These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Goonswarm: They are doing something with Ice and Oxytopes

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Richard Hammond II
Doomheim
#61 - 2011-10-01 13:39:03 UTC
Smoking Blunts wrote:
isnt this just the same as whats gonna happen when all ice is moved out of high sec anyway. cos you know ccp are dumb enough to do that right?


They have since said theyre not removing ALL the ice. Just "a lot of it". Maybe making ice's depletable like regular asyeroids are. Dunno why the hell they arent in the first place imo

Goons; infiltration at its best - first bob... now ccp itself. They dont realize you guys dot take this as "just a game". Bring it down guys, we're rooting for you.
Smoking Blunts
ZC Omega
#62 - 2011-10-01 13:40:49 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Smoking Blunts wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
Smoking Blunts wrote:


yeh does seam that with what ccp plan to do is just making 0.0 mega alliances richer and ******* everyone else.


Yeah like when they totally screwed hi-sec with the agent change. Roll



*moving t2 production to only be any good in 0.0, moving ice to only 0.0.


*not exactly the same as changing it so you need **** poor standings to get lv4's


Well I suppose the biggest difference is that one actually happened while the other didn't



you missed the word yet out.

the invetion t2 changes are in the outline of 0.0 changes. its on the whiteboard so it must be true.
the ice changes are also on there but are less likely to happen imo.

OMG when can i get a pic here
Richard Hammond II
Doomheim
#63 - 2011-10-01 13:41:12 UTC
Smoking Blunts wrote:



you do know that bots stick to belts as it has a higher isk/hour. and that most mining bots are in 0.0 already right?


And are being run by Goonswarm cause they have that dont report goons bots policy.
It was in a thread the other day that got conveniently locked

Goons; infiltration at its best - first bob... now ccp itself. They dont realize you guys dot take this as "just a game". Bring it down guys, we're rooting for you.
Eternum Praetorian
Doomheim
#64 - 2011-10-01 13:43:30 UTC
Richard Hammond II wrote:
Smoking Blunts wrote:



you do know that bots stick to belts as it has a higher isk/hour. and that most mining bots are in 0.0 already right?


And are being run by Goonswarm cause they have that dont report goons bots policy.
It was in a thread the other day that got conveniently locked



Well you don't want the CSM's condoning of macro's public knowledge do you?

[center]The EVE Gateway Blog[/center] [center]One Of EVE Online's Ultimate Resources[/center]
Smoking Blunts
ZC Omega
#65 - 2011-10-01 13:43:57 UTC
Richard Hammond II wrote:
Smoking Blunts wrote:



you do know that bots stick to belts as it has a higher isk/hour. and that most mining bots are in 0.0 already right?


And are being run by Goonswarm cause they have that dont report goons bots policy.
It was in a thread the other day that got conveniently locked


they are in every major sov holding allaince, even if that alliance has a zero tolerance to botting activity. yourll still find them as peopel will try to get away with it.

OMG when can i get a pic here
Richard Hammond II
Doomheim
#66 - 2011-10-01 13:47:36 UTC
Smoking Blunts wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
Smoking Blunts wrote:


yeh does seam that with what ccp plan to do is just making 0.0 mega alliances richer and ******* everyone else.


Yeah like when they totally screwed hi-sec with the agent change. Roll



moving t2 production to only be any good in 0.0, moving ice to only 0.0.
not exactly the same as changing it so you need **** poor standings to get lv4's


moving t2 production TO 0.0 as I understood the dev blog. not just "to be any good to 0.0"

Goons; infiltration at its best - first bob... now ccp itself. They dont realize you guys dot take this as "just a game". Bring it down guys, we're rooting for you.
Abrazzar
Vardaugas Family
#67 - 2011-10-01 13:48:08 UTC
Hey, maybe cyno jammers will need oxygen isotopes as fuel in the future and goons are just raising prices for them to make cyno jamming more expensive.

