These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Market Discussions

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Post drone nerf, and mission loot reshuffle, megacyte and zydrine return to 2011 prices, any ideas?

Author
Malinda Borgir
Band 0f Brothers
Brothers of Tangra
#1 - 2012-05-16 06:03:55 UTC
Im really curious, from a market standpoint, and from an investment standpoint, it really seems a bit off. I look at the math, the numbers, and the volume, and I just dont get it. Why did minerals tank so bad? Would love some input, thanks.
Esan Vartesa
Samarkand Financial
#2 - 2012-05-16 07:08:00 UTC
Profit-taking crashed the prices. Massive stockpiles, orders of magnitude larger than total demand for a good 2-3 months, were built up by speculators, and then offloaded.

I expect prices to now more gradually climb back to the peaks, and possibly a little higher.

The fundamentals changed drastically, and prices will eventually stabilize at higher levels.

Watch pyerite as an indicator.
Lutin Ballista
Ballista Investment Corp
#3 - 2012-05-16 07:59:19 UTC
Malinda Borgir wrote:
Im really curious, from a market standpoint, and from an investment standpoint, it really seems a bit off. I look at the math, the numbers, and the volume, and I just dont get it. Why did minerals tank so bad? Would love some input, thanks.


That is a hot avatar. Congrats

I get the impression that rich people bought loads, cause mass panic and then cash in. The majority of people are sheep and just follow the trend. I.e. Someone announces that Trit is now 20isk p/u and some fools will start refusing to sell below 20 isk p/u... everyone follows.
clixor
Celluloid Gurus
#4 - 2012-05-16 10:28:27 UTC
Lutin Ballista wrote:
Malinda Borgir wrote:
Im really curious, from a market standpoint, and from an investment standpoint, it really seems a bit off. I look at the math, the numbers, and the volume, and I just dont get it. Why did minerals tank so bad? Would love some input, thanks.


That is a hot avatar. Congrats

I get the impression that rich people bought loads, cause mass panic and then cash in. The majority of people are sheep and just follow the trend. I.e. Someone announces that Trit is now 20isk p/u and some fools will start refusing to sell below 20 isk p/u... everyone follows.


Indeed. hot :)

The most interesting part for me is that with this pre-exp speculation cycle it was not a few rich guys going all in (although i'm sure they did). But, because of the changes were so obvious and effecting a large part of the population, lots and lots of smaller players.
You would see players who never ventured on the markets suddenly buying a few bil of mins.

The ones who profitated were the players who exited early when you still had people desperately trying to not let the trend reverse.

papamike
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#5 - 2012-05-16 11:08:09 UTC
I havnt seen any convincing evidence that is was just speculation. Perhaps Im a shmuck but I still believe that zydrine will rise again once stockpiles are sold off.

This is about holding off hitting the panic sell button.

In saying that I totally walked into the Morphite speculation, and didnt think trit would rise as quick or as strongly as it did.

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#6 - 2012-05-16 15:54:36 UTC
papamike wrote:
I havnt seen any convincing evidence that is was just speculation. Perhaps Im a shmuck but I still believe that zydrine will rise again once stockpiles are sold off.

This is about holding off hitting the panic sell button.

In saying that I totally walked into the Morphite speculation, and didnt think trit would rise as quick or as strongly as it did.



Trit was obvious to hold and Mega / Morphite were obvious to tank, because they could only tank.
My main remaining multi billion mineral position that is still open as of today is, in fact, trit.
corestwo
Goonfleet Investment Banking
#7 - 2012-05-16 16:51:00 UTC
Well aren't you precious.

To bring some fundamentals into it, Morphite crashed because it was oversupplied. Prior to the start of speculation, anywhere from 43% to 60% of morphite was supplied via mining already, even with the price in the gutter. After speculation started running the price up into the high teens, mining alone was then supplying more than had been supplied previously by mining and drone poo combined, and that was even before the patch that removed drone poo. It is likely, due to the optimal method of handing grav sites, that the amount of Morphite mined has only increased, too.

Mega, Zyd & Nocx are also all undersupplied (Nocx especially, the numbers are hysterical) compared to when the drone regions were in existence, but as has been noted, all three were speculated in heavily. Combine with the fact that mining is still producing minerals, and those stockpiles will last for some time.

