These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

system population?
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
ShadowFire15
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#1 - 2012-04-27 02:31:55 UTC
so im watching this jita thing with goons and friends and notice the system is over 2100 pilots in system. is there max number of people that can be in one system?

[i]Stan Smith had a snow storm over weekend guy was shoveling snow outside, so i shot him and mined the snow myself. concord never showed up. on an unrelated note, i have a court date next tuesday[/i]
supersexysucker
Uber Awesome Fantastico Awesomeness Group
#2 - 2012-04-27 02:34:33 UTC
Ya lol CCP loves to speak of "one world" blah blah but still got system caps... so its all a sham.

Also seeing as CFC is doing nothing in jita they should be banned for causing lag... but CCP won't do a thing.

The tears would be great.
Jessie42
Eighty Joule Brewery
Goonswarm Federation
#3 - 2012-04-27 02:35:35 UTC
supersexysucker wrote:
Ya lol CCP loves to speak of "one world" blah blah but still got system caps... so its all a sham.

Also seeing as CFC is doing nothing in jita they should be banned for causing lag... but CCP won't do a thing.

The tears would be great.


Causing lag by being in the system?

How can that get people banned, exactly?
Zleon Leigh
#4 - 2012-04-27 02:39:45 UTC
In recent weeks gates into Jita have locked at about 2700. With TiDi and the fact that this was announced I would think that Jita is running on one of the super servers for the next few days - so no telling where the system will be allowed to max out.

Incarna - Newest business example of mismanaged capital. CCP - Continuing to gank independent PI producers every day

PvP's latest  incentive program ** Unified Inventory **  'Cause you gotta kill something after trying to use it
Sigurd Sig Hansen
Doomheim
#5 - 2012-04-27 02:40:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Sigurd Sig Hansen
Jessie42 wrote:
supersexysucker wrote:
Ya lol CCP loves to speak of "one world" blah blah but still got system caps... so its all a sham.

Also seeing as CFC is doing nothing in jita they should be banned for causing lag... but CCP won't do a thing.

The tears would be great.


Causing lag by being in the system?

How can that get people banned, exactly?


they redacted the rule that creating excessive stress on the server is bannable?

http://community.eveonline.com/pnp/eula.asp

Quote:
Section 6
CONDUCT
A. Specifically Restricted Conduct

Your continued access to the System and license to play the Game is subject to proper conduct. Without limiting CCP's rights to control the Game environment, and the conduct of the players within that environment, CCP prohibits the following practices that CCP has determined detract from the overall user experience of the users playing the Game.

1. You may not take any action that imposes an unreasonable or disproportionately large load on the System.


I think thats the part theyre talking about
and why the hell is that rule EVEN there?? Its totally unenforcable O.o

Mining is the "Deadliest Catch" in this game
supersexysucker
Uber Awesome Fantastico Awesomeness Group
#6 - 2012-04-27 02:42:13 UTC
First off jita is ALWAYS running on its own sever

Next
EULA says you can no cause try to cause lag... goons love to meta game... CCP should return it LOL....

They were doing *nothing*
Benny Ohu
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#7 - 2012-04-27 02:43:08 UTC
Burn Jita falls inside the category of 'normal gameplay'
Sigurd Sig Hansen
Doomheim
#8 - 2012-04-27 02:48:43 UTC
Benny Ohu wrote:
Burn Jita falls inside the category of 'normal gameplay'


Which is why I say the rule is stupid and unenforcible.

they should get rid of it

Mining is the "Deadliest Catch" in this game
Zleon Leigh
#9 - 2012-04-27 03:39:25 UTC
Yes, Jita runs on its own server, but I don't know if that node is one of the super fleet battle servers

Incarna - Newest business example of mismanaged capital. CCP - Continuing to gank independent PI producers every day

PvP's latest  incentive program ** Unified Inventory **  'Cause you gotta kill something after trying to use it
That Handsome Frog
A Random Corporation
#10 - 2012-04-27 03:50:43 UTC
I'm trying a gate as I made the smart decision to buy ammo there last night and not pick it up. The gate is spotty to get through w/ congestion atm >.>
Corina Jarr
en Welle Shipping Inc.
#11 - 2012-04-27 04:29:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Corina Jarr
Jita has had higher populations. Just most stayed docked and spammed.


