These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next page
 

PVP Elitism and Applicant Prescreening - You're Doing it Wrong

Author
Kahega Amielden
Rifterlings
#1 - 2012-04-26 19:55:10 UTC
So, as is well known a lot of the more serious business PVP organizations throughout EVE - from nullsec alliances to hisec mercenary groups - generally have some sort of requirements they use to filter 'unskilled' applicants. These range from things like skillpoint requirements to kill/death requirements to killboard efficiency. They do these thinking that it will bring them better applicants, ensuring that only 'good' pilots enter their ranks.

However, virtually every method used by PVP organizations to prescreen applicants is horrendously faulty and better at attracting KM whores than skilled pilots (they are not always the same thing).

First off is skillpoints. To some extent these can be a good screening tool if all you're looking to do is filter complete newbies. I don't see the point, as competent newbies can become knowledgable and useful with only a minimum of assistance, but I guess some people don't like answering questions.
SP only retains its usefulness up to about 3 million. Once you achieve some bare minimum experience with the game, knowledge and competence ceases to be tied to SP. I can think of month-old characters in my old corp that are better PVPers than some years-old baddies I've run into. So, unless your goal is to prescreen trialers, this is bad.

The most popular method seems to be checking out an applicant's killboard history here. There's a ton of problems with this approach. The only thing that a killboard entry says is that X ship(s) used offensive modules on Y ship that was fit like Z shortly before Y exploded.

The most absolutely terrible and elitist corps will look at things like killboard efficiency..a stat that has more to do with the size of the gang you fly in and how cheap you are in fitting your ships than anything else. The better ones will look at specific kills and look for signs of skill or incompetence, but this is still imperfect.

A variant of this, that I didn't know existed until I read some Noir. guy's sig, was kill/death ratio, which is quite possibly the most offensively stupid prescreening requirement I've ever heard of.

The following are a list of important things that could affect a pilot's killboard stats without being any sort of indicator about their skill.

-Bitchiness. If you are a risk-taker, you will have significantly worse KB efficiency and a lot more deaths than someone who utterly refuses to engage if he knows he might lose. Some people just go into engagements they know they are very likely to lose in the off chance that his opponents are bad or he gets lucky. This does not make them bad, but it certainly does make them look worse on the KB.

-Implants, expensive modules, and boosts. A lot of people run with expensive hardwirings/pirate implant sets or neutral boosting alts. Losing the latter is almost impossible and, even if it happens, will not reflect upon your main on the KB. Implants only show up if you get podded, which will pretty much never happen if you happen to be in lowsec. Expensive mods don't show up when you get a kill; only when you die.

To the killboard, a Wolf with halos and loki boosts that kills a Rupture is identical to a Wolf without any special mods killing a rupture...and yet the latter is far more indicative of pilot skill. But when screening applicants, you won't know which of those two each person falls into.

-Opponent's skill. A lot of "impressive" kills come as a result of your opponent either being a baddie, or making a crucial mistake. Sometimes these will show up on the killboard in the form of fits, but most will not...And even the ones that do show up in the fit are often subtle and won't be noticed by someone casually flipping through.

Quick, can you find the hidden incompetence that led to this poor bastard's demise? It's the Fury heavy missiles he was using against the smallest ship in the game. But of course, few people would examine the mail in detail enough to notice that, and many stupid mails won't have any such indication at all.

So how the hell do you prescreen applicants if you only want above-average pilots in your corp? There are few ways to actually determine someone's skill without flying with them. The Tuskers have an interesting requirement, which demands solo above-class ship kills. Of course, this does not necessarily measure skill, but it -does- ensure that the applicant is ballsy and willing to risk his ship in combat he's not guaranteed to win.

So, the only reliable way to ascertain skill is to fly with them. However, many people miss the fact that someone does not need to be in your corp to fly with them. Invite your applicants on a roam. The baddies will sort themselves out quickly.



