These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Out of Pod Experience

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Wall Street: The Silence Of US media?

Author
JordanParey
Obvious Money Laundering Service Inc
#21 - 2011-10-02 02:18:00 UTC
Bane Necran wrote:
Jada Maroo wrote:
Crowd control is a legal action. They might not like it but it is. The police aren't randomly gunning down protesters in a murderous rampage. Tear gas and pepper spray to keep unruly crowds in check is an accepted practice, and protesters do not have a right to shut down access to a street or place of business.


You're either unable to see things as they truly are, or are unwilling to.

'Crowd control' is like freaking doublespeak. What they want to do is disperse the crowds, and every method of so called crowd control is intended to do that. This includes, but is not limited to, marching forward and hitting anyone who doesn't move out of the way, and liberal use of teargas and mace on anyone within range, completely unprovoked. If any of the protesters actually do something aggressive then that gives the police carte blanche to use even more force against them, and the protesters are very aware of this.

This plays out time and time again, and it doesn't matter if you characterize the protesters as unruly. Things get unruly in the senate as well, and you don't see police breaking in to teargas and beat everyone. When the public can't have unruly protests without being attacked, then the public are no longer in control, and you can kiss your democracy goodbye.



Unruly protests are not protests, they are mobs. We have a right to protest... peacefully. If the kiddies can't handle themselves like adults, then they should stay at home and keep whining about how hard their lives are when they've really come from a middle class background where everything was given to them.
Jada Maroo
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#22 - 2011-10-02 02:42:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Jada Maroo
You have the right to protest. You do not have the right to lay claim to a street and block access. You do not have the right to block a bridge. Your rights end the moment you begin restrict the free actions of others, and that's when you move or get the pepper spray.

By the way, did anyone see the video of that guy who said his dad was a doctor and had all sorts of degrees and that Bank of America was taking their family home away?

Turned out the kid went to George Washington University, his parents pay $80,000 a year to send him there, they live in a $500,000 house, and owe $70,000 on the mortgage. In other words, if that lazy protesting bum got off his ass and worked for a year instead of making his parents pay his tuition, they could stay in their half million dollar house. God I hope that little douche got tazed.
Bane Necran
Appono Astos
#23 - 2011-10-02 03:01:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Bane Necran
There's video after video, which i assume you haven't bothered to watch, showing people peacefully demonstrating and abiding by the barriers police have erected in order to keep them from blocking traffic or anything, and the police walking up to the barriers and macing them for no reason.

You're at something of a disadvantage here, assuming how things are, and trying to argue with people who are actually monitoring the situation.

Who would you say is the aggressor in this situation? In order to have a leg to stand on at all here, you must justify the use of mace in that situation. I'll be patiently waiting. Smile

And even if they are blocking traffic, is that really justification for outright violence towards people who pose no threat to anyone?

"In the void is virtue, and no evil. Wisdom has existence, principle has existence, the Way has existence, spirit is nothingness." ~Miyamoto Musashi

VKhaun Vex
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#24 - 2011-10-02 04:04:22 UTC
Bane Necran wrote:
And even if they are blocking traffic, is that really justification for outright violence towards people who pose no threat to anyone?


Yes, actually.

Not all violence is bloody sunday, rodney king, and raping and pillaging then burning the village down. At some point you do, obviously, need officers to be violent to a degree if someone won't follow their directions about blocking traffic. If officers didn't force compliance it wouldn't be law, it would be suggestion.

Hell, if you try and stop me from going to work I'll get violent myself. Talk all you like about an officer in the wrong, but remember he's also between you and other citizens, too. If no cop stopped them and they filled a street, what would happen when a hundred angry motorists started trying to drive through them? You think they'd all play nice?

Get run down by a Wall Street exec in a tank of a luxury car with two body guards and his own legal team on speed dial, then complain to me about pepper spray and justice. Big smile

Charges Twilight fans with Ka-bar -Surfin's PlunderBunny LIIIIIIIIIIINNEEEEE PIIIEEEECCCCEEE!!!!!!! -Taedrin Using relativity to irrational numbers is smart -rodyas I no longer believe we landed on the moon. -Atticus Fynch

Bane Necran
Appono Astos
#25 - 2011-10-02 04:14:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Bane Necran
It's completely unnecessary violence in most cases. I understand the police are probably frustrated, but we should have people in those positions of authority who can restrain themselves.

