These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Tilting at windmills

First post First post
Author
Asuri Kinnes
Perkone
Caldari State
#101 - 2012-05-03 13:19:11 UTC
Malcanis wrote:

Virtually every 0.0, lo-sec and W-space player will have at least one hi-sec character, often more. I've never met a single exception to this rule, and if such players exist they are extremely rare. Of my 6 characters on 2 accounts, 1 is perma hi-sec and 3 of the others spend 80%+ of their time in hi-sec.

Very very few "hi-sec" focused players have a character outside of hi-sec.

It would be a safe statement to say that for every character in 0.0 there is a character in hi-sec belonging to the same player.


Soooo...

What about the "hi-sec industrialist" with 7 accounts? Or my favorite the guy I met while I was in Uni (he was obviously a much older toon) who had 25 accounts? There are, I'm sure, any number of variations on the theme... All we *know* are the numbers we've been given... (I have not identified him, because he's not involved in this conversation) - it used to be a standing joke that there were really only 5 people in the uni, everyone else was just this guys alts talking to each other....

Not saying you are in any way, shape or form wrong, just that it is speculation to argue that the 60+% in hi-sec are majority alts of null-sec'ers (or anyone else for that matter).

Bob is the god of Wormholes.

That's all you need to know.

RAP ACTION HERO
#102 - 2012-05-03 13:20:48 UTC
i don't think the 0.0 mains of hisec alts whine about hisec

vitoc erryday

Asuri Kinnes
Perkone
Caldari State
#103 - 2012-05-03 13:24:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Asuri Kinnes
RAP ACTION HERO wrote:
i don't think the 0.0 mains of hisec alts whine about hisec

I think your right...

Shocked

DAM PATOR TECH SCHOOL ALT POSTERS!
And - just for a change in pace; to the OP:

CCP is a business, regardless of *how much* influence any one group might (or might not) have on the developers, it is first, last and always a business. CCP will do pretty much what they think is best for the game. Subscriptions count more than all the threads we make ("watch what they do, not what they say...") - if CCP begins losing an appreciable number of accounts, they will take notice, and they have shown they will take action.

I think you're blowing this out of proportion...

Bob is the god of Wormholes.

That's all you need to know.

Asuri Kinnes
Perkone
Caldari State
#104 - 2012-05-03 13:28:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Asuri Kinnes
delete this stupid post...

Bob is the god of Wormholes.

That's all you need to know.

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#105 - 2012-05-03 13:29:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Malcanis
Asuri Kinnes wrote:
Malcanis wrote:

Virtually every 0.0, lo-sec and W-space player will have at least one hi-sec character, often more. I've never met a single exception to this rule, and if such players exist they are extremely rare. Of my 6 characters on 2 accounts, 1 is perma hi-sec and 3 of the others spend 80%+ of their time in hi-sec.

Very very few "hi-sec" focused players have a character outside of hi-sec.

It would be a safe statement to say that for every character in 0.0 there is a character in hi-sec belonging to the same player.


Soooo...

What about the "hi-sec industrialist" with 7 accounts? Or my favorite the guy I met while I was in Uni (he was obviously a much older toon) who had 25 accounts? There are, I'm sure, any number of variations on the theme... All we *know* are the numbers we've been given... (I have not identified him, because he's not involved in this conversation) - it used to be a standing joke that there were really only 5 people in the uni, everyone else was just this guys alts talking to each other....

Not saying you are in any way, shape or form wrong, just that it is speculation to argue that the 60+% in hi-sec are majority alts of null-sec'ers (or anyone else for that matter).


I'm not saying anything about 7-account hi-sec guys except that few of them seem to have 0.0/W-space characters, and if they do there aren't many of them.

I'm just saying that a significant demographic of "hi-sec" characters belong to players who consider themselves "null sec", whereas the demographic of "0.0" characters that belong to players who consider themselves "hi-sec" is trivial.

My wild-assed guess would be that hi-sec is something like 20-30% populated by characters belonging to players who consider themselves as "low/null" and that less than 1% of characters in null belong to "hi-sec" players.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#106 - 2012-05-03 13:32:53 UTC
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:
Malcanis wrote:


It would be a safe statement to say that for every character in 0.0 there is a character in hi-sec belonging to the same player.



That is indeed their Skeleton in a Closet. Come out, come out....wherever you are.....



