These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Issues, Workarounds & Localization

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Faction Warfare timer bug and occupancy warfare

First post First post First post
Author
Miht Virtaq
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#81 - 2012-04-20 19:12:46 UTC
The FW update will come in May not next week I'm afraid.
Hans Jagerblitzen
Ice Fire Warriors
#82 - 2012-04-20 19:17:22 UTC
praznimrak wrote:

Im suprised to so CSM members posting in here and taking side in this mather whithout knowing what is actuali hapening in here.


Actually, I've consistently refused to take sides in this conflict. It is not my place to call accuse Damar or Bad Messenger of exploiting (They admit this themselves, so there's nothing to discuss) and it's not my place to accuse the Gallente of doing this either since I don't live in your space and see things going on. That is the job of the GM's, not the CSM. All either side can do is petition problems and let the GM's handle the matter. They are the ones that gather evidence and sort through the data, I don't have access to their data so Its never my place to say that one side is doing this or the other. I have a responsibility to remain neutral, and I've done so.

The only thing I said I'd do was ask about the status of the bug, and you guys have gotten the answer, the bug is in the queue to be fixed. My work here is done for the time being, unless CCP persists in NOT fixing the bug. If it continues after the FW expansion than it will be time for me to take action again, if no other reason than I can't wait to see the bug fixed so there's nothing to complain about anymore.

CPM0 Chairman / CSM7 Vice Secretary

Hans Jagerblitzen
Ice Fire Warriors
#83 - 2012-04-20 19:23:43 UTC
Miht Virtaq wrote:
The FW update will come in May not next week I'm afraid.


Correct, and I want to be clear that the list of items mentioned at Fan Fest was only a proposal, It does not constitute the list of final changes to the Faction Warfare system. I am continuing to work with CCP on the package of changes, and not everything is yet set in stone. No one should assume that just because it was mentioned at Fan Fest that it will appear in the expansion in that form, players have given a lot of important feedback and CCP is definitely taking it into consideration.

CPM0 Chairman / CSM7 Vice Secretary

X Gallentius
Black Eagle1
#84 - 2012-04-20 20:58:03 UTC
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:
X Gallentius wrote:
I am looking forward to a relevant militia tab next week.
We're getting a relevant militia tab next week? Do you have a source for this?
I figure if there was one stupid thing they could easily fix if they were serious about FW it would be the militia tab. I guess we'll wait until May.


Super Chair
Project Cerberus
Templis CALSF
#85 - 2012-04-20 22:03:09 UTC
Miht Virtaq wrote:
The FW update will come in May not next week I'm afraid.


One month left without anymore details coming to light. You guys give CCP too much credit. I anticipate a "Surprise! We put FW on the back burner again!" Sometime in early may. Then we will be back to Soon(TM).


Not to mention this teiricide for cruiser, frigs, and BC, one month left and its not on the test server. They have their work cut out for them.
Bad Messenger
Rehabilitation Clinic
#86 - 2012-04-21 07:26:53 UTC
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:
praznimrak wrote:

Im suprised to so CSM members posting in here and taking side in this mather whithout knowing what is actuali hapening in here.


Actually, I've consistently refused to take sides in this conflict. It is not my place to call accuse Damar or Bad Messenger of exploiting (They admit this themselves, so there's nothing to discuss) and it's not my place to accuse the Gallente of doing this either since I don't live in your space and see things going on. That is the job of the GM's, not the CSM. All either side can do is petition problems and let the GM's handle the matter. They are the ones that gather evidence and sort through the data, I don't have access to their data so Its never my place to say that one side is doing this or the other. I have a responsibility to remain neutral, and I've done so.

The only thing I said I'd do was ask about the status of the bug, and you guys have gotten the answer, the bug is in the queue to be fixed. My work here is done for the time being, unless CCP persists in NOT fixing the bug. If it continues after the FW expansion than it will be time for me to take action again, if no other reason than I can't wait to see the bug fixed so there's nothing to complain about anymore.


WTF you are talking about? You have no data and still you accusing me about exploiting. Good way to play CSM.
Hans Jagerblitzen
Ice Fire Warriors
#87 - 2012-04-21 10:46:32 UTC

Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:
It is not my place to accuse Damar or Bad Messenger of exploiting


Bad Messenger wrote:
still you accusing me about exploiting.


Roll

CPM0 Chairman / CSM7 Vice Secretary

Miht Virtaq
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#88 - 2012-04-21 11:42:42 UTC
Bad Messenger wrote:
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:
praznimrak wrote:

Im suprised to so CSM members posting in here and taking side in this mather whithout knowing what is actuali hapening in here.


