These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

Missiles getting nerfed?
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Ager Agemo
Rainbow Ponies Incorporated
#1 - 2012-05-17 04:44:10 UTC
so... as it stands right now it seems now tracking disruptors will affect missile explosion radius, I m completely confused... we are all asking for missiles to get a buff for pvp and overall. but instead they are getting nerfed even further? aren't the T2 penalties already bad enough? I … don't even.. what... I m just so confused about why ccp is doing this?


And no, tracking computers do not boost missiles from what I have seen.
Karl Hobb
Imperial Margarine
#2 - 2012-05-17 04:55:56 UTC
Confirming this subject needed a completely new thread.

A professional astro-bastard was not available so they sent me.
Ocih
Space Mermaids
#3 - 2012-05-17 05:08:09 UTC
It explains why they wanted to re-bonus the Drake.
How about + 5% Shield resistance, - 5% Explosion Velocity?
Trade in Damnation Velocity bonus for Explosion Velocity too please.

I hope the Dust Bunnies like their new Missiles. We paid a heavy price for them.
Orlacc
#4 - 2012-05-17 05:14:59 UTC
Wow next thing they will make missiles miss!

"Measure Twice, Cut Once."
Markus Reese
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#5 - 2012-05-17 05:27:43 UTC
I hear they are going to also take capacitor to fire :p

To quote Lfod Shi

The ratting itself is PvE. Getting away with it is PvP.
masternerdguy
Doomheim
#6 - 2012-05-17 05:40:54 UTC
CCP just wants to remove Caldari from the game.

Things are only impossible until they are not.
Karl Hobb
Imperial Margarine
#7 - 2012-05-17 05:42:41 UTC
masternerdguy wrote:
CCP just wants to remove Caldari from the game.

I endorse this product/service.

A professional astro-bastard was not available so they sent me.
masternerdguy
Doomheim
#8 - 2012-05-17 05:44:32 UTC
Karl Hobb wrote:
masternerdguy wrote:
CCP just wants to remove Caldari from the game.

I endorse this product/service.


Right. Diversity must die. Everyone should be in close range blasterboats doing bare knuckle combat at 500m! How dare you want more options in the game.

People who want a variety of play-styles are communists and hippies right?

Things are only impossible until they are not.
Karl Hobb
Imperial Margarine
#9 - 2012-05-17 05:50:05 UTC
masternerdguy wrote:
Everyone should be in close range blasterboats doing bare knuckle combat at 500m!

I see no problems with honorable mustachioed combat.

A professional astro-bastard was not available so they sent me.
Hayaishi
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#10 - 2012-05-17 07:14:24 UTC
masternerdguy wrote:
Everyone should be in close range blasterboats doing bare knuckle combat at 500m!



Yes please :)
Allko
Zero Tax services
#11 - 2012-05-17 10:25:28 UTC
Ager Agemo wrote:
so... as it stands right now it seems now tracking disruptors will affect missile explosion radius, I m completely confused... we are all asking for missiles to get a buff for pvp and overall. but instead they are getting nerfed even further? aren't the T2 penalties already bad enough? I … don't even.. what... I m just so confused about why ccp is doing this?


And no, tracking computers do not boost missiles from what I have seen.


Could You pls link Your source of info regarding this BS

Thank You in advance Blink
Nnamuachs
Kiith Paktu
Reeloaded.
#12 - 2012-05-17 10:53:15 UTC
Allko wrote:
Ager Agemo wrote:
so... as it stands right now it seems now tracking disruptors will affect missile explosion radius, I m completely confused... we are all asking for missiles to get a buff for pvp and overall. but instead they are getting nerfed even further? aren't the T2 penalties already bad enough? I … don't even.. what... I m just so confused about why ccp is doing this?


And no, tracking computers do not boost missiles from what I have seen.


Could You pls link Your source of info regarding this BS

Thank You in advance Blink


/me points at the test server.

have a look yourself, its there.
St Mio
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#13 - 2012-05-17 10:57:16 UTC
Karl Hobb wrote:
masternerdguy wrote:
Everyone should be in close range blasterboats doing bare knuckle combat at 500m!

I see no problems with honorable mustachioed combat.

I do say, this is a most splendid suggestion!
Tobiaz
Spacerats
#14 - 2012-05-17 11:02:36 UTC
Karl Hobb wrote:
Confirming this subject needed a completely new thread.


Confirming CCP is completely ignoring the community's arguments why making Tracking Disruptors ALSO working on the already underpowered missiles is a bad idea.

Operation WRITE DOWN ALL THE THINGS!!!  Check out the list at http://bit.ly/wdatt Collecting and compiling all fixes and ideas for EVE. Looking for more editors!
Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
#15 - 2012-05-17 11:03:44 UTC
Damn and I just started training missiles past my already 5m SP that I won't use.

CCP's Motto: If it isn't broken, break it. If it is broken, ignore it. Improving NPE / Dynamic New Eden
evereplicant
Doomheim
#16 - 2012-05-17 11:07:31 UTC
CCP have now nailed the final coffin in missiles... All those nice missile graphic updates you did? waste of time seeing no one will use missiles anymore
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#17 - 2012-05-17 11:19:27 UTC
Karl Hobb wrote:
masternerdguy wrote:
Everyone should be in close range blasterboats doing bare knuckle combat at 500m!

I see no problems with honorable mustachioed combat.



Going by some of the female avatars you see, it'll be an equal opportunities bare knuckle bout

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack
Roime
Mea Culpa.
Shadow Cartel
#18 - 2012-05-17 11:52:07 UTC
Rank Weapons Kills
1 Heavy Missile Launcher II 29339

Yeah nobody uses missiles, completely underpowered. Only the most deadly weapon in the game.

.
Roime
Mea Culpa.
Shadow Cartel
#19 - 2012-05-17 11:52:34 UTC
Karl Hobb wrote:
masternerdguy wrote:
Everyone should be in close range blasterboats doing bare knuckle combat at 500m!

I see no problems with honorable mustachioed combat.


/ signed Cool

.
TheButcherPete
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#20 - 2012-05-17 11:55:06 UTC
awww, you're just upset that your missiles were e-war proof, because a. Smartbombs were rarely timed good enough to kill one, and b. defenders are useless.


Then you complain when CCP brings your weapon to scale with all other weapons, thus leveling the playing field.

HTFU, hardly anyone fits tracking disrupts anyway

[b]THE KING OF EVE RADIO

If EVE is real, does that mean all of us are RMTrs?[/b]
123Next pageLast page