Actually, i just remembered how that's part of riot police training: taking a person from a crowd and making an example of them to intimidate the rest. So i suppose it's not really a personal decision.

"In the void is virtue, and no evil. Wisdom has existence, principle has existence, the Way has existence, spirit is nothingness." ~Miyamoto Musashi

VKhaun Vex
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#26 - 2011-10-02 04:20:17 UTC  |  Edited by: VKhaun Vex
Bane Necran wrote:
It's completely unnecessary violence in most cases. I understand the police are probably frustrated, but we should have people in those positions of authority who can restrain themselves.


lol 'in most cases'... you're sitting at home watching videos and seeing what you want to. You have no idea why any particular group is pepper sprayed, what the police are trying to accomplish or what their options were. You're just vomiting bias through your keyboard.

I don't even have to defend or agree with the police to argue with you. Assumption about events you have no understanding of beyond a short you tube clip leading to a strong judgement like 'in most cases' make you wrong on principle without having to approach if the police actually did anything wrong or not. Even if we find out later that guy maced the whole group out of malice and loses his job, you are correct by luck, not by deduction.

Charges Twilight fans with Ka-bar -Surfin's PlunderBunny LIIIIIIIIIIINNEEEEE PIIIEEEECCCCEEE!!!!!!! -Taedrin Using relativity to irrational numbers is smart -rodyas I no longer believe we landed on the moon. -Atticus Fynch

Bane Necran
Appono Astos
#27 - 2011-10-02 04:22:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Bane Necran
I actually don't consider pepper spraying to be violence, and believe police are justified in using some force. But please, continue with your fantasy. It was getting interesting.

Quote:
Actually, i just remembered how that's part of riot police training: taking a person from a crowd and making an example of them to intimidate the rest. So i suppose it's not really a personal decision.


Citation needed.[/quote]

It's not the kind of thing i can just find on google or something for you. If you don't believe me, that's fine with me.

"In the void is virtue, and no evil. Wisdom has existence, principle has existence, the Way has existence, spirit is nothingness." ~Miyamoto Musashi

SpaceSquirrels
#28 - 2011-10-02 04:45:56 UTC
Jada Maroo wrote:
You have the right to protest. You do not have the right to lay claim to a street and block access. You do not have the right to block a bridge. Your rights end the moment you begin restrict the free actions of others, and that's when you move or get the pepper spray.

By the way, did anyone see the video of that guy who said his dad was a doctor and had all sorts of degrees and that Bank of America was taking their family home away?

Turned out the kid went to George Washington University, his parents pay $80,000 a year to send him there, they live in a $500,000 house, and owe $70,000 on the mortgage. In other words, if that lazy protesting bum got off his ass and worked for a year instead of making his parents pay his tuition, they could stay in their half million dollar house. God I hope that little douche got tazed.


Yeah them and all the faux hippies at the G20 stuff.

"Ahh sweet dude this pic of us protesting in gas masks is totally going to replace my water skiing in Nantucket pics on my Air book."

We really need to send douche bag entitled ass hats to 3rd world countries for a summer.
VKhaun Vex
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#29 - 2011-10-02 04:48:21 UTC
Bane Necran wrote:
It's not the kind of thing i can just find on google or something for you. If you don't believe me, that's fine with me.


I agree, and besides it's not a riot.
I edited out what you quoted but I was too slow.

Charges Twilight fans with Ka-bar -Surfin's PlunderBunny LIIIIIIIIIIINNEEEEE PIIIEEEECCCCEEE!!!!!!! -Taedrin Using relativity to irrational numbers is smart -rodyas I no longer believe we landed on the moon. -Atticus Fynch

Bane Necran
Appono Astos
#30 - 2011-10-02 04:52:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Bane Necran
You guys are unbelievable. These alleged hippies and entitled brats are out there standing up for something they believe in. Have you ever stood up for something you believe in your entire lives? TV shows and sports teams don't count.

Whether they're wrong or not, they're out there trying to make the world a better place for everyone, not just themselves.

