These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Missions & Complexes

Forum Index

EVE Forums » EVE Gameplay Center » Missions & Complexes » Petition to CCP to explain to us why Assaults waves wer...

Topic is locked indefinitely.

Petition to CCP to explain to us why Assaults waves were doubled in size. First post
Author

Previous Topic Next Topic

Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic 975
Keith Planck Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic Likes received: 975	#1 - 2012-04-25 06:27:07 UTC \| Edited by: Keith Planck 9 this is a stupid thread /unsigned crumbles up petition and throws it away ♞

Hedion University Amarr Empire 23
Trinity Six Hedion University Amarr Empire Likes received: 23	#2 - 2012-04-25 06:29:17 UTC Keith Planck wrote: /signed yup

Doomheim 5
Capitano Rivel Doomheim Likes received: 5	#3 - 2012-04-25 06:29:31 UTC /signed

Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State 2
Kasai Hightower Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State Likes received: 2	#4 - 2012-04-25 06:30:01 UTC Keith Planck wrote: /signed

Bureau of Astronomical Anomalies 1,190
Goldiiee Bureau of Astronomical Anomalies Likes received: 1,190	#5 - 2012-04-25 06:31:32 UTC /signed Things that keep me up at night; Why do we use a voice communication device to send telegraphs? Moore's Law should state, Once you have paid off the last PC upgrade you will need another.

Zateki Alliance 9
Johann Zateki Zateki Alliance Likes received: 9	#6 - 2012-04-25 06:31:42 UTC /signed

League of Extraordinary Equines 1
LadiesMan Pantydropper League of Extraordinary Equines Likes received: 1	#7 - 2012-04-25 06:31:42 UTC Capitano Rivel wrote: /signed because i can

Doomheim 0
asdfasdfasdfasdfasdf asdfasdfasdf Doomheim Likes received: 0	#8 - 2012-04-25 06:32:17 UTC Keith Planck wrote: /signed simple and to the point, i like it

Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic 14
KeeganWaffle Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic Likes received: 14	#9 - 2012-04-25 06:32:46 UTC LadiesMan Pantydropper wrote: Capitano Rivel wrote: /signed because i can i also can >.>

Doomheim 6
ISN Spy spizors Doomheim Likes received: 6	#10 - 2012-04-25 06:33:26 UTC Keith Planck wrote: /signed i can agree with this

Honads

Hedion University

Amarr Empire

Likes received: 2

#11 - 2012-04-25 06:40:36 UTC

Keith Planck wrote:

/signed

/signed

Most people can agree that vanguards needed a nerf. Highsec should not be as lucrative as vanguard incursions made it. I was under the impression CCP meant for assaults to be more worthwhile in comparison to running vanguards...

CCP has pooped all over themselves this time.

I leave you all with this, proof of CCP's trolling:

http://www.evonga.de/wp-content/gallery/cache/1515__320x240_Revenant.jpg

What other internet spaceships game allows you to actually fly a duke in space, ladies and gentlemen?

Crimnson Concept Flame 38
Katy Ling Crimnson Concept Flame Likes received: 38	#12 - 2012-04-25 06:50:12 UTC /signed although, i'm prity sure ccp is trying to make a tradition of coming up with something around this time of the year, to start to **** of people around summer time ...

Hellfire Heavy Industries 10
IMeres Hellfire Heavy Industries Likes received: 10	#13 - 2012-04-25 06:57:19 UTC /signed

DarthNefarius

Minmatar Heavy Industries

Likes received: 1,307

#14 - 2012-04-25 06:58:47 UTC | Edited by: DarthNefarius

/signed who the eff tests this?!?!?! assaults take 15-20 players was it only 2-3 DEVs testing it if that?

http://community.eveonline.com/en/inferno/features/ ", while the time to complete an Assault invasions will be reduced some."

The above quote is a lie. OCF's & NCS's have been significantly increased in time to complete

============================
Get rid of the @#$!!! NCN's they never worked why are they still a painfull hangnail that CCP refuses to pull off in 1 swoop?

An' then Chicken@little.com, he come scramblin outta the    Terminal room screaming "The system's crashing! The system's    crashing!" -Uncle RAMus, 'Tales for Cyberpsychotic Children'

Sootsia

HIgh Sec Care Bears

Brothers of Tangra

Likes received: 18

#15 - 2012-04-25 07:04:50 UTC

I can understand CCP's desire to turn back a bit, the isk faucet,,,,, but creating a sink? no.... Only in incursions does one specifically spend billions of isk on a ship, clone, implants to make a return on the investment on that scale for the purpose of PVE/ social ineraction.

Vanguards? not worth the time,,,, from 160-180m isk an hour to less than 60m isk per hour,,,,,I can make more mining, mission running, gassing, or running WH's.... let alone pvp

Assaults? Hell no... what buff? is a major loss of time/isk to run

HQs? hard enough to herd enough HS cats to run Assaults let alone HQ's..... and the isk per hour sucks even more....

Wheras I made billions of isk in incursion running,,, I also spent it on all those shinies that come from 0-0 space, shiny ships that I tossed into pvp making miners and industrials happy,,,,, now with the faucet turned down to a drip,,,, who will have the isk to buy the shiny stuff? CCP,,, you made a mistake,,, and simply moved your players elsewhere back to the daily SOLO grinds.

/Signed


Keith Planck Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic Likes received: 975	#16 - 2012-04-25 07:44:23 UTC \| Edited by: Keith Planck -1 nightmare ♞

Doomheim 8
Kapitain Zino Doomheim Likes received: 8	#17 - 2012-04-25 07:56:35 UTC /signed Incursions did bring ppl together most than every other task in eve. They were the best feature of the game. Now they got sucseccfully torpedoed.... Why?

Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation 10
Cobalt Rookits Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation Likes received: 10	#18 - 2012-04-25 08:01:43 UTC Curious why CCP hates incursions in general. /signed