TLDR stop using superficial quantitative measures of "skill" in your srsbusiness ELITE PVP corp.
KrakizBad
Section 8.
#2 - 2012-04-26 19:58:49 UTC
Which Leet corp denied you?
Kahega Amielden
Rifterlings
#3 - 2012-04-26 20:02:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Kahega Amielden
KrakizBad wrote:
Which Leet corp denied you?


Goonswarm. I paid the security deposit and everything but I couldn't fulfill the t2-fit velator requirement Sad
Ohh Yeah
Jerkasaurus Wrecks Inc.
Sedition.
#4 - 2012-04-26 20:05:12 UTC
I AGREE, OLD SPACEFRIEND

I did my time in Waffles, and I'm just as bad now as I was then Cool
Tanya Powers
Doomheim
#5 - 2012-04-26 20:08:26 UTC
Kahega Amielden wrote:
KrakizBad wrote:
Which Leet corp denied you?


Goonswarm. I paid the security deposit and everything but I just wasn't pro enough for them Sad




You just did it all wrong, you simply deserve what you got because:


You haven't took the necessary time use "search" function and read forums. You haven't read properly Goonswarm wiki because if you did, you should have read those red letters saying if you pay isk to join Goonswarm you're being scamed.


You did it all wrong.

Demolishar
United Aggression
#6 - 2012-04-26 20:08:49 UTC
It takes the fun out of being elite if you can't be elitist.
Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#7 - 2012-04-26 20:08:50 UTC
Kahega Amielden wrote:

Goonswarm. I paid the security deposit and everything but I couldn't fulfill the t2-fit velator requirement Sad


Giving them RL cash was your first mistake. Are you that 'desperate' for kills ?

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882

TRUE ZER0
SILENT INC
#8 - 2012-04-26 20:09:40 UTC
I know a guy who wins 3 v 1s even a 7 v 1 and has a pretty horrible KB. Because 1 v 1 are almost always 7 v 1s. You can't ever win a 7 v 1 if you're afraid to lose a 1 v 1.
Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings
#9 - 2012-04-26 20:11:39 UTC
Tanya Powers wrote:
Kahega Amielden wrote:
KrakizBad wrote:
Which Leet corp denied you?


Goonswarm. I paid the security deposit and everything but I just wasn't pro enough for them Sad


You just did it all wrong, you simply deserve what you got because:

You haven't took the necessary time use "search" function and read forums. You haven't read properly Goonswarm wiki because if you did, you should have read those red letters saying if you pay isk to join Goonswarm you're being scamed.

You did it all wrong.

You... are really that jaded with Eve baddies that you can't notice someone mocking the whole "scammed by Goonswarm" thing?

Accidentally The Whole Frigate - For-newbies blog (currently on pause)

Skex Relbore
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#10 - 2012-04-26 20:12:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Skex Relbore
Kahega Amielden wrote:
KrakizBad wrote:
Which Leet corp denied you?


Goonswarm. I paid the security deposit and everything but I couldn't fulfill the t2-fit velator requirement Sad


Part of me thinks this has to be a troll because no one could be this obtuse. Then I remember just how stupid people can really be.


Petrus Blackshell wrote:

You... are really that jaded with Eve baddies that you can't notice someone mocking the whole "scammed by Goonswarm" thing?



It's called Poe's law.
Verte Sinkon
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#11 - 2012-04-26 20:14:37 UTC
Kahega Amielden wrote:
KrakizBad wrote:
Which Leet corp denied you?


Goonswarm. I paid the security deposit and everything but I couldn't fulfill the t2-fit velator requirement Sad


What is a velator.
Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#12 - 2012-04-26 20:16:08 UTC
Verte Sinkon wrote:


What is a velator.



I ain't touchin' this stinkbomb..........anyone ? .........................

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882

Tanya Powers
Doomheim
#13 - 2012-04-26 20:16:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Tanya Powers
Petrus Blackshell wrote:
Tanya Powers wrote:
Kahega Amielden wrote:
KrakizBad wrote:
Which Leet corp denied you?