This post was crafted by a member of the GoonSwarm Federation Economic Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay.

fofofo

Esan Vartesa
Samarkand Financial
#8 - 2012-05-16 18:02:31 UTC
I stand by my prediction. 2-3 months.
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#9 - 2012-05-16 19:05:50 UTC  |  Edited by: ISD Eshtir
corestwo wrote:
Well aren't you precious.


I made and am still making money even as I am writing this.
I am a *snip* who is making money and the latter is what matters in trading.


corestwo wrote:

To bring some fundamentals into it, Morphite crashed because it was oversupplied. Prior to the start of speculation, anywhere from 43% to 60% of morphite was supplied via mining already, even with the price in the gutter. After speculation started running the price up into the high teens, mining alone was then supplying more than had been supplied previously by mining and drone poo combined, and that was even before the patch that removed drone poo. It is likely, due to the optimal method of handing grav sites, that the amount of Morphite mined has only increased, too.


My own fundamentals analysis brought me to the conclusion that Trit would be a safe trade but also the other low ends would go up in a steadier way. If that happened then the high ends would have had to tank because the old insurance minerals basket has been replaced by another, less obvious one. That and not just the true mined supply would affect prices.
Ioci
Bad Girl Posse
#10 - 2012-05-16 19:43:36 UTC
Esan Vartesa wrote:
I stand by my prediction. 2-3 months.


Minerals are like a car accident.
Alot of rubber neckers decided to come see what the fuss was all about. Everything I am making or losing ISK on I bought 6 months ago. Stuff I bought last week, I will get back to you in 4 months.

R.I.P. Vile Rat

Caecilia Arene
Doomheim
#11 - 2012-05-16 20:54:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Caecilia Arene
I agree with the sentiment that trit and pyerite are good at the moment. I just tend to hoard these minerals and never seem to get around to selling them since, well, why would you. They perform very well as holdings. Trit seems to have hit resistance around 6.00 - 6.20 ISK so it will be interesting if it can break through that barrier in a sustained way. Of interest is a slight but noticeable decrease in volumes, especially in Amarr, over the past month or so. This could indicate a supply imbalance... For me, I'm going to just hold it. What I mine I'll keep but I probably won't buy much more.

Pyerite also looks like it's breaking the pattern too at the moment. Again volumes have trended lower in the last three weeks. This I've been buying lately since it's held nicely against the drop in the higher end minerals.

Nocxium - I sold a little late on this one (around 850 - well and truly after the downward trend had kicked in). Until I get a sense that we're hitting a bottom I'm keeping my buy orders very low and so long as the trend remains I keep dropping my orders. Long term I'm positive though but I want to see trend changing first. I'm hoping we get some good support levels around 725 - 750. Time will tell I guess.

Zydrine - I've both made money in some positions and made some unrealized losses on others. I'm holding what I have since I have some heavy holdings which were bought around 1350. Long term I'm positive though. There is still a lot of volume being traded at the moment (and for the last two months) so it's hard to tell when the volatility is going to wash out of the system.

I certainly agree with people that Mega, Zyd, Nocx and Morphite were heavily speculated and vast volumes were accumulated. It's going to take time to unwind those positions.

For anyone who trades intra-day on the spread between buy and sell, morphite's OK right now (about a 7% spread) and mexallon (around 4%). Just make sure to close out your positions before you go to bed otherwise you may have a headache in the morning Blink. Especially in this market...
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#12 - 2012-05-16 21:25:16 UTC
Caecilia Arene wrote:
I agree with the sentiment that trit and pyerite are good at the moment. I just tend to hoard these minerals and never seem to get around to selling them since, well, why would you. They perform very well as holdings. Trit seems to have hit resistance around 6.00 - 6.20 ISK so it will be interesting if it can break through that barrier in a sustained way. Of interest is a slight but noticeable decrease in volumes, especially in Amarr, over the past month or so. This could indicate a supply imbalance... For me, I'm going to just hold it. What I mine I'll keep but I probably won't buy much more.


Nice not random coincidence, you found resistance (and I took partial profit there) because the April monthly bar maximum is exactly there and the May pin bar means price would return up back to that maximum.

