These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

What is Mystic Sensualism?

First post
Author
Rodj Blake
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#41 - 2012-04-27 08:51:43 UTC
This mystic sensualism sounds a lot like pagan debauchery to me.

Dolce et decorum est pro Imperium mori

Matthieu Kovalenko
Doomheim
#42 - 2012-04-27 09:03:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Matthieu Kovalenko
Morwen Lagann wrote:
Whine all you like about the numbers of "space lesbians," guys. Just remember that you are the ones perpetuating the problem: if there were more of you that were worth getting to know (or date, or even more), more of us would be available.

Is funny; if I were with someone, and they told me they refer women but are making do with me because the ones they meet are just bad - I would shove them out nearest airlock.

Not sure since when we need excuses to love ones we love.
Halete
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#43 - 2012-04-27 09:16:57 UTC
Matthieu Kovalenko wrote:

Is funny; if I were with someone, and they told me they refer women but are making do with me because the ones they meet are just bad - I would shove them out nearest airlock.

Not sure since when we need excuses to love ones we love.


I would want an excuse if I was an affront against nature.

"To know the true path, but yet, to never follow it. That is possibly the gravest sin" - The Scriptures, Book of Missions 13:21

Matthieu Kovalenko
Doomheim
#44 - 2012-04-27 09:33:08 UTC
Affront to you, maybe.
ValentinaDLM
SoE Roughriders
Electus Matari
#45 - 2012-04-27 12:29:02 UTC
Rodj Blake wrote:
This mystic sensualism sounds a lot like pagan debauchery to me.

Hmm, debauchery you know I like it when you talk all kinky Rodj.
Tiber Brucato
Really Great Space Corporation
United Neopian Federation
#46 - 2012-04-27 14:27:42 UTC
Wait... This is a real thing?

How is Minmater philosophy not more popular?
Morwen Lagann
Tyrathlion Interstellar
#47 - 2012-04-27 14:32:41 UTC
Matthieu Kovalenko wrote:
Morwen Lagann wrote:
Whine all you like about the numbers of "space lesbians," guys. Just remember that you are the ones perpetuating the problem: if there were more of you that were worth getting to know (or date, or even more), more of us would be available.

Is funny; if I were with someone, and they told me they refer women but are making do with me because the ones they meet are just bad - I would shove them out nearest airlock.

Not sure since when we need excuses to love ones we love.


Way to misinterpret my entire point and ascribe sentiment to it that wasn't there in the first place.

I said nothing about making excuses, or "making do" with anyone. If you're going to get into a relationship, you should be trying to make it last. If you're just "making do" with someone until someone "better" comes along, you sure as hell don't deserve what you already have.

I said not that these women are "making do" with other women until "good" men came along, but that these women are discounting men as possible partners entirely because the odds of finding a man who is available and compatible are so low that one might as well not bother looking. (As for why I didn't include the word "interested": if one isn't interested, they're not really available, are they?)

For the record: I have been with my current partner for well over two years now in some shape or form, and have zero intention of leaving her. I am also well to the right of center - about halfway to be precise - if we're insisting on using Seraphim's scale. This is mostly because of my needs in a relationship, but I would be lying if I didn't say past experience had nothing to do with it either.

However, as someone who once was in the position that these women are, as someone hearing from women currently in that position, and as someone constantly having to hear the tripe coming out of men who are perpetuating the issue, I am more than qualified and within my right to stand up and say why I think things are the way they are. That a number of other women agree with the sentiment says something.

Namely, that perhaps the men complaining loudest about the lack of available female partners are a very large part of the supposed "problem".

Morwen Lagann

CEO, Tyrathlion Interstellar

Coordinator, Arataka Research Consortium

Owner, The Golden Masque

Halete
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#48 - 2012-04-27 14:40:55 UTC
Off the record; I'm quickly starting to attribute a lot of respect to Morwen. On the record; I think Matthieu should consider himself rather fortunate if he finds himself in a relationship where his partner is 'settling' for him.

"To know the true path, but yet, to never follow it. That is possibly the gravest sin" - The Scriptures, Book of Missions 13:21

Repentence Tyrathlion
Tyrathlion Interstellar
#49 - 2012-04-27 15:02:44 UTC
Rodj Blake wrote:
This mystic sensualism sounds a lot like pagan debauchery to me.


Since I'm not seeing much in the way of spirituality or religious belief here, I'd debate the 'pagan' bit, aside from in a stereotypical sense.

...mind you, I can see why you might not want these ideas to spread. The idea of Captain Fierach experiencing a revelation and abruptly starting to flirt with you is not for the faint-hearted. Let me know if she does, though, it sounds like a fun challenge to be in that firing line.
Kalaratiri
Full Broadside
Deepwater Hooligans
#50 - 2012-04-27 15:43:54 UTC
Repentence Tyrathlion wrote:
The idea of Captain Fierach experiencing a revelation and abruptly starting to flirt with you is not for the faint-hearted. Let me know if she does, though, it sounds like a fun challenge to be in that firing line.


