These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Technology Lab

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

New PC

Author
Doyey3731
Tactical Feed.
Pandemic Horde
#1 - 2012-05-17 11:38:02 UTC
Hi all,

Sometime over the next couple of weeks I will be buying/building a new PC. I am somewhat out of date with hardware though, by a few years. I used to be in the know, but I'm more of a software guy now.

Anyway, I am looking for advice on what to buy/build for a great Eve experience. I currently have a Dell XPS 420 which is about 3 years old now and can't run eve too well.

I have a budget of around £1,500 ($3,400).

Cheers
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
#2 - 2012-05-17 12:33:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Steve Ronuken
i5 or i7 processor. i7 is better, but higher priced
GTX 560 ti or better (560's a decent graphics card. Mid range, so not stupid expensive. Runs my 2 screen at 1080p at 60fps with everything on in eve (except CQ. that drops to around 30))
8GB ram or better (I've found 8 to be my sweetspot. Not too expensive, and giving me bonuses). Populate all the slots if you can, even if it means downshifting chip size. At least in the situations I've run into, it improves your memory bandwidth.
Decent sized hard drive 1TB shouldn't set you back too much. SSD for the OS drive, if your budget stretches to it.
Windows 7 64 bit (Home premium is fine)
Multiple screens of the same size (resolution is the important factor. but actual size and height makes life nicer). Makes Eve better if you can shift stuff to a different screen.

My current rig set me back on the order of £900, if I put everything together at once.

http://www.dinopc.com/ are the people I bought from. Though check the components are what you want. The PSU I got with it needed replaced when I got the new graphics card, as it had 1 free molex connector available. nothing else.



Edit -
http://www.dinopc.com/shop/pc/Veloce-i7-3770-94p1366.htm might do you Blink Around £1k for the base unit, inc vat

Woo! CSM XI!

Fuzzwork Enterprises

Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter

TorTorden
Tors shibari party
#3 - 2012-05-17 19:00:31 UTC  |  Edited by: TorTorden
Now the GTX 560 is a great card, but a generation old already so if you are looking to upgrade I would wait just a bit more for either the 660 line or go for the Gtx 670 that got released in the wild last week (in norway, and we aren't normaly first to get these)


(googles what 3500$ would be,Hmm, I'm not getting 3400 usd for 1500 GBP, but 2500 usd, nit-picking I know)
Honestly with that big a budget I would consider the GTX 680 (if not two), and the more GPU RAM you have, the more clients you can run :)

I put together a personal shopping list for fun last month and think it had something like an i7, 12 gig RAM, 120Gig SSD, 4TB storage, GTX 680 (only single card), etc etc for about 2500 USD.
Karbowiak
State War Academy
Caldari State
#4 - 2012-05-18 13:44:10 UTC
Put it together yourself, will get you alot more computer for less / same money.

CPU: Core i7 3770K
CPU Cooling: Corsair Hydro Series H80
Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V Pro
Graphics card: Gainward GTX680 Phantom (2GB)
HDD: 2x WD Caviar Green 2TB
SSD: 2x Corsair Force Series 3 120GB
Memory: 4x4GB Corsair Vengeance
DVD: random DVD burner, doesn't really matter
Case: Silverstone Fortress FT02
PSU: Silverstone Strider 750W

Total price: about 3000 USD.

For the last ~500 USD you can go get a few more harddrives, or somehow dig up ~200 USD more, and get a 2nd GTX680

You have to find this stuff on a site like newegg or amazon, and order it, and put it together yourself tho.
If that isn't your cup of tea, you could always look around for a friend to put it together, or just go pay the same price for a machine pre-made, and with crappier specs.

Choise is yours :)
Doyey3731
Tactical Feed.
Pandemic Horde
#5 - 2012-05-18 23:36:46 UTC
Cheers guys.

I have no problem putting it together myself. I just didn't keep up to date with processers/graphics the last few years so I haven't a clue with what is good atm.

Thanks for the advice!
Hammer Crendraven
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#6 - 2012-05-20 02:31:59 UTC
Karbowiak wrote:
Put it together yourself, will get you alot more computer for less / same money.

CPU: Core i7 3770K
CPU Cooling: Corsair Hydro Series H80
Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V Pro
Graphics card: Gainward GTX680 Phantom (2GB)
HDD: 2x WD Caviar Green 2TB
SSD: 2x Corsair Force Series 3 120GB
Memory: 4x4GB Corsair Vengeance
DVD: random DVD burner, doesn't really matter
Case: Silverstone Fortress FT02
PSU: Silverstone Strider 750W

Total price: about 3000 USD.

