These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

How highsec miners threaten EVE, and how we can stop them. Manifesto II.

First post
Author
Thor Kerrigan
Guardians of Asceticism
#541 - 2012-04-28 14:06:55 UTC
Gerald Taric wrote:
OP tries to hit Gerald with MASSIVE POSTING.
"TL;DR" shild from Geralds ship repels it.


Before i read all of this massive wall of words, i wish to know one thing:

I myself consider me being a (proud) carebear, because i avoid PvP and prefer PvE action in WH- and HighSec-space.
Nevertheless ... i'm pretty fine with the "there's no save place in EVE" and do NOT want it to be removed.
In fact i consider it as a challenge.

Therefore ... how is a carebear defined in EVE?

Bear


You sir, are no carebear. Mystery solved. We can be friends and call each other carebears if you wish though Big smile
Takseen
Federal Defense Union
Gallente Federation
#542 - 2012-04-28 14:11:09 UTC
Thor Kerrigan wrote:
Takseen wrote:
Thor Kerrigan wrote:


But in all seriousness, care to explain why do you play EVE, the best SCI-FI PVP MMO as it is advertised?


For the Sci-fi and the persistent game world with other people in it. The pvp itself is unappealing.


Then you got the wrong game brah, and I don't want you to like PVP because I do. It just sucks you play a game where PVP is all around you, even in highsec, right? Removing PVP from anywhere would hurt what the game was initially all about. Do you really so openly demand EVE to mold into wow-in-space?


I do like Pvp. I just don't like Eve's pvp, so I don't participate in it. If you want more people to participate in the pvp, writing multi-page manifestos about how people who don't like Eve's pvp are Playing The Game Wrong won't do you any good.

You either make the pvp more appealing, or you accept that the type of pvp you enjoy isn't very popular.


Vaju Enki
Secular Wisdom
#543 - 2012-04-28 14:12:06 UTC
Takseen wrote:
Thor Kerrigan wrote:
Takseen wrote:
Thor Kerrigan wrote:


But in all seriousness, care to explain why do you play EVE, the best SCI-FI PVP MMO as it is advertised?


For the Sci-fi and the persistent game world with other people in it. The pvp itself is unappealing.


Then you got the wrong game brah, and I don't want you to like PVP because I do. It just sucks you play a game where PVP is all around you, even in highsec, right? Removing PVP from anywhere would hurt what the game was initially all about. Do you really so openly demand EVE to mold into wow-in-space?


I do like Pvp. I just don't like Eve's pvp, so I don't participate in it. If you want more people to participate in the pvp, writing multi-page manifestos about how people who don't like Eve's pvp are Playing The Game Wrong won't do you any good.

You either make the pvp more appealing, or you accept that the type of pvp you enjoy isn't very popular.




EvE Online is not the game for you.

The Tears Must Flow

Kengutsi Akira
Doomheim
#544 - 2012-04-28 14:14:38 UTC
Vaju Enki wrote:
Takseen wrote:
Thor Kerrigan wrote:
Takseen wrote:
Thor Kerrigan wrote:


But in all seriousness, care to explain why do you play EVE, the best SCI-FI PVP MMO as it is advertised?


For the Sci-fi and the persistent game world with other people in it. The pvp itself is unappealing.


Then you got the wrong game brah, and I don't want you to like PVP because I do. It just sucks you play a game where PVP is all around you, even in highsec, right? Removing PVP from anywhere would hurt what the game was initially all about. Do you really so openly demand EVE to mold into wow-in-space?


I do like Pvp. I just don't like Eve's pvp, so I don't participate in it. If you want more people to participate in the pvp, writing multi-page manifestos about how people who don't like Eve's pvp are Playing The Game Wrong won't do you any good.

You either make the pvp more appealing, or you accept that the type of pvp you enjoy isn't very popular.




