EVE General Discussion

EVE gains people at a terribly slow rate, even for a niche game.

What are these changes that will cause people to unsub?

You make a very angry post, but fail to give any sort of clue for your anger.

No, it hasn't. But you are one of the guys who doesn't really care about facts, aren't you.

I think NullSec Alliances better prepare for Hi-seccers pitching tents in their space protesting them.

I see favorable changes promoted by the CSM all the time, as do most of the players, and they let that be known on these very forums.

You know, you used to make some good observations, but here lately you've gone a bit off the deep end.

In other news, a roughly 25% growth in subscriptions since 2009... in the final third of a 9 year span when most MMO's are in serious decline... is considered to be VERY healthy in the gaming industry. Remarkably so in fact. Which rather explains why some of the bigger names in the industry want to be so cozy with CCP.

I think most of us realize that there needs to be more division in where resources are available in EVE, which means some things will remain in high sec and some may be limited... just as they will be in the other area's of EVE.

It might also interest you to know that the Data Cores will not only be available through FW in Low Sec (and if there was ever an area of the game that needed it's own thing, it's both FW and Low Sec). Data Cores will still be available through your research agents, but the amount will be reduced to compensate for their availability via FW. Yes you and I will both lose a little effortless income, but T2 industry (data cores in particular) are not being taken away from high sec as everyone is so fond of falsely claiming.

So far, with some notable (and welcomed) exceptions, the only thing this thread has put forth that is worth while is to suggest that if High Sec wants better representation they need to get off their butts and vote. Not that the CSM tells CCP what to do, despite the ignorant suggestions in this thread, but they do help represent the interests of the EVE community in all it's diversity by reminding CCP what our preferences (and in come cases, needs) are.

There are plenty of (mostly trivial) things to ***** about in EVE, but at least make some effort to separate fact from fiction before you make an ass out of yourself.

So you think the skill queue is a thing of evil then.
That's pretty odd, since most people seem to like it.

Always ready bro, come any day

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_silence

In short, you assume that those who do not speak must agree with you. Yet you have provided no evidence other than their silence.

a third of the eve population voted for CSM, I didn't including many others. How big portion of people playing eve are members in an alliance? Not me either!

Who visits fanfest and talk to devs and gm's daily?

whatever!

CCP needs to ask themselves if they are selling a game and service with equal product value or if full value only comes by kissing their rear ends.



I never hear about Blizzard having their nob polished and handing out free legendary gear as a result. It has happened in EVE twice, they even admitted to it. But I guess now it stopped happening?

Yes you did. You are ignorant and you are arguing against facts. It doesn't get any more clear than that.

You asked for something that the CSM brought to the game — the skill queue is one such thing.
Without their input, we'd still have CCP telling us that they want us to log in to change skills.

Just because you made up your mind what the answer must be doesn't change the fact that the answer isn't what you want it to be.