Urgh, I mangled the original sentence (I hate it when people at work interrupt my whoruming)

"It would be a safe statement to say that for every character in 0.0, W-space or 0.0, there is a character in hi-sec belonging to that category of player"

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Roime
Mea Culpa.
Shadow Cartel
#107 - 2012-05-03 13:45:37 UTC
Francisco Bizzaro wrote:
RAP ACTION HERO wrote:
what do you hisecers want again?

Not empty quoting. This part was missing from the OP.


Almost empty quoting.

.

Jessie-A Tassik
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#108 - 2012-05-03 13:46:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Jessie-A Tassik
Shian Yang wrote:
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:
Growth has been effectively zero since the beginning of 2009.


Greetings capsuleer,

This is a lie.

Regards,

Shian Yang


http://eve-offline.net/?server=tranquility

Well, I was trying to be nice, but heh, you want the unvarnished truth?

Eve was shrinking as of January 2012. I doubt this upset the dev's, cruising Null Sec and blowing up "pubbies" in Low Sec with a 1000 man capital blob one minute away from backing them up if "meanies" blew up their logi's.

So pro, so lete.

but it did upset their bosses and so they actually started fixing some things... or at least claiming to.

They are now running on Hope. Hope which giggles CCP Soundwave seems determined to crush.

And for the record, the positive things in Eve were almost certainly not created by CCP Soundwave, he simply takes credit for them.
Jessie-A Tassik
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#109 - 2012-05-03 13:50:21 UTC
Asuri Kinnes wrote:
RAP ACTION HERO wrote:
i don't think the 0.0 mains of hisec alts whine about hisec

I think your right...

Shocked

DAM PATOR TECH SCHOOL ALT POSTERS!
And - just for a change in pace; to the OP:

CCP is a business, regardless of *how much* influence any one group might (or might not) have on the developers, it is first, last and always a business. CCP will do pretty much what they think is best for the game. Subscriptions count more than all the threads we make ("watch what they do, not what they say...") - if CCP begins losing an appreciable number of accounts, they will take notice, and they have shown they will take action.

I think you're blowing this out of proportion...


Someone read Adam Smith and believed him?

Wow. Shocked

Why don't you give us a lecture about The Consumer With Perfect Knowledge? Kind of like physics "Frictionless Surfaces".
Roime
Mea Culpa.
Shadow Cartel
#110 - 2012-05-03 13:52:00 UTC
So many words, so little substance. You have an agenda, which seems to be bashing the game, the players and the devs, but why?

.

Sycho Pathic
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#111 - 2012-05-03 13:54:13 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
[quote=Krixtal Icefluxor][quote=Malcanis]
Urgh, I mangled the original sentence (I hate it when people at work interrupt my whoruming)


Heh. I just close my office door. If anyone asks what's up, I tell them I am arguing on the Internet.

Polly Oxford
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#112 - 2012-05-03 14:00:45 UTC
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:
Shian Yang wrote:
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:
Growth has been effectively zero since the beginning of 2009.


Greetings capsuleer,

This is a lie.

Regards,

Shian Yang


http://eve-offline.net/?server=tranquility

Well, I was trying to be nice, but heh, you want the unvarnished truth?

Eve was shrinking as of January 2012. I doubt this upset the dev's, cruising Null Sec and blowing up "pubbies" in Low Sec with a 1000 man capital blob one minute away from backing them up if "meanies" blew up their logi's.

So pro, so lete.

but it did upset their bosses and so they actually started fixing some things... or at least claiming to.

They are now running on Hope. Hope which giggles CCP Soundwave seems determined to crush.

And for the record, the positive things in Eve were almost certainly not created by CCP Soundwave, he simply takes credit for them.



Why are you still quoting that site? How is number of simultaneous users a good indicator of how the game is growing/shrinking? CCP gives subscriber numbers, which is the only interesting thing from a business perspective. That ****** graph can't account for people that only log in for an hour a day compared to someone who is logged in all day.

Also insinuating that Devs are corrupt without any proof whatsoever is despicable. Normally this forum is a great form of amusement, because people whine about everything, but accusations like this are disgusting and I really hope you will find another game to play.
I don't care if you hate me and call me names, but some lowlife making stuff up to hurt people in their real life is just wrong.
Francisco Bizzaro
#113 - 2012-05-03 14:15:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Francisco Bizzaro
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:
Asuri Kinnes wrote:
RAP ACTION HERO wrote:
i don't think the 0.0 mains of hisec alts whine about hisec

I think your right...