For the last ~500 USD you can go get a few more harddrives, or somehow dig up ~200 USD more, and get a 2nd GTX680

You have to find this stuff on a site like newegg or amazon, and order it, and put it together yourself tho.
If that isn't your cup of tea, you could always look around for a friend to put it together, or just go pay the same price for a machine pre-made, and with crappier specs.

Choise is yours :)


IMHO this is overkill. Eve is not that high end requirement. I am running a E6600 wolfdale 3.06 GHz LGA socket 775 CPU
which is a dual core and a nvida 9800GT video card. I can run most graphic settings on high just a few on meduim and I get average FPS around 90. When everything loads up in a big fight I still get 55 fps. Game looks great runs great.
Windows 7 is a hog though I am on win XP. With win 7 you needs extra cpu power just for win. With win 7 make sure you have at least 6 GB of ram. 8 is better. However when the new missile graphics get added to EVE I expect the video requirements to go up a bit and I might be wishing for more power at that time.
Karbowiak
State War Academy
Caldari State
#7 - 2012-05-20 06:59:38 UTC
Hammer Crendraven wrote:
Karbowiak wrote:
Put it together yourself, will get you alot more computer for less / same money.

CPU: Core i7 3770K
CPU Cooling: Corsair Hydro Series H80
Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V Pro
Graphics card: Gainward GTX680 Phantom (2GB)
HDD: 2x WD Caviar Green 2TB
SSD: 2x Corsair Force Series 3 120GB
Memory: 4x4GB Corsair Vengeance
DVD: random DVD burner, doesn't really matter
Case: Silverstone Fortress FT02
PSU: Silverstone Strider 750W

Total price: about 3000 USD.

For the last ~500 USD you can go get a few more harddrives, or somehow dig up ~200 USD more, and get a 2nd GTX680

You have to find this stuff on a site like newegg or amazon, and order it, and put it together yourself tho.
If that isn't your cup of tea, you could always look around for a friend to put it together, or just go pay the same price for a machine pre-made, and with crappier specs.

Choise is yours :)


IMHO this is overkill. Eve is not that high end requirement. I am running a E6600 wolfdale 3.06 GHz LGA socket 775 CPU
which is a dual core and a nvida 9800GT video card. I can run most graphic settings on high just a few on meduim and I get average FPS around 90. When everything loads up in a big fight I still get 55 fps. Game looks great runs great.
Windows 7 is a hog though I am on win XP. With win 7 you needs extra cpu power just for win. With win 7 make sure you have at least 6 GB of ram. 8 is better. However when the new missile graphics get added to EVE I expect the video requirements to go up a bit and I might be wishing for more power at that time.


Well, he was looking at spending max 3500 usd, so figured getting something together that would hit that almost figure, was the best way to go.

You can always downgrade some stuff, or you know, use it for stuff OTHER than EVE ;)
Nutbolt
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#8 - 2012-05-20 07:54:03 UTC
If your in the UK (you stated price in GBP first) then ebuyer and scan.co.uk are good sites to look at. When building my rig I got all the parts from ebuyer and scan.co.uk, with just a couple of bits from amazon as was cheaper. They are kind of the UKs version of newegg, just not as cheap because the UK sucks sometimes :)

Karbowiak
State War Academy
Caldari State
#9 - 2012-05-20 08:22:47 UTC
Nutbolt wrote:
If your in the UK (you stated price in GBP first) then ebuyer and scan.co.uk are good sites to look at. When building my rig I got all the parts from ebuyer and scan.co.uk, with just a couple of bits from amazon as was cheaper. They are kind of the UKs version of newegg, just not as cheap because the UK sucks sometimes :)



You can buy from anywhere in Europe, aslong as it's a country that is in EU - and get cheap shipping.

I usually buy most of my non-critical hardware in Germany, since i can get it ~20-30 EUR cheaper there, than here in Denmark.
Others i know buy their stuff in Poland, and save even more.

And only downside is a day extra shipping, just make sure that the waranty for the things you buy, actually allows you to send it to the manufacturer, otherwise you might get royally screwed in the ass, by where you bought it, if you ever have to RMA it. lol
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
#10 - 2012-05-20 19:25:42 UTC
Remember to account for the costs of the Windows license. (it's rare that people have a full retail version. OEM versions are tied to the first PC they're installed on.)



