I got rid of my Revelation, but it's kinda sad when a typical Carrier has no trouble tanking a DPS-fit Dread.


How is this the case, though? Looking at the video posted in this thread, the Dreadnaught was doing an actual dps of at least 10,000 assuming he did not miss, which he won't against a slow moving ultra large ship like a carrier.

So why aren't they effective anti capital ships?


Speed tank.Lol

Unless it's in triage, the dread will miss, all the time.


A dread will miss when firing against a capital ship moving at 60 m/s ...?

The hell?
sabre906
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#24 - 2012-05-20 20:35:34 UTC
Drakarin wrote:
sabre906 wrote:
Drakarin wrote:
ELECTR0FREAK wrote:
Dreads really should be an anti-capital weapon... it's a shame they're not very effective at it.

Granted, it's been a while since I got rid of my Revelation, but it's kinda sad when a typical Carrier has no trouble tanking a DPS-fit Dread.


How is this the case, though? Looking at the video posted in this thread, the Dreadnaught was doing an actual dps of at least 10,000 assuming he did not miss, which he won't against a slow moving ultra large ship like a carrier.

So why aren't they effective anti capital ships?


Speed tank.Lol

Unless it's in triage, the dread will miss, all the time.


A dread will miss when firing against a capital ship moving at 60 m/s ...?

The hell?


Yes, a lot.
Twisted Girl
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#25 - 2012-05-20 21:15:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Twisted Girl
Baneken wrote:
Drakarin wrote:
ELECTR0FREAK wrote:
Dreads really should be an anti-capital weapon... it's a shame they're not very effective at it.

Granted, it's been a while since I got rid of my Revelation, but it's kinda sad when a typical Carrier has no trouble tanking a DPS-fit Dread.


How is this the case, though? Looking at the video posted in this thread, the Dreadnaught was doing an actual dps of at least 10,000 assuming he did not miss, which he won't against a slow moving ultra large ship like a carrier.

So why aren't they effective anti capital ships?


Because of siege and that mom's had an equal/better DPS with E-war immunity and that FB's had no problems what so ever at dealing that same 10k dps on sub-capitals as well as capitals.
Now that super caps are least somewhat toned down regular caps, or rather their sub-capital support fleets, aren't as vulnerable as they used to.



its a lot of things that wrong in this thread but Im just gonna point out a few.

first off all supers got twice the dmg of a carrier if they had all their fighter drones. (which is like 2500 dps in a nyx)
however real combat fitted supers WILL NEVER have 20 fighters, nyxes and hels will have 15 , aeons and wyverns gonna have 10) They want to have 20 fighterbomber and then its only room for 15-10 fighters.
This means that Aeons and Wyverns do exactly the same dps as their "non supercap" siberlings, 1k dps (archon and chimera) agains subcaps. Nyx which does the most does 1920dps with its 15 fighters.
That is if target is webbed/got huge enough sig to be hit full force. Fighters tracks a little worse than heavy drones in my experince.

FBs is totaly useless again subcaps btw.




Quote:

Speed tank.Lol

Unless it's in triage, the dread will miss, all the time.

A dread will miss when firing against a capital ship moving at 60 m/s ...?

The hell?

]Yes, a lot.



Dreads got 0 issues tracking carriers unless they use the long range guns and sit at 5km trying to shoot carriers moving.
That is without tracking fit aswell.You can hit frigates with dreads I mean as long as you know what your is doing/frigate doesnt know what hes doing.


Btw reason why Dreads is less popular in non WH is mostly due to that they are 3 billion a pop due to mineral prices, they are a blob magnate and scale worse than carriers(cant rep eachother) , they are stuck for 5min pr cycle, They do equally/bether damage than a super , but got much less ehp. and people are afraid of loosing them. the second you trow away the "afraid" of loosing them the quicker you will have success with them. As long as your just catch people by suprice and is simply shooting someone/something while they are disorginized they rule.
Baneken
Arctic Light Inc.
Arctic Light
#26 - 2012-05-21 22:12:48 UTC
Twisted Girl wrote:


its a lot of things that wrong in this thread but Im just gonna point out a few.

first off all supers got twice the dmg of a carrier if they had all their fighter drones. (which is like 2500 dps in a nyx)
however real combat fitted supers WILL NEVER have 20 fighters, nyxes and hels will have 15 , aeons and wyverns gonna have 10) They want to have 20 fighterbomber and then its only room for 15-10 fighters.
This means that Aeons and Wyverns do exactly the same dps as their "non supercap" siberlings, 1k dps (archon and chimera) agains subcaps. Nyx which does the most does 1920dps with its 15 fighters.
That is if target is webbed/got huge enough sig to be hit full force. Fighters tracks a little worse than heavy drones in my experince.