It's a Goonspiracy, I tell ya!

Sovereignty and Population

New Mining Mechanics
Richard Hammond II
Doomheim
#68 - 2011-10-01 13:49:16 UTC
Eternum Praetorian wrote:

CSMs should be trying to **** on everyone in EVE and ruin the economy of a broken game right? Publically no less. I also like that our CSMs are abusing the macrobot feature in order to temp ban everyone mining in a mac.


there was that one thread where Vile rat I think it was was quoted as telling ppl in Goons not to report goons botting or youll get kicked out lol

Goons; infiltration at its best - first bob... now ccp itself. They dont realize you guys dot take this as "just a game". Bring it down guys, we're rooting for you.
Smoking Blunts
ZC Omega
#69 - 2011-10-01 13:49:56 UTC
Richard Hammond II wrote:
Smoking Blunts wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
Smoking Blunts wrote:


yeh does seam that with what ccp plan to do is just making 0.0 mega alliances richer and ******* everyone else.


Yeah like when they totally screwed hi-sec with the agent change. Roll



moving t2 production to only be any good in 0.0, moving ice to only 0.0.
not exactly the same as changing it so you need **** poor standings to get lv4's


moving t2 production TO 0.0 as I understood the dev blog. not just "to be any good to 0.0"



if you followed what greyscaley dude was saying in the discussion topic he said something along the lines of being better in 0.0. than empire. so prob increase in % chance down the sec levels is what i took from what he said.

OMG when can i get a pic here
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#70 - 2011-10-01 13:53:21 UTC
Smoking Blunts wrote:

you missed the word yet out.

the invetion t2 changes are in the outline of 0.0 changes. its on the whiteboard so it must be true.
the ice changes are also on there but are less likely to happen imo.


I suggest you read your own sig.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016
Richard Hammond II
Doomheim
#71 - 2011-10-01 13:53:37 UTC
Smoking Blunts wrote:
Richard Hammond II wrote:
Smoking Blunts wrote:



you do know that bots stick to belts as it has a higher isk/hour. and that most mining bots are in 0.0 already right?


And are being run by Goonswarm cause they have that dont report goons bots policy.
It was in a thread the other day that got conveniently locked


they are in every major sov holding allaince, even if that alliance has a zero tolerance to botting activity. yourll still find them as peopel will try to get away with it.


I get that but where the csm was actually quoted (albeit in an end around way but - seriously, how hard they pretended that wasnt what he was saying was just funny) telling ppl in his corp not to report or "****" fellow Goons was just funny. It was even more funny when Sreegs came into the thread (an ex Goon CCP employee hired as security for the game - lol just lol).

Goons; infiltration at its best - first bob... now ccp itself. They dont realize you guys dot take this as "just a game". Bring it down guys, we're rooting for you.
Smoking Blunts
ZC Omega
#72 - 2011-10-01 13:55:46 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Smoking Blunts wrote:

you missed the word yet out.

the invetion t2 changes are in the outline of 0.0 changes. its on the whiteboard so it must be true.
the ice changes are also on there but are less likely to happen imo.


I suggest you read your own sig.



lol yeh but that could be applied to the whole 0.0 discussion also. which leaves at were we are now. which is much like being a mushroom

OMG when can i get a pic here
Mara Tessidar
Perkone
Caldari State
#73 - 2011-10-01 13:57:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Mara Tessidar
Richard Hammond II wrote:
there was that one thread where Vile rat I think it was was quoted as telling ppl in Goons not to report goons botting or youll get kicked out lol


Oh you mean the thread where he said this:

"We do not condone botting. We think it is destructive to the game. We tell people not to bot and strongly discourage it because it's stupid and easily caught, not to mention it cheapens the effort of players who play the game the way it was meant to be. We are also not CCP's policemen. It is not our job to police botting or EULA breaking activities in the game, this is CCP's job. CCP Sreegs is doing a wonderful job policing this and we support his actions. Asking a playerbase to police EULA infractions is dumb and it is not our place. There is a report bot mechanism, we encourage people to use it."
Aloe Cloveris
The Greater Goon
#74 - 2011-10-01 13:59:12 UTC
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
I for one am glad that this is how our CSM's choose to spend their time!!!