With so many undocked, the node is getting tired.

Also TiDI is specifically not lag. Goons are fine as long as they don't crash the node. Then, CCP might do something. Otherwise all's fair in... war.
Lithely Jaine
Perkone
Caldari State
#12 - 2012-04-27 04:34:08 UTC
Sigurd Sig Hansen wrote:
Jessie42 wrote:
supersexysucker wrote:
Ya lol CCP loves to speak of "one world" blah blah but still got system caps... so its all a sham.

Also seeing as CFC is doing nothing in jita they should be banned for causing lag... but CCP won't do a thing.

The tears would be great.


Causing lag by being in the system?

How can that get people banned, exactly?


they redacted the rule that creating excessive stress on the server is bannable?

http://community.eveonline.com/pnp/eula.asp

Quote:
Section 6
CONDUCT
A. Specifically Restricted Conduct

Your continued access to the System and license to play the Game is subject to proper conduct. Without limiting CCP's rights to control the Game environment, and the conduct of the players within that environment, CCP prohibits the following practices that CCP has determined detract from the overall user experience of the users playing the Game.

1. You may not take any action that imposes an unreasonable or disproportionately large load on the System.


I think thats the part theyre talking about
and why the hell is that rule EVEN there?? Its totally unenforcable O.o



No it is . You know having Mass newb ships undocking with GCC to cause lag fall directly in that category or Shuttle spamming undocks.
Jake Warbird
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#13 - 2012-04-27 04:47:06 UTC
It was 2180-ish a few minutes back. It takes like 78976346 minutes to undock... fml

Sugar Von MurdererTits : Jake Warbird gets my vote for most intriguing and attractive male character in Eve.
That Handsome Frog
A Random Corporation
#14 - 2012-04-27 04:54:48 UTC
I'm trying to reach the monument in a BS X
Culmen
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#15 - 2012-04-27 05:29:41 UTC
Sigurd Sig Hansen wrote:
Benny Ohu wrote:
Burn Jita falls inside the category of 'normal gameplay'


Which is why I say the rule is stupid and unenforcible.

they should get rid of it


Its there for the same reason that alot of organizations have explusion rules along the lines of
"Conduct unbecoming of a member"

If something needs to be banned, they can just point to it and say "That" and break out the ban hammer.
This however falls under normal gameplay, just goons are doing it with more people and less skill.

I would really like to see the goons try to burn down Jita.
So far the lack of major freighter containers clogging up the undock ramps seems to imply they aren't doing a good job.

There is a fine line between a post and a signature.
Corbin Blair
Doomheim
#16 - 2012-04-27 05:31:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Corbin Blair
supersexysucker wrote:
Ya lol CCP loves to speak of "one world" blah blah but still got system caps... so its all a sham.

Also seeing as CFC is doing nothing in jita they should be banned for causing lag... but CCP won't do a thing.

The tears would be great.

By that logic you'd have to ban 95% of the population of high sec. I enthusiastically support this suggestion.

Culmen wrote:

I would really like to see the goons try to burn down Jita.
So far the lack of major freighter containers clogging up the undock ramps seems to imply they aren't doing a good job.

They haven't officially started yet. Some of them apparently got impatient.
Thomas Kreshant
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#17 - 2012-04-27 06:23:29 UTC
Sigurd Sig Hansen wrote:
Benny Ohu wrote:
Burn Jita falls inside the category of 'normal gameplay'


Which is why I say the rule is stupid and unenforcible.

they should get rid of it



Normal gameplay means nothing, those types of rules are catch alls to give GM's something to point at when they ban.