Goonswarm. I paid the security deposit and everything but I just wasn't pro enough for them Sad


You just did it all wrong, you simply deserve what you got because:

You haven't took the necessary time use "search" function and read forums. You haven't read properly Goonswarm wiki because if you did, you should have read those red letters saying if you pay isk to join Goonswarm you're being scamed.

You did it all wrong.

You... are really that jaded with Eve baddies that you can't notice someone mocking the whole "scammed by Goonswarm" thing?



Can you pump up the volume? -I can't hear you

When trolls get trolled peasants get a hard time living. Lol

I'm throwing ya some bone go ahead and jumpBear
THE L0CK
Denying You Access
#14 - 2012-04-26 20:36:24 UTC  |  Edited by: THE L0CK
Tanya Powers wrote:
Kahega Amielden wrote:
KrakizBad wrote:
Which Leet corp denied you?


Goonswarm. I paid the security deposit and everything but I just wasn't pro enough for them Sad




You just did it all wrong, you simply deserve what you got because:


You haven't took the necessary time use "search" function and read forums. You haven't read properly Goonswarm wiki because if you did, you should have read those red letters saying if you pay isk to join Goonswarm you're being scamed.


You did it all wrong.



You just got taken for a ride.

Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:


Giving them RL cash was your first mistake. Are you that 'desperate' for kills ?


And you just fell under the bus.

Do you smell what the Lock's cooking?

Talon SilverHawk
Patria o Muerte
#15 - 2012-04-26 20:38:04 UTC
THE L0CK wrote:
Tanya Powers wrote:
Kahega Amielden wrote:
KrakizBad wrote:
Which Leet corp denied you?


Goonswarm. I paid the security deposit and everything but I just wasn't pro enough for them Sad




You just did it all wrong, you simply deserve what you got because:


You haven't took the necessary time use "search" function and read forums. You haven't read properly Goonswarm wiki because if you did, you should have read those red letters saying if you pay isk to join Goonswarm you're being scamed.


You did it all wrong.



You just got taken for a ride.

Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:


Giving them RL cash was your first mistake. Are you that 'desperate' for kills ?


And you just fell under the bus.




Can I be in before you, can I, can I Lol
Tanya Powers
Doomheim
#16 - 2012-04-26 20:41:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Tanya Powers
Something not needing balance for once, how can you not like it?


Trolling posts own all Lol

I thank you and waiting for the bus !!
Large Collidable Object
morons.
#17 - 2012-04-26 20:41:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Large Collidable Object
Kahega Amielden wrote:
To the killboard, a Wolf with halos and loki boosts that kills a Rupture is identical to a Wolf without any special mods killing a rupture...and yet the latter is far more indicative of pilot skill. But when screening applicants, you won't know which of those two each person falls into.

[...]

There are few ways to actually determine someone's skill without flying with them. The Tuskers have an interesting requirement, which demands solo above-class ship kills. Of course, this does not necessarily measure skill, but it -does- ensure that the applicant is ballsy and willing to risk his ship in combat he's not guaranteed to win.




You're a little bit contradicting yourself there - a requirement like the one Tuskers make encourages people to fly around with an offgrid booster and implants.


A good measure would also be to divide the overall K/D ratio with the average number of participants on the pilots killmail (suicide ganks don't count of course). If that is still above 2, at least the corp the pilot was in usually punched above its weight.

Examples:

- Pilot has 3000 kills, 300 deaths and a 10:1 K/D ratio - all his killmails are in a DRAEK and have at leats 30 participants on them -> score 0.33 = pilot is a blobsheep without a clue about pvp. (I'd still recruit him as cannonfodder if I was recruiting for a blobbing alliance)

- Pilot has 500 kills, 100 deaths - all his kills are solokills in frigs/HACs/Recons -> score 5 = pilot probably has a very good clue about what he's doing in PvP.