This.. would be absolutely terrifying.

She's mad but she's magic, there's no lie in her fire.

This is possibly one of the worst threads in the history of these forums.  - CCP Falcon

I don't remember when last time you said something that wasn't either dumb or absurd. - Diana Kim

Morwen Lagann
Tyrathlion Interstellar
#51 - 2012-04-27 17:25:24 UTC
Kalaratiri wrote:
Repentence Tyrathlion wrote:
The idea of Captain Fierach experiencing a revelation and abruptly starting to flirt with you is not for the faint-hearted. Let me know if she does, though, it sounds like a fun challenge to be in that firing line.


This.. would be absolutely terrifying.


On the other hand, it would be entertaining to see her going on the offensive for once, instead of simply being offensive.

Morwen Lagann

CEO, Tyrathlion Interstellar

Coordinator, Arataka Research Consortium

Owner, The Golden Masque

Matthieu Kovalenko
Doomheim
#52 - 2012-04-27 17:46:10 UTC
Spirits do people take remarks poorly. Very well, I will yield ground - perhaps you are a beautiful snowflake.

But I am not convinced this story holds true for general case. I got sockets cut only a few weeks ago, so perhaps missed special proof of assholishness of male capsuleers. On other hand, am closer to baseline population then. And seems to me assholes are assholes whether pod-compatible or not. Find it much more likely people find egg-men boorish because they are not attracted to them, than the other way around.

Maybe some food for thought, here - how many supposedly equally attracted people end up with man, comparing to total?
Katrina Oniseki
Oniseki-Raata Internal Watch
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#53 - 2012-04-27 18:29:44 UTC
I don't see why this is even considered a problem. If a Capsuleer male wants a significant other, why does it need to be one of his peers? Can't he use his significant influence to woo a non-Capsuleer?

I've met a many men I like, actually. Few of them have been Capsuleers. Even so, I'm quite happily spoken for now, so my attractions to Capsuleers of the male persuasion are irrelevant.

Katrina Oniseki

Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#54 - 2012-04-27 18:51:29 UTC
Repentence Tyrathlion wrote:
Rodj Blake wrote:
This mystic sensualism sounds a lot like pagan debauchery to me.


Since I'm not seeing much in the way of spirituality or religious belief here, I'd debate the 'pagan' bit, aside from in a stereotypical sense.

...mind you, I can see why you might not want these ideas to spread. The idea of Captain Fierach experiencing a revelation and abruptly starting to flirt with you is not for the faint-hearted. Let me know if she does, though, it sounds like a fun challenge to be in that firing line.


I thought that amarrian caricature actually shared quite different tastes ?

Morwen Lagann wrote:
Matthieu Kovalenko wrote:
Morwen Lagann wrote:
Whine all you like about the numbers of "space lesbians," guys. Just remember that you are the ones perpetuating the problem: if there were more of you that were worth getting to know (or date, or even more), more of us would be available.

Is funny; if I were with someone, and they told me they refer women but are making do with me because the ones they meet are just bad - I would shove them out nearest airlock.

Not sure since when we need excuses to love ones we love.


Way to misinterpret my entire point and ascribe sentiment to it that wasn't there in the first place.

I said nothing about making excuses, or "making do" with anyone. If you're going to get into a relationship, you should be trying to make it last. If you're just "making do" with someone until someone "better" comes along, you sure as hell don't deserve what you already have.

I said not that these women are "making do" with other women until "good" men came along, but that these women are discounting men as possible partners entirely because the odds of finding a man who is available and compatible are so low that one might as well not bother looking. (As for why I didn't include the word "interested": if one isn't interested, they're not really available, are they?)

For the record: I have been with my current partner for well over two years now in some shape or form, and have zero intention of leaving her. I am also well to the right of center - about halfway to be precise - if we're insisting on using Seraphim's scale. This is mostly because of my needs in a relationship, but I would be lying if I didn't say past experience had nothing to do with it either.

However, as someone who once was in the position that these women are, as someone hearing from women currently in that position, and as someone constantly having to hear the tripe coming out of men who are perpetuating the issue, I am more than qualified and within my right to stand up and say why I think things are the way they are. That a number of other women agree with the sentiment says something.

Namely, that perhaps the men complaining loudest about the lack of available female partners are a very large part of the supposed "problem".


This is an interesting point of view. Not that I paid a lot of attention to that but I find many female capsuleers as much as subject to stupidity as their male counterpart. Of course, my main sample is The Summit.

Interesting people are not so hard to find...
Elsebeth Rhiannon
Gradient
Electus Matari
#55 - 2012-04-28 09:32:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Elsebeth Rhiannon
As there now is a Gradient tag under these posts, let me clarify this:

"Mystic sensualism" is not a common tribal belief, though obviously it exists and is followed by many. Gradient so far has no other pilots subscribing to it, and by no means it is a corporation policy any more than some other beliefs held by various tribe members.