Shocked

DAM PATOR TECH SCHOOL ALT POSTERS!
And - just for a change in pace; to the OP:

CCP is a business, regardless of *how much* influence any one group might (or might not) have on the developers, it is first, last and always a business. CCP will do pretty much what they think is best for the game. Subscriptions count more than all the threads we make ("watch what they do, not what they say...") - if CCP begins losing an appreciable number of accounts, they will take notice, and they have shown they will take action.

I think you're blowing this out of proportion...


Someone read Adam Smith and believed him?

Wow. Shocked

Is Adam Smith a Goon, and is he paying for Soundwave's house and his car and his kids' running shoes?

Because Eve-Online is. So as long as that's the case, I guess CCP employees' best interests are aligned with the success of the game as a whole, not one of its ephemeral in-game entities.
Hamshoe
Doomheim
#114 - 2012-05-03 14:18:05 UTC
Polly Oxford wrote:

Also insinuating that Devs are corrupt without any proof whatsoever is despicable.


Yes. It would be wholly unprecedented.

Straight
Jake Warbird
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#115 - 2012-05-03 14:26:39 UTC
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#116 - 2012-05-03 14:39:13 UTC
ITT: people who don't know that the eve-offline graphs go from right to left.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Asuri Kinnes
Perkone
Caldari State
#117 - 2012-05-03 15:00:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Asuri Kinnes
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:
Someone read Adam Smith and believed him?

Wow. Shocked

Why don't you give us a lecture about The Consumer With Perfect Knowledge? Kind of like physics "Frictionless Surfaces".

Never read adam smith - but tbqh - everyone qq'ing about "goons" wrecking the game is getting under my skin. One of the "goons" biggest advantages has been in (super) cap ships (lately) - And Mittani and all the rest of the 0.0 inhabitants have lobbied, directly against their own best interests to get them nerfed...

So yeah, I think people are blowing they're "control" over ccp way out of line...
Malcanis wrote:
I'm not saying anything about 7-account hi-sec guys except that few of them seem to have 0.0/W-space characters, and if they do there aren't many of them.

I'm just saying that a significant demographic of "hi-sec" characters belong to players who consider themselves "null sec", whereas the demographic of "0.0" characters that belong to players who consider themselves "hi-sec" is trivial.

My wild-assed guess would be that hi-sec is something like 20-30% populated by characters belonging to players who consider themselves as "low/null" and that less than 1% of characters in null belong to "hi-sec" players.

And my original point was that we *only* know for sure the numbers that CCP has put out, and nothing else. 2.2 accounts (average) per player, and the % break down of where people live...

Everything else is speculation...

Bob is the god of Wormholes.

That's all you need to know.

Markus Reese
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#118 - 2012-05-03 15:55:46 UTC
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:


Well they've been sucking up to Null Bears since the game started and EvE hasn't grown in years.

So BUSINESS says you are wrong.


No, that shows I am right. It has started growing since changes have been made to the more causual play such as the pve mechanics. There is a solid statement that moon minerals will be removed from being fixed atms. Moon mins become accessible to asteroid belts, that pretty much negates the 0.0 cuddlefest provided people have the tools to be able to get out there and mine. Depending on the mechanics and what is available, this could be a very good thing to breaking the grip on the consortiums.

To quote Lfod Shi

The ratting itself is PvE. Getting away with it is PvP.

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
#119 - 2012-05-03 15:55:53 UTC  |  Edited by: Simi Kusoni
Asuri it is not really speculation to those of us that have lived in high, low and null sec. I have been in high sec corporations, and low sec ones. I even joined a null sec power block for a few months.

I can assure you, the number of people in most high sec corps with their own personal scout alts etc. is relatively low. They also tend not to multi-box in PvE, only people I know who multi-box high sec PvE do it in incursions. And they are low sec/null sec alts anyway.

Two accounts is pretty much the minimum for almost everyone in null/low. Any less than that and you cannot even scout yourself from a to b.

*EDIT: Anyway, that is somewhat detracting from the point. The point is that those who consider themselves high sec players are very unlikely to have characters in low/null, whereas null sec players almost always have trading alts etc. in high sec. And more recently they also have incursion alts.

[center]"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"  -MXZF[/center]

Beekeeper Bob
Beekeepers Anonymous
#120 - 2012-05-03 16:28:52 UTC
70% of that 70% are 0.0 alts. Cool

So while I agree that Highsec needs better representation, you can't believe everything you read on the internet.....


Signature removed - CCP Eterne