These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Goonswarm: They are doing something with Ice and Oxytopes

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Smoking Blunts
ZC Omega
#41 - 2011-10-01 11:10:38 UTC
isnt this just the same as whats gonna happen when all ice is moved out of high sec anyway. cos you know ccp are dumb enough to do that right?

OMG when can i get a pic here
Tenchi Sal
White Knights of Equestria
#42 - 2011-10-01 11:35:28 UTC
ccp should gank all their bots in return. show them how it feels to lose an important asset.
Thorn Galen
Bene Gesserit ChapterHouse
The Curatores Veritatis Auxiliary
#43 - 2011-10-01 11:46:45 UTC
Shouldn't Goonswarm be carrying out such a plan to affect the DRF ? So they choose soft-targets in Highsec, even assuming they are bots. What about the DRF's bots? For every bot nailed in Highsec, there must be at least 2 dozen DRF bots doing their thing. I just don't get it. Goonswarm are simply paving the way for the DRF to take it all.

COO - Bene Gesserit Chapterhouse  CEO - Sanctuary Pact Alliance
Hroya
#44 - 2011-10-01 11:48:51 UTC
Smoking Blunts wrote:
isnt this just the same as whats gonna happen when all ice is moved out of high sec anyway. cos you know ccp are dumb enough to do that right?



And i cant wait for this to happen.
Finally all high sec icemining bots will become useless and that wonderfull activity is in the hands of reall players who are eager to spend their time mining ice.

It's good to see a move like this to further invigorate the excitement reall players are looking for in null sec.

No problem here if ice products become more expensive because i would know that it are genuine die hards sitting at their comps and mined the ice for hours on end.

Keep up the good work.

You go your corridor but.
Blawrf McTaggart
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#45 - 2011-10-01 11:58:08 UTC
Denidil wrote:
just goons being typical cowards.


Didn't want that space anyway?
Smoking Blunts
ZC Omega
#46 - 2011-10-01 12:15:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Smoking Blunts
Hroya wrote:
Smoking Blunts wrote:
isnt this just the same as whats gonna happen when all ice is moved out of high sec anyway. cos you know ccp are dumb enough to do that right?



And i cant wait for this to happen.
Finally all high sec icemining bots will become useless and that wonderfull activity is in the hands of reall players who are eager to spend their time mining ice.

It's good to see a move like this to further invigorate the excitement reall players are looking for in null sec.

No problem here if ice products become more expensive because i would know that it are genuine die hards sitting at their comps and mined the ice for hours on end.

Keep up the good work.



you do know that bots stick to belts as it has a higher isk/hour. and that most mining bots are in 0.0 already right?

OMG when can i get a pic here
Blue Binary
Polychoron
#47 - 2011-10-01 12:21:14 UTC
Smoking Blunts wrote:
isnt this just the same as whats gonna happen when all ice is moved out of high sec anyway. cos you know ccp are dumb enough to do that right?

Aye, you've been smoking plenty of blunts...

CCP Greyscale has already stated that they are leaning towards not removing ice from high sec. They might match regeneration to demand, or they might do nothing.

Post #55
CCP Greyscale wrote:
Thinking about it a bit, not sure where we're going to go. We might not change it at all, we might just make hisec belts deplete (and regen as normal) so they can roughly meet hisec demand.

Post #291
CCP Greyscale wrote:
Also for anyone who's not following we're leaning towards just making ice in empire non-infinite rather than removing it, but I realize most people coming in to post aren't actually reading the thread first, I just wanted to say this so people couldn't say we hadn't said it.
Smoking Blunts
ZC Omega
#48 - 2011-10-01 12:24:00 UTC
Blue Binary wrote:
Smoking Blunts wrote:
isnt this just the same as whats gonna happen when all ice is moved out of high sec anyway. cos you know ccp are dumb enough to do that right?

Aye, you've been smoking plenty of blunts...

CCP Greyscale has already stated that they are leaning towards not removing ice from high sec. They might match regeneration to demand, or they might do nothing.

Post #55
CCP Greyscale wrote:
Thinking about it a bit, not sure where we're going to go. We might not change it at all, we might just make hisec belts deplete (and regen as normal) so they can roughly meet hisec demand.

Post #291
CCP Greyscale wrote:
Also for anyone who's not following we're leaning towards just making ice in empire non-infinite rather than removing it, but I realize most people coming in to post aren't actually reading the thread first, I just wanted to say this so people couldn't say we hadn't said it.




when have ccp not gone aganst what they have said? remember no mt's in eve. look how that turned out

OMG when can i get a pic here
Hroya
#49 - 2011-10-01 12:28:12 UTC
Well sarcasm was in play, but i proberbly failed at that.

As to the ccp greyscale posts:

Empire ice depletes ( to match demand ... rrrright)
null sec ice doesnt deplete ?

Seems to be it's a more time consuming move towards monopolising that part of the market to the formeantioned bot cultures.
Instead of one big bang here you go have a nice day with your monopoly, you just leave a few chips behind for the scrubs to fight over he ?

Add to that the ongoing suicides on flimsy paperbag to expensive Fartinaws and you will get the same result.

You're not fixing anything, just making it worse.