For further information please feel free to read my thread at this location or the fully illustrated and zoomable Tritanium trade on my website.
The above pin bar "rule" is explained and illustrated at page 3.
Hungry Ghost
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#13 - 2012-05-16 23:50:27 UTC
Quote:

Tritanium acquired through refining in March: 1,827,142,004,787 units.
392,573,060,532 units of Pyerite produced through refining in March.
Refining produced 121,376,618,763 units of Mexallon in March.
24,153,369,147 - units of Isogen from refining in March.
7,303,157,663 - units of Nocxium from refining in March.
1,397,519,750 - units of Zydrine from refining in March.
667,862,370 - units of Megacyte from refining in March.
40,146,724 - units of Morphite from refining in March.


Quote:

Jonathan Cole ‏@Driftspite

@CCP_Diagoras So does this figure of ~40m Morphite refined include 'reprocessed' Quantities ( Opulent Compound )?

@Driftspite @CCP_Diagoras iirc yes, the numbers were from *all* refines.


We can see here an upper estimation of monthly mineral production pre Inferno. Its upper estimation, because it did not take into account reprocessing from 'mineral compression' and such - ie actual amounts of minerals introduced in game per month is somewhat lower. Just how much lower is irrelevant for the moment.

Mining stats from the end of the april :
Quote:

Veldspar, daily avg for Feb: 5.3bn units. Last 7 days avg: 6.35bn. Up 19.83%
Scordite, daily avg for Feb: 1.6bn units. Last 7 days avg: 1.77bn. Up 10.46%.
Pyroxeres, daily avg for Feb: 1.49bn units. Last 7 days avg: 1.78bn units. Up 20.1%
Plagioclase, daily avg for Feb: 1.02bn units. Last 7 days avg: 1.03bn units. Up 1.87%.
Kernite, daily avg for Feb: 204.8m units. Last 7 days average: 201.6m units. Down 1.55%.
Omber, daily avg for Feb: 130.0m units. Last 7 days average: 151.8m units. Up 16.79%.
Jaspet, daily avg for Feb: 14.9m units. Last 7 days average: 19.1m units. Up 28.02%.
Hemorphite, daily avg for Feb: 10.6m units. Last 7 days average: 13.6m units. Up 27.73%.
Hedbergite, daily avg for Feb: 8.1m units. Last 7 days average: 10.4m units. Up 28.52%.
Gneiss, daily avg for Feb: 4.0m units. Last 7 days average: 4.96m units. Up 23.2%.
Spodumain, daily average for Feb: 4.0m units. Last 7 days average: 4.4m units. Up 10.37%.
Dark Ochre, daily average for Feb: 3.79m units. Last 7 days average: 4.95m units. Up 31.46%.
Crokite, daily average for Feb: 5.31m units. Last 7 days average: 7.31m units. Up 37.51%.
Bistot, daily average for Feb: 8.49m units. Last 7 days average: 10.07m units. Up 18.73%.
Arkonor, daily average for Feb: 5.77m units. Last 7 days average: 6.75m units. Up 17.05%.
Mercoxit, daily average for Feb: 381k units. Last 7 days average: 927k units. Up 143.12%.


Reprocessed into minerals these ores produce per day:
29140777020 trit
4169005810 pyer
1844773273 mexa
312495200 isog
103454539 nocx
50179070 zydr
22797750 mega
1965240 morp

This is conservative estimate, as it does not take into account +5% and +10% ores(in original data all kinds of veldespar go into veldespar stat and so on).

Basically as far as high ends are concerned - with current mining levels zydrine and megacyte produced from mining already surpassed march levels of supply from ALL sources.
Orion Wyvernbane
Federal Defense Union
Gallente Federation
#14 - 2012-05-17 00:20:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Orion Wyvernbane
I feel I just lost at analyst pvp. I saw your numbers and had to crunch them into my crude understanding.

Curse you and your lack of commas! Twisted

Name, March, April, Rough Ratio

Iso 24B 9.6B 1/2
Mega 667M 683M Up
Mexa 121Tr 55Tr 1/3
Morp 40M 58.9M Up
Nocx 7B 3.1B 1/3
P 392Tr 125Tr 1/3
T 1827Tr 874Tr 1/2
Zyd 1387M 150M 1/10 <-- typo?
Asher Brood
State War Academy
Caldari State
#15 - 2012-05-17 01:03:49 UTC
Malinda Borgir wrote:
Im really curious, from a market standpoint, and from an investment standpoint, it really seems a bit off. I look at the math, the numbers, and the volume, and I just dont get it. Why did minerals tank so bad? Would love some input, thanks.


great stack!!
corestwo
Goonfleet Investment Banking
#16 - 2012-05-17 02:11:09 UTC  |  Edited by: corestwo
Hungry Ghost wrote:
Basically as far as high ends are concerned - with current mining levels zydrine and megacyte produced from mining already surpassed march levels of supply from ALL sources.