While many clans are matrilinear, I personally find it old-fashioned and an affront to propagate the idea that men in general "lack subtlety" and are "less nurturing" and pretty much predestined to not be good for anything but fight wars. I have many male friends - and have had lovers - and I find this to be completely untrue. As a corporation policy, all members of Gradient are expected to treat their male and female wingmates with the same civil and respecting conduct. Any hints that someone would be less suitable for any role in life (including that of a lover) based on their gender alone are out of line.

Individual preferences as to the gender of a lover are of course fine and none of the corporation's business - as are personal opinions about whether certain combinations of gender/tribe/age/whatever are disgraceful. Where romance between capsuleers occurs (which obviously does happen between people who work together) we expect people to handle the inevitable drama in a mature way.

Elsebeth Rhiannon
CEO
Gradient
Chell Charon
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#56 - 2012-04-28 13:23:28 UTC
Women telling how men think and what motivates our actions. Telling that we can't draw conclusions on a fraction of a fraction of females and on a same page describing all capsuleer men based on the Summit channel and communications here?

If there ever was proof that what you have between your legs, sure as hell ain't making you less of an *******. -Or indeed a pig.

Heterosexual men rarely comment on women and their attractive attributes outside of two forms of discussion. Compatriotic commentary on an individual females sexually desirable attributes. And, when wooing a woman to that woman in particular.

Those of us that engage our brains every now and then are not going to comment on a lovely colour of a womans skin in any conditions observable to most men let alone to women. Why then do you think we would comment more often, with increased observability on other men?

Less nurturing? What a load of. Just because most men prefer not to make a public show of it, or indeed do not act the nurture part in a same way as women do?

Speaking of capsuleer men being so bad that there is lot less of capsuleer women looking for capsuleer men for relationships? How many of you capsuleer women that have commented on here think any man with a measure of sanity would seek a relationship with what we see on here and the Summit channel? Do note that relationship part, though most men are going to prefer less grating even in purely sexual relations. Leaving kinks out of this for now.
ValentinaDLM
SoE Roughriders
Electus Matari
#57 - 2012-04-28 15:21:20 UTC
Well....thinking on all this the men I have been interested in have all either led me on or spurned my affections, so even I have been considering not going after them as potential romantic partners. I mean, how come it is so hard to find a date with one of my peers? And why should I.settle for a baseliner?

Last time I tried to take a non-capsuleer he was constantly afraid that I spiked his drink with nanites, perhaps I should have told him about my loyalties before the date but it is hard enough for brutor girl living in the empire to find a date without bringing up my loyalties. So i don't think i will be doing that again, so maybe it is time to start pursuing women.
Rek Jaiga
Teraa Matar
#58 - 2012-04-28 15:36:47 UTC
Valentina, I am sorry if I led you on. You know why I can't be with you. You're a sweet girl but you're just so....fanatic! I can't stand behind what you do.

I want to marry within the Tribe. Have a nice, cozy little place, enough kredits to not worry. Stay home and raise some little ones!
Arkady Vachon
The Gold Angels
Sixth Empire
#59 - 2012-04-29 12:30:17 UTC
I do not consider relationships to be compatible with our current incarnations as capsuleers and, by definition, clones.

The reality of our existence is one of immortality, yes, but an immortality that leaves behind an ever-growing succession of clone bodies and violent deaths until we are but a copy of a copy of whom we once were. That, coupled with the treacherous world that we live in does not lend itself well to long-lasting relationships. It is virtually guaranteed that no capsuleer will end up passing away in the same body that they were born into this universe into, nor even the second body into which they will be reborn as a copy of themselves.

Still, even a clone body has biological urges that cannot be completely wiped out from the cloning process, nor can it be completely suppressed by medication and meditation.

In those instances the trysts that I have partaken in have been with those of a like-minded bent, both partners realizing the ever-shifting state of our existences and rendezvousing for a short time for said tryst before going on our separate ways.

Relationships, family, love, and nurturing does not enter into this particular equation as all partners recognize their need to satisfy themselves for a short bout of companionship before moving on once again. Family and the creation of does not enter into this arrangement either, as medical science makes 100% contraceptives practical for either or both partners.

I do not fault those who seek longer-lasting and more emotional and familial ties in their relations, but for myself and others of a like mind this is not our path.

*falls silent*

Nothing Personal - Just Business...

Chaos Creates Content

Ava Starfire
Khushakor Clan
#60 - 2012-04-29 13:09:28 UTC
Someone give me a tl;dr on how a thread about an obscure, but quite alive, Minmatar religion got derailed so far that it became a discussion on the merits and flaws of space lesbians?

"There is no strength in numbers; have no such misconception." -Jayka Vofur, "Warfare in the North"