These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Lets Talk About Inferno’s [Questionable] New Wardec Mechanics

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Akirei Scytale
Okami Syndicate
#21 - 2012-05-03 19:57:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Akirei Scytale
Alavaria Fera wrote:

Isn't it like why 250 Hurricans is blobbing, but 50 titans is perfectly honorable?

It matters who you are. If you are the guy with RRs, it's perfectly fine. If not, it's blobbing.


Pretty much. Hooray for selective reasoning and cognitive dissonance.
Fannie Maes
Doomheim
#22 - 2012-05-03 19:57:51 UTC
It is a sandbox game where you can do anything you want... as long as goons approve of your activity!
Akirei Scytale
Okami Syndicate
#23 - 2012-05-03 19:58:11 UTC
Eternum Praetorian wrote:

You are 100% correct, it is about the same. But what you fail to realize is that you assume that we are all in empire doing just that. We are not, and I am not. Since you assume that only blobs and/or docking games factor into the equation, I must now assume that you are an idiot.



We DONT want any of that.
That is the point.


Then go to lowsec? Roll
Eternum Praetorian
Doomheim
#24 - 2012-05-03 19:59:20 UTC
Fannie Maes wrote:
It is a sandbox game where you can do anything you want... as long as goons approve of your activity!



TBH I don't understand why they even care, this is not their area of the game.
Does wardecs from Oprhans really **** you off that much? You live in Deklein for gods sake. Who cares?

[center]The EVE Gateway Blog[/center] [center]One Of EVE Online's Ultimate Resources[/center]
Eternum Praetorian
Doomheim
#25 - 2012-05-03 20:00:14 UTC
Akirei Scytale wrote:
Eternum Praetorian wrote:

You are 100% correct, it is about the same. But what you fail to realize is that you assume that we are all in empire doing just that. We are not, and I am not. Since you assume that only blobs and/or docking games factor into the equation, I must now assume that you are an idiot.



We DONT want any of that.
That is the point.


Then go to lowsec? Roll



The "Oh god CCP can you finally buff low sec" thread is that way ArrowArrowArrow
& not the topic of this thread, but I would be ecstatic if they did.

[center]The EVE Gateway Blog[/center] [center]One Of EVE Online's Ultimate Resources[/center]
Akirei Scytale
Okami Syndicate
#26 - 2012-05-03 20:07:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Akirei Scytale
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
The "Oh god CCP can you finally buff low sec" thread is that way ArrowArrowArrow
& not the topic of this thread, but I would be ecstatic if they did.


I think I see your problem.

You'll find something to whine about no matter what you're talking about, and use that to rationalize your decision to play station and gate games while denying that you do.

Want to have actual two-sided combat? Leave highsec. Don't like politics? Go to lowsec instead of null. Don't want to deal with sec loss / gate guns? Go to WH space.

If you genuinely want what you claim to want, you'll find it by looking for it, not whining.
Nicolo da'Vicenza
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#27 - 2012-05-03 20:08:52 UTC
op is right, wardecs should be next to free, and impossible to welch out of.
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#28 - 2012-05-03 20:12:28 UTC  |  Edited by: Alavaria Fera
Basically, wait until the changes come out and then whine to CCP about how goons are wardeccing all the little corps.

Clearly, shooting wardecs is so fun the next time around, Jita will be full of blinking red people.
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:
op is right, wardecs should be next to free, and impossible to welch out of.

We wouldn't mind, he might. We have FCs that love camping people into stations.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?
Eternum Praetorian
Doomheim
#29 - 2012-05-03 20:14:50 UTC
Alavaria Fera wrote:
Basically, wait until the changes come out and then whine to CCP about how goons are wardeccing all the little corps.

Clearly, shooting wardecs is so fun the next time around, Jita will be full of blinking red people.



Oh...
Ofc... and the other shoe drops.




At least it all makes sense now. Thx CCP for a easily exploitable CSM system, I hope you reap what you sow (again)

[center]The EVE Gateway Blog[/center] [center]One Of EVE Online's Ultimate Resources[/center]
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#30 - 2012-05-03 20:18:05 UTC
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
Alavaria Fera wrote:
Basically, wait until the changes come out and then whine to CCP about how goons are wardeccing all the little corps.

Clearly, shooting wardecs is so fun the next time around, Jita will be full of blinking red people.

Oh...
Ofc... and the other shoe drops.

At least it all makes sense now. Thx CCP for a easily exploitable CSM system, I hope you reap what you sow (again)

I don't think the nullsec groups really cared much about highsec warfare, until the run up to burn jita, anyway.

Besides, freighters always have the NPC corp. Like on the forums ~

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?
Fannie Maes
Doomheim
#31 - 2012-05-03 20:26:11 UTC
Alavaria Fera wrote:
Basically, wait until the changes come out and then whine to CCP about how goons are wardeccing all the little corps.

Clearly, shooting wardecs is so fun the next time around, Jita will be full of blinking red people.
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:
op is right, wardecs should be next to free, and impossible to welch out of.

We wouldn't mind, he might. We have FCs that love camping people into stations.



