These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

Forum Index

EVE Forums » EVE Communication Center » EVE General Discussion » Forced expulsion of 1.0 players

Topic is locked indefinitely.

Forced expulsion of 1.0 players First post
Author

Previous Topic Next Topic

Highsec Haulers Inc. 521
Nick Bete Highsec Haulers Inc. Likes received: 521	#41 - 2012-04-26 07:10:35 UTC This is damned hilarious coming from a notorious troll and scammer who sits and spams all day in Rens and never undocks.

Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire 113
ILikeMarkets Royal Amarr Institute Amarr Empire Likes received: 113	#42 - 2012-04-26 07:13:26 UTC 1 Trying to make the sandbox a little less sandbox with invisible walls and extra rules? Nice. Proof that capital ships are rare in EVE: http://imgur.com/gallery/jJJE1

Drop of Honey 513
Seleia O'Sinnor Drop of Honey Likes received: 513	#43 - 2012-04-26 09:20:35 UTC Why is this needed? Odyssey: Repacking in POS hangars for modules +1, but please for other stuff too, especially containers. Make containers openable in POS hangars.

Aliastra Gallente Federation 2,198
March rabbit Aliastra Gallente Federation Likes received: 2,198	#44 - 2012-04-26 10:10:24 UTC Miilla wrote: ... it is to get them further out into the eve universe sooner. what reason? The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"

Alavaria Fera

GoonWaffe

Likes received: 6,953

#45 - 2012-04-26 10:22:12 UTC

The only amusing thing I rememberseeing in the rookie 1.0 systems was a couple of hulks eating all the veldspar there a few months ago, expecting to be left alone. I don't even think they were jetcanning (might have been non-manual miners, that just docked and dropped off the veldspar, who knows).

I just hope they leave/left some for the newbies that are learning the game. Maybe they're not there anymore.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Doomheim 26
Rekon X Doomheim Likes received: 26	#46 - 2012-04-26 11:56:26 UTC OP gets my vote for stupidest player award. I don't care what you think, if you ever think at all.

Dark Drifter

Sons of Seyllin

Pirate Lords of War

Likes received: 154

#47 - 2012-04-26 12:45:26 UTC

there are only 12 1.0 systems in this great gamescape that we call eve that are subject to the non interfearance rule set forward by CCP. the rest are all good for the ganking!!!

anyhoo if you want to gank your noob friend then just wait till the tutorial agent sends him/*her to the career advancement agenst 2 systems away... they are 0.9 and not subject to this rule. again free for the ganking

Lfod's Ratting and Salvage 392
Lfod Shi Lfod's Ratting and Salvage Likes received: 392	#48 - 2012-04-26 13:03:09 UTC Hope the newborn learn to make ammo fast... and don't get booted from the system before the job is done. Kiddies gotta eat! ♪ They'll always be bloodclaws to me ♫

Science and Trade Institute Caldari State 22
Ticarus Hellbrandt Science and Trade Institute Caldari State Likes received: 22	#49 - 2012-04-26 13:12:44 UTC stupid idea, i often pop into kisogo to buy skill books

Sable Moran

Moran Light Industries

Likes received: 443

#50 - 2012-04-26 13:18:10 UTC

Miilla wrote:

New players in 1.0 "rookie" systems should be forced to leave 1.0 after they have either completed the tutorial or after a set amount of hours/days/weeks/after a month "actively" playing in there. After that condition has been met, nobody except rookies within that condition should be allowed back in.

Push them out once they gain experience playing eve "Actively" (so many hours/days/weeks/first month playing online or tutorial and so many hours after).

Some of those noobie systems are right smack in the middle of busy traveling routes. So, another stillborn idea from Miilla. When will they stop?

Sable's Ammo Shop at Alentene V - Moon 4 - Duvolle Labs Factory. Hybrid charges, Projectile ammo, Missiles, Drones, Ships, Need'em? We have'em, at affordable prices. Pop in at our Ammo Shop in sunny Alentene.

Lucas Schuyler

Federal Navy Academy

Gallente Federation

Likes received: 27

#51 - 2012-04-26 13:21:12 UTC

Miilla wrote:

Really? Of all the issues in Eve, the fact that you have to wait a little while to gank new players is a concern worthy of a forum post? Roll

Barakach

Caldari Provisions

Caldari State

Likes received: 211

#52 - 2012-04-26 13:36:07 UTC

Miilla wrote:

Ai Shun wrote:

Miilla wrote:

Ai Shun wrote:

Josef Djugashvilis wrote:

Unless said player is breaking CCP rules, let them stay where they want for as long as they want.

Sandbox.

+1

Don't dictate how others should play.

CCP already dictate how we should play.

Tell you what; add a PvP flag for Carebears. Then I'll agree with your idea because the two are essentially the same concept - heavy handed interference in a player's playing.

CCP already are heavy handed in players playing. Eve isn't really the sandbox you think it is. That is just a buzzword thrown around for marketing.

The rules CCP makes are more like the laws of physics. You can't have a game with absolutely no rules at all. How would one decide if you took damage or avoided damage?... rules.

CCP tries to make semi-fair rules. High sec has high sec rules, low sec has low sec rules, null sec has null sec rules.

Go to which ever sec fits the kind of rules you want.

Doomheim 70
Kairos Antilles Doomheim Likes received: 70	#53 - 2012-04-26 13:43:15 UTC Miilla wrote: ...make them do it. Emphasis mine... You honestly can't see how that is antithetical to a 'sandbox'?

C C P C C P Alliance 7,905
CCP Phantom C C P C C P Alliance Likes received: 7,905	#54 - 2012-04-27 23:00:22 UTC Not relevant to EVE General Discussion. Thread locked. CCP Phantom - Senior Community Developer