EvE Online is not the game for you.


also; telling other ppl what game is/isnt for them really doesnt help
plus I dont see how making PVP better/more popular makex EVE bnot the game for the poster. Are you saying EVE's PVP is traditionally boring and must stay that way?

"Is it fair that CCP can get away with..." :: checks ownership on the box ::

Yes

Takseen
Federal Defense Union
Gallente Federation
#545 - 2012-04-28 14:15:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Takseen
Vaju Enki wrote:

EvE Online is not the game for you.


My subscription fees say otherwise.

Edit : And if Eve's pvp is super duper fine as it is, why are CCP devoting an entire expansion to basically fixing wardecs and Faction Warfare?
Thor Kerrigan
Guardians of Asceticism
#546 - 2012-04-28 14:15:14 UTC
Kestrix wrote:
Corbin Blair wrote:
Kestrix wrote:
Thats wrong, Null sec mining does happen and is very profitable.

Says the guy in the high sec corp.


And of course I couldn't possibley have firends in other none hi-sec corps. Infact I'm in the process of moving out to null sec, you guys play too rough in Hi-sec for me.


We're just bustin' your balls. But I have seen the true face of null mining... and it is scary. Shocked
Just Alter
Futures Abstractions
#547 - 2012-04-28 14:15:14 UTC
Thor Kerrigan wrote:
Gerald Taric wrote:
OP tries to hit Gerald with MASSIVE POSTING.
"TL;DR" shild from Geralds ship repels it.


Before i read all of this massive wall of words, i wish to know one thing:

I myself consider me being a (proud) carebear, because i avoid PvP and prefer PvE action in WH- and HighSec-space.
Nevertheless ... i'm pretty fine with the "there's no save place in EVE" and do NOT want it to be removed.
In fact i consider it as a challenge.

Therefore ... how is a carebear defined in EVE?

Bear


You sir, are no carebear. Mystery solved. We can be friends and call each other carebears if you wish though Big smile





This thread is not bashing carebears, it is bashing whiny misguided witless idiots who wants to ruin the game by changing its rules.

Being a carebear is fine, being an evil moronic ****** who want to ruin eve for everyone it's not.
Thor Kerrigan
Guardians of Asceticism
#548 - 2012-04-28 14:17:11 UTC
Takseen wrote:
Thor Kerrigan wrote:
Takseen wrote:
Thor Kerrigan wrote:


But in all seriousness, care to explain why do you play EVE, the best SCI-FI PVP MMO as it is advertised?


For the Sci-fi and the persistent game world with other people in it. The pvp itself is unappealing.


Then you got the wrong game brah, and I don't want you to like PVP because I do. It just sucks you play a game where PVP is all around you, even in highsec, right? Removing PVP from anywhere would hurt what the game was initially all about. Do you really so openly demand EVE to mold into wow-in-space?


I do like Pvp. I just don't like Eve's pvp, so I don't participate in it. If you want more people to participate in the pvp, writing multi-page manifestos about how people who don't like Eve's pvp are Playing The Game Wrong won't do you any good.

You either make the pvp more appealing, or you accept that the type of pvp you enjoy isn't very popular.




The worst part is that the OP actually covers the point you just made. Seriously.
Just Alter
Futures Abstractions
#549 - 2012-04-28 14:18:18 UTC
Takseen wrote:
Thor Kerrigan wrote:
Takseen wrote:
Thor Kerrigan wrote:


But in all seriousness, care to explain why do you play EVE, the best SCI-FI PVP MMO as it is advertised?


For the Sci-fi and the persistent game world with other people in it. The pvp itself is unappealing.


Then you got the wrong game brah, and I don't want you to like PVP because I do. It just sucks you play a game where PVP is all around you, even in highsec, right? Removing PVP from anywhere would hurt what the game was initially all about. Do you really so openly demand EVE to mold into wow-in-space?


I do like Pvp. I just don't like Eve's pvp, so I don't participate in it. If you want more people to participate in the pvp, writing multi-page manifestos about how people who don't like Eve's pvp are Playing The Game Wrong won't do you any good.