CSMs should be trying to **** on everyone in EVE and ruin the economy of a broken game right? Publically no less. I also like that our CSMs are abusing the macrobot feature in order to temp ban everyone mining in a mac.


Also...

I am impressed with the rest of the CSM's silence on this matter as well! Well done! It is good to see that Goonswarm and Pandemic CSM's have no other interests the then the bettering of EVE Online! Cool




This is 100% your fault CCP.
Fix the voting system.


This is exactly how the game should be played. I don't see where any 'fault' lies and why the CSM should have to play the game any differently than the rest of us.
KaarBaak
Squirrel Team
#75 - 2011-10-01 14:02:49 UTC

I was in Brap last night and was wondering why there were so many pods just sitting there. Some would occasionally warp out and back and just sit.

Kittenswarm is like chemo-therapy for the cancer of botting. Makes you crazy sick and miserable, but eventually removes the disease.

Dum Spiro Spero
Hroya
#76 - 2011-10-01 14:20:08 UTC
KaarBaak wrote:

I was in Brap last night and was wondering why there were so many pods just sitting there. Some would occasionally warp out and back and just sit.

Kittenswarm is like chemo-therapy for the cancer of botting. Makes you crazy sick and miserable, but eventually removes the disease.




It doesnt cure it.
You still maintain the breeding ground for the disease.

I hope Goonswarm has fun in their campaign, really. it's what eve is.
But to think it solves the problem is just delusional.

Muppets fall for this kind of stuff. They think they are doing the "good thing"

You go your corridor but.
Richard Hammond II
Doomheim
#77 - 2011-10-01 14:27:39 UTC
lol they should look internally first if they really care about removing the bot problem

Its just like how hulkageddon was supposedly an anti-bot thing and was in fact for nothing more than *****-n-giggles an blowing up the carebears

Goons; infiltration at its best - first bob... now ccp itself. They dont realize you guys dot take this as "just a game". Bring it down guys, we're rooting for you.
Psychophantic
#78 - 2011-10-01 14:32:56 UTC
Mara Tessidar wrote:

"We do not condone botting. We think it is destructive to the game. We tell people not to bot and strongly discourage it because it's stupid and easily caught, not to mention it cheapens the effort of players who play the game the way it was meant to be. We are also not CCP's policemen. It is not our job to police botting or EULA breaking activities in the game, this is CCP's job. CCP Sreegs is doing a wonderful job policing this and we support his actions. Asking a playerbase to police EULA infractions is dumb and it is not our place. There is a report bot mechanism, we encourage people to use it."


I triple guarantee you, Goonswarm does not condone nor harbour botters.
Mara Tessidar
Perkone
Caldari State
#79 - 2011-10-01 14:33:51 UTC
Richard Hammond II wrote:
Its just like how hulkageddon was supposedly an anti-bot thing and was in fact for nothing more than *****-n-giggles an blowing up the carebears


I think I see some tears rolling down your cheeks
Richard Hammond II
Doomheim
#80 - 2011-10-01 14:40:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Richard Hammond II
Quote:
The isolated pain of random pubbies is not enough. It is time for Goonswarm to hurt everyone in EVE, and so reap the misery of a wronged universe.

We're going to wreck the entire EVE economy


any question left that Mittani is trying to do the best for EVE as CSM?

lol way to show your colors dude!

lol I have pretty much all of the goons on that neat thing that allows me to see nothing more than a red bar that says "view post"
makes my forum life much happier

Goons; infiltration at its best - first bob... now ccp itself. They dont realize you guys dot take this as "just a game". Bring it down guys, we're rooting for you.