Keep up the good work

You go your corridor but.
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#50 - 2011-10-01 12:30:30 UTC
Thorn Galen wrote:
Shouldn't Goonswarm be carrying out such a plan to affect the DRF ?


You're aware that goons aren't fighting the DRF, right?

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#51 - 2011-10-01 12:31:05 UTC
Blawrf McTaggart wrote:
Denidil wrote:
just goons being typical cowards.


Didn't want that space anyway?


When you're in Morsus Mihi, every day is opposite day.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016
Smoking Blunts
ZC Omega
#52 - 2011-10-01 12:36:00 UTC
Hroya wrote:
Well sarcasm was in play, but i proberbly failed at that.

As to the ccp greyscale posts:

Empire ice depletes ( to match demand ... rrrright)
null sec ice doesnt deplete ?

Seems to be it's a more time consuming move towards monopolising that part of the market to the formeantioned bot cultures.
Instead of one big bang here you go have a nice day with your monopoly, you just leave a few chips behind for the scrubs to fight over he ?

Add to that the ongoing suicides on flimsy paperbag to expensive Fartinaws and you will get the same result.

You're not fixing anything, just making it worse.

Keep up the good work



lol sorry missed the sarcasm, its too early and ive not had enough expresso yet to detect it...lol

yeh does seam that with what ccp plan to do is just making 0.0 mega alliances richer and ******* everyone else.

ive played every aspect of eve, high low and 0.0 and most of teh 0.0 revamp makes no ******* sence to me. ccp have a plan, much like the cylons the total distruction of something

OMG when can i get a pic here
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#53 - 2011-10-01 13:04:10 UTC
Smoking Blunts wrote:


yeh does seam that with what ccp plan to do is just making 0.0 mega alliances richer and ******* everyone else.


Yeah like when they totally screwed hi-sec with the agent change. Roll

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#54 - 2011-10-01 13:05:00 UTC
Tenchi Sal wrote:
ccp should gank all their bots in return. show them how it feels to lose an important asset.


Natually, it's no good expecting the players to do anything themselves

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016
Hroya
#55 - 2011-10-01 13:17:00 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Tenchi Sal wrote:
ccp should gank all their bots in return. show them how it feels to lose an important asset.


Natually, it's no good expecting the players to do anything themselves



And why should they ? Are you paying your subscribtion to be a cop ?

"Just" change the mechanics and it's dealt with. But hey, loss of subscribtions and all that, right ?

You go your corridor but.
Smoking Blunts
ZC Omega
#56 - 2011-10-01 13:31:06 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Smoking Blunts wrote:


yeh does seam that with what ccp plan to do is just making 0.0 mega alliances richer and ******* everyone else.


Yeah like when they totally screwed hi-sec with the agent change. Roll



moving t2 production to only be any good in 0.0, moving ice to only 0.0.
not exactly the same as changing it so you need **** poor standings to get lv4's

OMG when can i get a pic here
Richard Hammond II
Doomheim
#57 - 2011-10-01 13:35:03 UTC
Wot I Think wrote:
What are they doing?
Ganking Mackinaws.

Why?
Because it somehow has some effect on all Tech 2 Productions

So what?
They think it will collapse the entire EVE economy.

Oh?
Yep.

So What do we do about it?
Hell if I know.

Where did you read about this?
Some website I can't link beings with a K though.

So you read something who cares?
Also a goon in recruitment told me about it.

Goons are idiots?
So are alot of people.

Do you like popcorn?
I like the sweet and salty kettle corn.

What is your favorite color?
Red.

Do you have any pets?
Yes, I have a cat.

Do you have a facebook?
I totally do and I want you to be my friend.


huh cool story brah, what subforum? Whats the thread name so I can read it myself rather than the rabble rabble of incoherent ppl on EVE-O lol

Goons; infiltration at its best - first bob... now ccp itself. They dont realize you guys dot take this as "just a game". Bring it down guys, we're rooting for you.
Daemon Angel
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#58 - 2011-10-01 13:35:30 UTC
who cares
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#59 - 2011-10-01 13:36:32 UTC
Smoking Blunts wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
Smoking Blunts wrote:


yeh does seam that with what ccp plan to do is just making 0.0 mega alliances richer and ******* everyone else.


Yeah like when they totally screwed hi-sec with the agent change. Roll



*moving t2 production to only be any good in 0.0, moving ice to only 0.0.


*not exactly the same as changing it so you need **** poor standings to get lv4's


Well I suppose the biggest difference is that one actually happened while the other didn't

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016
Eternum Praetorian
Doomheim
#60 - 2011-10-01 13:37:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Eternum Praetorian
I for one am glad that this is how our CSM's choose to spend their time!!!



CSMs should be trying to **** on everyone in EVE and ruin the economy of a broken game right? Publically no less. I also like that our CSMs are abusing the macrobot feature in order to temp ban everyone mining in a mac.


Also...

I am impressed with the rest of the CSM's silence on this matter as well! Well done! It is good to see that Goonswarm and Pandemic CSM's have no other interests the then the bettering of EVE Online! Cool




This is 100% your fault CCP.
Fix the voting system.

[center]The EVE Gateway Blog[/center] [center]One Of EVE Online's Ultimate Resources[/center]