"In the void is virtue, and no evil. Wisdom has existence, principle has existence, the Way has existence, spirit is nothingness." ~Miyamoto Musashi

Bane Necran
Appono Astos
#31 - 2011-10-02 05:02:18 UTC
I think this thread needs an interlude until there's some new developments, and with that in mind, i bring you Joey. It gets funnier the more you watch it. Lol

"In the void is virtue, and no evil. Wisdom has existence, principle has existence, the Way has existence, spirit is nothingness." ~Miyamoto Musashi

Kalmanaka
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#32 - 2011-10-02 07:57:37 UTC
Bane Necran wrote:
You guys are unbelievable. These alleged hippies and entitled brats are out there standing up for something they believe in. Have you ever stood up for something you believe in your entire lives? TV shows and sports teams don't count.

Whether they're wrong or not, they're out there trying to make the world a better place for everyone, not just themselves.


They're protesting in the wrong place. Wall St. is where brokers hang out. The protesters are claiming they're tired of corporations and lobbyists controlling politicians. Corporate officers and lobbyists don't hang out on Wall St.
Everyone is ignoring them because you don't pay attention to people who can't get their act straight and who protest more for fun and out of boredom than anything else. All they're doing is making themselves look dumb.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#33 - 2011-10-02 08:16:33 UTC
Got reports last night that the police guided them onto a bridge, stopped them for a bit and then proceeded to arrest a few hundred for blocking the bridgeLol

JordanParey
Obvious Money Laundering Service Inc
#34 - 2011-10-02 08:42:01 UTC
Bane Necran wrote:
You guys are unbelievable. These alleged hippies and entitled brats are out there standing up for something they believe in. Have you ever stood up for something you believe in your entire lives? TV shows and sports teams don't count.

Whether they're wrong or not, they're out there trying to make the world a better place for everyone, not just themselves.


Yes, I have stood for things that I believe in, but not at the inconvenience of others. I understand that humans are fairly unpredictable and that some people will do what they want, but watching some of this stuff it's become evident to me that some of them are there "just" to be there. They want to be seen there, so they can say they were there, so that they can go and talk about it with other somewhat misguided but generally well-meaning people.

I also don't believe that the media is trying to black it out. Our country's politicians and media (all of it) are all ********, and even though the elections ARE NEXT YEAR they've been campaigning for the last 8-9 months... coverage is obviously gonna be skewed.
Myfanwy Heimdal
Heimdal Freight and Manufacture Inc
#35 - 2011-10-02 10:33:37 UTC
Bane Necran wrote:


And even if they are blocking traffic, is that really justification for outright violence towards people who pose no threat to anyone?


Odd that Tony Bliar stopped the right of the Freemen of the City of London to herd sheep across London Bridge. He did this for the exact same reason - to prevent the protestors doing something which would be visible.

One of my drinking chums has been asked, as a Freeman, to take sheep across the bridge but being a Townie hadn't a clue as to which end was which.

What happened yesterday in the New York protests was overractive by the police. But, then again, we expected this from the authorities; wherever in the world they are.

Pam:  I wonder what my name means in Welsh?Nessa: Why?

stoicfaux
#36 - 2011-10-02 18:03:22 UTC
frank observation: The protests aren't relevant or meaningful to enough people to warrant heavy media coverage. What is being protested? What injustice needs to be remedied? What is the goal of the protest? How is interfering with traffic on wall street going to get the attention of law makers and/or voters who have the political will and money to fix the (unstated) problem with Wall Street?

cynical realism: Plus, I think that the country is already burned out on Wall Street due to financial crisis and bailout, mortgage robo-signing fraud, the economy, banks still not lending money despite the bailout, etc.. It's easier for the masses suffering from a weak economy and unemployment to focus on "Blame Obama For Everything(tm)," "I'm not Romney(tm)", and the "Tea Party's Plan of Saving the Country by Destroying the Government Strategy(tm)" that's passing for political debate right now.

Pon Farr Memorial: once every 7 years, all the carebears in high-sec must PvP or they will be temp-banned.

Alu Utukku
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#37 - 2011-10-02 18:39:35 UTC
stoicfaux

- The protests aren't relevant or meaningful to enough people to warrant heavy media coverage. What is being protested? due to financial crisis and bailout, mortgage robo-signing fraud, the economy, banks still not lending money despite the bailout, etc.[ you answer yourself with your own words from the second paragraph]

-What injustice needs to be remedied? intentional fraud is still a crime isn't it? but, let's go arrest some hippies and ignore the large cash elephant in the room.