Don't forget that CCP is on record as saying that 40% of high ends come from the drone regions. If you check your ratios, that doesn't line up - you get more like 15% from "non-mining" sources. If you correct diagoras' "refined in march" numbers to account for that and give you ~40% high ends from non-mining, it paints a very different picture...and even that might be low since "non-mining", in this case, would include both compression and refined rat loot. Compression, by the way, is not actually an overly huge portion of his number, either.

Also he was questioned on his february/last 7 days ore tweets, and those do, in fact, include the improved ores.

This post was crafted by a member of the GoonSwarm Federation Economic Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay.

fofofo

Hungry Ghost
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#17 - 2012-05-17 08:21:32 UTC
corestwo wrote:
Hungry Ghost wrote:
Basically as far as high ends are concerned - with current mining levels zydrine and megacyte produced from mining already surpassed march levels of supply from ALL sources.


Don't forget that CCP is on record as saying that 40% of high ends come from the drone regions.



Well, you can draw you own conclusions from that. Either diagoras numbers are incorrect, or 40% number is no longer true as of march this year. Its clear that his refine numbers for march is actually refine plus reprocess(exactly as he himself says) - low ends output is much higher than april output from mining.

Quote:
Also he was questioned on his february/last 7 days ore tweets, and those do, in fact, include the improved ores.

Yes they are. I just treated them as normal ores when calculating refined output. Ie actual refined output will be a little higher - but not by much. 2% more or something like that. Than again not all refine is perfect, so its couple percent points in different direction.
corestwo
Goonfleet Investment Banking
#18 - 2012-05-17 16:21:13 UTC
Hungry Ghost wrote:
corestwo wrote:
Hungry Ghost wrote:
Basically as far as high ends are concerned - with current mining levels zydrine and megacyte produced from mining already surpassed march levels of supply from ALL sources.


Don't forget that CCP is on record as saying that 40% of high ends come from the drone regions.



Well, you can draw you own conclusions from that. Either diagoras numbers are incorrect, or 40% number is no longer true as of march this year. Its clear that his refine numbers for march is actually refine plus reprocess(exactly as he himself says) - low ends output is much higher than april output from mining.

Quote:
Also he was questioned on his february/last 7 days ore tweets, and those do, in fact, include the improved ores.

Yes they are. I just treated them as normal ores when calculating refined output. Ie actual refined output will be a little higher - but not by much. 2% more or something like that. Than again not all refine is perfect, so its couple percent points in different direction.


Diagoras is pulling directly from the database so I can't imagine his numbers are wrong, and the "40%" number was stated very recently, in a pre-Escalation interview with TenTonHammer.

This post was crafted by a member of the GoonSwarm Federation Economic Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay.

fofofo

Ocih
Space Mermaids
#19 - 2012-05-17 16:38:54 UTC
The reason the drone regions got reset to bounties was they created over supply. They have been doing that for years. A month won't reset the market. Those minerals might very well float in the system for a year or more. Longer with Morphite as no new T2 Hulls have been added in a long while. A new T2 Hull would promote production and clean up minerals. It would also insure a fair playing field because any T2 Hull coming out today won't have a BPO so any production will be exlusive to invention.

T2 Drake/ Harbinger/ Myrmidon/ Hurricane anyone?
Debiru
Universal Fleet Operations
#20 - 2012-05-17 17:26:02 UTC
Don't expect much change in price without interference from speculators again. People always underestimate the "people-go-to-the-money" factor, which now is mining nullsec ores. Mining values will continue to rise, which will offset the diwndling stockpiles sitting on market. Then, as speculators realize that the prices won't be rising again, they'll offload more stockpiles and cause dips in the price every once in awhile.

Removing Dronepoo doesn't mean the old Drone miners won't become ore miners. Now nullsec mining is a very profitable endeavour for the ISK investment needed to get set up into it. Same goes for WH mining.

Lastly remember that a very large portion of the drone region minerals went into the residing alliance's production. Not all of it was carted off to highsec.
12Next page