FBs is totaly useless again subcaps btw.


3 per lvl = 15 + 5 = 20 = 10 000 dps from a max skilled Nyx; FB's used to hit full on any subcapital.
As far as fighters/drones are concerned a Nyx or any other mom can have twice as much fighters out as any carrier.

Now that FB's have guns instead of missiles along with a host of other nerfs they are a lot less deadly on sub capitals then they used to.
Also 5 min siege timer and other improvements have made dreads a whole lot better (especially the removal of tracking bonus while sieged) and I can't complain about 5min triage on carriers either.
Mocam
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#27 - 2012-05-22 02:23:52 UTC
I haven't tried it but don't dreads still lose all targeting when shifting to siege mode?

They do lose three quarters of their scan res (example: A Moros will go from 100mm to 25mm in siege).

That composite means you spend about 20 seconds locking a Carrier once you do get in siege mode and that 14k DPS number is based upon siege -- using anti-matter, which will get you under 6k optimal with 19k falloff.

A blaster Moros should probably look at different ammo than anti-matter if that carrier isn't in triage mode. Parking on top of a target (siege), then spending 20 seconds or so locking it is quite a while if it can move at all.
Valea Silpha
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#28 - 2012-05-22 08:55:28 UTC
sabre906 wrote:
Drakarin wrote:
sabre906 wrote:
Drakarin wrote:
ELECTR0FREAK wrote:
Dreads really should be an anti-capital weapon... it's a shame they're not very effective at it.

Granted, it's been a while since I got rid of my Revelation, but it's kinda sad when a typical Carrier has no trouble tanking a DPS-fit Dread.


How is this the case, though? Looking at the video posted in this thread, the Dreadnaught was doing an actual dps of at least 10,000 assuming he did not miss, which he won't against a slow moving ultra large ship like a carrier.

So why aren't they effective anti capital ships?


Speed tank.Lol

Unless it's in triage, the dread will miss, all the time.


A dread will miss when firing against a capital ship moving at 60 m/s ...?

The hell?


Yes, a lot.


Well, its the same old tracking formula. You can't just say a carrier will speed tank a sieged dread without some qualifiers.

If the carrier is very very close to the dread, and it is orbiting at max speed, then yes, it can drop its damage to practically nothing. However, that's not hugely realistic for a number of reasons.

Firstly, dropping a dread on a carrier before it is in triage is dumb. And tbh, even beyond that you shouldn't be dropping the dread until it is in triage and under some capacitor pressure, with your sub caps switching dps around and generally forcing it to run reps a lot.

Secondly, dropping a dread on a carrier at 0m is dumb. Capital blasters may not have epic range, but they have a good 20km range, and you should be seeking to drop at about 15ish km away, with the dread coming in so that anything the carrier might want to burn towards when it comes out of triage is in a straight line.

Thirdly, if your sub caps can manage to put 1 regular non pimp web on the carrier, then its ability to speed tank is greatly diminished (8k dps at 5km, 10k dps at 8km) , and with 2 webs its basically non existent (10k dps at 3km at full transversal).

Finally, a carrier would have to be totally surplus to requirements in terms of repping its subcap gang to even think about dropping out of triage and orbiting a dread thats shooting it. If the carriers reps are totally unneeded, then that means the dreads sup cap gang has failed. They are fighting against a bigger or better equipped gang that is just shrugging off its damage, and that means that the dread is probably going to die anyway because its support can't help it. The carrier has no need to be there, and so would probably be better advised to leave than to stay and orbit the dread for giggles.

So put all that together, and it tells us that while it is certainly possible to speed tank a dread in a carrier. I'm certainly not denying that. However, for a lot of reasons its not generally realistic. If a carrier is a triage and gets shot at by a singular dread, its pretty much stuck there until the fight is decided one way or the other. If it untriages at some point, it is to jump out or otherwise run away.
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#29 - 2012-05-22 09:57:43 UTC
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:
ELECTR0FREAK wrote:
Dreads really should be an anti-capital weapon... it's a shame they're not very effective at it.

Granted, it's been a while since I got rid of my Revelation, but it's kinda sad when a typical Carrier has no trouble tanking a DPS-fit Dread.



Since when?

A typical carrier can "easily" tank 90K shots from Moros with support fleet? -excuse me if I have some hard time believing you.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMFahR4wXTg

Here's a pair of Archons tanking 2 Dreads and 4 Supers. How's that for a support fleet.

