These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Looks like we're winning the war: Highsec mining drops by HALF!

Author
Selene Theron
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#161 - 2012-05-14 10:00:56 UTC
Marcin Arkaral wrote:
I don't understand how is that a good thing? This will only drive mineral prices up. So if by good, it means that ppl want to pay more for their ship and stuff than its fine with me.


For certain people that is the perfect scenario. Blink
Its not that hard to grasp if you think about it.
Kogh Ayon
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#162 - 2012-05-14 10:01:41 UTC
Marcin Arkaral wrote:
I don't understand how is that a good thing? This will only drive mineral prices up. So if by good, it means that ppl want to pay more for their ship and stuff than its fine with me.

Much better if minerals were sold by NPC?
Aldeskwatso
Primus Societas
Crimson Interstellar Alliance
#163 - 2012-05-14 10:15:12 UTC
Marcin Arkaral wrote:
...This will only drive mineral prices up...


Sounds good to me^^ More pay for less work. Tho noxcium was a bit underpriced at one time but saved it and made a 17mil additional profit for no work at all.

Still a cut down to almost 50% on mined stuffs in high sec. Didn't expect that to be honest. Guess more miners need to wise up.

The biggest obstacle you'll encounter doing anything is yourself.

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
#164 - 2012-05-14 10:53:00 UTC
Dreadknoght Lomaree wrote:
You are an idiot if you think that mineral inputs droppng 50% is a good thing...

Where do you think that every ship in eve came from? Every ship that dies in hulkaggedon, the miner & the ganker, costs minerals to build. Now, miners in high-sec bring in the largest total of minerals in eve, and you think this is a good thing? You think miners will want to go into low-sec or 0.0 when all of this is going on?

Yeah, lets see you in a few weeks when ships begin to increase in price 10-fold (which means tens of millions of isk for a single frigate!)

And im not even talking about the destroyed modules prices...

You seem to be mistaking us for people too space poor to pay a little bit more for our ships.

[center]"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"  -MXZF[/center]

Ptraci
3 R Corporation
#165 - 2012-05-14 11:18:55 UTC
Spurty wrote:


Where's the part that gives me numbers. A lot means nothing to me. I want to be able to point and go "Jesus ******* christ, 200 asteroids were mined in system XYZ in the last hour!" who wants to wait a week? Oof.



The actual numbers don't mean anything. Seriously do you really care if 3001 m3 were mined in the past minute, versus 3478m3? However the industry level implies some numbers thanks to the system decay that has to be fended off to prevent the level falling. To maintain industry 5 you need 12M m3 worth of mining per 24 hours. To maintain industry 3, you need 3M m3 mined per 24 hours. It's up to you to use google and a calculator to figure out the rest. Yeah it's an "average" number, but it's a real number.
Peter Raptor
Galactic Hawks
#166 - 2012-05-14 11:32:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Peter Raptor
James 315; "As the miners' numbers diminish, so does their power and influence over CCP."

LOL, youre mixing us miners up with the Goons Roll

Evelopedia; 

The Amarr Empire, is known for its omnipresent religion  †  

Aron Croup
Incompatible Protocol
#167 - 2012-05-14 11:32:56 UTC
This is the really short version:


  1. Goonswarm funds hulkageddon with technetium, paying gankers 100m ISK for 10 kills.
  2. Hulkageddon effectively cuts the amount of mined ORE in high-sec by 50%


Ergo, one broken game mechanic allows the breaking of another game mechanic.

Steel Wraith
#168 - 2012-05-14 12:29:49 UTC
Stirko Hek wrote:
NickyYo wrote:
Eve Orwell wrote:
Musashi IV wrote:
After reading your post I think your IQ dropped by half to a -5.


how does that even work. The only way it could have been halved and ended at -5 is if it went UP from -10.


He didn't say it was halved he said half, like half of a maximum IQ and dropped to -5.

LOL got to love a goon trying to be inteligent..


What exactly is "half of a maximum IQ"?

It also might help if you could spell intelligent, but I dare say you probably share the vacant stare of your avatar and insinuate that you more than likely are vacant in other departments as well.


He means it dropped by half in the same way high-sec mining dropped by half:

x = y
x^2 = xy
x^2 - y^2 = x*y - y^2
(x - y)(x + y) = y(x - y)
(x - y)(x + y)/(x - y) = y(x - y)/(x - y)
x + y = y
y + y = y
2y = y
2 = 1
Takseen
Federal Defense Union
Gallente Federation
#169 - 2012-05-14 12:47:17 UTC
Kogh Ayon wrote:
Marcin Arkaral wrote:
I don't understand how is that a good thing? This will only drive mineral prices up. So if by good, it means that ppl want to pay more for their ship and stuff than its fine with me.

Much better if minerals were sold by NPC?


