These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Market Discussions

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

Corestwo pls stop postin in MD

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Elise DarkStar
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#21 - 2012-05-09 18:43:45 UTC
Please Corestwo, Don't Hurt 'Em
Debiru
Universal Fleet Operations
#22 - 2012-05-09 19:35:48 UTC
What would MD be without Corestwo?
Liberty Eternal
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#23 - 2012-05-09 21:33:46 UTC
Debiru wrote:
What would MD be without Corestwo?


Who?
Caldari Citizen20110707
Doomheim
#24 - 2012-05-09 21:41:12 UTC
Liberty Eternal wrote:
Debiru wrote:
What would MD be without Corestwo?


Who?


some random goon troll
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#25 - 2012-05-09 21:47:49 UTC
Caldari Citizen20110707 wrote:
Liberty Eternal wrote:
Debiru wrote:
What would MD be without Corestwo?


Who?


some random goon troll


Look, some random NPC corp troll.

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon
corestwo
Goonfleet Investment Banking
#26 - 2012-05-09 22:01:38 UTC
Liberty Eternal wrote:
Debiru wrote:
What would MD be without Corestwo?


Who?


Hi! I'm Corestwo! You might recognize me from such posts as "calling you a moron for thinking that eve being designed so that scamming and thievery are possible is a flaw".

This post was crafted by a member of the GoonSwarm Federation Economic Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay.

fofofo
Liberty Eternal
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#27 - 2012-05-09 22:12:35 UTC
corestwo wrote:
Liberty Eternal wrote:
Debiru wrote:
What would MD be without Corestwo?


Who?


Hi! I'm Corestwo! You might recognize me from such posts as "calling you a moron for thinking that eve being designed so that scamming and thievery are possible is a flaw".


Ah, the guy who thinks ad hominems are arguments.

Well, every forum has that guy. You can stay.
corestwo
Goonfleet Investment Banking
#28 - 2012-05-09 22:17:37 UTC
Ad hominems? Oh heavens no! I'm merely summarizing - rather poorly and, looking back over it, in a fairly distorted fashion - our little back and forth in the latest "onoes I got margin trading scammed" thread. Lol

This post was crafted by a member of the GoonSwarm Federation Economic Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay.

fofofo
Liberty Eternal
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#29 - 2012-05-09 22:22:59 UTC
corestwo wrote:
Ad hominems? Oh heavens no! I'm merely summarizing - rather poorly and, looking back over it, in a fairly distorted fashion - our little back and forth in the latest "onoes I got margin trading scammed" thread. Lol


My bad - I thought you were summarising all your posting.
corestwo
Goonfleet Investment Banking
#30 - 2012-05-09 22:31:27 UTC
All my posting? I'm hurt. Cry


That only summarizes some of my posting, and then only when they're not worth arguing with. Or they deserve it. P

This post was crafted by a member of the GoonSwarm Federation Economic Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay.

fofofo
Elise DarkStar
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#31 - 2012-05-09 22:37:58 UTC
Contrary to the impression given by the leagues of liberal arts graduates, calling someone an idiot during the course of an exchange is not in and of itself an ad hominem fallacy.

For example:

Your argument is wrong because you are dumb. <- ad hominem

You are dumb because your argument is wrong <- not an adhominem
Adunh Slavy
#32 - 2012-05-09 22:55:01 UTC
Elise DarkStar wrote:
Contrary to the impression given by the leagues of liberal arts graduates, calling someone an idiot during the course of an exchange is not in and of itself an ad hominem fallacy.

For example:

Your argument is wrong because you are dumb. <- ad hominem

You are dumb because your argument is wrong <- not an adhominem



The second example is a fallacy, thus you are dumb, right?

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.  - William Pitt
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#33 - 2012-05-09 23:10:38 UTC
Adunh Slavy wrote:
Elise DarkStar wrote:
Contrary to the impression given by the leagues of liberal arts graduates, calling someone an idiot during the course of an exchange is not in and of itself an ad hominem fallacy.

For example:

Your argument is wrong because you are dumb. <- ad hominem

You are dumb because your argument is wrong <- not an adhominem



The second example is a fallacy, thus you are dumb, right?


The second example has insufficient evidence for strong inductive reasoning, but I don't see a specific fallacy. Which fallacy did you see?

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon
Elise DarkStar
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#34 - 2012-05-09 23:12:02 UTC
RubyPorto wrote:
The second example has insufficient evidence for strong inductive reasoning, but I don't see a specific fallacy.


Correct.
Adunh Slavy
#35 - 2012-05-10 00:07:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Adunh Slavy
RubyPorto wrote:
Adunh Slavy wrote:
Elise DarkStar wrote:
Contrary to the impression given by the leagues of liberal arts graduates, calling someone an idiot during the course of an exchange is not in and of itself an ad hominem fallacy.

For example:

Your argument is wrong because you are dumb. <- ad hominem

You are dumb because your argument is wrong <- not an adhominem



The second example is a fallacy, thus you are dumb, right?


The second example has insufficient evidence for strong inductive reasoning, but I don't see a specific fallacy. Which fallacy did you see?




Just because someone has a bad argument does not make them dumb. Just because something swims in water does not make it a fish.

edit - Affirming the consequent if you must have a moniker.

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.  - William Pitt
Elise DarkStar
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#36 - 2012-05-10 00:15:47 UTC
Adunh Slavy wrote:
Just because someone has a bad argument does not make them dumb. Just because something swims in water does not make it a fish.


That's not a fallacy. It's a weak argument.
Adunh Slavy
#37 - 2012-05-10 00:24:34 UTC
Elise DarkStar wrote:
Adunh Slavy wrote:
Just because someone has a bad argument does not make them dumb. Just because something swims in water does not make it a fish.


That's not a fallacy. It's a weak argument.



Roll

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.  - William Pitt
Elise DarkStar
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#38 - 2012-05-10 00:29:43 UTC
Adunh Slavy wrote:
Roll


Sorry, bro, that's a pretty important distinction.
Adunh Slavy
#39 - 2012-05-10 00:31:12 UTC
Elise DarkStar wrote:
Adunh Slavy wrote:
Roll


Sorry, bro, that's a pretty important distinction.



Your lack of comprehension isn't my problem.

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.  - William Pitt
Elise DarkStar
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#40 - 2012-05-10 00:36:36 UTC
Adunh Slavy wrote:
Your lack of comprehension isn't my problem.


Very rarely do I find comprehension to be an issue. Please take some of your valuable time to explain where I've gone wrong here. It would be greatly appreciated.
Previous page123Next page