Actually, I've consistently refused to take sides in this conflict. It is not my place to call accuse Damar or Bad Messenger of exploiting (They admit this themselves, so there's nothing to discuss) and it's not my place to accuse the Gallente of doing this either since I don't live in your space and see things going on. That is the job of the GM's, not the CSM. All either side can do is petition problems and let the GM's handle the matter. They are the ones that gather evidence and sort through the data, I don't have access to their data so Its never my place to say that one side is doing this or the other. I have a responsibility to remain neutral, and I've done so.

The only thing I said I'd do was ask about the status of the bug, and you guys have gotten the answer, the bug is in the queue to be fixed. My work here is done for the time being, unless CCP persists in NOT fixing the bug. If it continues after the FW expansion than it will be time for me to take action again, if no other reason than I can't wait to see the bug fixed so there's nothing to complain about anymore.


WTF you are talking about? You have no data and still you accusing me about exploiting. Good way to play CSM.


Thank you for proving our point.
Bad Messenger
Rehabilitation Clinic
#89 - 2012-04-21 13:47:23 UTC
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:

Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:
It is not my place to accuse Damar or Bad Messenger of exploiting (They admit this themselves, so there's nothing to discuss)


Bad Messenger wrote:
still you accusing me about exploiting.


Roll


fixed
ScarredEye
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#90 - 2012-04-24 21:55:04 UTC
Damar, so childish.

That's all I need to say.
X Gallentius
Black Eagle1
#91 - 2012-04-25 16:15:49 UTC
GM Zerat wrote:
This is a bug, and is scheduled to be fixed in a future patch. Abusing this intentionally is NOT allowed. Period.
Was this bug fixed in this patch? If not, is there any way you could provide a timeframe for the future patch for when it will be fixed?
David Caldera
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#92 - 2012-04-25 18:00:40 UTC
X Gallentius wrote:
GM Zerat wrote:
This is a bug, and is scheduled to be fixed in a future patch. Abusing this intentionally is NOT allowed. Period.
Was this bug fixed in this patch? If not, is there any way you could provide a timeframe for the future patch for when it will be fixed?

Not fixed with Escalation. I can get get other people to confirm that as well.
Damar Rocarion
Nasranite Watch
#93 - 2012-04-29 17:40:14 UTC
Could CCP comfirm if preventing captured plexes from despawning and re-entering circulation is an exploit or not? This is relatively easy to achieve and practiced by gallente a lot.

Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#94 - 2012-04-30 15:26:59 UTC
David Caldera wrote:
X Gallentius wrote:
GM Zerat wrote:
This is a bug, and is scheduled to be fixed in a future patch. Abusing this intentionally is NOT allowed. Period.
Was this bug fixed in this patch? If not, is there any way you could provide a timeframe for the future patch for when it will be fixed?

Not fixed with Escalation. I can get get other people to confirm that as well.


CCP please take a look at this. Few are playing this aspect of the game due to your neglect of this known bug.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

Tiffy Mezzier
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#95 - 2012-04-30 23:46:09 UTC
Yeah, ignoring the politics, the larger issue is that this is a bug that disrupts normal gameplay.

We need to collectively focus on this fact rather than finger pointing. If we ensure that CCP makes the effort to fix the issue, then the discussion regarding its exploitation will be rendered irrelevant.
Damar Rocarion
Nasranite Watch
#96 - 2012-05-02 14:38:58 UTC
Tiffy Mezzier wrote:
Yeah, ignoring the politics, the larger issue is that this is a bug that disrupts normal gameplay.

We need to collectively focus on this fact rather than finger pointing. If we ensure that CCP makes the effort to fix the issue, then the discussion regarding its exploitation will be rendered irrelevant.


Yesterday Gallentes removed two plexes from circulation in Kedama, at least one pilot was petitioned for it. Knowing CCP, they will not take action since gallentes were involved.


Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#97 - 2012-05-03 14:04:12 UTC
Damar Rocarion wrote:
Tiffy Mezzier wrote:
Yeah, ignoring the politics, the larger issue is that this is a bug that disrupts normal gameplay.

We need to collectively focus on this fact rather than finger pointing. If we ensure that CCP makes the effort to fix the issue, then the discussion regarding its exploitation will be rendered irrelevant.


Yesterday Gallentes removed two plexes from circulation in Kedama, at least one pilot was petitioned for it. Knowing CCP, they will not take action since gallentes were involved.







Damar you are right ccp doesn't care about bugs in faction war and never has. But they don't care who is using the bug. They just don't care at all.