-What is the goal of the protest? to show that despite everything illegal being done by the financial community [wall street to main street] that it's the hippies being arrested and removed.

-How is interfering with traffic on wall street going to get the attention of law makers and/or voters who have the political will and money to fix the (unstated) problem with Wall Street? how has any protest been used to gather attention on a topic?

cynical realism: Plus, I think that the country is already burned out on Wall Street due to financial crisis and bailout, mortgage robo-signing fraud, the economy, banks still not lending money despite the bailout, etc.. It's easier for the masses suffering from a weak economy and unemployment to focus on "Blame Obama For Everything(tm)," "I'm not Romney(tm)", and the "Tea Party's Plan of Saving the Country by Destroying the Government Strategy(tm)" that's passing for political debate right now.

how do you think the economy got the way it is? too much cookies and milk?

do you really think that 'it's the tea party' tearing apart the u.s. right now? yoink. try this for a bit of light and interesting reading : http://www.truth-out.org/goodbye-all-reflections-gop-operative-who-left-cult/1314907779



fun quote: John P. Judis sums up the modern GOP this way:

"Over the last four decades, the Republican Party has transformed from a loyal opposition into an insurrectionary party that flouts the law when it is in the majority and threatens disorder when it is the minority. It is the party of Watergate and Iran-Contra, but also of the government shutdown in 1995 and the impeachment trial of 1999. If there is an earlier American precedent for today's Republican Party, it is the antebellum Southern Democrats of John Calhoun who threatened to nullify, or disregard, federal legislation they objected to and who later led the fight to secede from the union over slavery."

A couple of years ago, a Republican committee staff director told me candidly (and proudly) what the method was to all this obstruction and disruption. Should Republicans succeed in obstructing the Senate from doing its job, it would further lower Congress's generic favorability rating among the American people. By sabotaging the reputation of an institution of government, the party that is programmatically against government would come out the relative winner.



Astenion
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#38 - 2011-10-02 23:24:20 UTC
Jada Maroo wrote:
If I were a reporter I'd ignore them too. They look like they stink and they sound like tards in interviews.

Bane Necran wrote:


What he is describing is a violation of the UCMJ. There are limits to what you can do while wearing your uniform.


The veterans were, well, VETERANS and no longer active or reserve military. Therefore, the UCMJ doesn't apply to them. If I want to break out my dress blues and join the protest as a veteran of the US armed forces, then I can do it because I am no longer active or reserve military.

I think what he was saying was that a cop is not going to want to mace a bunch of decorated veterans because: A. They'll beat the crap out of him and, B. it's REALLY bad PR.

As for me, I'm kinda on the fence about this whole thing. If the people are peacefully and lawfully protesting then there's no reason there should be any problems. While I may smirk at the tree-huggers (because, well, come on...they're tree hugging, dirty hippies), I DO think they have a point. Wall Street has gone out of control, along with our government leaders of all parties and they need a wake-up call.
Azelor Delaria
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#39 - 2011-10-02 23:49:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Azelor Delaria
Jada Maroo wrote:
If I were a reporter I'd ignore them too. They look like they stink and they sound like tards in interviews.

Bane Necran wrote:


What he is describing is a violation of the UCMJ. There are limits to what you can do while wearing your uniform.


As long as you have some contract with the military, you can and will fall under the UCMJ. However, is the contract - to include any and all reserve time - has ended, then wearing your uniform for a non-political purpose is perfectly fine. I'll look up any and all relevant articles, just to be sure, but it seems like these guys may be in the clear.

EDIT: As much as I support these guys, sadly this Devil Dog still has a contractual obligation for another two years. Then may be put on "possible recall for life" due to his pay grade. FML. -.-
Astenion
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#40 - 2011-10-02 23:55:33 UTC
I wonder if inactive reserve counts as well. I'm sure it does.

However, I'm sure that the last thing on any JAG's mind is prosecuting a bunch of veterans for joining a protest in their uniform when they may not be completely done with inactive reserve. I mean, you're a civilian at that point anyway. The red tape would be staggering and the PR hit would seriously damage morale.

It's not like they're active duty or activated reservists. It's basically a Veteran's Day parade scenario.