Sometimes it's worth getting someone else to assemble it for you. That way, you have someone to yell at if breaks. Let someone take care of your integration issues Blink Especially if you're not confident about the assembly process.

Woo! CSM XI!

Fuzzwork Enterprises

Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter

Andy DelGardo
#11 - 2012-05-21 11:38:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Andy DelGardo
Small hint on the memory, since often this is simply stated wrongly. Normal 32bit applications cant and wont use more than 2GB of ram, do to software/windows limitations. So u need a 64bit compiled and correctly flagged program to be able to even utilize more than 2GB on a single application. Keep in mind, that many games are still 32bit applications and even if they are 64bit compiled wont make use of the extra RAM, since the game still has to run "well" on 32bit systems.

So the actual math with 4GB ram and even a 32bit windows is this: from the 4GB, windows can only use around 3.2-3.6GB since the GPU hardware also reserves some for mapping. Than Win7 needs around 150MB for itself, which leaves us at around 3GB while keeping some Windows Cache intact. Now u have 1GB left for Firefox and other applications and still have 2GB max. useable RAM for one EveClient. Actually 2GB is enough to run 3 clients simultaneously.

So if u don't plan to simultaneously quadruple with 4+ clients at around 600-700MB per client or have photoshop and 3dsMax open while u play, anything over 4GB is simply wasted and unused RAM. Ofc at your price point this might not be your biggest concern regarding RAM prices :)

bye Andy
Acid Kanshi
AIFAM
#12 - 2012-05-21 12:24:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Acid Kanshi
i7 is meant for 3d rendering, encoding and scientific applications which require heavy duty calculating, where hyper-threading comes in, which in i7 is best. You pay lots of money for features you will never use. (If you are not planning to do those things mentioned before)

For a gaming PC, a i5 2500k latest model is the best choice. In gaming i5 2500k vs i7 performance is almost non-existent, but for i7 you pay a lot more.

If money pays a role in your purchase, then I suggest not to buy i7. Most people who buy them for gaming PC's have lots of money or are clueless about the hardware details. Invest the extra money something more important, like 600 series graphics card. 660ti wont come before late q3 2012, but maybe 670.

Also reading above post. That dude has no clue what he is talking about. I myself play with 6 accounts same time. With everyday applications open, browser with lots of tabs etc. Maybe WoT alt-tabbed aswell. It gets to 6gb used memory. I strongly recommend 8gb. Below that worked few years back. Even WoW today requires minimum of 4gb (in major cities you will lag) 8gb recommended. For future proof get 8gb. I personally have 8gb ddr3 1600mhz Corsair Vengeance(2 sticks) (costs about 50 EUR). Cheap as frack.

EVE-Cost is a manufacturing tool for EVE players. http://www.eve-cost.eu

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
#13 - 2012-05-21 13:55:44 UTC
Even on a 32 bit application, more ram helps. if it's accessing the disk, for example. Ram that's not actively in use, should be being used by the disk cache. which should help.

Woo! CSM XI!

Fuzzwork Enterprises

Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter

Karbowiak
State War Academy
Caldari State
#14 - 2012-05-21 15:33:18 UTC
Andy DelGardo wrote:
Small hint on the memory, since often this is simply stated wrongly. Normal 32bit applications cant and wont use more than 2GB of ram, do to software/windows limitations. So u need a 64bit compiled and correctly flagged program to be able to even utilize more than 2GB on a single application. Keep in mind, that many games are still 32bit applications and even if they are 64bit compiled wont make use of the extra RAM, since the game still has to run "well" on 32bit systems.

So the actual math with 4GB ram and even a 32bit windows is this: from the 4GB, windows can only use around 3.2-3.6GB since the GPU hardware also reserves some for mapping. Than Win7 needs around 150MB for itself, which leaves us at around 3GB while keeping some Windows Cache intact. Now u have 1GB left for Firefox and other applications and still have 2GB max. useable RAM for one EveClient. Actually 2GB is enough to run 3 clients simultaneously.

So if u don't plan to simultaneously quadruple with 4+ clients at around 600-700MB per client or have photoshop and 3dsMax open while u play, anything over 4GB is simply wasted and unused RAM. Ofc at your price point this might not be your biggest concern regarding RAM prices :)

bye Andy


32Bit Windows can only allocate 4GB memory, and that is total.