I think you should bug report it as a null sec issue that might get it to someone who actually fixes bugs.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

Tiffy Mezzier
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#98 - 2012-05-04 06:20:52 UTC
Damar Rocarion wrote:
Tiffy Mezzier wrote:
Yeah, ignoring the politics, the larger issue is that this is a bug that disrupts normal gameplay.

We need to collectively focus on this fact rather than finger pointing. If we ensure that CCP makes the effort to fix the issue, then the discussion regarding its exploitation will be rendered irrelevant.


Yesterday Gallentes removed two plexes from circulation in Kedama, at least one pilot was petitioned for it. Knowing CCP, they will not take action since gallentes were involved.





Damar, I'm surprised that you'd qoute me but then completely gloss over the entire point of what I was trying to say. Hear me out, because I think this will explain a lot.

Understand, the way most studios work, bugs like these get submitted to a live server QA team. Live QA then has to find it amidst the garbage and dupilcate bugs people submit, and send it to a QA pending box. The bug then sits there until a lead in core QA finds it and farms it out for someone to confirm. After being confirmed, the bug gets sent by QA to the bugbox of whatever team the bug needs to be fixed by. This is not always the right box...

It then sits in whatever bugbox it got sent to until someone on that team discovers it. If the bug is listed as high-priority , then they will probably see it within the day. If it's a medium or lower, then it could be a month before anyone sees it.

When it's deemed fixed by that team, it gets compiled into a build with whatever other fixes and patches are being worked on and rolled out onto an internal server. The bug then goes BACK to QA who confirms that the fix actually worked. This does not always happen...

After ALL of this, that fix remains on the internal servers until the whole build is deemed as "complete" regarding whatever milestone or sprint the various teams are working on.


So here's what I'm trying to say:


If we want to see this thing fixed, we have to make enough noise collectively to justify the community and/or live team flagging the bug as high-priority. There are two required things needed to accomplish this:

One is a clear and coherent bug report free of any information that does not directly relate to the bug itself.

You've done a good job of collecting information, so kudos for that. Polish up your steps for reproducing the bug, and log into the test server to get fraps or screenshots. It's much easier for CCP to approach fixing an issue when they have all information on what the issue is, where it occurs, and how it occurs.

Then the next thing would be to approach a relevant member of the dev staff, and ask them politely to prioritize this. It is highly likely that there is already a fix for this going into the next big patch since FW is getting overhauled.

As a side note, for the sake of ensuring the issue gets assigned to the proper staff members, I would strongly advise against making any accusations of exploiting in your bug report, and instead include that information into a SEPARATE report.

This because any such accusations will immediately cause the report to be sent to the community team, who will then sit on the issue if they can get away with it until it becomes irrelevant. Not because CCP is chosing sides, but because sitting on an issue is much easier than trying to appease angry mobs.
Damar Rocarion
Nasranite Watch
#99 - 2012-05-04 20:03:29 UTC
Tiffy Mezzier wrote:
As a side note, for the sake of ensuring the issue gets assigned to the proper staff members, I would strongly advise against making any accusations of exploiting in your bug report, and instead include that information into a SEPARATE report.

This because any such accusations will immediately cause the report to be sent to the community team, who will then sit on the issue if they can get away with it until it becomes irrelevant. Not because CCP is chosing sides, but because sitting on an issue is much easier than trying to appease angry mobs.


In other words, give in to terrorists. F..k no. I should never have reported this one since CCP is content to let gallente side keep using this bug without repercussions as I bit expected.
Tiffy Mezzier
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#100 - 2012-05-04 22:34:51 UTC
Damar Rocarion wrote:
Tiffy Mezzier wrote:
As a side note, for the sake of ensuring the issue gets assigned to the proper staff members, I would strongly advise against making any accusations of exploiting in your bug report, and instead include that information into a SEPARATE report.

This because any such accusations will immediately cause the report to be sent to the community team, who will then sit on the issue if they can get away with it until it becomes irrelevant. Not because CCP is chosing sides, but because sitting on an issue is much easier than trying to appease angry mobs.


In other words, give in to terrorists. F..k no. I should never have reported this one since CCP is content to let gallente side keep using this bug without repercussions as I bit expected.



I tried Damar, I tried so hard to turn this thread around and steer the discussion away from your tiresome grandstanding.

I was hoping for some kind of positive result where the FW community as a whole would be able to benefit. Instead you insist on using every remotely well thought out post as your personal soapbox.

So enjoy your corner, I'm fairly sure that your efforts have made this thread radioactive. To the point that any legitimate issues which might have been solved here have likely been taken out back and buried 400 feet under the Icelandic tundra.