These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123
 

A New Eve? please vote
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Bluddwolf
Heimatar Military Industries
#41 - 2012-05-05 16:01:00 UTC
Not Amused Responsible wrote:

“Who am I?”
Just a client, who are you just a client,
Who are we? CCP customers.



The fact that you are either:

A. Only one day old

or....

B. Hiding behind a one day old character

discredits your request / idea.

Your poll options are based on a false premise, that CCP does not listen to its customers at all. Simply false, considering the game has been around for 9 years!!

EVE Online Fan ... Looking for "End Game" since 2006 ... Happily, I still havn't found it
Antisocial Malkavian
Antisocial Malkavians
#42 - 2012-05-05 16:03:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Antisocial Malkavian
Neither works when you have a history of developer misconduct favoring their friends in game

Cutter Isaacson wrote:
Not Amused Responsible wrote:



CCP can do what they like.







There, I finished your social experiment for you. Question was null and void the second it was asked.


didnt this summer show we DONT want that?

**** if I were CCP Id be confused as hell WHAT to do especially when theyve stuck themselves right between the HTFU and mining/noobs crowds who are pretty much opposed

Schmata Bastanold wrote:
Eve already has a voting system implemented, it is called subscription cancellation. Don't hesitate to participate if you don't like game anymore, rest of us will be thankful.


I ABSOLUTELY agree with this. Then we'll see which way CCP is gonna go with it. They stopped the Nex store and that whole BS due to the unsubs this summer. Itll be interesting to see who theyre gonna allow to leave, the old, hard, htfu crowd or the noobs and the miners

And, isn't sanity really just a one-trick pony anyway? I mean all you get is one trick, rational thinking, but when you're good and crazy, oooh, oooh, oooh, the sky is the limit.

Mortimer Civeri
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#43 - 2012-05-05 21:05:17 UTC
"A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." Kay MIB



Good job on getting the dumb, panicky dangerous animals, to chose the direction CCP goes in...I think.

"I don't know which is worse, ...that everyone has his price, or that the price is always so low." Calvin
Kietay Ayari
Caldari State
#44 - 2012-05-05 21:34:53 UTC
It brings a tear of happiness to my eye to see so many people against this insane idea c:

Ferox #1
Mars Theran
Foreign Interloper
#45 - 2012-05-05 21:53:15 UTC
Ballot voting on game design to see whether it is implemented or developed or not is not likely to produce any results. What it is likely to produce is nothing.
zubzubzubzubzubzubzubzub
Torneach
Doomheim
#46 - 2012-05-05 22:35:49 UTC
Entered thread expecting it to be about making an entire new EVE with new star systems and mechanics and removed assets.

Left confused.
Vangelios
#47 - 2012-05-05 22:50:35 UTC
IMO, CCP should keep on making game mechanics and decide the future of the game on their own.

Why?
Because any player, no matter how much involved in EVE, thinks of game changes in way that would benefit their own game, gamestyle or whatever they think their game should be, and that is quite expected behavior. Being involved as players of game, renders you immune of thinking without prejudice. In other words, to design sandbox, sorry, you have to be out of it.

And there are even more prejudice if you invest a lot of time (years) ingame. There is also a sort of deviation in thinking of very old players, that they are of crucial importance to sandbox, while perhaps (some magic here) replaced with same number of new players who will pay subs for many years... you see? It's prejudice.

CCP has very clear goals with EVE. To make it better game for everyone, and to make it last for ages.
I wish best to CCP.

... Each small candle Lights a corner of the dark...
Mars Theran
Foreign Interloper
#48 - 2012-05-05 23:06:00 UTC
Vangelios wrote:
IMO, CCP should keep on making game mechanics and decide the future of the game on their own.

Why?
Because any player, no matter how much involved in EVE, thinks of game changes in way that would benefit their own game, gamestyle or whatever they think their game should be, and that is quite expected behavior. Being involved as players of game, renders you immune of thinking without prejudice. In other words, to design sandbox, sorry, you have to be out of it.

And there are even more prejudice if you invest a lot of time (years) ingame. There is also a sort of deviation in thinking of very old players, that they are of crucial importance to sandbox, while perhaps (some magic here) replaced with same number of new players who will pay subs for many years... you see? It's prejudice.

CCP has very clear goals with EVE. To make it better game for everyone, and to make it last for ages.
I wish best to CCP.


Your sig is moderately disturbing. Almost like you could be expected to sprout bat wings and suddenly grow fangs and had gnarly fingernails.
zubzubzubzubzubzubzubzub
Vangelios
#49 - 2012-05-05 23:22:47 UTC
Mars Theran wrote:
Vangelios wrote:
IMO, CCP should keep on making game mechanics and decide the future of the game on their own.

Why?
Because any player, no matter how much involved in EVE, thinks of game changes in way that would benefit their own game, gamestyle or whatever they think their game should be, and that is quite expected behavior. Being involved as players of game, renders you immune of thinking without prejudice. In other words, to design sandbox, sorry, you have to be out of it.

And there are even more prejudice if you invest a lot of time (years) ingame. There is also a sort of deviation in thinking of very old players, that they are of crucial importance to sandbox, while perhaps (some magic here) replaced with same number of new players who will pay subs for many years... you see? It's prejudice.

CCP has very clear goals with EVE. To make it better game for everyone, and to make it last for ages.
I wish best to CCP.


Your sig is moderately disturbing. Almost like you could be expected to sprout bat wings and suddenly grow fangs and had gnarly fingernails.


:) No sir, it's prejudice. But like your idea to be implemented in-game, so more options for wis. Didn't you heard that all space stations are infested with immortal space vampires and other creatures of type. That "Station atmosphere not yet decontaminated for capsuleer consumption." is just CCP cover-up.

... Each small candle Lights a corner of the dark...
Destru Kaneda
Black Rebel Rifter Club
The Devil's Tattoo
#50 - 2012-05-05 23:44:45 UTC
No offense, but this new Eve sounds like ****.

I like it best when the beats are naked.
Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
#51 - 2012-05-05 23:50:14 UTC
Akirei Scytale wrote:


Valve is completely horizontal. No job descriptions and no bosses.


No wonder its taken them 5 years and counting to make HL3.

CCP's Motto: If it isn't broken, break it. If it is broken, ignore it. Improving NPE / Dynamic New Eden
Serene Repose
#52 - 2012-05-06 01:41:12 UTC
This would be fabulous were I paying mere game players to play THEIR game. Oddly enough, I'm NOT. I'm paying CCP to play THEIR game. If I find I'm playing the player's game, I'll be sorely pissed and might SUE CCP for breach of contract.

Stick that in your red/blue pipe and smoke it.

We must accommodate the idiocracy.
Previous page123