As for Windows requiring 150MB memory? yeah, no.
Windows requires quite a bit more than that, 150MB might me minimum requirements, but if Windows has memory to use, it'll use it.
My own rig has 16GB memory, and after a boot, Windows + a few minor programs (Trillian, MSE, Dropbox, FluffyApp) consume about 2.5GB of memory.

Anyway, if he runs 64bit Windows, he doesn't have to concern himself with any of this, as for you saying anything above 4GB memory is wasted and unused, yeah, no..

Next you're probably gonna tell us that 32bit Windows outperforms 64bit Windows, and that he should totally run 32bit Windows instead of 64bit, right? Roll

Acid Kanshi wrote:
i7 is meant for 3d rendering, encoding and scientific applications which require heavy duty calculating, where hyper-threading comes in, which in i7 is best. You pay lots of money for features you will never use. (If you are not planning to do those things mentioned before)

For a gaming PC, a i5 2500k latest model is the best choice. In gaming i5 2500k vs i7 performance is almost non-existent, but for i7 you pay a lot more.

If money pays a role in your purchase, then I suggest not to buy i7. Most people who buy them for gaming PC's have lots of money or are clueless about the hardware details. Invest the extra money something more important, like 600 series graphics card. 660ti wont come before late q3 2012, but maybe 670.

Also reading above post. That dude has no clue what he is talking about. I myself play with 6 accounts same time. With everyday applications open, browser with lots of tabs etc. Maybe WoT alt-tabbed aswell. It gets to 6gb used memory. I strongly recommend 8gb. Below that worked few years back. Even WoW today requires minimum of 4gb (in major cities you will lag) 8gb recommended. For future proof get 8gb. I personally have 8gb ddr3 1600mhz Corsair Vengeance(2 sticks) (costs about 50 EUR). Cheap as frack.


You do realize memory is cheap as ****?..

Might aswell get 16GB now rather than later.
As for the i7, the i7 isn't for scientific applications and whatnot, it can be used for that, but it isn't made specifically for that.
Also for scientific tests, the GPU is more often used than the CPU (and for that Quadro cards and whatevertheyrecalledfromAMDfiresomething are used)

This said, he mentioned his machine had a max cost of ~3500 USD, and i proposed a build that went close to that maximum cost, what he chose to buy and what he chose to cut down isn't my concern.
The rig i proposed would kick ass today, tomorrow, a year from now and could still hold it's own two years from now.
At most he might need to upgrade the graphics card.

Andy DelGardo
#15 - 2012-05-21 15:40:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Andy DelGardo
Acid Kanshi wrote:

Also reading above post. That dude has no clue what he is talking about.
...
I personally have 8gb ddr3 1600mhz Corsair Vengeance(2 sticks) (costs about 50 EUR). Cheap as frack.


Yeah the logic for years was simply: more = better and cheap more ram = also better.

If u would have read my entire post, in the last section i specifically noted that u need more ram, if u want to run multiple clients. So yes your 8GB PC allows u to run 6 clients simultaneously and wow u even run WoT and heck u run ton's of other ****.

I simply question the actual case of how many "gamers" run 2 games at the same time or even 7 like u, state as a valid reasoning for owning more ram.

Steve Ronuken wrote:

Even on a 32 bit application, more ram helps. if it's accessing the disk, for example. Ram that's not actively in use, should be being used by the disk cache. which should help.


I also stated that u still have 100-200MB left for cache even "if" Eve would actually use all the 2GB ram, since thats not the case u even end up with several hundred MB for caching. Also simply throwing more ram for caching wont increase disk&game performance linear, u may see a speedup from 4MB cache to 128MB cache, but going from 512MB to 4GB makes no difference.
Also the cache pages are often flushed and the way games access there data is very specific and complex, so the cache wont do "wonders" here.

Quote:

As for Windows requiring 150MB memory? yeah, no.
Windows requires quite a bit more than that, 150MB might me minimum requirements, but if Windows has memory to use, it'll use it.
My own rig has 16GB memory, and after a boot, Windows + a few minor programs (Trillian, MSE, Dropbox, FluffyApp) consume about 2.5GB of memory.


Try research how windows actually allocates its memory and what is actual allocated and "used" memory, what is virtual memory and what is reserved for cache. Now also research what memory type is used for what and for what reason.