So I guess Goons do what they do for empire players benefit out of the kindness of their heart? Roll
Akirei Scytale
Okami Syndicate
#32 - 2012-05-03 20:26:38 UTC
Eternum Praetorian wrote:

At least it all makes sense now. Thx CCP for a easily exploitable CSM system, I hope you reap what you sow (again)


TIL "Having an overwhelming majority of players support your cause, most of which are external to your coalition" is considered an exploit.
Fannie Maes
Doomheim
#33 - 2012-05-03 20:30:10 UTC
Akirei Scytale wrote:
Eternum Praetorian wrote:

At least it all makes sense now. Thx CCP for a easily exploitable CSM system, I hope you reap what you sow (again)


TIL "Having an overwhelming majority of players support your cause, most of which are external to your coalition" is considered an exploit.



Sounds about right with a third even voting for a CSM (a worse statistic than a Syrian election,) with a an even smaller % voting for a CSM that holds your opinion.
Eternum Praetorian
Doomheim
#34 - 2012-05-03 20:30:23 UTC
Akirei Scytale wrote:
Eternum Praetorian wrote:

At least it all makes sense now. Thx CCP for a easily exploitable CSM system, I hope you reap what you sow (again)


TIL "Having an overwhelming majority of players support your cause, most of which are external to your coalition" is considered an exploit.



Again, I must now think you an idiot. At least the smart trolls try the lame counter argument of 1 person with 10 accounts counts for a legitimate 10 votes. That at least looks more respectable. You failed just then, just saying.

[center]The EVE Gateway Blog[/center] [center]One Of EVE Online's Ultimate Resources[/center]
Akirei Scytale
Okami Syndicate
#35 - 2012-05-03 20:31:39 UTC
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
Akirei Scytale wrote:
Eternum Praetorian wrote:

At least it all makes sense now. Thx CCP for a easily exploitable CSM system, I hope you reap what you sow (again)


TIL "Having an overwhelming majority of players support your cause, most of which are external to your coalition" is considered an exploit.



Again, I must now think you an idiot. At least the smart trolls try the lame counter argument of 1 person with 10 accounts counts for a legitimate 10 votes. That at least looks more respectable. You failed just then, just saying.


Try talking to other players outside your little bubble.

There was a pretty overwhelming opinion that The Mittani could get **** done and proved it in CSM6.
Eternum Praetorian
Doomheim
#36 - 2012-05-03 20:38:01 UTC
Akirei Scytale wrote:
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
Akirei Scytale wrote:
Eternum Praetorian wrote:

At least it all makes sense now. Thx CCP for a easily exploitable CSM system, I hope you reap what you sow (again)


TIL "Having an overwhelming majority of players support your cause, most of which are external to your coalition" is considered an exploit.



Again, I must now think you an idiot. At least the smart trolls try the lame counter argument of 1 person with 10 accounts counts for a legitimate 10 votes. That at least looks more respectable. You failed just then, just saying.


Try talking to other players outside your little bubble.

There was a pretty overwhelming opinion that The Mittani could get **** done and proved it in CSM6.


I then counter your assertion with "Take some of your own advice kid"
And then remind you that now that he is lul banned, it no longer matters. Blink



This thread is about inferno and empire war.

[center]The EVE Gateway Blog[/center] [center]One Of EVE Online's Ultimate Resources[/center]
VagabondAlt
GoonCorp
Goonswarm Federation
#37 - 2012-05-03 20:39:58 UTC
Eternum Praetorian wrote:

Again, I must now think you an idiot. At least the smart trolls try the lame counter argument of 1 person with 10 accounts counts for a legitimate 10 votes. That at least looks more respectable. You failed just then, just saying.

oh no the barely literate moron has determined someone's argument is bad

that's crippling, how will he ever live with the shame
Akirei Scytale
Okami Syndicate
#38 - 2012-05-03 20:41:58 UTC
Eternum Praetorian wrote:


I then counter your assertion with "Take some of your own advice kid"
And then remind you that now that he is lul banned, it no longer matters. Blink



This thread is about inferno and empire war.


I spend more time talking to new players than alliance mates, broski.
Twulf
Purple Void Corporation
LinkNet
#39 - 2012-05-03 20:45:53 UTC
Akirei Scytale wrote:
Eternum Praetorian wrote:

You are 100% correct, it is about the same. But what you fail to realize is that you assume that we are all in empire doing just that. We are not, and I am not. Since you assume that only blobs and/or docking games factor into the equation, I must now assume that you are an idiot.



We DONT want any of that.
That is the point.


Then go to lowsec? Roll


But you keep calling it a Sandbox. EVE is a SandBox. If it was really a Sandbox then PVP in Highsec, low sec and nullsec would all be valid play styles but clearly EVE is not a Sandbox per your logic as you say that highsec PVP is not really pvp and should take place in low sec and nullsec.

That is what I find so funny about all you so called EVE Vet's. You keep repeating this tired false line that EVE is a Sandbox and the very nice post you say that the player is playing wrong and should do X, Y and Z. Well if you have to play a certain way to play EVE right, then EVE is not a Sandbox.
Fannie Maes
Doomheim
#40 - 2012-05-03 20:46:16 UTC
VagabondAlt wrote:
Eternum Praetorian wrote:

Again, I must now think you an idiot. At least the smart trolls try the lame counter argument of 1 person with 10 accounts counts for a legitimate 10 votes. That at least looks more respectable. You failed just then, just saying.

oh no the barely literate moron has determined someone's argument is bad

that's crippling, how will he ever live with the shame



File a petition like you guys do?