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

Cunanium
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#30 - 2012-05-23 23:37:30 UTC
RubyPorto wrote:
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:
ELECTR0FREAK wrote:
Dreads really should be an anti-capital weapon... it's a shame they're not very effective at it.

Granted, it's been a while since I got rid of my Revelation, but it's kinda sad when a typical Carrier has no trouble tanking a DPS-fit Dread.



Since when?

A typical carrier can "easily" tank 90K shots from Moros with support fleet? -excuse me if I have some hard time believing you.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMFahR4wXTg

Here's a pair of Archons tanking 2 Dreads and 4 Supers. How's that for a support fleet.



If the archons are tactically refitting and the other side isn't paying attention, then yes they can. And if the other side isn't bringing in a nuet domi with their support... I mean the video is pretty fail on the other side...

Dreads have become a whole lot better since the removal of the tracking penalty for siege mode. I think most people in this thread never read patch notes or something... With T2 sieges, removal of tracking penalties and the sig radius nerf to Titan XL turrets, dreads are now the blap machines against sub caps. "A Dread in Siege" is now a saying of the past...

Carrier speed tank a dread? Lawl, not anymore. Throw a web on the carrier if he even manages to get close to the dread and it is all over.

Mom's also have a huge liability with FB's. A good support fleet will completely remove FB's from the field, eliminating their dps. Hence, most Mom's have been relegated to the world of TP'ing for Titans to blap, or as fleet fixture points.

The problem with dreads now is their lack of tank and relatively poor scaling with regards to carriers, however, with newer tactics against Fighters and FB, carriers have started to lose their edge in fights as well. You will start to see alot more dreads out there since they bring alot of the blap capability of a titan without the huge liability.
Victor Sane
A-1 Industrial and Salvage
#31 - 2012-05-24 11:12:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Victor Sane
Br4inz wrote:
Just come back to the game after a fairly long break, got a dread sitting about, are these only used for pos bashing stil ?

is so its gona get sold/refined cos no way im coming back to eve to shoot pos =p


yes they are used for pos yanking, but when dust514 comes out as a new coupling feature with eve online dreads will serve as a crucial backup for planetary bombardment backups for conquering them or defending.

Beyond this i dont know what other purpose they could serve than being a fleet supporter for very large fleet combats.
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#32 - 2012-05-24 22:03:12 UTC
Cunanium wrote:
RubyPorto wrote:
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:
ELECTR0FREAK wrote:
Dreads really should be an anti-capital weapon... it's a shame they're not very effective at it.

Granted, it's been a while since I got rid of my Revelation, but it's kinda sad when a typical Carrier has no trouble tanking a DPS-fit Dread.



Since when?

A typical carrier can "easily" tank 90K shots from Moros with support fleet? -excuse me if I have some hard time believing you.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMFahR4wXTg

Here's a pair of Archons tanking 2 Dreads and 4 Supers. How's that for a support fleet.



If the archons are tactically refitting and the other side isn't paying attention, then yes they can. And if the other side isn't bringing in a nuet domi with their support... I mean the video is pretty fail on the other side...


He was saying that a Carrier can't tank a single dread with the type of support fleet that's likely fielded by someone who only drops one dread. This is a pair of dreads, 4 supers, and the kind of support fleet that's likely to be fielded by someone supporting a solo dread.
Sure the other side is kind of mediocre, but most people don't switch primaries when it appears that reps are having trouble keeping up with incoming dps (which is what they mean by "keeping them keen").

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

Cunanium
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#33 - 2012-05-25 00:13:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Cunanium
RubyPorto wrote:


He was saying that a Carrier can't tank a single dread with the type of support fleet that's likely fielded by someone who only drops one dread. This is a pair of dreads, 4 supers, and the kind of support fleet that's likely to be fielded by someone supporting a solo dread.
Sure the other side is kind of mediocre, but most people don't switch primaries when it appears that reps are having trouble keeping up with incoming dps (which is what they mean by "keeping them keen").



If you go through several cycles of bringing a carrier to almost hull only to have the thing repped back against your dps, its a sign that you need to swap up your TTP's. Its not hard to look at the carriers to see who is receiving reps and who is giving them and swap dps to the triage carrier.

I squarely place the loss of that fight on the FC for not realizing what was happening and countering it.

Edit: And if you arn't able to break the triage carrier before the end of his cycle you need to quit the field.
destiny2
Decaying Rocky Odious Non Evil Stupid Inane Nobody
Rogue Drone Recovery Syndicate
#34 - 2012-05-25 07:07:54 UTC
ELECTR0FREAK wrote:
Dreads really should be an anti-capital weapon... it's a shame they're not very effective at it.