Anyway - best way to find a good and usable pilot is to give it a try and then keep the people that fit within the corps desired profile.
You know... [morons.](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4gjOx65yD5A)
Peck R Wood
Doomheim
#18 - 2012-04-26 20:45:54 UTC
Skex Relbore wrote:
Kahega Amielden wrote:
KrakizBad wrote:
Which Leet corp denied you?


Goonswarm. I paid the security deposit and everything but I couldn't fulfill the t2-fit velator requirement Sad


Part of me thinks this has to be a troll because no one could be this obtuse. Then I remember just how stupid people can really be.


Petrus Blackshell wrote:

You... are really that jaded with Eve baddies that you can't notice someone mocking the whole "scammed by Goonswarm" thing?



It's called Poe's law.




You sure are smart, mister!

"Benteen, come on, big village, be quick. Bring packs." -George Armstrong Custer

Kahega Amielden
Rifterlings
#19 - 2012-04-26 20:47:05 UTC
Quote:
You're a little bit ontradicting yourself there - a requirement like the one Tuskers make encourages people to fly around with an offgrid booster and implants.


It sort of does, however if you PVP enough in smaller ships and are willing to engage in fights you aren't guaranteed to win, you're bound to get a kill or two like that eventually. You'd get those kills more quickly with offgrid boosters and whatnot faster, of course, but it's more about risk-taking than 'skill' in my opinion.

Regardless, I agree that the best way is to fly with them. I was just giving that as an example of something far better than say, KB efficiency.
Skex Relbore
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#20 - 2012-04-26 20:48:32 UTC
BTW OP you are wrong on multiple levels.

One I think that the elitism is mostly mythology, I've been in null long enough at this point to know that it's full of barely competent mouth breathers who fit their ships by selecting every item in their hanger and clicking "fit o ship" and undocking what ever sticks. This is why competent organizations have official fleet doctrines so they don't have to count on individual pilots understanding how to properly fit a ship. The only real skill that counts for the line grunt is the ability to follow orders and shoot the primaries. Elitist Ops outfits who are looking for more are generally trying to fly some sort of fancy concept fleets and want pilots who can plug in without having to spend 6 months training.

Now as to individual pilot skill and killboards. while it's true that it isn't a complete or perfectly reliable measurement of skill it isn't entirely useless. As long as one bears in mind certain caveats. Assuming the kill board is a players primary PVP character and not an alt or something they picked up off the Bazaar then you can make some reasonable assumptions about a players skill level. 1st if they are a ranked (top 10k on BC) character they're at least moderately competent. K/D ratio's can also give you useful info. A pilot who's got a particularly high number of kills vs deaths is probably risk adverse one who has a flipped ratio probably sucks pretty badly unless they work mostly solo.

In the end though attitude is more important than aptitude. Assuming someone isn't a total twit they can be molded into a useful member of a fleet. If they're a complete asshat that no one wants to associate with not even the best KB will make them useful or desirable.

Risk takers while they won't have similar K/D ratio's to risk adverse pilots will generally have solid KB stats as aggressiveness is a pretty good predictor of success in solo combat in this game. A decent KD ratio also indicates at least some competence in selecting fights, Oh and just because a pilot is risk adverse doesn't make them a bad pilot. These types of guys tend to be really good at picking their fights and are usually quite skilled at avoiding fights they can't win, This is a type of pilot who tends to make a great scout and a good scout is always more useful than a F1 grunt.


As far as implants leadership boosters expensive modules and other factors, in the end what matters is making the other guy die more often than not. All the tools mentioned are a part of that process and when you are recruiting you are looking at the complete package not just one bit of data.

Of course the ultimate flaw in your reasoning is that you are assuming that recruiters aren't considering the factors you mention as limitations of existing recruiting practices. The most successful null sec entity in the game loves the hell out of newbies and could give a rats backside about K/D stats. And there are plenty of other corporations/alliances that follow similar philosophies they just don't have the same spy filter that the Goons have so they tend to rely on SP to mean that a spy has to spend a little time building their cover identities.

The reality is that if you are trying to join corporations who engage in practices like you describe then you are doing it wrong.
123Next page