I doubt the mining profession will die off entirely. If prices go high enough, it'd even be economical to mine in a tanked battleship, if necessary. And of course suicide ganking won't effect null and WH mining ops, since they already know how to mind their ships.
Jake Warbird
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#170 - 2012-05-14 13:14:21 UTC
If mineral prices do indeed go up, how are you hurting miners? Not trolling, genuinely interested.
Urgg Boolean
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#171 - 2012-05-14 14:42:50 UTC
I agree from what I have seen first hand :: the belts are a freakin' set of ghost towns now, and the roidz tend to have max m3. So, yeah, thanks for clearing out the belts! In fact, our scouts have found many wrecked hulks and the presence of Concorde all around us, and yet we mine without harassment. We do see a bunch of guys mining in cruisers, which may well be part of the explanation for the mining reduction.

Having said that, we are mining almost as much as usual, but we do so in a fleet of Rokhs with a Drake as the mining boss (my main). The one drawback is that we must use jet cans, so griefers come around and steal ore from time to time, but for the most part, we get left alone to harvest ore and supply minerals to a hungry public and profit as usual. Our fleet is described here. We recently recruited another guy making it a 3@Rokh + 1@Drake (Boss) fleet. We have always flown Rokhs during HulkaG, but this is the first year we actually formed up a mining fleet due to the atypical one month duration.

Our attitude is that maybe Rokh fleets will get targeted in HulkaG VI, but the gankers are gonna have to spend some ISK and generally function with a coordinated effort to take out a ships(s) with Incursion quality tanks and with omni resists in the 90's. Admittedly, the Drake is the wimpiest ship in the fleet ... but way cheaper to replace than an Orca in the event it is targeted.

So yeah - thanks for clearing out the belts. I'm not sure it's all that good for the economy, but as a statement of having an impact on the game, just look at the empty belts...
Anastysia
Bluestar Mining and Industrial
#172 - 2012-05-14 15:03:10 UTC
Let me see if I have this straight...

James 315 and friends have more or less removed human miners from high sec mining, leaving only bots behind.

Seems odd that they would be leaving bots behind, unless they were behind them. And since the bots are profiting from their actions, well....
Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
#173 - 2012-05-14 16:35:56 UTC
Jake Warbird wrote:
If mineral prices do indeed go up, how are you hurting miners? Not trolling, genuinely interested.

It isn't hurting miners, in fact as mineral prices go up newbie miners (who belong in high sec) will be earning higher ISK/hour.

All thanks to James 315 and his ilk's tireless efforts to rid Eve of those overly-experienced miners that should have grown the balls to leave high sec years ago.

[center]"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"  -MXZF[/center]

Nephilius
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#174 - 2012-05-14 16:45:47 UTC
The more I think about this, the more absurd it seems. To call it a war implies that both sides have an equal chance at victory. Blink
"If."
Takseen
Federal Defense Union
Gallente Federation
#175 - 2012-05-14 17:04:54 UTC
Anastysia wrote:
Let me see if I have this straight...

James 315 and friends have more or less removed human miners from high sec mining, leaving only bots behind.

Seems odd that they would be leaving bots behind, unless they were behind them. And since the bots are profiting from their actions, well....


There's no need to bring out the conspiracy theories. Hulkageddon is open to anyone. If bots aren't being killed, its because they're better at avoiding/surviving ganks than human miners.
Jake Warbird
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#176 - 2012-05-14 17:33:39 UTC
Simi Kusoni wrote:
Jake Warbird wrote:
If mineral prices do indeed go up, how are you hurting miners? Not trolling, genuinely interested.

It isn't hurting miners, in fact as mineral prices go up newbie miners (who belong in high sec) will be earning higher ISK/hour.

All thanks to James 315 and his ilk's tireless efforts to rid Eve of those overly-experienced miners that should have grown the balls to leave high sec years ago.

I agree. But if miners are ganked all the time, would the new miners ultimately benefit from the high mineral prices?
Uusuras Oramara
Asemakaavi Corporation
#177 - 2012-05-14 17:39:39 UTC
Jake Warbird wrote:
But if miners are ganked all the time, would the new miners ultimately benefit from the high mineral prices?


How gracious of everyone.
Jake Warbird
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#178 - 2012-05-14 17:43:17 UTC
Uusuras Oramara wrote:
Jake Warbird wrote:
But if miners are ganked all the time, would the new miners ultimately benefit from the high mineral prices?


How gracious of everyone.

Sorry, didn't get you there... Were you trolling?
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#179 - 2012-05-14 17:50:12 UTC
Jake Warbird wrote:

I agree. But if miners are ganked all the time, would the new miners ultimately benefit from the high mineral prices?


Hasn't stopped them in the past 9 years.
Jake Warbird
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#180 - 2012-05-14 18:03:29 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Jake Warbird wrote:

I agree. But if miners are ganked all the time, would the new miners ultimately benefit from the high mineral prices?


Hasn't stopped them in the past 9 years.

But isn't this the most successful Hulkageddon yet? Or have miners been killed in the same magnitude since Eve went online? Just trying to figure things out ofc. So I can tell the guys who mine in my corp.