Granted, it's been a while since I got rid of my Revelation, but it's kinda sad when a typical Carrier has no trouble tanking a DPS-fit Dread.



a dread can be used as anti capital weapons 5 dreads with the t2 siege mod are really nice especially the pheonix
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#35 - 2012-05-25 22:05:07 UTC
destiny2 wrote:
ELECTR0FREAK wrote:
Dreads really should be an anti-capital weapon... it's a shame they're not very effective at it.

Granted, it's been a while since I got rid of my Revelation, but it's kinda sad when a typical Carrier has no trouble tanking a DPS-fit Dread.



a dread can be used as anti capital weapons 5 dreads with the t2 siege mod are really nice especially the pheonix


Phoenix.... nice.... Phoenix... nice... Shocked

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

Apolyon I
Shadow of ISW
#36 - 2012-05-26 03:07:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Apolyon I
Lin-Young Borovskova wrote:
ELECTR0FREAK wrote:
Dreads really should be an anti-capital weapon... it's a shame they're not very effective at it.

Granted, it's been a while since I got rid of my Revelation, but it's kinda sad when a typical Carrier has no trouble tanking a DPS-fit Dread.



Since when?

A typical carrier can "easily" tank 90K shots from Moros with support fleet? -excuse me if I have some hard time believing you.


my carrier tank 3 dread and cap stable

EDIT: no overheat needed

Rroff wrote:

A mildly pimped archon with legion links, exile and overheating can tank more than twice that for a couple of minutes or so and 25-28k dps sustained.


that thing can tank 40~45k dps in a few mins and cap stable
Rip Minner
ARMITAGE Logistics Salvage and Industries
#37 - 2012-05-26 04:01:51 UTC
Mfume Apocal wrote:
Br4inz wrote:
Just come back to the game after a fairly long break, got a dread sitting about, are these only used for pos bashing stil ?

is so its gona get sold/refined cos no way im coming back to eve to shoot pos =p


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R2ti9DFeRMI



That's Classic man I love it.


Ok Caps are great when facing off against high numbers that dont have any.

Basicly what happend there is you already know Dreads tracking is crap you need range to hit smaller ships right.

So what you do is use two groups. A and B. Put like 80-100km between the two.

Any body attacking group A is shreaded by group B and anyone attacking group B is shreaded by group A.

Distance makes tracking a more or less non issue.

Is it a rock point a lazer at it and profit. Is it a ship point a lazer at it and profit. I dont see any problems here.

Rip Marley
MANPENIS
#38 - 2012-06-27 10:04:18 UTC
So, dreads are better than they were but still not as useful as a carrier for anything other than a POS bash?






Also, is it just me or are the Revelation and Moros just all around better than the Pheonix and Naglfar? The Revelation and Moros can do the same jobs as the Pheonix and Naglfar, but are able to blast sub caps much more effectively if circumstances permit.





I ask because I've always wanted to find a reason to buy a Naglfar but dreads in general didn't seem worth the time to train or the Isk to buy.
Robert Lefcourt
BigPoppaMonkeys
E.B.O.L.A.
#39 - 2012-06-27 11:10:44 UTC
Reppyk wrote:
ELECTR0FREAK wrote:
Granted, it's been a while since I got rid of my Revelation, but it's kinda sad when a typical Carrier has no trouble tanking a DPS-fit Dread.
Tell me how you tank the 14,000 dps from a moros.


I move away further than 20 km ;-)


regards,

Rob
Apolyon I
Shadow of ISW
#40 - 2012-06-27 11:13:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Apolyon I
Rip Marley wrote:
So, dreads are better than they were but still not as useful as a carrier for anything other than a POS bash?

Also, is it just me or are the Revelation and Moros just all around better than the Pheonix and Naglfar? The Revelation and Moros can do the same jobs as the Pheonix and Naglfar, but are able to blast sub caps much more effectively if circumstances permit.

I ask because I've always wanted to find a reason to buy a Naglfar but dreads in general didn't seem worth the time to train or the Isk to buy.

the problem with citadel missile is its crappy explosive radius, while rev and moros can blast the sh*t out of BS and with enough web/TP, subcap too. citadel missile can't, the only thing it can hit is anything bigger than a carrier.

otherwise, capital projectile works fine
Reppyk wrote:

Tell me how you tank the 14,000 dps from a moros.

a standard fit triage archon can tank 14k dps from moros without a single sweat, using drug
Previous page123Next page