These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

Forum Index

EVE Forums » EVE Communication Center » EVE General Discussion » Local: Intel Gathering

Topic is locked indefinitely.

Local: Intel Gathering
Author

Previous Topic Next Topic

Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic 38
Duramah Brutor Tribe Minmatar Republic Likes received: 38	#21 - 2012-04-23 08:50:47 UTC Look at all them Null sec bears voting low straight off nuff said

Science and Trade Institute Caldari State 476
Vaal Erit Science and Trade Institute Caldari State Likes received: 476	#22 - 2012-04-23 09:01:04 UTC I wish the forums had local...

Doomheim 309
Sasha Azala Doomheim Likes received: 309	#23 - 2012-04-23 09:08:27 UTC MadMuppet wrote: Build an 'active' D-scan tool first, then turn off local. Sounds reasonable to me, local was far to easy to rely on in 0.0

ACME Mineral and Gas 261
Bootleg Jack ACME Mineral and Gas Likes received: 261	#24 - 2012-04-23 14:11:23 UTC MadMuppet wrote: Build an 'active' D-scan tool first, then turn off local. So as long as you have a way to see who is there with no effort you are good? I'm an American, English is my second language...

State War Academy Caldari State 812
Simetraz State War Academy Caldari State Likes received: 812	#25 - 2012-04-23 14:22:45 UTC Tools for the hunted or Alliances controlling space. Local. Tools for the invaders Local In game Universe map with its wonderful information http://evemaps.dotlan.net/ http://www.battleclinic.com/ and and and and Just a quick look tells me removing local would not be a good idea right now. EVERYBODY KNOWS

Doomheim 93
Lanasak Doomheim Likes received: 93	#26 - 2012-04-23 14:33:00 UTC threads about local should just be automatically locked on creation because they never lead anywhere

Doomheim 45
Lord Dravius Doomheim Likes received: 45	#27 - 2012-04-23 14:38:05 UTC snowshoes wrote: It will never happen. Maybe if there was a region or something without local.. like a region where you had to use scan probes for everything and there was no local, now that would be cool, I could support that. Yeah but knowing CCP such an area would be a logistics nightmare and have an entrance that constantly moves.

Lord Dravius

Doomheim

Likes received: 45

#28 - 2012-04-23 14:40:50 UTC

Simetraz wrote:

Tools for the hunted or Alliances controlling space.
Local.

Tools for the invaders
Local
In game Universe map with its wonderful information
http://evemaps.dotlan.net/
http://www.battleclinic.com/
and and and and

Just a quick look tells me removing local would not be a good idea right now.

You're either ignorant or deceitful. Tons of stuff was left out of both lists.

Doomheim 458
Kengutsi Akira Doomheim Likes received: 458	#29 - 2012-04-23 14:45:59 UTC Bootleg Jack wrote: Use Scan Probes Get Rid of Local Player List nuff said. Dont like local go to WH nuff said /thread "Is it fair that CCP can get away with..." :: checks ownership on the box :: Yes

Bootleg Jack

ACME Mineral and Gas

Likes received: 261

#30 - 2012-04-23 14:47:57 UTC

Lord Dravius wrote:

Simetraz wrote:

You're either ignorant or deceitful. Tons of stuff was left out of both lists.

I'm an American, English is my second language...

Simetraz

State War Academy

Caldari State

Likes received: 812

#31 - 2012-04-23 14:50:17 UTC | Edited by: Simetraz

Lord Dravius wrote:

You're either ignorant or deceitful. Tons of stuff was left out of both lists.

I thought about using the word tons but then realized it was a weight measurement.

But at any rate you could of at least added to the list if you felt it was too biased in one direction.

Oh and "deceitful" I would NEVER imagine ANYONE in EVE being like that.

EVERYBODY KNOWS

Mr Kidd

Center for Advanced Studies

Gallente Federation

Likes received: 1,753

#32 - 2012-04-23 14:51:31 UTC

Bootleg Jack wrote:

MadMuppet wrote:

Build an 'active' D-scan tool first, then turn off local.

So as long as you have a way to see who is there with no effort you are good? Straight

Being a w-space inhabitant and hammering the dscan button every 5 - 10 seconds, yeah, it needs re-working. I would support some automation here. Dscanning at 360 degrees and max range, there's nothing skillful about it. Anyone can do it. And unless you're paying attention to the results it's still very easy for someone to slip in, within someone's dscan range, and cloak before they notice you.

The person sitting there hammering dscan every 2 - 5 seconds can very easily....you know....after the hundredth press of that button...miss something that pops up momentarily. So, automation of dscan is not like having ever present local as intel. And so, I would support automating dscan with some limitations.

Don't ban me, bro!