You either make the pvp more appealing, or you accept that the type of pvp you enjoy isn't very popular.





Aaaaahhhhhh why will nobody read the first post?

I dont really like eve pvp too much myself (at least ~elite pvp~).
I very much prefer an fps or an RTS for pvp.

This is not the issue here: if you dont like pvp fine, just dont whine to have the game changed!
Kengutsi Akira
Doomheim
#550 - 2012-04-28 14:19:17 UTC
Takseen wrote:
Vaju Enki wrote:

EvE Online is not the game for you.


My subscription fees say otherwise.

Edit : And if Eve's pvp is super duper fine as it is, why are CCP devoting an entire expansion to basically fixing wardecs and Faction Warfare?


Theyre not fixing Faction Warfare as much as theyre forcing all of t2 research though it.

And I dont understand AT ALL how EVE isnt the game for you when you said make PVP more interesting. Sounds like EVE isnt the game for him given he thinks EVE PVP ISNT interesting.

"Is it fair that CCP can get away with..." :: checks ownership on the box ::

Yes

Takseen
Federal Defense Union
Gallente Federation
#551 - 2012-04-28 14:20:59 UTC
Thor Kerrigan wrote:

The worst part is that the OP actually covers the point you just made. Seriously.


He could have covered the Grandfather Paradox and the Unified Field Theory for all I can remember. The posts weren't well written enough for me to bother reading them at length. I'll go back and have a look so.
Vaju Enki
Secular Wisdom
#552 - 2012-04-28 14:22:34 UTC
Takseen wrote:
Vaju Enki wrote:

EvE Online is not the game for you.


My subscription fees say otherwise.

Edit : And if Eve's pvp is super duper fine as it is, why are CCP devoting an entire expansion to basically fixing wardecs and Faction Warfare?


It is just say that you have no clue in what you spend your money on.

Some people buy fps games i don't like fps games, some pay EvE subscription and don't like EvE. Carebears are wierd.

The Tears Must Flow

Thor Kerrigan
Guardians of Asceticism
#553 - 2012-04-28 14:22:46 UTC
Takseen wrote:
Vaju Enki wrote:

EvE Online is not the game for you.


My subscription fees say otherwise.


So if I subscribe to a Tango dance class, then demand them to teach me Baseball because I payed for GODDAMN BASEBALL, my argument still holds?

c'mon maaan! Pirate

We all signed up for this, some us will like the game other won't. I'm sorry you lost your money, I truly am.
Bluddwolf
Heimatar Military Industries
#554 - 2012-04-28 14:25:56 UTC
James 315 wrote:
Given forum readers' complaints about the length of my previous manifesto, I opted to keep it short and sweet this time. My motto is that you should never use 20,000 words when 15,000 will do.



I quickly scrolled down after reading this and realized..... If your first statement was untrue, what value could there be in anything else you had to say?

TL;DR

One premise that you do base your argument on is not clearly based on facts. You do not make a good connection between HiSec mining somehow eliminating Null sec PVP and Null Sec mining.

The only reason why there is less Null sec PVP is because there are fewer Null sec miners. There are fewer Null sec miners, because the Null Sec PvPers were too good at what they did. This drove the Null sec miners to do a cost-benefit analysis and they came to one conclusion. Less reward and less risk has a better payout in the long term.

Now the Hi Sec space is cluttered with miners. Mining everything they can get their lasers into. They are here because Null Sec PVP is threatening EVE. Sooner or later, the miners will find there are no roids to pick clean in Hi sec. They will move back to low / Null sec. The PVPers will follow their prey.

We are back to square one!

What you have here is the laws of nature and supply and demand economics working together, Neither PVE mining or PVE ganking are killing the game. They are just creating an ever cyclic migration pattern.