I also noted since ram is this cheep the more = better thinking is a valid point, i just don't like the "vague" assumptions what more ram actually does. So feel free to e-peen your PC as much as u like :p

My point is simply, if u would build 2 exactly same PC where one has 4GB Ram/Win32 and the other 8GB ram/Win64, u than start a webbrowser + skype and start one EveClient u wont notice any difference. If u add more clients simultaneously and a lot of other applications u will reach the 3.4GB limit eventually.



bye Andy


PS: If u actually want some real extra worth from your 64bit OS and all your RAM, consider setting up a ramdisk and copy eve to it, this ofc wont make a huge impact if u already own a fast SSD.
Karbowiak
State War Academy
Caldari State
#16 - 2012-05-21 15:54:23 UTC
Andy DelGardo wrote:
Acid Kanshi wrote:

Also reading above post. That dude has no clue what he is talking about.
...
I personally have 8gb ddr3 1600mhz Corsair Vengeance(2 sticks) (costs about 50 EUR). Cheap as frack.


Yeah the logic for years was simply: more = better and cheap more ram = also better.

If u would have read my entire post, in the last section i specifically noted that u need more ram, if u want to run multiple clients. So yes your 8GB PC allows u to run 6 clients simultaneously and wow u even run WoT and heck u run ton's of other ****.

I simply question the actual case of how many "gamers" run 2 games at the same time or even 7 like u, state as a valid reasoning for owning more ram.

Steve Ronuken wrote:

Even on a 32 bit application, more ram helps. if it's accessing the disk, for example. Ram that's not actively in use, should be being used by the disk cache. which should help.


I also stated that u still have 100-200MB left for cache even "if" Eve would actually use all the 2GB ram, since thats not the case u even end up with several hundred MB for caching. Also simply throwing more ram for caching wont increase disk&game performance linear, u may see a speedup from 4MB cache to 128MB cache, but going from 512MB to 4GB makes no difference.
Also the cache pages are often flushed and the way games access there data is very specific and complex, so the cache wont do "wonders" here.

Quote:

As for Windows requiring 150MB memory? yeah, no.
Windows requires quite a bit more than that, 150MB might me minimum requirements, but if Windows has memory to use, it'll use it.
My own rig has 16GB memory, and after a boot, Windows + a few minor programs (Trillian, MSE, Dropbox, FluffyApp) consume about 2.5GB of memory.


Try research how windows actually allocates its memory and what is actual allocated and "used" memory, what is virtual memory and what is reserved for cache. Now also research what memory type is used for what and for what reason.


I also noted since ram is this cheep the more = better thinking is a valid point, i just don't like the "vague" assumptions what more ram actually does. So feel free to e-peen your PC as much as u like :p

My point is simply, if u would build 2 exactly same PC where one has 4GB Ram/Win32 and the other 8GB ram/Win64, u than start a webbrowser + skype and start one EveClient u wont notice any difference. If u add more clients simultaneously and a lot of other applications u will reach the 3.4GB limit eventually.



bye Andy


I just hit the 4GB mark when i opened EVE on my computer, and Aimp3.
Why is that? oh that's right, because i have memory left that the machine can actually use and allocate.

As i said, give the machine enough memory, and it'll start using it.
As for looking at used memory, virtual memory and whatnot, iknow, i was looking at used, not used+cache, dum dum.

But used+cache is currently little over 6.5GB total, still plenty to go however, 16GB memory mmhhh..
Andy DelGardo
#17 - 2012-05-21 16:04:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Andy DelGardo
Quote:

As i said, give the machine enough memory, and it'll start using it.


If u insist so, last time i checked application memory is allocated by the application and not by windows. Also u still confuse commited and physically used memory.

Btw here is a good article of many other articles and benchmarks, that all show similar trends and conclusions. Upgrading from 4GB to 8GB wont net any FPS gain and only increase the loading performance on none SSD systems or very heavy multi-tasked environments.
SSD or 8 GB of Memory: Researching Reasonable Upgrade Options.


bye Andy

PS:
Quote:

Next you're probably gonna tell us that 32bit Windows outperforms 64bit Windows, and that he should totally run 32bit Windows instead of 64bit, right?


This ofc depends on the GPU memory size, since this determines the "lost" use-able memory on the 32bit os, but simply regarding sheer application performance, yes a 32bit compiled Application on a 4GB, 32bit Windows will always perform better or at least the same, than on a 4GB 64bit windows. This is because the 32bit compiled application cant use any of the 64bit register benefits and also the 64bit OS has to-do more expansive context switches between its 64 and 32 bit processes.