These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Supers "nerf" WRONG

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Solstice Project
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#121 - 2011-09-29 11:05:59 UTC

OP is right, of course,
because he used the word "factually" in a paragraph
full of opinions, which - of course - are well known facts.

Now, on the other hand ...

Give us the ability to dock into them,
in combination with the self destruct.
-> Clear Skies 2

As Clear Skies 2 is a movie, it is of course factually true.
That said, factually speaking, i know better than everybody else.
Of course.


Where my sarcasm tag ?
Dirk Tungsten
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#122 - 2011-10-03 12:46:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Dirk Tungsten
You all want to know the real reason for Supers & Titans getting a nerf. Its completely biased and will massively decrease player base. Goons with there multiple CSM's GMs are pushing, influencing these nerfs becuase they want to be able to lagg out systems with 2000 man fleets again, the only thing that has so far countered Mass goon blobs has been Supers/Titans. Lagging out systems is neither Pro or fun for any1, it is a mark for how fail Goons are that they are influencing this decision. No1s fualt but there own that they dont have the balls to use there own Supers/Titans.

CCP should step in an make sure biased influences such as these are picked up an dealt with. Leaving it to continue will lose the game a huge chunk of Vets who are ofc the main loyal player base of EVE.
Mendolus
Aurelius Federation
#123 - 2011-10-03 13:53:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Mendolus
This thread is shameful, quit bumping it, you have no idea what you're talking about.

Edit: Yes, I realize I bumped it myself, but ffs, could you be more wrong?

...clearly the Ishukone Watch Scorpion is the fifth horseman of the Apocalypse, i.e. the Brown Rider, otherwise known as Poopie.
Scatim Helicon
State War Academy
Caldari State
#124 - 2011-10-03 13:54:43 UTC
I'd be angry too if I'd joined an alliance of mouth-foaming keyboard mashers like NC. and then RMT'd myself into a supercap so that I could declare myself an elite PvPer, just in time to be kicked in the balls by a long-overdue rebalance.

Every time you post a WiS thread, Hilmar strangles a kitten.
Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
#125 - 2011-10-03 13:55:16 UTC
Can we get this thread locked too? Since its full of false accusations and bitterness. Wheres that report button.



Also super serious question to a mod. Why can't you "like" posts in lock threads?

CCP's Motto: If it isn't broken, break it. If it is broken, ignore it. Improving NPE / Dynamic New Eden
Guy Grand
Doomheim
#126 - 2011-10-03 13:57:40 UTC
I would agree, the GMs and CSMs are biased. Biased towards a horrible mechanic that should have been fixed a while ago.

You are being discriminated against, they are showing discrimination toward your use of a horrible mechanic as a power lever.

As for influences, everyone is influenced by something. I have no doubt that you are just as influenced by your desire to retain said power lever, and in reality have no concern for the state of the game. This of course destroys the assumed ethical superiority of your position.

Leaving your argument with... nothing, no substance, no reason to respond with anything but ridicule, or as you so delightfully put it in another thread, "nonscence".
Austneal
Nero Fazione
#127 - 2011-10-03 14:04:22 UTC
Slade Trillgon
Brutor Force Federated
#128 - 2011-10-03 14:14:40 UTC
:Annoyed

Your arguments are horrible and those of six year old child having his toy taken away.

But be my guest, continue to rabble raise with horrible arguments and use your alt to like all your posts.

But please oh please;

Learn to quote!


Slade
Xython
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#129 - 2011-10-03 14:16:37 UTC
These threads are only going to get bigger, louder, and more incoherent the closer we get to winter.

~ Winter is coming ~
Tijai Betula
Ontogenic Achronycal PLC
#130 - 2011-10-03 15:06:23 UTC
Rodj Blake wrote:
Supercaps should be generally very tough, but extremely vulnerable to noobships that target the exhaust vent.



I like this.

No I really like this - theres potential here ;)
Jaroslav Unwanted
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#131 - 2011-10-03 15:09:34 UTC
Tijai Betula wrote:
Rodj Blake wrote:
Supercaps should be generally very tough, but extremely vulnerable to noobships that target the exhaust vent.



I like this.

No I really like this - theres potential here ;)



Would require different style of maneuvering ..aka fps mode.
CCP Zymurgist
C C P
C C P Alliance
#132 - 2011-10-03 15:47:30 UTC
Moved from General Discussion.

Zymurgist Community Representative CCP NA, EVE Online Contact Us at http://support.eveonline.com/pages/petitions/createpetition.aspx
Sarahs Sister
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#133 - 2011-10-03 15:49:15 UTC
My only 2 cents is that we do and can chnage SuperC so that they cant target structures and FB cant target anything other than a capital. And a EHP buff to match that of a well fit Aeon.

Dreads should then have a 80% buff to damage and a 50% buff to hp a 10% buff to resists and the obvious 5min siege. Allow dreads to only attack structures in siege and ships out of siege.

my reasons are that the SuperC become anti cap ships rather then territory mechines and can support Dreads that are there to kill structures. SuperC have always and should always be able to use 20+ drones, they do cost not LOADS of ISK but alot of ISK so should still have a very good tank. The log off trick needs to be addressed by that if the ship is shoot within 10min of the char logging off then it will stay logged in for 30min prior and if engaement stops it will log out after comabt timer fo 15min.

The buff to dreads HP and Damage means that they can do alot more damage to a SuperC and last longer with Carrier support (out of siege) and yes you will likley lose 20 dreads in a 50 dread engagement but you will kill 50-60% of the Supers. Obviously this relies on fleets have good communication and well trainned Triage carriers. (this is a good oods engagement 50 dreads is about 50-60 billion 20-40 supersC is about 400-800 billion, that might stop the blobs).

S
Temuken Radzu
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#134 - 2011-10-03 16:23:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Temuken Radzu
How about we make it simple, lets just make the Super Capitals unable to spidertank other Capitals, This way we will be able to force the capital back to a support class ship instead of the superpwnagewithnoweakness-class.
Messoroz
AQUILA INC
Verge of Collapse
#135 - 2011-10-03 17:12:07 UTC
Temuken Radzu wrote:
How about we make it simple, lets just make the Super Capitals unable to spidertank other Capitals, This way we will be able to force the capital back to a support class ship instead of the superpwnagewithnoweakness-class.



Supercaps can speed tank dreads, they barely ever spider tank. They seriously need their base speeds nerfed to ******* hell and back.
Satav
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#136 - 2011-10-03 18:58:38 UTC
When i saw the the OP was from NC. i stopped reading...................
Scatim Helicon
State War Academy
Caldari State
#137 - 2011-10-03 19:46:20 UTC
Satav wrote:
When i saw the the OP was from NC. i stopped reading...................


Strange. When I saw the OP was from NC., I started laughing.

Every time you post a WiS thread, Hilmar strangles a kitten.