EVE Online Fan ... Looking for "End Game" since 2006 ... Happily, I still havn't found it

Solhild
Doomheim
#555 - 2012-04-28 14:31:02 UTC
So, CCP nerfs and buffs things to change flavour of the month/year ships and/or tactics. Keeps EVE fresh for all player styles - OP doesn't like.

Just about sums it up What?
Takseen
Federal Defense Union
Gallente Federation
#556 - 2012-04-28 14:32:33 UTC
Thor Kerrigan wrote:


The worst part is that the OP actually covers the point you just made. Seriously.


Ok I reread "how carebears killed nullsec pvp", as ridiculous as the idea was. I get what he was saying, you need someone or something for the pvpers on either side to fight over. At the time, it was mining fleets. Over time, miners presumably found this less and less appealing.

That horse has bolted, I don't think you can entice them back. You(or CCP) need to come up with another conflict driver in nullsec.
Thor Kerrigan
Guardians of Asceticism
#557 - 2012-04-28 14:34:07 UTC
Takseen wrote:
Thor Kerrigan wrote:

The worst part is that the OP actually covers the point you just made. Seriously.


He could have covered the Grandfather Paradox and the Unified Field Theory for all I can remember. The posts weren't well written enough for me to bother reading them at length. I'll go back and have a look so.


In complete honesty, just between you and me, I saw the title and was like "meh, not sure any sort of argument can lead me to believe that..."

It is quite outrageous, I agree. What is even more outrageous is that he's right.
Takseen
Federal Defense Union
Gallente Federation
#558 - 2012-04-28 14:35:08 UTC
Thor Kerrigan wrote:
Takseen wrote:
Vaju Enki wrote:

EvE Online is not the game for you.


My subscription fees say otherwise.


So if I subscribe to a Tango dance class, then demand them to teach me Baseball because I payed for GODDAMN BASEBALL, my argument still holds?

c'mon maaan! Pirate

We all signed up for this, some us will like the game other won't. I'm sorry you lost your money, I truly am.


I subscribed to a game that had a vast, single-shard universe/server, a wealth of ship, module and skill choices, and a vast selection of space related activities to choose from. One of which was pvp, which I concluded was not in my interest any more then mining was. That game has not fundamentally changed since I arrived. Its the zealots on either side who want to either turf everyone bar the newbies out of highsec, or prevent all violence in highsec that are trying to fundamentally change the game. And I'm not a fan of that.
Thor Kerrigan
Guardians of Asceticism
#559 - 2012-04-28 14:42:53 UTC
Takseen wrote:
Thor Kerrigan wrote:


The worst part is that the OP actually covers the point you just made. Seriously.


Ok I reread "how carebears killed nullsec pvp", as ridiculous as the idea was. I get what he was saying, you need someone or something for the pvpers on either side to fight over. At the time, it was mining fleets. Over time, miners presumably found this less and less appealing.

That horse has bolted, I don't think you can entice them back. You(or CCP) need to come up with another conflict driver in nullsec.


All that is required is a proper risk/reward distribution. Highsec gave too much rewards for the lack of risks. Hell, I would not mind there being a 100% safezone if the rewards there are 0%. Want 99% risks? Then you get 1% rewards. At least they can still be AFK and keep doing what they are doing, without the fear of losing their ship.

But wait, what? They ask for better rewards? Why do they even need rewards in the first place if they have nothing to replace. The argument falls flat pretty hard at this point. I'm sure if carebears described in the OP could mine docked in the station they would.
Just Alter
Futures Abstractions
#560 - 2012-04-28 14:43:17 UTC
Takseen wrote:
Thor Kerrigan wrote:

The worst part is that the OP actually covers the point you just made. Seriously.


He could have covered the Grandfather Paradox and the Unified Field Theory for all I can remember. The posts weren't well written enough for me to bother reading them at length. I'll go back and have a look so.


Don't go around blaming his ability to write as an excuse for your inability to read, understand or remember.