Intergalactic Summit

1) They have spoken out against Amarrian slavery, not slavery in general, if I recall correctly. At some point, the TC was always mentionned. Would have to verify this assertion.

2) That research you refer to was nothing more than illusionist powder flirting with charlatanism. You should ask for confirmation on scientific theories before believing anything. Are you that desperate ?



Your previous question enquired about possible raids on people conducted or supported by CTCS. The CTCS answer told nothing to validate or invalidate the fact, and was nothing but elusive. What was pointed out to you was that by agreeing with a member of the 24th Crusade, you would sound like "doing what the Amarr tell you". You seem ready to conclude blue standings upon that reason alone. Somehow, they just have to remind you that they oppose the TC, and thus the religious head of Amarr, for you to agree. Out of genuine interest, are you a follower of "the enemy of my enemy is my ally ?", because only this would make sense in your decision.

Just to clarify: EM has not made any particular diplomatic statement in this thread. We usually conduct our diplomacy in private. My posts are simply personal opinions.

Public thread on a public forum discussing diplomacy in public invites public commentary.

If you don't want third parties "parading around" in "your" matters, don't air them in public. It's really that simple.

And a good rule of thumb: Your allies won't always be fond of each other. Doing your diplomacy in public may cost you some of them as a result, so do it in private instead.

Yes, thank you Morwen. I am new to leadership, and you strike good points/lessons.

To address your question, Ms Farel. Do I believe "the enemy of my enemy is my friend"? In most cases, yes. So long as such a relationship doesn't conflict with existing, longer-standing, and more fundamental friendships and alliances, of course.

As for how desperate I am, all I will say is everything about our fight is desperate. This is not a war for profit or glory, nor honor and medals. This is a war for the people I have come to call kin. If I see an opportunity to help the Matari people, I will take it even if it makes me look dumb or naive. My personal reputation is insignificant in the grand scheme of things.

Could you elaborate on CTCS authorized or encouraged activities by anyone, anywhere?

(My impression so far in this thread is that regular blood draining causes an inability to give simple, clear statements.)

What is the opinion of the CTCS on draining the blood of an unrighteous without their consent to allow them to be close to your god?

So she raided him for fluids, eh?

To my knowledge there has so far been no official position of EM on the topic of the Bloody Hands of Matar, so I can not give you "the opinion of Electus Matari" on them (would require a Council opinion). Though the Republic considers them terrorists and outlawed the organization, and I would assume we follow the Republic's position on that.

I would recommend you start a new thread for that topic if it's interesting to you, else one might think you are trying to detract from the questions asked here ...

So, let me get this right. You are trying to imply in various ways that you do not drain the blood of involuntaries, despite your own leaflet about your own faith claiming so, and when asked about it, you are incredibly evasive and even try to deflect from the issue.

I guess that speaks for itself.